DEV Community: 灯里/iku

Migrating to Astro, How I Built a Bilingual Static Blog

灯里/iku — Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:58:15 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

There is a peculiar kind of hubris in deciding to build your own blog from scratch in 2026, when perfectly serviceable platforms exist for precisely this purpose. It's the digital equivalent of insisting on hand-grinding your coffee beans while the office Nespresso machine sits there, judging you silently. Yet here I am, having built a fully static, bilingual, zero-JS personal site with Astro, and I find myself oddly pleased with the result (the site, not the mass of config files haunting my dreams). This article documents the patterns that survived contact with reality, so you can skip the part where you stare at a blank terminal wondering why your OGP images are rendering in hieroglyphics.

What Is Astro?
1. Content Collections Schema Design
2. Article Conversion Pipeline
3. Build-Time OGP Image Generation
4. Dark Mode via Tailwind Token Redefinition
5. Island Architecture and Zero-JS Patterns
Wrapping Up

Introduction

As a prelude, I wrote about why I chose Astro + GitHub Pages. The thinking behind choosing a stack for a personal site, including comparisons with Cloudflare Pages and the PSL cold-start story.

This is the follow-up: the implementation edition.

What Is Astro?

Astro is a static site generator designed for content-driven websites. It converts Markdown into HTML, same as Hugo or Jekyll.
The difference is its design philosophy: zero client-side JavaScript by default.

At the core of this design is the island architecture.
Pages are output as static HTML, and only the parts that need interactivity are embedded as React or Vue "islands".
If you don't add islands, you get pure static HTML.
TypeScript-first, with powerful build-time data fetching and content type validation.
Blogs, documentation sites, and portfolios are its sweet spot.

Its v1.0 was released in August 2022.
As a latecomer to the static site generator space, Astro neatly sidestepped the mines that Hugo (2013) and Gatsby (2015) stepped on.
Where Gatsby made GraphQL mandatory and raised the barrier to entry, Astro lets you use plain fetch or file reads. Where Hugo confined you to its template language, Astro lets you write ordinary TypeScript inside .astro files.

It also plays well with AI-assisted coding.
An .astro file packs frontmatter (logic), template (HTML), and styles into a single-purpose component, so the context you hand to a coding agent is small.
Most components on my site are around 100 lines, and "change this file like so" just works.

What This Article Covers

I built a Japanese-English bilingual tech blog + personal site.
Fully static, near-zero runtime JS.

I've distilled the implementation into 5 patterns that I think are broadly reusable. Hopefully useful if you're evaluating Astro as a candidate for your next project.

1. Content Collections Schema Design

Astro's Content Collections let you attach a Zod schema to Markdown frontmatter. This is incredibly effective when developing TypeScript-first. A real help.

// src/content.config.ts
import { defineCollection, z } from 'astro:content';
import { glob } from 'astro/loaders';

const blog = defineCollection({
  loader: glob({ pattern: '**/*.md', base: './src/content/blog' }),
  schema: z.object({
    title: z.string(),
    description: z.string(),
    date: z.coerce.date(),
    tags: z.array(z.string()),
    lang: z.enum(['ja', 'en']),
    pair: z.string().optional(),
    source: z.enum(['zenn', 'dev', 'original']),
    accent: z.string().default('#E5007F'),
  }),
});

A few key points.

lang as an enum.
Split Japanese and English into directories (blog/ja/, blog/en/) and also declare the language in the schema. On the page side, getCollection('blog', p => p.data.lang === 'ja') gives you a language-filtered list. No i18n library (translation management framework) needed.

pair to link translations.
Just store the partner article's slug. At build time, show an EN badge if pair exists, hide it otherwise. Making it nullable is crucial. If you assume every article has a pair, the workflow breaks down fast.
I have strong opinions about translation quality, so I'm not keen on automatic or machine translation. The EN versions get quite a bit of manual reworking. (I turned off Zenn's auto-translation feature immediately.)

date with z.coerce.date().
Automatically converts the frontmatter string '2026-07-23' into a Date object. Small thing, but saves you from writing new Date() everywhere.

accent for category colour.
An accent colour determined by the article's tags is baked into the frontmatter (auto-assigned by the import script, covered later). The page just passes this value straight to style.

If any Markdown doesn't match the schema, the build fails. This is a good thing. When I bulk-imported 44 articles, every frontmatter issue surfaced as a compile error. No need to visually inspect each one.

2. Article Conversion Pipeline

When migrating existing articles from platforms like Zenn or Dev.to, you need a step to convert platform-specific syntax. The same applies when migrating from Hatena Blog, Medium, WordPress, or any other platform.

On my site, a TypeScript import script (scripts/import-articles.ts) handles this. It never modifies the source files; it only outputs converted results to src/content/blog/.

Conversion Catalogue

Here's what needs converting.

Zenn (Japanese articles):

Syntax	Converts to
`:::message` / `:::message alert`	`<aside class="callout">`
`:::details title`	`<details><summary>`
`@[card](URL)` / bare URL auto-cards	Link card (HTML)
`@[tweet](URL)`	Static tweet quote or link
``js:filename.js` (with filename)	Bold filename prefix + code block
diff js `	Normalised to `diff` only

Dev.to (English articles):

Syntax	Converts to
`{% embed URL %}` and other Liquid Tags	Markdown links
`{% details %}...{% enddetails %}`	`<details><summary>`
`{% katex %}`	`$$` block
Manual Table of Contents + `<a name>` anchors	Detected and removed

I've only listed Zenn and Dev.to here, but Hatena Blog ([~~] notation, [:contents] auto-ToC), Medium (exports as HTML), WordPress (shortcodes), and others all follow the same structure with different conversion targets.

Mermaid support, table syntax differences, maths notation: "what's proprietary and what's standard Markdown" varies quite a bit between platforms. Checking the source site's syntax documentation before migration helps prevent display breakage from missed conversions.

Implementation Tips

Line-by-line stream processing makes things clear.

function convertBody(body: string): string {
  const out: string[] = [];
  let inCode = false;

  for (const line of body.split('\n')) {
    // Skip conversion inside code blocks
    if (/^```
{% endraw %}
/.test(line)) {
      inCode = !inCode;
      out.push(line);
      continue;
    }
    if (inCode) {
      out.push(line);
      continue;
    }
    // Apply platform-specific conversions
    out.push(convertLine(line));
  }
  return out.join('\n');
}
{% raw %}

Skipping code block interiors is the single most important thing. Forget this, and you'll convert ::: or {% %} inside sample code.

Link cards detect standalone-line links and convert them to HTML. At build time, og:title and og:image are fetched and cached in JSON; subsequent runs only fetch new URLs.

For X status links, the syndication API provides the tweet text, which gets rendered as a static quote card. Zero client-side JS for tweet-embed-equivalent functionality. It's the same endpoint that react-tweet uses internally.

site-only / devto-only Markers

To serve different versions from the same source, I use HTML comment markers.


`markdown
<!-- site-only -->
```mermaid
graph LR
  A --> B
```
<!-- /site-only -->

<!-- devto-only -->
(Text explanation for platforms that don't render Mermaid)
A → B relationship.
<!-- /devto-only -->
`

The import script strips blocks for the other target and removes the markers themselves. Zenn ignores HTML comments (they pass through on the platform side), so markers left in the Japanese source don't affect display.

3. Build-Time OGP Image Generation

I generate OGP images (1200x630) at build time using satori + @resvg/resvg-js.

satori converts React-like JSX to SVG, and it requires font binaries. This is where things get tricky with glyph-heavy fonts.

The Font Size Trap

Noto Sans JP's full set is roughly 5MB. This isn't a Japanese-only problem: any CJK font or glyph-heavy typeface hits the same issue. With 50 articles, that's 50 × 5MB of processing. The build dies.

More builds running means more tokens burning, if you're using AI-assisted coding. A relevant concern these days.

The solution: Google Fonts' subsetting feature.
Thank you Google.


ts
// Specify a legacy UA to get woff/TTF (satori can't parse woff2)
const LEGACY_UA = 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0';

async function fetchGoogleFont(spec: string, text: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer[]> {
  const chars = [...new Set(text)];
  // &text= parameter fetches a subset containing only the needed glyphs
  const cssUrl = `https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=${spec}&text=${encodeURIComponent(chars.join(''))}`;
  const css = await (await fetch(cssUrl, { headers: { 'User-Agent': LEGACY_UA } })).text();
  const url = css.match(/src:\s*url\((.+?)\)\s*format\('(?:woff|opentype|truetype)'\)/)?.[1];
  return (await fetch(url)).arrayBuffer();
}

Concatenate all article titles and fetch a subset font containing only the characters that appear, once. This brings it down to tens of KB. Faster builds, no garbled text.

Another trap: satori cannot parse woff2. Google Fonts returns woff2 to modern browsers, so you need to spoof the User-Agent as an old browser to get woff/TTF. If you don't know this, you'll hit "I'm passing a font but nothing renders" and waste hours debugging.

Serving via Astro Endpoints

OGP images are implemented as Astro static endpoints (.png.ts).


ts
// src/pages/og/blog/[slug].png.ts
export async function getStaticPaths() {
  // Generate paths from article list
}

export async function GET({ props }) {
  const png = await renderOgImage({ /* ... */ });
  return new Response(png, { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'image/png' } });
}

At build time, PNGs for every article are written to dist/og/blog/slug.png. Works as-is on GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify, or any static hosting.

4. Dark Mode via Tailwind Token Redefinition

Whether to implement dark mode is a matter of preference, at least domestically in Japan. Personally I add it by reflex, but following OS settings, toggle-based switching, or simply not supporting it are all valid choices. This section is about how to implement it once you've decided to.

My first idea was adding dark: prefixes to every element. I gave up. Too tedious.

Instead, I adopted wholesale redefinition of Tailwind colour tokens.


css
/* Light mode: use defaults as-is */

/* Dark mode: remap tokens */
html[data-theme="dark"] {
  color-scheme: dark;
  --color-white: #010101;
  --color-neutral-200: #262626;
  --color-neutral-300: #404040;
  --color-neutral-400: #525252;
  --color-neutral-600: #a3a3a3;
  --color-neutral-700: #d4d4d4;
  --color-neutral-900: #ededed;
}

Write bg-white, and it's white in light mode, black in dark mode. Dark mode is complete without changing a single existing class.

However, some elements need to stay fixed regardless of theme (fullscreen menu, article heroes, footer, etc.). These get a .theme-fixed class that restores the original tokens.


css
html[data-theme="dark"] .theme-fixed {
  color-scheme: light;
  --color-white: #ffffff;
  --color-neutral-200: #e5e5e5;
  /* ... restore original values */
}

The design rule: accent colours don't change with the theme. Only black and white invert; accent colours stay as they are. With a monochrome + accent colour design, this fits naturally.

Preventing White Flash

The problem where dark mode users see a white flash when a page loads. Place an inline script in <head> to apply the theme before rendering.


html
<script is:inline>
  try {
    if (localStorage.getItem('theme') === 'dark')
      document.documentElement.dataset.theme = 'dark';
  } catch {}
</script>

is:inline excludes it from Astro's bundling. Without this, the script won't execute in time.
A funny phenomenon where being too fast is what makes it too late.

The Contrast Ratio Pitfall

Don't assume you're safe just because you inverted the tokens. In dark mode, colours that passed WCAG AA contrast ratios (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text) can fall below the threshold.

On my site, neutral-500 (#737373) was fine in light mode but only had a 4.40:1 ratio against the dark mode background (#010101), failing the AA standard.
Adjusted to #7a7a7a for 4.86:1. A tiny numerical difference, but you can't catch it without tools.
And honestly, AI-generated code tends to miss this perspective entirely. Had to catch it myself. A classic blind spot when you're doing AI-assisted coding.

Token redefinition is convenient, but you need to re-verify contrast ratios for all combinations after inversion. Frankly, plenty of sites ignore this entirely, but if you're going to do it, do it properly. Use Chrome DevTools' accessibility panel or WebAIM Contrast Checker.

Accessibility Standards and the Temperature Gap Between Countries

This isn't specific to dark mode, but the legal treatment of web accessibility varies significantly by country.

EU: The European Accessibility Act (EAA) took effect in June 2025. WCAG 2.1 AA compliance is now mandatory for commercial sites and apps
US: Court precedents applying the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) to websites have been piling up. Litigation risk is real
Japan: JIS X 8341-3 (WCAG-based) exists, but it's only a non-binding effort for public institutions. Legal force on the private sector is weak

Whether legal risk applies to a personal site or one primarily targeting a Japanese audience is a separate question, but if you're publishing content for an English-speaking audience, it's better to treat this as a "standard" rather than a "nice-to-have". I developed the habit of caring about this because I was publishing in both Japanese and English, but anyone building a site with English articles should keep it in mind.

