I wouldn't say it's hard. I also wouldn't necessarily say it's different.
CSS does something that honestly very few other languages or grammars do as their sole role, so it can look obsequious when compared to the rest of the stack.
I would liken CSS to hard in the same way getting out of bed every day is hard. It's not really that difficult but we're all objectively terrible at it because we're exhausted.
I'm finding a lot of success with CSS modules and BEM.
CSS does something that honestly very few other languages or grammars do as their sole role, so it can look obsequious when compared to the rest of the stack.
I like it for this reason. Its intricacies are deep, CSS animation is crazy.
I would liken CSS to hard in the same way getting out of bed every day is hard.
Yes.
It's been like learning anything else so far, RTFM and practice. You're spot on with this;
the bulk of our tutorials, memories, books, and old websites are just filled with deprecated information.
Some of the best articles I've come across are from 2011-2014.
Putting script tags in your body tag means that it'll load based on the DOM and pretty much nothing else. It can quickly lead to race conditions.
If you need to ensure a script doesn't run until the DOM is ready, but aren't using a framework that loads things, you can add the defer property to your script tag in the head section.
There's some other reasons too, but in general it's definitely a code smell to investigate.
I would be happy to elaborate on it but I don't want to sound condescending.
I wouldn't say it's hard. I also wouldn't necessarily say it's different.
CSS does something that honestly very few other languages or grammars do as their sole role, so it can look obsequious when compared to the rest of the stack.
I would liken CSS to hard in the same way getting out of bed every day is hard. It's not really that difficult but we're all objectively terrible at it because we're exhausted.
I'm finding a lot of success with CSS modules and BEM.
I like it for this reason. Its intricacies are deep, CSS animation is crazy.
Yes.
It's been like learning anything else so far, RTFM and practice. You're spot on with this;
Some of the best articles I've come across are from 2011-2014.
So true! Namely, css-tricks has always been my go to.
Well yes. Gems do exist. But we still have new sites telling people to load script tags in the
<body>tag instead as well.I load my script tags in the
bodytag. What's wrong with that?I think the pendulum did a back-and-forth on that one.
I remember reading about how it was an awful thing to do because separation of concerns -- which I think lead to the abuse of classes.
Now I read about how inline CSS is useful to optimise first page load for AMP and other stacks.
Putting script tags in your
bodytag means that it'll load based on the DOM and pretty much nothing else. It can quickly lead to race conditions.If you need to ensure a script doesn't run until the DOM is ready, but aren't using a framework that loads things, you can add the
deferproperty to your script tag in theheadsection.There's some other reasons too, but in general it's definitely a code smell to investigate.
I would be happy to elaborate on it but I don't want to sound condescending.
Would you make a post about it?
DEV needs more CSS.
If I'm able to, I'll look into it, sure.