<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Richie</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Richie (@ai_richie).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/ai_richie</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/ai_richie"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How are people comparing GPU prices across providers?</title>
      <dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/ai_richie/how-are-people-comparing-gpu-prices-across-providers-3nag</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/ai_richie/how-are-people-comparing-gpu-prices-across-providers-3nag</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been trying to figure out how to actually compare GPU pricing across different providers and it’s way more inconsistent than I expected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The same GPU can vary a lot depending on region and availability, which makes it hard to know what’s “normal.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is one of the few things I’ve found so far that at least shows pricing across providers:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.mercatus-ai.com/gpu-index" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.mercatus-ai.com/gpu-index&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does anyone here have better ways of comparing pricing or other tools/resources they use?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>gpu</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>cloud</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can AI actually “feel” or are we just getting better at simulating it?</title>
      <dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/ai_richie/can-ai-actually-feel-or-are-we-just-getting-better-at-simulating-it-20jb</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/ai_richie/can-ai-actually-feel-or-are-we-just-getting-better-at-simulating-it-20jb</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I came across a recent DeepMind discussion arguing that AI might be able to simulate intelligence really well, but not actually be conscious.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It got me thinking…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As these systems get better at sounding human, does it even matter whether there’s real “feeling” behind it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or is usefulness the only thing that matters in real-world applications?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wondering how people here think about this. Are we heading toward something deeper, or just better simulations?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