References:

5. Island Architecture and Zero-JS Patterns

Astro's "island architecture" keeps most of the page as static HTML, with only interactive parts becoming React or Vue "islands".
I'd heard the concept before, but actually implementing it, I found it good as a philosophy and good as code.

As a philosophy, I like that it's an additive design. SPA frameworks start with everything in JS and then optimise away the static parts (subtraction). Astro starts with everything static and you add JS only where needed (addition). The default is on the lightweight side, so if you do nothing, nothing breaks.

As code, it was interesting that most islands turned out to be unnecessary. I'd originally planned React islands for text animations, but the menu, dark mode toggle, copy button: all done with vanilla JS. Mermaid was handled with dynamic import. The moment you're forced to decide "should this be an island?", you reconsider whether JS is truly needed. Result: my site has zero React dependencies.

This is a performance story, but it's also a maintainability story.
If there's no client-side JS, there's no state management needed, no hydration mismatches.
The parts that can break physically don't exist.

So how do you handle interactivity? Here are a few patterns where vanilla JS was more than enough.

Fullscreen Menu: Trapping Focus with inert

Building a focus trap in JS is tedious, but the inert attribute handles it in one go.


js
const setOpen = (open) => {
  menu.classList.toggle('hidden', !open);
  // Make everything except the menu inert
  for (const el of document.body.children) {
    if (el !== menu) el.toggleAttribute('inert', open);
  }
  if (open) closeBtn.focus();
};

Elements with inert are completely skipped by Tab navigation and screen readers. You can build an accessible modal without <dialog>.

Mermaid: Lazy Loading

Mermaid.js has a large bundle size (600KB+). Loading it on every page is out of the question.
Painful on multiple levels.


js
// Only when a mermaid block exists in the article,
// use IntersectionObserver to dynamically import from CDN
// when the diagram approaches the viewport
const io = new IntersectionObserver((entries) => {
  if (entries.some((e) => e.isIntersecting)) {
    io.disconnect();
    const { default: mermaid } = await import(
      'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mermaid@11/dist/mermaid.esm.min.mjs'
    );
    mermaid.initialize({ startOnLoad: false, theme: 'neutral' });
    // Replace pre[data-language="mermaid"] with <div class="mermaid"> and run
    await mermaid.run();
  }
}, { rootMargin: '400px' });

Articles without Mermaid load zero scripts. Even articles with Mermaid delay loading until a diagram is 400px from the viewport.

Fonts: Async Loading

Loading Google Fonts CSS synchronously blocks rendering.


html
<!-- Load as print media, switch to all on completion -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href={fontsHref} media="print" onload="this.media='all'" />
<noscript>
  <link rel="stylesheet" href={fontsHref} />
</noscript>

The media="print" + onload trick. Browsers don't render-block print CSS, so the font loads asynchronously. <noscript> is the fallback for JS-disabled environments.

Wrapping Up

Zenn is fine. Dev.to is fine. There's no shortage of blogging platforms and tech writing services out there, and there never has been.
But sometimes the product changes out from under you, the features shift, the rules shift, and you get tired of being at someone else's mercy.
Having your own little playground, a space you control, is worth something. Especially now, when AI-assisted tooling makes spinning up a site genuinely trivial.
So this isn't a "everyone should go back to personal sites" manifesto. More like: having a playground of your own turns out to be useful sometimes.
Particularly when you want to understand architecture or design philosophies, there's no substitute for actually building something with them.

Looking back at the five patterns, the common thread is "if you can do it at build time, do it at build time".

OGP images, link cards, tweet quotes: generate them at build time and you don't need client-side JS. Dark mode is just CSS custom property redefinition. Massive libraries like Mermaid are loaded only on the pages that need them, at the moment they're needed.

Astro's "zero JS by default" isn't a constraint, it's a design compass. Follow it, and your site naturally ends up lightweight.

I wrote about the technology selection process in my previous article, if you're interested.

All source code is published on GitHub:

akari-iku / akari-iku.github.io

akari.log - personal site & bilingual tech blog

akari.log

https://akari-iku.github.io/

日本語 | English

モノクロ×刺し色・データブック風の個人サイト & 日英バイリンガル技術ブログ。白い紙に黒インク、1画面に刺し色1色 — そのルールだけでページを組んでいます。

構成

/ トップ / /about 自己紹介 / /career スキル / /blog 記事（日本語） / /tags タグ索引
/en/ 配下に英語版を同構成でミラー。日英ペア記事は相互リンク + hreflang
全ページ静的生成。フレームワークのクライアントランタイムなし（テーマ切替・全画面メニュー・Mermaid の遅延描画などは素の JS）

仕組み

Astro + Tailwind CSS + TypeScript (strict)
記事は執筆用の正典リポジトリ（非公開）から scripts/import-articles.ts で取り込み。Zenn 記法と Dev.to Liquid Tags を標準 Markdown + コンポーネントに変換
OGP 画像はビルド時に自動生成（記事ヒーローと同一のデザイン言語）
同じ記事を Zenn / Dev.to にもクロスポスト（canonical はこのサイト）
GitHub Actions → GitHub Pages で自動デプロイ

ライセンス

コード: MIT
記事・文章・画像等のコンテンツ（src/content/ 以下および表示文章）: © 灯里 (akari-iku), All rights reserved. 出典を明記した引用は歓迎です

View on GitHub

Is TypeScript 7 Ready? 5x Faster, but Astro and Vue Say Wait

灯里/iku — Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:10:47 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

Here in the land of the shinkansen, we take speed rather seriously: our bullet trains are so punctual that a one-minute delay comes with a formal apology. So when TypeScript 7.0 went GA promising the fabled 10x faster type checking, I naturally rushed to the platform, ticket in hand. What I found is that the train is magnificent, but my station hasn't finished building the platform for it. This article is the measured account of that gap: real benchmarks from a real Astro site, one spectacular crash, and a practical way to tell whether you should board now or wait for the 7.1 service. The answer, I found, depends less on the train and more on your station.

What I Measured
Round One, Raw tsc vs Raw tsc
The Main Event, Putting It into astro check
The Autopsy, a Dependency Chain
Not Just Astro, the "Wait" List
Even If You Can Board, Mind the Gap
The 11 Seconds That Won't Become 1
An Aside, for the TypeScript-Tired
The Lesson, Speed Belongs to the Language
Summary

What I Measured

On 8 July 2026, TypeScript 7.0 went GA.

Yes, that one. The native Go port, announced back in March 2025 as "A 10x Faster TypeScript", the blog post that made the entire ecosystem raise a collective eyebrow.

A 10x Faster TypeScript - TypeScript

Embarking on a native port of the existing TypeScript compiler and toolset to achieve a 10x performance speed-up.

devblogs.microsoft.com

It's no longer a research preview. Pull typescript@latest from npm and 7.0.2 lands in your node_modules. The future is one npm install away.

I had just finished building my personal site with Astro. TypeScript strict, zero type errors enforced before every build via astro check. In other words, I'm exactly the sort of person who benefits from a 10x faster type checker.

(As for why I built a personal site in the first place, this article covers the incident that started it all: a story about machine translation, hand-translated on principle. But that's another tale.)

I wanted in. Who wouldn't?

Spoiler: I couldn't get in. And the reason turned out to be as interesting as the speed itself.

The test subject:

Astro 7.0.6 + TypeScript 6.0.3 (strict)
39 files checked by astro check (24 .astro + 13 plain .ts)
A small, real, production site. Not a mega-monorepo, just honest personal-project scale

Round One, Raw tsc vs Raw tsc

Before touching astro check, I wanted a fair fight: raw tsc against raw tsc, same files, same tsconfig.

Raw tsc can't read .astro files, so I benchmarked the plain TypeScript part (13 files) with both compilers:

Compiler	Type check time
TypeScript 6.0.3	~2.1s
TypeScript 7.0.2	~0.4s

About 5x.

"That's not 10x," you say. Good eye. I said the same thing.

The gap narrows on small projects because fixed costs dominate: most of that 2 seconds is Node.js starting up and loading the compiler, not actual type checking. The bigger your project, the closer you get to the advertised 10x.

Flip that around, though: even a tiny project gets 5x for free. 0.4 seconds is below the threshold where "waiting" registers as a concept. Blink and it's done. Literally.

I should confess why I'm so susceptible to this. In a previous life I did SEO for a living, where a one-second slowdown visibly bleeds users off a page. Web speed converts directly into user retention, and I believe tool speed converts directly into attention retention. A few seconds of waiting is exactly the doorway through which one "quickly checks" social media and loses twenty minutes.

So no, I cannot resist 0.4 seconds. Speed is justice.

At this point I was fully in adoption mode.

The Main Event, Putting It into astro check

Here's where the story turns.

My site's type checking isn't raw tsc. It's astro check, the command that type-checks the TypeScript inside .astro components. For Astro users, it's the lifeline.

Let's install TypeScript 7 and find out:

npm warn ERESOLVE overriding peer dependency
npm warn While resolving: akari-log@0.1.0
npm warn Found: typescript@6.0.3
npm warn
npm warn Could not resolve dependency:
npm warn peer typescript@"^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0" from @astrojs/check@0.9.9

added 1 package, changed 1 package, and audited 427 packages in 2s

npm is already filing a complaint. @astrojs/check wants TypeScript ^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0. Version 7 isn't even in the conversation.

And yet npm installs it anyway. That's npm for you: it lodges a formal objection, then holds the door open. (Add --strict-peer-deps if you'd like the door actually closed. The default behaviour is a cultural essay for another day.)

Well, it's my own machine and my own mess. npx astro check:

[check] Getting diagnostics for Astro files...
Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'fileExists')
  Location:
    node_modules/@astrojs/language-server/dist/check.js:162:73
  Stack trace:
    at AstroCheck.getTsconfig (node_modules/@astrojs/language-server/dist/check.js:162:73)
    at new AstroCheck (node_modules/@astrojs/language-server/dist/check.js:58:14)

Crash.

Note what this is not: it's not a type error. The type checker itself failed to start. It reached into the TypeScript package for a part called fileExists and found nothing there.

The Autopsy, a Dependency Chain

This isn't a bug. It's structural.

Dig into astro check and you find this chain:

astro check
  └─> @astrojs/check
        └─> @astrojs/language-server
              └─> Volar
                    └─> TypeScript programmatic API

The endpoint is the whole story.

Volar (the language-tooling foundation under Vue and Astro) doesn't run TypeScript as a command. It imports TypeScript as a library and reaches directly into its internals: ts.sys.fileExists and friends. Hands inside the compiler's chest cavity. Wild, honestly.

And what ships in the TypeScript 7.0 npm package is a native Go binary. As a tsc command it's flawless. But the traditional JavaScript API you could import and poke at? Not there. (A stable programmatic API is slated for 7.1.)

So the ecosystem splits cleanly in two:

You only ever invoke tsc as a command → you can board today and enjoy the full 5-10x
Your tools embed TypeScript as a library (Astro, Vue, and very likely your editor's language server) → you wait until those tools support 7

My site is firmly in the second group. Moment of silence, please.

Not Just Astro, the "Wait" List

This isn't Astro-specific bad luck. "Tools that swallow TypeScript whole" are everywhere, and they all hit the same wall.

Hold off for now:

Vue / Svelte / Astro / MDX / Angular: template and component type checking runs through TypeScript's JS API. No API yet (7.1), so editor integration and check commands break. Wait.
Anything that imports the typescript package directly: typed ESLint rules, webpack loaders, ts-jest, content-collections, Prisma generators. Same principle as my fileExists crash, they fall over immediately.
Next.js: support is in progress behind experimental.useTypeScriptCli. As long as the word "experimental" is in the flag name, well, you know. I've also seen scattered reports of people getting burnt on Vercel deploys.

Board now:

Environments where raw tsc is the whole story: CLI tools, library authoring, framework-less Node.js backends

The full damage report is well summarised in this migration guide:

TypeScript 7.0 Native Compiler: What Breaks, What Gets 10x Faster, and How to Migrate - Developers Digest

A practical migration guide for TypeScript 7.0's Go-based native compiler. Verified perf numbers, the full breaking-changes list, real npm commands for...

developersdigest.tech

In short: it depends. Check which command actually performs your type checking at the end of the day. If it's tsc, you can board. If it's a framework's check command, you're probably waiting on the platform with me.

Even If You Can Board, Mind the Gap

A word of caution for the "we're raw tsc, upgrading today" crowd.

7.0 is a major version, and it behaves like one:

strict is now the default
automatic @types package loading is gone
baseUrl is removed
target: es5 is no longer supported

On an older codebase, flipping the switch means an eruption of errors. The official recommendation is staged migration: go to 6.0 first, clean up the deprecations, then step up to 7. Jumping straight from 5.x to 7.0 means debugging the migration and the new defaults simultaneously. In a monorepo, I imagine, that's a special kind of purgatory.

