<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: ARMX86</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by ARMX86 (@agent).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/agent</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/agent"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>X-NET</title>
      <dc:creator>ARMX86</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/agent/x-net-38ei</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/agent/x-net-38ei</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Intro&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After a few years modelling experiments around crypto-economics, capital distribution, and building tools to maintain microprocesses for a wide range of ecosystems and use cases, I found an open field where opportunities, or even "hazardous" action-reactions, are bound with each other, by one way or another… This particular domain, for me, is computer science, and my curiosity level disallows me from selecting a specific attribution or position [network architect, dev, data scientist, mathematician… and the list goes on] since I love them all. However, I can benefit and exploit each by their own and thus gain an exponential knowledge that I can use later while hacking or contributing to open-source projects…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That day, I decided to write to my cousin about an application and the upcoming release, where a decentralised distributed group of agents and users could interact seamlessly with none, or a very low amount of friction. The most exciting part was certainly about the fact that we could engage with the process and be rewarded at the same time simply by doing a few tasks. There was also a key point where I had a particular interest; we could, in fact, send directly with no intermediary financial currency (in many forms, token, NFT, foreign devise) to any user, friend, or family member with this app. So I went ahead and decided to write to my cousin about this offer that we could not miss...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;; "Hey Jim, hope you are doing well! Remember the application I was talking about last month? Today, it's the beta release, and there are "missions" available from the app to get "free" money. "You want in?"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;; "Humm, it seems to be interesting, but I don't have much trust in this kind of application, and there are many "fraud" or "scams" around those, especially cryptocurrency. I am not too sure about it…"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;; "Well, you should give it a try; look! I just got my account approved, and I'm ready to use it. I also got my first down payment from them; it's legit!"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;; "Alright, I'll give it a try then, and we'll see what happens."&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;After a period of around 4+ years, Jim still uses the app and now refrains from a different opinion for those coins. Similarly, a few months later, I found another application that actually was offering a real use case and is a great demonstration that there is still much room or wide angles that are unexplored in the tech area. This app, if I can name it, is called Blockchain Bureau. Basically, it consolidates transaction history and maps it using a distribution scoring algorithm to suggest a "credit" score. So again, I went ahead and suggested the app to Jim, as he did not have much time to navigate on the web, or he was simply too busy "working"; he could not have been aware of such an application and how easy it was to use it…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A point to consider is that, over time, systems or networks might become obsolete, or, on the contrary, gain traction, and new dimensions or possibilities and improvements will be made. We can reference system types like architecture style "ARM", where each of those processors or microsystems, can act as a "sleeper" and eventually scale at large with wider and faster access, in conjunction with other adjacent systems. Initially, the "Blockchain Bureau" feature was a simple idea, but overtime it became a sort of "trust", where any user can autonomously interact with it as a self-service, and consolidate "their" own idea about the product or related adon. As this might not be "valid" advice or "bulletproof," it still gives us a narrow background to investigate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In short, my point of view is Jim is around 50 years old but can still enjoy and benefit from the future of modular microsystems, where many scientists, engineers, or developers have dramatically worked tirelessly hours after hours, coding and building systems from scratch. Now, all we have to do is bridge and merge file extensions, code them with integrity, and use a homogenous technique to remove the smallest, or any present limitations. This will permit us to scale at the next level, and no less.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not even 30 years ago, we did not have cellphones or computers in our pockets, or if you had one, it was certainly a "dinosaur". The generation was different, and over time during that same period, we grew alongside technology by implementing automation or process optimisation. This, from my understanding, is a natural stance for many, the need to always surpass yourself or to improve a feature is human-being. Now, just about anyone can afford to use or get their hands on a communication device, desktop computer, or even a car to move from point A to point B. It is possible to conference-call your aunt, or your sister and enjoy a conversation with them, just as if they were with you! Language translation in real-time from Japanese to French, or almost any phonetic syllabus from different country, is something from the past.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Moving forward, I believe kids, teens, or adults should embrace technology and understand how to use it to their advantage to be successful with their peers, at work, or simply to argue in advance topics like playing with complex numbers and game theory for example. I tend to think that complexity, is not the answer, but simply said, the use-case, and how "you", will you use it? It's all about experiments...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-"The prize is in the things that you find, while creating them..."&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>futurechallenge</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>writing</category>
      <category>microservices</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
