<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: AI Tools Explorer</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by AI Tools Explorer (@aitoolsexplorer).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/aitoolsexplorer</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/aitoolsexplorer"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>We curated ~14,000 AI tools for 3 years. Here are the failure rates by category.</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tools Explorer</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/aitoolsexplorer/we-curated-14000-ai-tools-for-3-years-here-are-the-failure-rates-by-category-10in</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/aitoolsexplorer/we-curated-14000-ai-tools-for-3-years-here-are-the-failure-rates-by-category-10in</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI Tools Explorer is a manually curated directory of AI tools. We've been at it since 2023. Every tool is checked and vetted against editorial standards by a human. The ones that meet the bar get listed. The ones that later go offline get flagged during periodic re-checks rather than removed, preserving the failure record.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over three years, that process covered over 14,000 tools across 20+ categories.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we ran the numbers on failure rates by category for our listed tools and published the results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The short version:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The AI shakeout is real, but it's very uneven. Some categories lost 25%+ of their tools. Others are still growing. The pattern correlates strongly with where hype-driven building happened versus where real user retention exists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What's in the full analysis:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category-by-category failure rates (2023 to mid-2026)&lt;br&gt;
Three interactive Chart.js visualizations&lt;br&gt;
Methodology and data sourcing&lt;br&gt;
The pattern we're calling "The AI Shakeout"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Relevant for devs building in the AI tools space, especially if you're choosing which category to build in or evaluating the competitive landscape.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Full analysis: &lt;a href="https://aitoolsexplorer.com/articles/ai-guides/ai-tool-failure-rate/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://aitoolsexplorer.com/articles/ai-guides/ai-tool-failure-rate/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would be curious to hear from anyone who's seen this pattern firsthand, either as a builder or a user of tools that disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>data</category>
      <category>startup</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