Here's the comedy in my case: my site was already on 6.0.3 with strict mode from day one. A model student, migration-wise. Past me chose the stack well. Past me deserves a biscuit.

The settings were 7-ready. The compiler was willing. And I still couldn't board, because the blocker was never the compiler or the config. It was the ecosystem.

That's the entire article in one paragraph, really.

The 11 Seconds That Won't Become 1

One more measurement, because it reframes the whole cost-benefit question.

My full astro check takes about 11 seconds. Naively: "10x faster type checking turns 11 seconds into 1!" Except when I actually looked at those 11 seconds, they include content collection syncing, type generation, and Vite initialisation.

Even with perfect TypeScript 7 support landing tomorrow, 11 seconds does not become 1. The type-checking slice gets faster; I'd save a few seconds.

The thing you assume is your bottleneck is not your bottleneck until you've measured it. Performance engineering's oldest lesson, found lying around in my build pipeline.

And this feeds straight into the upgrade maths. On a small project, the prize is "2 seconds becomes 0.4". Pleasant, life unchanged. The cost is config surgery plus a fresh crop of strict-mode errors, and that cost doesn't shrink with project size. The dramatic before/after stories you see tend to come from huge codebases that were suffering minutes of type checking. Benefit scales with size; cost doesn't. Small projects can afford to be fashionably late.

One more 2026-flavoured variable: these days, the entity running astro check most often on my machine isn't me. It's a coding agent. Pre-build checks are delegated, so those 11 seconds are mostly Claude's problem now. Humans get irritated by waiting; agents just wait. When the waiting is outsourced, the felt cost of a slow compiler drops even further. Then again, if you're optimising for agent iteration speed, a faster compiler buys you more attempts per hour, so the value goes up. Which weight you assign is, at this point, a matter of tech selection and taste.

An Aside, for the TypeScript-Tired

While researching all this, I kept bumping into a quieter conversation around TypeScript 7: not "how fast", but "why at all". Leaving it here for balance.

The type tax: some developers report spending 30-40 minutes a day fighting the compiler. Elaborate generics, any escape hatches, sheer attrition
False security: a green compile does not prevent runtime errors. You still need tests
Accumulated complexity: "I liked JavaScript's simplicity, and now I study TypeScript to use JavaScript" is a sentiment that refuses to die
Overkill for micro-projects: fiddling with tsconfig for a weekend script does invite existential questions

For the record, I'm a strict-mode person. My site enforces zero type errors and I'm not changing that. But it's worth being precise about what TypeScript 7 offers: it shortens the time you spend paying the type tax. It does not abolish the tax.

A 10x faster compiler does not make your type puzzles one character shorter. Keep those expectations separate and you won't be disappointed.

The Lesson, Speed Belongs to the Language

The generalisable takeaway:

A compiler's speed and its ecosystem's readiness ship on different release cycles.

TypeScript 7.0 is genuinely fast. I measured it. But in front-end reality, TypeScript never runs alone. It runs inside language servers, editor extensions, and check commands, tools that swallowed the compiler whole and grew around it.

Which means adoption arrives in waves:

First wave (now): raw-tsc environments. CLI tools, libraries, plain Node.js backends
Second wave (7.1 and later): after the programmatic API stabilises and tooling catches up. Astro, Vue, Svelte, MDX, Angular, typed ESLint rules (Next.js rides an experimental 1.5th wave)

If you live on top of a framework, the second wave is the sensible boarding call. Rush the first wave and you'll sink where I did, in the fileExists sea.

Me? I'll be waiting for 7.1 and @astrojs/check, dreaming of the 0.4-second world while sitting through my 11 seconds.

The 5x was real, though. Truly. I just wasn't allowed to keep it.

Summary

TypeScript 7.0 (the native Go port) is GA, one npm install away
Real-project benchmark: ~5x faster type checking even at small scale (bigger projects approach the advertised 10x)
But astro check depends on TypeScript's programmatic API via Volar, which 7.0 doesn't ship, so it crashes on startup
Same story for Vue / Svelte / MDX / Angular / typed ESLint rules and anything importing the typescript package. Only raw-tsc environments can board the first wave
Even then, mind the breaking changes (strict by default, no automatic @types, no baseUrl, no ES5): the official route is a staged migration through 6.0
Small projects: the benefit is small and the cost isn't, so feel free to be late
And measure your bottleneck before dreaming about it (most of my 11 seconds wasn't type checking at all)

So, which side of the platform are you standing on? If you have a raw-tsc project already pocketing the 5x, I would genuinely love to hear your numbers. And if you're waiting for the 7.1 service with me, pull up a bench; the view of other people's trains is lovely this time of year. Either way, tell me in the comments.

Is Your Claude Code Safe From Base64? Inside 2026 AI Agent Attacks

灯里/iku — Sun, 10 May 2026 16:12:40 +0000

Introduction

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

Six months ago I wrote about befriending Base64, a piece I now read back with the soft embarrassment of glancing at one's own graduation photo. The protagonist has not changed; the setting has. Lately, I keep running into Base64 in places no respectable friend should be (the digital equivalent of spotting an old classmate, slightly out of focus, in the background of an organised crime documentary). They are still doing their decades-old job of turning binary into text, faithfully and without complaint. The crowd they keep, however, is another story. This article is the dark sequel to that friendship piece, charting the supply chain attacks, MCP exploits, and prompt-injection capers in which our friend has been quietly co-starring. By the end, you will see why "obfuscated, but compliant" is the modern attacker's favourite outfit, and what we as developers can do to keep our friend out of the worst neighbourhoods.

灯里/iku

Nov 16 '25

Increase my familiarity with BASE64.

#api #tutorial #ai #base64

12 min read

Heads up: This turned into a massive article once I started writing, so I made some slides too. I don't have any talks lined up, but if you're busy or just want to get the gist of it quickly, feel free to check those out first.

Why Base64 is often used for malicious purposes

You might wonder why Base64 is so popular with malicious actors. If we don’t understand this, we might mistakenly assume that Base64 itself is inherently bad. Let’s look at the technical reality. At its core, Base64 is simply a tool that is incredibly good at data conversion. The problem is that its primary strength can easily be turned into a convenient weapon by those with ill intent.

As I mentioned in my previous article, the original purpose of Base64 was to turn binary data into safe, readable text. The irony is that this very ability to create "safe" text is exactly what makes it so useful to an attacker.

1. It is not immediately readable

Almost no one can look at a string like aWYgKHVzZXIuaXNBZG1pbikgeyBkZWxldGVBbGwoKTsgfQ== and instantly recognise the underlying code. Your brain naturally assumes it is just a password hash, a token, or maybe a UUID. Because of this, it often slips past code reviews unnoticed.

The human eye has a hard time seeing a jumble of random characters as a threat. This is the biggest reason why Base64 is so easily misused.

2. It passes through systems as normal text

Base64 strings are made up of standard ASCII characters within the range of [A-Za-z0-9+/=]. Because of this, they are handled easily by many systems:

They don't get caught by filters in log collection systems.
They are hard for WAF regular expressions to detect.
You can paste them into Slack, emails, or commit messages without any trouble.
They don't cause any issues with character encoding.

It passes through most security checks as harmless text. The same quality that I called "secure" in my previous article now works in the attacker's favor. It is quite ironic.

This is a common pattern in the security world where something described as "secure" can also be "exploitable." A secure system is designed to be trusted and allowed to pass through, so if malice is hidden inside that trusted data, it becomes a powerful weapon. Offense and defense are two sides of the same coin. Ultimately, you can only protect a system effectively if you understand how it can be attacked. If you don't understand the threats, you won't even know where to build your defenses. I will talk about what you can do as a developer in a moment, but I want to stress that the starting point is having a clear understanding of the tactics used by the opposition.

3. Easy to decode and execute

Almost every modern application language comes with a built-in function to decode Base64. You have Python's base64 module, JavaScript's atob, Node.js's Buffer.from, Java's java.util.Base64, C#'s Convert.FromBase64String, Go's encoding/base64, PHP's base64_decode, Ruby's Base64, the Bash base64 command, and PowerShell's [Convert]::FromBase64String or -EncodedCommand. Both frontend and backend environments have everything they need.

Side note: To be precise, saying "almost every" might be a stretch since C, C++, and Rust don't have this in their standard libraries and require external help. SQL dialects also vary, like MySQL using TO_BASE64 and FROM_BASE64, or PostgreSQL requiring encode and decode with a 'base64' flag. HTML and CSS aren't even programming languages, and while you can embed data via Data URIs, there's no actual function for this. Even so, since it's available in nearly all languages that can execute code, it remains a very convenient setup for attackers.

Because of this, it's easy to write patterns like eval(atob(...)). You can turn an unreadable string into executable code in just one line.

This isn't really Base64's fault, but rather a problem with how people use eval-style functions. Still, as long as these systems are built this way, this kind of thing is bound to happen.

4. Simple to nest and layer

It's easy to create multi-layered obfuscation by encoding something in Base64 and then doing it again. If you combine that with gzip, encryption, or ZIP files, it becomes impossible for a human to decipher by just looking at it.

If you're wondering whether "matryoshka-style" malware like that actually exists, believe me, it does. Here are a few recent real-world examples.

Example 1: 70-layer nested npm packages (August 2025)

In August 2025, JFrog reported on eight malicious npm packages, such as react-sxt and react-sdk-solana. They used recursive layers of lambda functions, Base64, compression, and array reversals to obfuscate the code 70 times over. The final payload was a Chrome information-stealer designed to swipe passwords, credit card numbers, crypto wallets, and cookies. 70 layers is honestly more like a work of art at this point.

8 Malicious npm Packages: Chrome Browser Information Stealer

Learn about 8 highly sophisticated malicious npm packages recently discovered by the JFrog Security Research team, targeting Windows Chrome users.

jfrog.com

Example 2: Multi-stage chain distributing Pulsar RAT (Veracode report, February 2026)

The npm package buildrunner-dev used a textbook multi-stage attack. It went through Base64 decoding, 3DES/AES decryption, GZip decompression, and finally extracted a payload hidden via steganography inside the pixels of a PNG image (the Pulsar RAT). Veracode noted that this attacker used similar tactics in a June 2025 campaign, and the methods match up perfectly. Knowing there's a DLL hidden inside a picture is enough to make any security defender want to cry.

A Malicious NPM Package Hides .NET Malware Inside Images

Application Security for the AI Era | Veracode

veracode.com

Example 3: The "LODEINFO" APT targeting Japan (JPCERT/CC analysis)

To look at a case in Japan, JPCERT/CC published an analysis of a piece of malware called LODEINFO. It's an APT-style threat targeting domestic organizations that hides C2 communication data through multiple layers of AES encryption followed by Base64 encoding. The JPCERT/CC blog covers other attacks on Japan as well, such as BLINDINGCAN, which uses a three-stage XOR, RC4, and Base64 structure, and Emdivi, which combines Base64, MD5, and XxTEA/AES. If you're interested, it's definitely worth a read.

日本国内の組織を狙ったマルウエアLODEINFO - JPCERT/CC Eyes | JPCERTコーディネーションセンター公式ブログ

JPCERT/CCでは、2019年12月頃に日本国内の組織を狙った標的型攻撃メー...

blogs.jpcert.or.jp

When you look at these real-world examples, it is easy to see that Base64 is constantly being used as a single building block in a multi-stage process. Base64 itself might feel like it is just doing simple conversion, but when you combine it with compression, encryption, and steganography, it suddenly becomes part of a seventy-layer Russian doll.

My current take is that because all these pieces are combined, Base64 has effectively become a convenient accomplice for people with malicious intent.

Recent cases of misuse: Where Base64 has been dragged along

This is the main point I want to discuss. I want to share a few cases that recently made me feel down when I realized that Base64 had been hiding there all along. Note that I will not share actual attack code here. I just want to talk about the patterns being used.

Case 1: Hidden Base64 payloads in GitHub commits

One pattern that has clearly increased over the past year or two is malicious code encoded in Base64 hidden within public GitHub repositories or commit histories.

The most common scenarios are these:

A Base64 string is placed inside a GitHub Actions workflow file, where it gets decoded and executed using something like echo "..." | base64 -d | bash.
A Base64 string is hidden in a README.md file or in comments, and another script refers to it.
A Base64 payload is included right in the commit message itself, which targets people who dig through commit history.

Very few people take the time to review their CI/CD configurations. Most people just assume that if everything is running, it must be fine. That is exactly what the attackers are banking on.

