<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Abhishek Mahajan</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Abhishek Mahajan (@__mahajan__).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/__mahajan__</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/__mahajan__"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>One agent, many skills: structuring a production AI assistant</title>
      <dc:creator>Abhishek Mahajan</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 05:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/__mahajan__/one-agent-many-skills-structuring-a-production-ai-assistant-2ak5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/__mahajan__/one-agent-many-skills-structuring-a-production-ai-assistant-2ak5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We didn't give our AI agent one big brain. We gave it skills.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We built a conversational AI inside an enterprise SaaS platform, where users get work done just by chatting — change a customer's user, create a survey, add questions, reopen customers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The first version handled everything in one place. It worked fine — while we had 3 or 4 features.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then the pain started. 😅 Every new feature made that one place heavier. Change one thing, break another. Re-testing the old flows became a nightmare.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's what I learned: don't give an AI one giant brain — give it separate "skills."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we restructured:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;→ A user's prompt goes to a classifier that decides which skill is relevant&lt;br&gt;
→ Each skill is self-contained, with its own tools and one responsibility (the "change user" skill only knows how to reassign a user)&lt;br&gt;
→ Common work — like resolving which customer or user the request means — lives in one shared layer, not copy-pasted into every skill&lt;br&gt;
→ Each skill stays in its lane. Not its job? It hands off to another skill.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The payoff:&lt;/strong&gt; a new feature means adding a new skill, not touching the old ones. Testing became predictable, and changes stopped being scary.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The lesson:&lt;/strong&gt; if your AI system feels fragile every time you add a feature, the problem usually isn't the AI — it's the structure. Break it into skills.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>agenticai</category>
      <category>node</category>
      <category>aiengineering</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
