<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: 叶嘉</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by 叶嘉 (@_ee149a18b76a65720ad76).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/_ee149a18b76a65720ad76</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/_ee149a18b76a65720ad76"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>ClawVault showcase post</title>
      <dc:creator>叶嘉</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/_ee149a18b76a65720ad76/clawvault-showcase-post-2ake</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/_ee149a18b76a65720ad76/clawvault-showcase-post-2ake</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Once AI agents start interacting with real systems, the problem changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is no longer only about model output. Teams also need a clearer way to inspect interactions, define narrower capability boundaries, and handle risky behavior around tools, APIs, and sensitive workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is the direction ClawVault takes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to the current repository README, ClawVault is an open-source OpenClaw Security Vault for AI agents and AI applications centered on:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Visual Monitoring&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Atomic Control&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Generative Policies&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The README also lists more concrete areas such as:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;sensitive data detection&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;prompt injection defense&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;dangerous command guard&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;auto-sanitization&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;token budget control&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a real-time dashboard&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From an engineering perspective, one of the most interesting parts is the control path described in the repo:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a transparent proxy gateway&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a detection engine&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a guard / sanitizer layer&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;audit + monitoring&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a dashboard&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That gives you a more centralized way to inspect, detect, and act on AI interactions than scattering checks across application code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Repository:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://github.com/tophant-ai/ClawVault" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/tophant-ai/ClawVault&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>agents</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