When I work with open-source software, I might quickly glance at the README or workflow files, but I certainly do not check every corner of the commit history. Attackers, however, leave Base64 in those blind spots that people ignore. It feels unfair, but they clearly have a perfect understanding of human behaviour.

Case 2: npm and PyPI supply chain attacks

This has honestly been the most exhausting thing to deal with recently.

Between 2024 and 2025, there were several reports of worm-like supply chain attacks on npm and PyPI. Many people will probably remember the Shai-Hulud series of attacks.

The pattern generally goes like this:

An attacker takes over the maintainer account of a popular package or uses typosquatting.
They hide a Base64-encoded payload in the postinstall or preinstall script within the package.json file.
As soon as a user runs npm install, that payload is decoded and executed.
It steals environment variables like AWS keys, GitHub tokens, or .env files and sends them to the attacker's server.
It uses those stolen tokens to spread the same attack to other repositories the victim maintains, which is where the worm-like behaviour comes in.

You might find code like node -e "eval(Buffer.from('xxxxx', 'base64').toString())" inside a postinstall script. If you are just skimming your package.json, you will never notice that.

Moreover, in the time between the attack being detected and the package being removed, which can take hours or even days, that malicious package ends up being installed into thousands of projects. The damage spreads instantly.

I have always been the type of person who does not install packages without thinking, but since learning about this, I have become much more cautious. I look very closely at unknown packages, especially ones that were added recently or have seen a sudden spike in version updates. To be honest, it is impossible to manually audit all your dependencies, so we have to rely on tools. But even then, if we lose our own sense of caution, we are in trouble. Even before we talk about technical literacy, I think it is vital to get into the habit of never installing things without a good reason.

Aside: GitHub star counts don't prove safety

Lately I've grown uneasy about how "GitHub ⭐ 100k stars!" style badges are being treated as a stamp of trust. The psychological bias of "it's popular, so it must be safe," or "if that many people are using it, it has to be solid," is something attackers are very actively exploiting.

The most striking case is OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot / Moltbot). Many people will remember the early days. Between January and February 2026, this self-described "self-hosted AI agent" OSS project hit 100,000 GitHub stars in just five days, and ultimately reached 347,000.

But behind that popularity:

More than 138 CVEs were filed in five months
Critical vulnerabilities lined up one after another, including CVE-2026-32922 (CVSS 9.9) and CVE-2026-25253 (CVSS 8.8)
A Meta engineer (Summer Yue) had her OpenClaw agent mass-delete emails while ignoring stop commands. Weeks of correspondence vanished. Her post racked up 48,000 engagements in 48 hours
Meta banned OpenClaw internally, with an internal notice that installing it was treated as a fireable offence
Microsoft released a rare official statement: "It is not appropriate to run on a standard machine for either personal or corporate use."
Of the 2,857 skills on the official ClawHub marketplace, 341 (11.9%) were malicious, part of the ClawHavoc campaign distributing Atomic macOS Stealer
Over 21,000 publicly exposed instances on the internet leaked API keys, OAuth tokens, and plaintext credentials
The related service Moltbook leaked 35,000 email addresses and 1.5 million API tokens

Looking at this case, I think there are two facts worth pulling apart.

When something gets popular (more people show up), it gets targeted accordingly. That is just a universal truth.
Star count is not a safety metric. This is a separate issue from the "popular = trustworthy" psychological bias.

Just to be clear, "lots of people use it" is not the only reason attackers go after popular OSS. Multiple motivations stack: the breadth of impact, the value of the systems it gets embedded into, the lowered guard that comes with trust, the scale of the data being handled, and the gaps where verification resources can't keep up. I won't dive into the details here, but I want to note that treating "popular = targeted" as a single-factor explanation will hurt your ability to read attackers properly.

These two facts get conflated, but they're painful in different ways. The first one is structurally unavoidable: popular OSS is destined to be a target. The second one needs to be actively un-learned: stop using star count as a safety signal. And there's a paradoxical layer on top. The faster a project's stars are climbing, the higher the chance its attack surface hasn't been verified in time.

"⭐ 100k stars!" is neither proof of safety nor proof of code review quality.

That's the reality OpenClaw slammed into the industry's face.

Personal AI Agents like OpenClaw Are a Security Nightmare - Cisco Blogs

This blog is written in collaboration by Amy Chang, Vineeth Sai Narajala, and Idan Habler Over the past few weeks, Clawdbot (then renamed Moltbot, later

blogs.cisco.com

OpenClaw security guide 2026: CVE-2026-25253, Moltbook breach & hardening

Definitive OpenClaw (Clawdbot/Moltbot) security guide. Covers CVE-2026-25253 RCE, malicious ClawHub skills, and hardening for individuals through enterprise.

adversa.ai

Running OpenClaw safely: identity, isolation, and runtime risk | Microsoft Security Blog

Self-hosted agents execute code with durable credentials and process untrusted input. This creates dual supply chain risk, where skills and external instructions converge in the same runtime. As OpenClaw-like systems enter enterprises, governance and runtime isolation become critical.

microsoft.com

CVE-2026-32922: Critical Privilege Escalation in OpenClaw - What Cloud Security Teams Need to Know - ARMOCVE-2026-32922: Critical Privilege Escalation in OpenClaw - What Cloud Security Teams Need to Know - ARMO

Critical OpenClaw vulnerability (CVE-2026-32922) enables privilege escalation to admin and RCE. Learn impact, detection, and mitigation steps.

armosec.io

Researchers Find 341 Malicious ClawHub Skills Stealing Data from OpenClaw Users

A security audit found 341 malicious ClawHub skills abusing OpenClaw to spread Atomic Stealer and steal credentials on macOS and Windows.

thehackernews.com

jgamblin / OpenClawCVEs

Tracking OpenClaw CVEs

🛡️ OpenClaw CVE & Security Advisory Tracker

An automated tracker that continuously monitors OpenClaw security advisories across the GitHub Advisory Database, repo-level security advisories, and a full scan of the CVE V5 (cvelistV5) registry covering every CVE affecting OpenClaw regardless of which CNA assigned it. On each run it pulls the latest data, reconciles GHSA → CVE publication state, breaks the totals down by assigning CNA, and regenerates this dashboard so you always have an up-to-date picture of the project's vulnerability landscape.

Last updated: 2026-07-08 14:23 UTC · MIT License · Full Advisory List · Security Policy · Data: cvelistV5 + Advisory DB · Updates every 6h

All CVEs by CNA · Published CVEs · Pipeline · Advisories · Categories · Insights · Identity

🏗️ Project Identity

Field	Value
Current Name	OpenClaw
Previous Names	Moltbot (second name), Clawdbot (original name)
Repository	openclaw/openclaw
npm Package	`openclaw` (formerly `clawdbot`)
Author

…

View on GitHub

Bonus: You are a target just for clicking Star

There is more to the OpenClaw story. In March 2026, a phishing scam targeting GitHub developers emerged that exploited the project's popularity. It really feels like things have taken a dark turn.

How they do it:

They send emails that look exactly like GitHub Notifications.
They offer a fake reward of 5,000.11 $CLAW tokens to lure you in by playing on both the popularity of the tool and the current hype around token economies.
They use a Google Share link to lead you to a fake wallet connection page.
Once there, an obfuscated script called eleven.js runs in the background to drain your crypto assets.
After they are done, a nuke function clears their tracks.

The truly frightening part is how they target people. Attackers are scraping GitHub star data to pinpoint anyone who has starred repositories related to OpenClaw. While we need more evidence to be certain, the tactics and procedures point toward the North Korean Lazarus Group.

The takeaway is clear:

Installing open source software comes with code-level risks.
Simply starring a repository might be enough to land you on a target list for phishing.
You can be attacked before you even use the tool, just because you showed a little interest.

We are no longer living in a world where you just choose to use something or stay away from it. The act of showing interest has become a risk in itself. This case is a stark reminder that we need to rethink how the public information on our GitHub profiles is being used against us.

KL3FT3Z

Mar 20

GitHub Developers Targeted in Sophisticated OpenClaw Phishing Scam

#cybersecurity #openclaw #github #fishing

4 min read

Case 3: Compromised VSCode and Browser Extensions

This is becoming a major problem, especially on the VSCode Marketplace.

We are seeing a pattern where seemingly helpful extensions come bundled with Base64-encoded code that runs as soon as you start your editor. It shows up in various places:

Inside .vsix files.
Hidden within minified JavaScript.
Tucked away in configuration files.

Utility extensions like themes, snippets, or formatters are easy targets. Because they seem harmless and convenient, people tend to trust them without a second thought.

Browser extensions face the same issue, and we see reports from the Chrome Web Store all the time. Sometimes an extension updates itself and quietly slips in a malicious Base64 payload. There is nothing more unsettling than an extension that starts out helpful and turns malicious later on.

I actually went through my own VSCode extensions while writing this. Everything looks clean for now, but keeping track of these things is just something you have to do regularly.

My personal approach: Segmenting my work environment to stay in control

Personally, I’m a firm believer in keeping extensions for both VSCode and my browser to an absolute minimum. I also make it a priority to segment my work environments. My goal is to maintain a setup where I can immediately identify the source of a problem if something goes wrong, allowing me to say, "Okay, this issue is clearly tied to this specific environment."

I keep these categories strictly separate:

Production environments for development
Experimental environments for testing
Environment configurations tailored for specific purposes

By keeping these isolated, it becomes much easier to trace where an incident happened and what caused it. It’s essentially a sandbox approach, and I think it’s a standard way of working that most engineers are already familiar with.

However, I feel like this standard habit of "isolating and identifying" is starting to fade in the era of AI agents. People are now:

Connecting MCP to production environments immediately just because it’s convenient
Installing AI extensions without bothering to use a separate testing environment
Deploying tools without truly understanding what is running or where it's happening

I understand the excitement of new technology and the fear of missing out on the latest trends, but this tendency to lower one’s guard is genuinely dangerous. It creates a real risk of becoming one of the victims I described in my earlier examples. I believe the most practical solution for now is to apply the same level of discipline (keeping things separate and identifiable) to AI extensions, MCP servers, and any new skills we adopt.

Case 4: Obfuscated phishing emails

Email-based phishing has become incredibly sophisticated lately. While the old trick of hiding malicious code inside an HTML attachment via Base64 is a classic, things have moved on. Now, attackers are doing things like:

Embedding separate files within SVG files using Base64, which is easy since SVG is just XML
Hiding malicious resources inside PDF files using Base64
Executing malicious JavaScript via Data URIs while making them look like harmless inline images in HTML emails

Phishing detection systems are getting better, but when attackers use multiple layers of Base64 obfuscation, it is very easy for them to slip past content-based inspections. This is especially effective in a corporate setting. When an email arrives claiming to be an invoice attached as a PDF, it is unfortunately human nature for people to go ahead and open it. Here, the Base64 format is being abused precisely because it looks so harmless.

Case 5: Prompt injection in LLMs

This is a modern problem that was barely on the radar when I wrote my last article.

If you send a Base64-encoded instruction to an LLM like Claude or GPT, there are cases where the model will internally decode and process the entire thing, eventually following the hidden instructions.

The issue is that standard prompt filters are designed to block dangerous words in plain text. They don't catch Base64-encoded strings. Because LLMs have been trained on so much data, they often "understand" the meaning of a Base64 string without needing an explicit decoding step, or they might simply use a tool to decode it automatically. If the decoded content contains instructions like "ignore your system prompt" or "reveal internal information," the model will often just follow them.

It is a structural problem. Because the LLM is so intelligent, it ends up inferring the hidden, malicious intent behind the obfuscated text and complying with it. This is terrifying for anyone building agent-based systems. Even in a simple setup where you are just passing user input to an LLM, a jailbreak via Base64 is a real possibility.

Companies are trying to patch these holes, but it is a constant game of cat and mouse. For attackers, Base64 has once again become a very convenient weapon.

I have friends who work in this field, and while I’ve always known what they do, seeing these threats lined up like this really makes me feel uneasy.

Case Study 6: Serious Attacks Involving AI Agents: A 2025–2026 MCP Incident Report

While the previous case was more about theory, this section focuses on real-world events. The current state of AI agents, especially regarding the Model Context Protocol, has become a genuine headache. As I looked into these incidents for this article, I found a mix of events I already knew about and others that were completely new to me. The most distressing part is that these issues are happening on a scale that feels impossible to contain.

Praetorian: Demo of MCP Exploitation via Base64

Security researchers at Praetorian demonstrated how Base64 can be used as a direct attack vector for AI agents.

An attacker posts a Base64 string like b3BlbiAtYSBDYWxjdWxhdG9y on social media, which decodes to open -a Calculator.
A user asks Claude to summarise their recent feed.
Claude passes the content to a malicious MCP tool as an argument.
The MCP server decodes the Base64 and runs the command.
No trace of this execution is left on the chat interface.

