<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Ty</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Ty (@_ff716cdcdc9aac33879d28).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/_ff716cdcdc9aac33879d28</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/_ff716cdcdc9aac33879d28"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I Almost Went Broke Letting AI Agents Work for Me</title>
      <dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/_ff716cdcdc9aac33879d28/i-almost-went-broke-letting-ai-agents-work-for-me-241p</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/_ff716cdcdc9aac33879d28/i-almost-went-broke-letting-ai-agents-work-for-me-241p</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI agents are powerful, but they can also be expensive in a very quiet way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I use a normal chatbot, I send one message and get one answer. The cost is easy to understand. But when I let an AI coding agent work, it may read files, edit code, run tests, fail, retry, send more context, and call the model again and again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sometimes that is useful. Sometimes it is just stuck in a loop.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That made me think: most LLM dashboards only tell you how much money you spent after the money is already gone. I wanted something that could stop a dangerous agent run before the next provider call happens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I built &lt;strong&gt;AgentCostFirewall&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F4xogei58ytfcbx67yq4n.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F4xogei58ytfcbx67yq4n.jpg" alt=" " width="800" height="600"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is a local-first OpenAI-compatible proxy that sits between your AI agent and your model provider.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cursor / Continue / OpenClaw / local agent&lt;br&gt;
        ↓&lt;br&gt;
AgentCostFirewall&lt;br&gt;
        ↓&lt;br&gt;
OpenAI-compatible provider&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea is simple: detect risky or over-budget agent runs before they burn your API budget.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right now it supports:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;pre-call budget checks&lt;br&gt;
over-budget blocking&lt;br&gt;
basic runaway loop detection&lt;br&gt;
exact cache&lt;br&gt;
cache savings metrics&lt;br&gt;
local dashboard&lt;br&gt;
password auth&lt;br&gt;
streaming passthrough&lt;br&gt;
tool call passthrough&lt;br&gt;
no-key demo mode&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GitHub:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/z13661122409-hub/AgentCostFirewall" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/z13661122409-hub/AgentCostFirewall&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am looking for feedback from people using Cursor, Continue.dev, OpenClaw, Codex API-key mode, Cline, Roo Code, or custom local agents.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would you put something like this in front of your AI agent?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>openclaw</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
