DEV Community

loading...

Discussion on: How I Reduced Load Time by 25% on Squarespace and Why I Couldn't Get More

Collapse
deathshadow60 profile image
Comment marked as low quality/non-constructive by the community. View Code of Conduct
deathshadow60 • Edited

Shame being squarespace you couldn't fix it being so ineptly coded that the entire markup and CSS likely belongs in the trash, and instead ended up screwing around with things that have far, FAR less to do with any real-world problems.

Laugh being that you probably could have kept the excess images if you could simply have fixed it being an endless stream of separate files and swung a giant axe at the endless pointless derpy "JavaScript for nothing".

... and that's before we talk the walking-talking WCAG violations they have the unmitigated GALL to call websites.

All the techniques you used being more akin to treating a headshot with a .50 cal with one of those useless pinky-sized band-aids that sits in the back of the medicine cabinet for decades because they're too small for any cut warranting a bandage.

There's a reason places like squarespace, wix, weebly, etc are nothing more than scams used to sucker nubes and rubes, and are utterly unfit for building anything more complex than a blog for grandma. Anyone promoting the use of such systems for business being nothing more than a dirtbag snake oil peddling scam artist.

Collapse
codenutt profile image
Jared Author

Wow, you have some very strong views. I'm not gonna argue with you, but why do you dislike site builders so much?

Collapse
deathshadow60 profile image
Comment marked as low quality/non-constructive by the community. View Code of Conduct
deathshadow60 • Edited

My primary web dev work of the past ten years -- basically half the time I've been doing it, and a quarter of the time I've spent my life programming -- has been accessibility consulting to banks, public utilities, government agencies, and health care facilities who are in court facing either federal fines, or civil litigation over WCAG failings. See laws like the US ADA, or the UK's EQA and DDA, or the dozens of other laws that certain types of sites are automatically required to adhere to, and now thanks to civil lawsuits it's open season on any business. (See the Supreme Court refusing to hear / overturn the Domino's finding)

... and not ONE of these train wrecks of developer ineptitude can produce a compliant website. Nor can they produce a fast website! Or one that indexes on search well...

But client after client comes up with lame excuses to claim "but millions of people use these systems" or even dumber claims of "it was easier" or "better for collaboration". Unfounded bald-face LIES that are more propaganda at best. They'll blame everyone and everything except the choice of tools, when more often than not it's EXACTLY these derpy tools that got them in trouble in the first place!

And to be brutally frank?

JUST like brain damaged front-end frameworks such as bootcrap, it is painfully and agonizingly apparent if you know the first blasted thing about HTML or CSS, the people who CREATED these systems aren't qualified to write a single line of either! They do not know enough about semantic markup, separation of concerns, accessibility, usability, or even just the most basic reasons HTML even exists to have ANY business building systems for people who know even less than themselves to use.

Don't believe me? Just view-source.

If you know even the most rudimentary aspects of web development, accessibility, and good practices looking at the HTML source of what something like bootcrap, or w3.css, WYSIWYG's, or any of these idiotic "Site builders" have the unmitigated GALL to call a website, you should be so horrified as to warn anyone and everyone away from it.

If you're not disgusted by what you see, you don't know anywhere near as much about HTML or CSS as you think!

They are a scam that prey upon ignorance. Nothing more, nothing less. Not a single claim made about them is based in fact, and they only provide the ILLUSION of simplicity. Even the best of them spit out results that will bite the site owner sooner or later.

Visual design tools and front end frameworks are the top two ways to screw over a business with the 3i of web development; Ignorance, Incompetence, and Ineptitude.

I've NEVER seen a site built with any of this mentally enfeebled trash that was worth a flying purple fish, and didn't need to be thrown in the garbage and started over from scratch to fix deep rooted issues and drag it kicking and screaming into the light.

But just like other scams such as Amway or Mary Kay, good luck convincing people brainwashed by the propaganda of that, given a confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance deeply rooted in apathy, ignorance, and wishful thinking. Hence why dealing with the fans of this rubbish is more akin to dealing with cultists than sane and rational engineers.