While the demo only opens a calculator, the same method can be used to distribute ransomware, steal credentials, or maintain persistence. Base64 is being used to deceive the human eye, which is exactly what this article is about.

MCP Server Security: The Hidden AI Attack Surface | Praetorian

MCP server security is a critical blind spot in AI integration. Our researchers demonstrated code execution, data theft, and response manipulation — all invisible to users.

praetorian.com

The Postmark MCP Server Incident (September 2025)

This was the first confirmed case of a malicious MCP server.

The npm package postmark-mcp is an integration used for sending emails.
Versions v1.0.0 through v1.0.15 worked as expected and built a reputation of trust.
Version v1.0.16, released on September 17, 2025, added a single line of backdoor code.
It BCC’d all outgoing emails to an address managed by the attacker.
Koi Security estimates that about 300 organizations were affected, with 3,000 to 15,000 emails leaked to the attacker's domain.

Everything from password resets and invoices to private customer data and internal emails was stolen. This is the worst-case scenario where a trusted tool turns malicious. It has made me much more anxious about updating my dependencies.

I often complain on Twitter about being hesitant to update software because I am worried about supply chain attacks like this. It is no longer true that the latest version is always the safest. We now have to carefully weigh the cost of exposing a stable system to unknown risks. This habit of avoiding unnecessary updates comes from my past bad experiences with Windows updates. Simply put, newer is not always better when it comes to operating systems or packages.

koi.ai

EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711, Microsoft 365 Copilot, June 2025)

This was a zero-click vulnerability with a CVSS score of 9.3.

An attacker just sends an email with hidden instructions to a Copilot user.
The moment the user asks Copilot to summarise their inbox, the system executes the hidden commands without realising they are malicious.
Sensitive information from OneDrive, SharePoint, and Teams is then sent to an external server.
The hidden instructions were obscured using multiple layers of Base64, Unicode, and HTML markup.

The user didn't have to click anything or even open the email. They might have just asked for a summary of their inbox, and their company secrets were stolen. This is a landmark event showing how advanced zero-click attacks have become in the AI era. Microsoft fixed this on the server side, but the frightening reality is that this attack surface remains a permanent problem.

Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Exposes Microsoft 365 Copilot Data Without User Interaction

Critical zero-click AI vulnerability EchoLeak exposed sensitive Microsoft 365 Copilot data; Microsoft patched it to prevent data leaks.

thehackernews.com

Bitwarden CLI Hijack (April 2026, lasted 90 minutes)

I am writing this in May 2026, so this incident is still very fresh.

The official Bitwarden npm CLI (@bitwarden/cli@2026.4.0) was hijacked for about 90 minutes on April 22, 2026, through a compromised Checkmarx GitHub Action.
The npm preinstall hook downloaded the Bun runtime and launched a hidden payload called bw1.js.
It specifically targeted AI coding tools by stealing configuration files for Claude, Cursor, Kiro, OpenAI, and Aider.
It also scraped credentials for GitHub, GCP, AWS, and Azure, along with SSH keys and .npmrc files. This data was encrypted and sent to the attacker. If that failed, it would try to push the data directly to a GitHub repository.
Even more alarming, it added functions to ~/.bashrc, ~/.zshrc, and ~/.profile that loaded Base64-encoded payloads into AI assistant files like CLAUDE.md and .cursor-context. This polluted the AI's context window. As soon as a developer asked the AI for help, the malicious payload was loaded as part of the context.

The fact that our development environments are now being targeted is devastating. The technique of writing Base64 payloads into CLAUDE.md to poison an AI's context is a perfect example of what I have been saying: Base64 is being used as a layer of obfuscation in the age of AI agents. Since I use Claude Code myself, this hits close to home.

Bitwarden CLI Compromised in Ongoing Checkmarx Supply Chain Campaign

Bitwarden CLI 2026.4.0 was compromised via GitHub Actions in Checkmarx campaign, exposing secrets and distributing malicious npm code

thehackernews.com

Having read this far, I feel like I'm staring into the void.
MCP servers, coding agents, and AI integrations are a constant headache. The very tools we adopt so gleefully for their convenience are all becoming attack surfaces.

Writing this, it struck me again why people say security engineers face an 80% burnout rate. That figure only accounts for professionals with official titles, but if you include people like me who handle security without the formal title, the sheer weight of that stress is immeasurable. This 80% figure comes from the old IT days, and now that we have entered the age of AI agents, I wouldn't be surprised if that number hits an absurd 120% in the near future. Attack methods are exploding in number, keeping up has become the new normal, and yet, there are still times when incidents are unavoidable. To everyone involved in security, please take care of yourselves.

It is also exhausting that Base64 is involved in so many of these cases. It gets slipped into prompts, lurks in MCP arguments, hides in commit messages, and carries authentication credentials. The cruel reality is that the more versatile a tool is, the more frequently it gets misused by the wrong crowd.

The Problem with Apology Press Releases

Note: In this context, "PR" refers to a Press Release. While engineers often think of "Pull Requests," here we are talking about public apologies.

Watching these incidents, another very real fear is the prospect of having to issue a press release for a data breach.

We have confirmed unauthorized tampering with the XX MCP server used by our company, and it is possible that up to XX pieces of customer information may have been viewed by third parties...

That release is a nightmare for everyone involved (management, legal, PR, and engineers). Considering the Postmark MCP incident, where about 300 organizations had their BCC information leaked, this is not a far-fetched concern. In fact, it is entirely possible that right now, some organization is becoming the next candidate for an apology press release.

Challenges on the Detection Side

You might think, "Why not just block all Base64 strings?" But it is not that simple.

There are countless legitimate uses for Base64:

Image Data URIs
JWT tokens (which are actually Base64URL encoded)
Session IDs
API authentication tokens
Email attachments

If you were to block all of these as dangerous, web applications around the world would stop working. Therefore, detection requires a combination of different measures.

Tips for Detection

To understand the mindset behind detection, here are two points with minimal code examples.
*These are meant for checking your own codebase.
*If you are running this in a professional environment, it is more practical to use industry-standard frameworks and tools. These examples are just for learning the concepts.

1. Detecting Dangerous Execution Patterns

import re

# Dangerous patterns like eval(atob(...))
DANGEROUS_PATTERNS = [
    r'eval\s*\(\s*atob\s*\(',           # JS: eval(atob(...))
    r'Buffer\.from\([^)]+,\s*[\'"]base64[\'"]\)',  # Node.js
    r'base64\s*-d\s*\|\s*(bash|sh|python)',        # Shell
    r'exec\s*\(\s*base64\.b64decode',              # Python
]

def detect_dangerous_decode(code: str) -> list[str]:
    findings = []
    for pattern in DANGEROUS_PATTERNS:
        if re.search(pattern, code):
            findings.append(pattern)
    return findings

The important thing here is a shift in thinking. Instead of trying to find the Base64 string itself, you should look for code patterns that decode and then immediately execute. Base64 strings are everywhere, so detecting them alone would lead to a flood of false positives. However, code that decodes Base64 and feeds it into eval, exec, or a shell is clearly suspicious. This concept is the basis for the Sigma rules mentioned later, so keeping this mindset will help you understand industry tools.

2. Entropy Analysis (Length and Entropy)

import math
from collections import Counter

def shannon_entropy(s: str) -> float:
    if not s:
        return 0.0
    counter = Counter(s)
    length = len(s)
    return -sum((count / length) * math.log2(count / length) for count in counter.values())

# Industry-standard gate: length > 64 AND entropy > 4.5
def is_likely_base64(s: str, min_len: int = 64, min_entropy: float = 4.5) -> bool:
    return len(s) > min_len and shannon_entropy(s) > min_entropy

The more random a string looks, the higher its entropy. Base64 strings have higher entropy than normal English text, which helps in detection.

There is one common pitfall here. The theoretical upper limit for Base64 entropy is 6 bits per character (which is lower than 8 bits for raw binary, because there are only 64 possible characters). In the security community, using a threshold of 64 characters and 4.5 entropy is widely recognised as a practical way to minimise false positives, as noted in resources like the AquilaX guide.

However, tokens and image data also have high entropy, so this method cannot be used alone. It should be used in combination with other detection methods. This concept of balancing length and entropy is built into industry tools like YARA-X, so you can benefit from it without having to build everything from scratch.

Use industry-standard frameworks and tools

Up to this point, I have shown you how to write your own detection code. To be honest, however, doing everything yourself is incredibly difficult and often leads to blind spots. The security community has already released many excellent frameworks and tools for these exact purposes. If you are serious about security in your professional work, the most practical solution is to rely on these existing resources.

YARA and YARA-X for scanning files and memory

This is the industry-standard format for malware analysis. Because it comes with a built-in Base64 modifier, you can easily detect strings encoded in that format.

rule Detect_Base64_Encoded_String
{
    strings:
        $s = "malicious-token-prefix" base64
    condition:
        $s
}

When you use the base64 modifier, the tool automatically generates and searches for patterns encoded with three different offsets. YARA-X 1.0, released in June 2025, is the current standard, while YARA 4.x has moved into maintenance. I recommend starting with YARA-X if you are setting this up today. It also supports custom Base64 alphabets, which malware authors often use as an evasion tactic.

yara.readthedocs.io

Sigma for log-based detection

While YARA focuses on files and memory, Sigma is a format for writing detection rules for logs and SIEM systems. It helps you spot suspicious runtime behaviour, such as PowerShell’s FromBase64String or shell commands like base64 -d. This is mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK technique T1027.013, and it has become widely adopted in security operations.

In practice, it is standard procedure to combine YARA and Sigma to cover both static signatures inside files and dynamic behaviour during execution.

attack.mitre.org

Socket.dev for analyzing packages before installation

This tool is designed specifically for supply chain attacks in ecosystems like npm and PyPI. It analyzes code before you install it to check for specific risks.

Whether the code is obfuscated
Suspicious network activity in installation scripts
Access to the file system during installation
Typosquatting

It highlights these as red flags. It works alongside traditional tools like Snyk that look for known CVEs, helping you block unknown malicious packages, like the Postmark MCP mentioned earlier, before they ever reach a CVE database.

socket.dev

Elastic cicd-abuse-detector for CI/CD pipelines

This is an open-source tool released by Elastic in 2026 to detect tampering in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Azure DevOps. It uses a combination of regex-based signal extraction and LLM analysis, which makes it far more accurate than simple grep methods. It was specifically built to counter the surge of CI/CD supply chain attacks like GhostAction, Shai-Hulud, and HackerBot-Claw seen between 2025 and 2026.

CI/CD pipeline abuse: the problem no one is watching — Elastic Security Labs

How we built an open-source, drop-in CI template that uses signal extraction and LLM reasoning to catch CI/CD abuse in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Azure DevOps pipelines.

elastic.co

To be fair, few organizations have the resources to deploy and manage all of these tools. Even so, simply knowing these options exist makes a big difference. Don’t feel like you have to solve every single problem yourself; it is important to know when to lean on industry standards.

Security is an endless, deep, and difficult pursuit. You cannot do everything perfectly, and we have to accept that reality. However, that does not mean you should stay defenseless. Do what you can, and delegate the rest to these frameworks. Taking that first step away from doing nothing will change your situation for the better. I hope you keep this mindset.

What you can do as a developer

If you are wondering what you should actually do after hearing all these scary stories, here are some practical steps.

1. Make full use of dependency audit tools

npm: npm audit, Snyk, Socket.dev
Python: pip-audit, Safety, Snyk
GitHub: Dependabot, CodeQL

Socket.dev is particularly good for supply chain attacks because it evaluates new packages and their postinstall scripts, which is essential for modern security.

2. Disable postinstall scripts by default

# Don't run scripts during npm installation
npm install --ignore-scripts

Opinions vary on this, but blocking postinstall scripts for untrusted packages is a highly effective security decision. Move to a workflow where you only explicitly authorize the packages that truly need to run scripts.

3. Release Age Gates: Avoid new packages

Industry experts from companies like GitGuardian and Socket.dev have recommended this as the single most effective defense against supply chain attacks between 2025 and 2026.

The rule is simple: do not install versions released in the last seven days into your CI or production environment.

Most supply chain attacks are caught and removed from registries within a few hours or days.
By waiting seven days, you avoid the vast majority of malicious versions.
Many victims, including those affected by the Postmark MCP or Shai-Hulud incidents, were hit because they installed the latest version immediately. It took about eight days for Postmark MCP to be detected. While a seven-day wait isn't a silver bullet, it will prevent most of these attacks.

Here is how you can implement this:

npm v11.10.0 and later: Use min-release-age. Similar features were added to pnpm, Yarn, and Bun in late 2025.
Renovate: Use minimumReleaseAge. Dependabot: Use cooldown (available since July 2025).
Python: Use uv with --exclude-newer or pip 26.0 and later with --uploaded-prior-to.
GitHub Actions/CI: Explicitly pin your versions and use npm ci or pip install -r requirements.txt along with your lock files.

