Looks like you are talking about two different points, most of the users that want "secure" email providers aren't criminals, most of them just want alternatives to avoid megacorps like Google handling all his data.
Secure doesn't mean that you could use it to commit crimes.
Looks like you are talking about two different points, most of the users that want "secure" email providers aren't criminals, most of them just want alternatives to avoid megacorps like Google handling all his data.
Secure doesn't mean that you could use it to commit crimes.
If you read the post carefully, you'll see the point is not there. It invites users not to use "secure" emails for the wrong reasons.
It also notices that, unfortunately, many people find secure emails addresses suspicious.
Maybe I didn't get that point because I'm not a native English speaker, but you are right many people find addresses like "@pm.me" suspicious.