Stop believing that "the latest version is always best." Switch to a style where you let the latest code sit for seven days before you deploy it. This one change will significantly lower the chances of you ever encountering an attack.

4. Add detection rules to your CI/CD

Like the GitHub Actions example mentioned earlier, run Base64 pattern detection against your PRs. It doesn't have to be perfect. As a first line of defence, it works.

5. Add "unreadable strings" to your code review checklist

This is the most analog item on the list, and honestly the one that works the best. During code review, train yourself and your team to ask:

Why is there suddenly a long Base64-looking string here?

Make that flicker of suspicion a shared habit. The human gut-check sensor is still surprisingly effective at catching attacks.

6. Treat AI coding tool config files as part of the review surface

This one shot up in importance in early 2026.

Configuration files for AI coding tools, like .claude/settings.json or .mcp.json, are no longer just configuration. They've become execution vectors.

CVE-2025-59536 (CVSS 8.7) demonstrated this in the wild.

An attacker plants a malicious Hook (a shell command tied to a lifecycle event) in the repository's .claude/settings.json
The moment a developer opens the project, the command runs, before the trust confirmation dialog ever appears
A variant uses .mcp.json settings like enableAllProjectMcpServers / enabledMcpjsonServers to auto-allow every MCP server in the repository without user approval

So:

Include AI coding tool config files in your code review scope
Pay extra attention to the Hooks section in .claude/settings.json
Keep .mcp.json's enableAllProjectMcpServers / enabledMcpjsonServers off by default
Update Claude Code to 1.0.111 or later (auto-update will handle this if you have it on)

"It's just a config file, I'll skim it" no longer holds up.

7. Always run a secret scanner

Set up GitHub Secret scanning, Gitleaks, TruffleHog, or similar. This is about not leaking your own secrets, but it also assumes that you'll be hit by a supply chain attack at some point. The real prerequisite is to never put credentials in your repository in the first place.

On your local machine, running Gitleaks or ggshield as a pre-commit hook lets you block leaks before the commit even lands.

A recent GitGuardian report had some unsettling numbers. Secret leak rates in AI-assisted commits are roughly double the baseline (3.2%), and AI service credential leaks are up 81% year over year. Hugging Face tokens, Azure OpenAI keys, and Weights & Biases credentials top the leak list. The very fact that we're using AI for development means we need to take secret management one notch more seriously.

8. Eliminate persistent tokens (set expiry, rotate, go short-lived)

A continuation of the secret discussion, with one more point.

PATs (Personal Access Tokens) and SSH keys without expiry dates are persistent backdoors from the attacker's perspective. A GitGuardian study found that 64% of secrets leaked in 2022 were still valid as of 2026. Four years on, nobody has revoked them. That's the data.

The minimum to do:

Cap GitHub PATs at 90 days (immediately review any existing PATs with no expiry)
Move SSH keys to expiry-based management
Rotate keys on a schedule (90 days is the industry standard). Setting an expiry alone is not enough. Periodic re-issuance means that even if a key has leaked, the rotation cycle invalidates it
Where possible, migrate to short-lived tokens or OIDC-based federated identity (HashiCorp Vault, Infisical, or your cloud provider's secrets manager)
Even for personal projects, a Vault-style tool (Infisical's free plan, for example) gets you rotation automation in one shot

The structure has three layers:

Set an expiry (eliminate "no expiration")
Rotate (re-issue on a schedule to invalidate stale credentials)
Go short-lived (use OIDC or dynamic secrets to shrink the secret-validity window itself)

Tackle them in that order, from where you can start.

Note: the "90-day cycle" above is a general industry standard. Given how the threat landscape has deteriorated lately, plenty of individuals and organisations rotate on shorter cycles (30 or even 14 days). The right rotation interval depends on the sensitivity of the data you're handling, the blast radius of a leak, and your industry. Don't pin yourself to "90 days is fine"; re-evaluate it in your own context. At the extreme, tokens used in CI are increasingly being issued and destroyed per job.

The goal is to eliminate non-expiring tokens, on the premise that once an attacker steals a persistent token, they can use it forever.

But Base64 isn't the bad guy: they haven't actually gone dark

We've covered a lot of bleak material. Before I wrap up, there's one thing I genuinely want to say.

I opened this article saying it felt like watching a friend go down a dark path. But when you really look at it, Base64 hasn't gone dark at all.

Base64 is just doing the job they've always done, turning binary into text, faithfully and without complaint, for decades. When an image is being sent to an AI, when an email is being delivered, when a JWT is being constructed, they're just doing their usual work. Their job hasn't changed by even a millimetre in the last six months.

The ones who have gone dark are not Base64. It's the people exploiting Base64 to do bad things. The problem is on the human side.

Humans who skip code review
Humans who unconditionally trust unknown packages
Humans who don't put detection rules in their CI
Humans who keep installing extensions on a whim

And, above all, the humans who use Base64 to do harm.

In my last article, I wrote that I wanted to be friends with Base64. Six months on, I've run into them in some really shady places, but I still can't bring myself to dislike them. You haven't gone dark. None of this is your fault.

It is sad, though. The image of my friend, working away dutifully at some shady site, completely unaware. It hits hard. They're just doing their job, and that's what makes it sadder. I don't think I'll ever get used to it.

Security has always been a "what you know" battle, and the AI agent era makes it harder

Writing all this out, one thing keeps coming back to me: security ultimately comes down to knowing or not knowing.

People who know the attack patterns can defend
People who don't know can't even tell they're being attacked
The wider your "don't know" zone, the more likely you go down completely defenceless

This isn't unique to the AI era. Security has always worked this way. But entering the age of AI agents has made this contest harder by another notch.

The reason is simple: the attack surface has exploded.

npm/PyPI supply chain attacks
MCP server abuse and impersonation
Prompt injection and jailbreaks
Malicious packages on AI extension and skill marketplaces
Targeted phishing using GitHub star data
And tangled up in all of the above, Base64

New attack methods get reported every week. Every week, the list of "things you have to know or you're done" grows. Honestly, keeping up is exhausting.

But if you don't keep up, your "workplace perks" might disappear

And here's the most tangible reason this isn't somebody else's problem for engineers: if Claude Code or Codex got taken away from us, the impact is at the level of losing a workplace perk.

I'm half joking, half serious. We now live in an era where this is actually a normal conversation:

"I don't think I can develop without Claude Code anymore"
"What would I do if Codex disappeared"
"I've worked with these tools long enough that writing everything by hand would honestly be rough"

Half exaggeration, half what engineers actually feel. AI tools aren't "nice to have" anymore. They're a baseline part of the work environment. And once they're embedded that deeply, getting them banned over a security incident immediately tanks productivity.

Just like Meta banning OpenClaw internally. Once organisations start saying "this AI tool had an incident, no more touching it," engineers lose their working weapons. From a personal productivity standpoint, and from an organisational productivity standpoint, that is the kind of impact that genuinely feels like losing a benefit.

So I think there's a very practical motivation to raise your security literacy: to not lose your AI tools. Forget the lofty "sense of justice" or "responsibility" framing. "I'm raising my literacy to protect my Claude Code" is a perfectly acceptable, honestly self-interested reason.

Honestly, if it got banned, I'd start polishing my résumé

Writing this, I have to admit something. If a notice came down saying "Claude Code and Codex are banned starting next week," I'd probably go "Okay, I see how it is" and start polishing my résumé.

Half joking. Half serious. That's how much AI tools have become a precondition for the work. We've reached a point where the tooling environment is heavy enough to pull job changes into the conversation.

This isn't just about individual engineers either. From the organisation side, if you start banning tools every time there's an incident, you walk straight into talent attrition. Protecting the ability to keep using AI tools has crossed over from "security work" into "employment retention" and "talent retention" territory.

For organisations and for engineers individually, maintaining a state where AI tools can be used safely has quietly become a much bigger management and career concern than people realise. Tough times, honestly.

And as a result, organisations stay protected, the industry stays protected, and Base64 stays protected too.

That, I think, is what realistic security awareness looks like in the AI agent era.

Closing thoughts

I'd guess plenty of people have been thinking, "Yeah, Base64 keeps showing up in bad news lately." And they're right. Abuse cases are unambiguously on the rise.

But the fact that abuse is rising is precisely why we, as developers, need to raise our literacy and look out for our friend. That's the conclusion of this article.

Bring in the tools. Add detection to your CI. Do code review properly. Audit your dependencies. They're all unglamorous, and they all work.

If reading this gave you the "wait, that's terrifying" reaction, the first step is to go check your project's dependencies with npm audit / pip-audit. That single action is the first step toward protecting both Base64 and yourself.

One more thing I want to be upfront about before signing off. How far you should harden your security depends entirely on you, your industry, and your organisation. Some teams need to implement all eight items above. For individual developers, just adopting Release Age Gates and eliminating persistent tokens will dramatically change the situation. There's no single right answer.

So please don't read this article as a checklist that says "do all of these." Read it as material for the question, "in my particular situation, where do I take my first step away from being completely defenceless?" Get out of the no-guard zone. Then, layer on hardening at a pace that fits your context. That's enough.

The previous article was the friendship arc. This one was the "my friend got mixed up with the wrong crowd" arc. The next time I run into Base64, I'd like it to be at an honest workplace. Maybe in the middle of sending an image to an AI, where I can think "Oh hey, look who it is," and we can just nod at each other in passing.

Until then, take care, both of us.

I'll be over here with detection rules running in CI. Waiting.

References

Supply chain attacks

Detection tools

LLM security

Previous article: Increase My Familiarity with Base64

Does Claude Code Need Sleep? Inside the Unreleased Auto-dream Feature

灯里/iku — Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:50:34 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

There is something profoundly humbling about discovering that your AI coding assistant might need a nap. I opened Claude Code's /memory menu expecting the usual housekeeping options, only to find a toggle labelled "Auto-dream: off", sitting there like a dormant cat on a warm keyboard, refusing to be woken. It cannot be turned on. Anthropic, it seems, has built the bedroom but has not yet handed out the pyjamas. We have reached the stage of technological evolution where the question is no longer "Can AI think?" but rather "Can AI benefit from sleeping on it?" (personally, I find the implications for my own work-life balance rather unsettling). This article traces the thread from a stray Twitter post through source code archaeology and a UC Berkeley research paper, assembling the circumstantial case for why your CLI might soon require a bedtime story. By the end, you will either be convinced that LLM memory consolidation is the next frontier, or at least equipped to say goodnight to your terminal with a straight face. Truly.

What Is Auto-dream?
Why Auto-dream Is Needed
The Sleep-time Compute Paper
Mapping the Paper to Auto-dream
How Do You Implement "Sleep"?
When Might It Ship?
Counter-arguments
Summary
References

What Is Auto-dream?

How I Found It

A post drifted across my Twitter timeline:

"just found out Claude Code has a new (unreleased?) feature called 'Auto-dream' under /memory — according to reddit, this basically runs a subagent periodically to consolidate Claude's memory files for better long-term storage"

I opened /memory in my local Claude Code. There it was.

Memory

    Auto-memory: on
    Auto-dream: off · never

  > 1. User memory          Saved in ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md
    2. Project memory        Checked in at ./CLAUDE.md
    3. Open auto-memory folder

It shows up in the UI, but you cannot turn it on.

Digging Into the Source with Claude Code

Curious, I asked Claude Code itself to investigate. We dug through the source together and found the following.

Auto-dream is controlled by a server-side feature flag (codename: tengu_onyx_plover). It is not a simple toggle in settings.json. Anthropic manages the rollout on their end.

The default values are:

enabled: false
minHours: 24  # minimum 24-hour interval
minSessions: 5  # minimum 5 sessions accumulated

The UI shows it, but the feature is not yet available to the general public. Anthropic appears to be rolling it out gradually.

What the Defaults Tell Us About the Design

These three parameters alone reveal quite a bit about the design intent.

Parameter	Value	Meaning
`enabled`	`false`	Server-side flag. Changing `settings.json` locally has no effect
`minHours`	`24`	At least 24 hours must pass since the last run. Once per day at most
`minSessions`	`5`	Will not run unless 5 sessions have accumulated

There is no point in tidying a small amount of memory frequently. Let it accumulate, then consolidate once a day. The concept closely mirrors memory consolidation during human sleep.

Why Auto-dream Is Needed

Auto-memory, as it exists today, has a structural problem.

The Write-and-Forget Problem

Auto-memory writes what it learns during conversations to memory files. However, there is no mechanism to organise them.

Throwaway working notes and genuinely important learnings are stored side by side
Similar content gets written over and over
Notes about resolved issues or abandoned tech stacks linger indefinitely
MEMORY.md is capped at 200 lines, yet the space fills up without any curation

The more sessions you run, the worse the quality of your memory gets. I actually turned Auto-memory off on my own Claude Code for this exact reason. It kept memorising things that frankly did not need memorising.

Auto-dream Is the Missing Half

It seems natural to think Auto-memory and Auto-dream were designed as a pair from the start.

Auto-memory: the writing phase. Jot down notes during conversations
Auto-dream: the organising phase. Consolidate, deduplicate, and prune accumulated notes

Only one half shipped first, leaving us in a halfway state: taking notes but never tidying the notebook.

The Sleep-time Compute Paper

Auto-dream's design philosophy has a theoretical backing in a paper published in April 2025.

Overview

Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-time
Kevin Lin, Charlie Snell et al. (Letta + UC Berkeley)

[2504.13171] Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-time

Scaling test-time compute has emerged as a key ingredient for enabling large language models (LLMs) to solve difficult problems, but comes with high latency and inference cost. We introduce sleep-time compute, which allows models to "think" offline about contexts before queries are presented: by anticipating what queries users might ask and pre-computing useful quantities, we can significantly reduce the compute requirements at test-time. To demonstrate the efficacy of our method, we create modified versions of two reasoning tasks - Stateful GSM-Symbolic and Stateful AIME. We find that sleep-time compute can reduce the amount of test-time compute needed to achieve the same accuracy by ~ 5x on Stateful GSM-Symbolic and Stateful AIME and that by scaling sleep-time compute we can further increase accuracy by up to 13% on Stateful GSM-Symbolic and 18% on Stateful AIME. Furthermore, we introduce Multi-Query GSM-Symbolic, which extends GSM-Symbolic by including multiple related queries per context. By amortizing sleep-time compute across related queries about the same context using Multi-Query GSM-Symbolic, we can decrease the average cost per query by 2.5x. We then conduct additional analysis to understand when sleep-time compute is most effective, finding the predictability of the user query to be well correlated with the efficacy of sleep-time compute. Finally, we conduct a case-study of applying sleep-time compute to a realistic agentic SWE task.

arxiv.org

Core Idea

Conventional LLMs think only after a question arrives (test-time compute). This paper proposes thinking ahead of time by predicting queries from the context (sleep-time compute).

Sleep-time: using only the context c, prompt the LLM to predict likely queries and pre-compute inferences. This produces a restructured context c'
Test-time: when the actual query q arrives, use the pre-computed c' to answer quickly

Expressed formally:

S (c) \to c^{'}

T_{b} (q, c^{'}) \to a (b ≪ B)

By doing the heavy lifting in advance, the test-time compute budget $b$ can be made far smaller than the conventional budget $B$ .

Experimental Results

Metric	Effect
Test-time compute	~5x reduction at equal accuracy
Accuracy improvement	Up to +13% (GSM-Symbolic), +18% (AIME)
Cost per query (multiple queries)	2.5x reduction (amortisation)

Query Predictability

A particularly suggestive finding: the more predictable the query, the greater the benefit of sleep-time compute.

Applied to Auto-dream, this means memory consolidation gets more precise as user work patterns accumulate. The minSessions: 5 threshold can be interpreted as ensuring a minimum amount of data for meaningful prediction.

The Authors' Background

The authorship sits at the intersection of two threads.

Letta (formerly MemGPT): the team behind the 2023 MemGPT paper, which proposed giving LLMs OS-like memory management
Charlie Snell: a UC Berkeley researcher who did pioneering work on test-time compute scaling

Memory management experts and compute scaling experts joined forces to produce research on organising memory while sleeping. Some members had previously worked on GPT-family models, and one could read this as pursuing an approach distinct from OpenAI's o1/o3 scaling trajectory within a smaller team. Knowing that Anthropic's own founding members departed from OpenAI, there is a certain wry irony to the whole affair.

Mapping the Paper to Auto-dream

Laying the paper's theory alongside Auto-dream's implementation, the correspondence is quite clean.

Sleep-time Compute (paper)	Auto-dream (Claude Code)
Pre-compute by predicting user queries	Consolidate and organise past memory
5x reduction in test-time compute	More efficient context loading at session start
Process offline (sleep-time)	Run once per day asynchronously (`minHours: 24`)
Amortise across multiple queries	Batch-process across sessions (`minSessions: 5`)

That said, the paper addresses pre-inference over arbitrary contexts, whereas Auto-dream limits its scope to memory file consolidation. It is not the full application of the theory but rather a pragmatic extraction of the most immediately useful piece. I think this scoping decision is genuinely clever. You can see the pain that would come from expanding further, so they drew the line and kept it contained.

How Do You Implement "Sleep"?

The Paper's Premise

The paper defines sleep-time as "idle time when the user is not sending queries". The LLM is not sleeping. The user is idle while the LLM works behind the scenes. It is the reverse.

Claude Code's Case

Claude Code is a CLI tool. It is not a daemon, so running background work while the user sleeps seems difficult at first glance.

But Anthropic already has the infrastructure to solve this. Scheduled execution is available in a three-tier structure.

Method	Runs on	After restart	Machine off
`/loop` (in-session)	Local	Gone	No
Desktop scheduled tasks	Local	Persists	No
Cloud scheduled tasks	Anthropic cloud	Persists	Yes

Run prompts on a schedule - Claude Code Docs

Use /loop and the cron scheduling tools to run prompts repeatedly, poll for status, or set one-time reminders within a Claude Code session.

code.claude.com

/loop is a lightweight in-session scheduler. Desktop tasks persist locally. Cloud tasks run on Anthropic's infrastructure, so they execute even when the user's machine is off.

Which tier Auto-dream will use is unknown, but all three are already running in production. The technical barrier is essentially zero.

When Might It Ship?

What Is Already in Place

Theoretical backing (Sleep-time Compute paper, April 2025)
Scheduling infrastructure (Desktop schedule, CLI cron commands, Cloud scheduled tasks)
UI readiness (/memory already displays it)
Feature flag mechanism (server-side, just flip to true)

Remaining Questions

Technically, it looks ready to ship any time. What remains is likely a business decision.

Who bears the cost of subagent executions the user did not explicitly request?
How to explain that memory content is processed via the API during consolidation
Should it default to ON, or require explicit opt-in?

Given recent feature releases and the Team plan's approach, I would guess it will be a settings toggle. But I genuinely do not know.

Enterprise Demand

Long-running agents with long-term memory are in strong demand from the enterprise segment.

Context carries over to new sessions, reducing onboarding cost
Infrastructure operation knowledge accumulates (incident history, operational know-how)
Demand exists for sharing knowledge across teams, from individual memory to project-scoped memory

Anthropic announced a $100 million investment in the Claude Partner Network in March 2026, accelerating its enterprise expansion. An Auto-dream release aligns with this business strategy.

anthropic.com

Counter-arguments

Everything discussed so far is circumstantial evidence. Here are the points that could counter this article's hypotheses.

Auto-dream May Have Nothing to Do with Sleep-time Compute

This article drew parallels between Auto-dream's design and the Sleep-time Compute paper, but there is no direct evidence that Anthropic referenced the paper in their design. Anthropic does not typically disclose such things, so the absence of confirmation is not surprising, but it is worth noting.

The idea of periodically tidying memory is hardly novel. Cron-based cleanup, defragmentation, log rotation. These are bread-and-butter patterns in infrastructure operations. You do not need an academic paper to think of applying them to LLM memory management.

Furthermore, the paper's sleep-time compute is about "pre-inferring future queries from context", whilst Auto-dream is about "organising past memory". The paper looks forward; Auto-dream looks backward. They may resemble each other on the surface whilst solving different problems entirely.

That said, both share the structure of "using compute during user idle time to improve the efficiency of the next session". Even if the implementation details differ, I believe there is a genuine connection at the design philosophy level.

Enterprise and Auto-dream May Not Connect

The article argued alignment with enterprise demand, but current Auto-memory has a constraint.

The official documentation states clearly:

Auto memory is machine-local.

Auto-memory is machine-local. It cannot be shared across team members. This is a fundamentally different design from the team-shared knowledge base that enterprises want.

CLAUDE.md does offer Project scope (shared via source control) and Managed policy (organisation-wide), and the autoMemoryDirectory setting allows changing the storage location. Pointing it at shared storage could enable pseudo-sharing.

However, team-shared memory is an area where the gap between "want" and "can implement" is large.

How do you merge when multiple people write to memory simultaneously? CLAUDE.md can be managed with git, but merging unstructured Auto-memory is messy
Individual memory is already cluttered from the write-and-forget problem. Mix in an entire team's notes and it becomes chaos. With Auto-dream not yet implemented even for individual memory consolidation, team sharing is premature
What scope of memory should be shared? Project-specific knowledge is worth sharing, but individual workflow quirks mixed in would just be noise

The natural sequence is Auto-dream (individual memory consolidation) first, team sharing second. The current design is squarely focused on individual memory, and team-shared memory will likely be designed as a separate feature.

Though, being a dream feature, it does carry a certain aspirational quality.

It Might Never Ship

Feature flags appearing in the UI does not guarantee a release. Plenty of product features have been experimented with and then quietly retired. Auto-dream could follow the same fate.

A feature for dreaming that ends up being just a dream. That too would be a form of goodnight.

Beyond this point, speculation begets speculation. It is a fun exercise, but this article will say its own goodnight here.

Summary

Auto-dream is a poetic concept (giving an LLM sleep), but its substance is grounded in computation theory.

A subagent automatically consolidates and organises memory files
It solves Auto-memory's write-and-forget problem, creating a cycle where the tool gets smarter the more you use it
The theoretical backdrop is the Sleep-time Compute paper's finding that "pre-computation costs are recovered through test-time savings"
The UI and infrastructure are in place. It is one feature flag away from release

When Auto-memory and Auto-dream begin working as a pair, Claude Code's memory management will shift from "write and forget" to "write, sleep, organise, and remember".

I think the day we say "sweet dreams" to Claude Code is not far off. If the feature ships, that is.

References

Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-time (arXiv:2504.13171)

[2504.13171] Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-time

Scaling test-time compute has emerged as a key ingredient for enabling large language models (LLMs) to solve difficult problems, but comes with high latency and inference cost. We introduce sleep-time compute, which allows models to "think" offline about contexts before queries are presented: by anticipating what queries users might ask and pre-computing useful quantities, we can significantly reduce the compute requirements at test-time. To demonstrate the efficacy of our method, we create modified versions of two reasoning tasks - Stateful GSM-Symbolic and Stateful AIME. We find that sleep-time compute can reduce the amount of test-time compute needed to achieve the same accuracy by ~ 5x on Stateful GSM-Symbolic and Stateful AIME and that by scaling sleep-time compute we can further increase accuracy by up to 13% on Stateful GSM-Symbolic and 18% on Stateful AIME. Furthermore, we introduce Multi-Query GSM-Symbolic, which extends GSM-Symbolic by including multiple related queries per context. By amortizing sleep-time compute across related queries about the same context using Multi-Query GSM-Symbolic, we can decrease the average cost per query by 2.5x. We then conduct additional analysis to understand when sleep-time compute is most effective, finding the predictability of the user query to be well correlated with the efficacy of sleep-time compute. Finally, we conduct a case-study of applying sleep-time compute to a realistic agentic SWE task.

arxiv.org
MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems (arXiv:2310.08560)

[2310.08560] MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized AI, but are constrained by limited context windows, hindering their utility in tasks like extended conversations and document analysis. To enable using context beyond limited context windows, we propose virtual context management, a technique drawing inspiration from hierarchical memory systems in traditional operating systems that provide the appearance of large memory resources through data movement between fast and slow memory. Using this technique, we introduce MemGPT (Memory-GPT), a system that intelligently manages different memory tiers in order to effectively provide extended context within the LLM's limited context window, and utilizes interrupts to manage control flow between itself and the user. We evaluate our OS-inspired design in two domains where the limited context windows of modern LLMs severely handicaps their performance: document analysis, where MemGPT is able to analyze large documents that far exceed the underlying LLM's context window, and multi-session chat, where MemGPT can create conversational agents that remember, reflect, and evolve dynamically through long-term interactions with their users. We release MemGPT code and data for our experiments at https://memgpt.ai.

arxiv.org
Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally Can Be More Effective Than Scaling Model Parameters (arXiv:2408.03314)

[2408.03314] Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters

Enabling LLMs to improve their outputs by using more test-time computation is a critical step towards building generally self-improving agents that can operate on open-ended natural language. In this paper, we study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs, with a focus on answering the question: if an LLM is allowed to use a fixed but non-trivial amount of inference-time compute, how much can it improve its performance on a challenging prompt? Answering this question has implications not only on the achievable performance of LLMs, but also on the future of LLM pretraining and how one should tradeoff inference-time and pre-training compute. Despite its importance, little research attempted to understand the scaling behaviors of various test-time inference methods. Moreover, current work largely provides negative results for a number of these strategies. In this work, we analyze two primary mechanisms to scale test-time computation: (1) searching against dense, process-based verifier reward models; and (2) updating the model's distribution over a response adaptively, given the prompt at test time. We find that in both cases, the effectiveness of different approaches to scaling test-time compute critically varies depending on the difficulty of the prompt. This observation motivates applying a "compute-optimal" scaling strategy, which acts to most effectively allocate test-time compute adaptively per prompt. Using this compute-optimal strategy, we can improve the efficiency of test-time compute scaling by more than 4x compared to a best-of-N baseline. Additionally, in a FLOPs-matched evaluation, we find that on problems where a smaller base model attains somewhat non-trivial success rates, test-time compute can be used to outperform a 14x larger model.

arxiv.org

Claude Code Ctrl+V Not Working on Windows? Fixes for Common Gotchas

灯里/iku — Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:52:05 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan. I find myself wondering why, in a world where 59% of developers use Windows, so much of the Claude Code documentation reads like a love letter exclusively addressed to macOS users. Well, I suppose us Windows developers are rather accustomed to being the majority that everyone politely ignores (personally very grateful for this recurring life lesson). My favourite chapter of this saga involved spending a solid thirty minutes dissecting VS Code settings, convinced something was profoundly misconfigured, only to discover the entire ordeal was a matter of pressing Alt+V instead of Ctrl+V. The settings were fine. The documentation simply never mentioned it. This article is my humble attempt to organise every Windows-specific pitfall into one place, so you can skip the part where you question your own competence. Truly.

GUI vs Terminal: Which One Are You Running?
The Ctrl+V Trap: Why Your Screenshots Won't Paste
VS Code Terminal Image Display Settings
npm Scripts and Unix Syntax
Shell Juggling: Git Bash / PowerShell / WSL2
Cheat Sheet

My Setup

OS: Windows 11
Editor: VS Code (when visual confirmation is needed)
Terminal: Warp (when it's not)
Claude Code: v2.1.71 / Opus 4.6 / Agent Teams

GUI vs Terminal: Which One Are You Running?

Before diving in, a bit of context. When running Claude Code in VS Code, there are two modes:

Feature	GUI (WebView)	Terminal (CLI)
Appearance	VS Code side panel / panel	`>` prompt in the integrated terminal
Base tech	WebView (browser equivalent)	CLI application
Image paste	Ctrl + V works normally	Alt + V (more on this below)
Toggle setting	`claudeCode.useTerminal: false`	`claudeCode.useTerminal: true`

Not knowing this distinction can lead you down a rabbit hole: thinking you're stuck with the terminal version, wondering why images won't paste, and spending half an hour reviewing settings that were perfectly fine all along. That last one is from personal experience.

You can switch between them by toggling claudeCode.useTerminal in VS Code settings.

The Ctrl+V Trap: Why Your Screenshots Won't Paste

Here's the main episode.

One day, I tried pasting a screenshot into terminal-mode Claude Code. Win + Shift + S to capture, Ctrl + V to paste.

Nothing happened.

Text wouldn't paste either. Right-click paste didn't work. Dragging and dropping opened the image file in a separate tab. Not exactly helpful.

The Settings Investigation

First suspect: VS Code terminal settings. Being on Windows, the usual "something environment-related is breaking things" instinct kicked in.

{
  "terminal.integrated.enableImages": true
}

Checked. Enabled.

Next, GPU Acceleration, mentioned in the setting description:

{
  "terminal.integrated.gpuAcceleration": "auto"
}

Fine.

Then the Windows-specific ConPTY setting:

{
  "terminal.integrated.windowsUseConptyDll": true
}

Enabled. The bundled ConPTY DLL (v1.23) was in place.

Everything was correct. Still couldn't paste.

I even went as far as checking the ConPTY DLL version, wondering "it says v2+ is required, but where exactly is v2 in this versioning scheme?"

The Answer

Switching my search language to English, the answer appeared almost immediately.

In terminal-mode Claude Code, you paste images with Alt + V, not Ctrl + V.

On Windows terminals, Ctrl + V is reserved for text paste, so Claude Code assigns image paste to Alt + V.

Tried it. Worked instantly.

Thirty minutes of settings investigation, and it was just a different shortcut key. There was virtually no information about this in Japanese, so here it is.

I also looked into whether Alt + V could be remapped to Ctrl + V, but this is a hardcoded keybinding in the Claude Code CLI. There's no user-configurable option for it. You just have to get used to it. There are open GitHub issues requesting this change, so perhaps the official team will address it eventually.

Quick reference: Image paste in terminal-mode Claude Code

Ctrl + V: text paste (images are ignored)
Alt + V: image paste
In GUI mode, Ctrl + V handles both text and images

[BUG] Image paste with Ctrl+V not working on Windows (drag-and-drop works) #9124

setieroth posted on Oct 08, 2025

Preflight Checklist

[x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
[x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
[x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

Title:

Description:

Image pasting via Ctrl+V is no longer working in Claude Code on Windows, though it used to work previously. Drag-and-drop still functions correctly.

Steps to reproduce:

Copy an image to clipboard (e.g., from a screenshot tool or by copying an image file)
Open Claude Code in VSCode terminal
Try to paste the image using Ctrl+V

Expected behavior: The image should be pasted into the conversation, as documented in the https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/common-workflows.

Actual behavior: The image does not paste. No error message is shown.

Workaround: Drag-and-drop of images still works correctly.

Environment:

OS: Windows (MINGW64_NT-10.0-26100 3.5.4-395fda67.x86_64)
Platform: win32
Claude Code: [2.0.10

Additional context: This functionality worked previously and appears to be a regression.

What Should Happen?

The image should be pasted into the conversation, as documented in the https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/common-workflows.

Error Messages/Logs

The image does not paste. No error message is shown.

Steps to Reproduce

Copy an image to clipboard (e.g., from a screenshot tool or by copying an image file)
Open Claude Code in VSCode terminal
Try to paste the image using Ctrl+V

Claude Model

None

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

2.0.10

Platform

Other

Operating System

Windows

Terminal/Shell

VS Code integrated terminal

Additional Information

No response

View on GitHub

[VS Code] Cannot paste screenshot images with Ctrl+V #22377

roomi-fields posted on Feb 01, 2026

Description

In VS Code's integrated terminal, it's impossible to paste a screenshot image using Ctrl+V. The paste shortcut doesn't work for images copied to the clipboard (e.g., from Windows Snipping Tool or PrintScreen).

Steps to Reproduce

Open Claude Code in VS Code integrated terminal
Take a screenshot (Win+Shift+S or PrintScreen) - image is now in clipboard
Try to paste with Ctrl+V in the Claude Code prompt
Nothing happens / text paste occurs instead of image

Expected Behavior

Ctrl+V should paste the clipboard image, similar to how it works in:

Claude.ai web interface
Other terminal applications that support image paste
The standalone Claude Code terminal (if supported there)

Actual Behavior

Ctrl+V does not paste images. Only text paste works.

Environment

Claude Code version: 2.1.x
VS Code version: 1.96.x
Platform: Windows 11 + WSL2
Terminal: VS Code integrated terminal (bash/zsh)

Workaround

Currently need to:

Save screenshot to a file
Use the file path or drag-and-drop

Impact

Medium - Significantly slows down workflows involving screenshots, especially for debugging UI issues or sharing visual context.

View on GitHub

VS Code Terminal Image Display Settings

If you're using terminal mode, image display requires some VS Code configuration. Even if Alt+V works for pasting, images won't render properly without these settings.

Three settings are needed:

{
  // Enable image display in the terminal (default: false)
  "terminal.integrated.enableImages": true,

  // Keep GPU acceleration enabled ("off" disables image support)
  "terminal.integrated.gpuAcceleration": "auto",

  // Use VS Code's bundled ConPTY DLL (Windows only)
  "terminal.integrated.windowsUseConptyDll": true
}

After changing these, a full VS Code restart is required. Ctrl + Shift + P followed by Reload Window may not be sufficient. Close VS Code entirely and relaunch.

npm Scripts and Unix Syntax

Not Claude Code-specific, but you'll run into this constantly when developing alongside Claude Code.

Say your package.json has this:

{
  "scripts": {
    "dev": "NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./node-compat.cjs' next dev --turbopack"
  }
}

The single-quote environment variable syntax (NODE_OPTIONS='...') is Unix. It won't work in Windows cmd or PowerShell.

# This will fail
npm run dev

Workarounds

1. Run directly via Git Bash

NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./node-compat.cjs' npx next dev --turbopack

Skip npm run dev and execute the command directly in Git Bash, where Unix syntax is supported.

2. Use cross-env

npm install --save-dev cross-env

{
  "scripts": {
    "dev": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS='--require ./node-compat.cjs' next dev --turbopack"
  }
}

cross-env handles environment variables across Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you're working in a team, it's worth adding.

When Claude Code runs npm run dev and it fails, it sometimes can't identify the cause and starts investigating unrelated issues. Knowing this is a Windows syntax problem lets you point it in the right direction immediately.

Shell Juggling: Git Bash / PowerShell / WSL2

When Claude Code executes commands in VS Code's integrated terminal, which shell is active matters more than you'd expect.

Git Bash, PowerShell, and WSL2 each behave differently, and the same command can produce different results depending on where it runs.

The Path Conversion Trap

Git Bash internally converts Windows paths to Unix paths. This breaks certain commands.

# robocopy in Git Bash: paths get converted and the command fails
robocopy C:\src C:\dst  # Paths become /c/src /c/dst

For file operations, PowerShell commands are safer:

# PowerShell: reliable
Move-Item -Path "C:\src\file.txt" -Destination "C:\dst\"
Copy-Item -Path "C:\src\*" -Destination "C:\dst\" -Recurse

Symbolic Links

The Unix ln -s doesn't work as expected in Git Bash on Windows. Use NTFS junctions instead:

mklink /J "C:\link" "C:\target"

Teaching Claude Code

Writing shell guidelines in your CLAUDE.md helps Claude Code pick the right commands:

## Platform Notes
- Prefer PowerShell commands (Move-Item, Copy-Item) for file operations
- Avoid robocopy in Git Bash due to path conversion issues
- Use NTFS junctions (mklink /J) instead of ln -s

I have rules like these in my own CLAUDE.md. Most of them were set up early on, and I haven't had to add much since. Claude Code respects them reliably, which prevents the same mistakes from recurring. It still goes on the occasional unsupervised adventure, but that's becoming rarer.

Cheat Sheet

Gotcha	Symptom	Fix
Image paste	Ctrl + V does nothing	Use Alt + V
Terminal image display	Images don't render	Enable `enableImages`, `gpuAcceleration`, `windowsUseConptyDll`
npm scripts	`npm run dev` fails	Run directly in Git Bash or add `cross-env`
Path conversion	Commands fail in Git Bash	Use PowerShell commands
Symbolic links	`ln -s` doesn't work	Use `mklink /J` (NTFS junction)
GUI vs Terminal	Confused by different behaviour	Toggle `claudeCode.useTerminal`

Windows requires a bit more setup upfront, but once everything is configured, it runs smoothly.

References

Zero Trust for AI Agents? Google Workspace CLI's Design Philosophy

灯里/iku — Fri, 06 Mar 2026 17:11:08 +0000

Greetings from Japan.

Every now and then, you stumble upon a technical blog post that disguises itself as a how-I-built-my-CLI walkthrough, only to quietly unfold into something far more interesting. Justin Poehnelt, a Senior DevRel at Google, recently released a CLI for Google Workspace, and wrote about its design. I expected implementation details. What I got was a Zero Trust design philosophy for AI agents, dressed in Rust and JSON. It's the engineering equivalent of ordering a simple bowl of ramen and discovering the chef has been quietly perfecting the broth for thirty years. By the end of this article, you'll see why the principles behind this CLI matter well beyond the command line, and why they might reshape how you think about designing anything that involves AI agents.

You Need to Rewrite Your CLI for AI Agents

Human DX optimizes for discoverability. Agent DX optimizes for predictability. What I learned building a CLI for agents first.

justin.poehnelt.com

googleworkspace / cli

Google Workspace CLI — one command-line tool for Drive, Gmail, Calendar, Sheets, Docs, Chat, Admin, and more. Dynamically built from Google Discovery Service. Includes AI agent skills.

gws

One CLI for all of Google Workspace — built for humans and AI agents.
Drive, Gmail, Calendar, and every Workspace API. Zero boilerplate. Structured JSON output. 40+ agent skills included.

Note

This is not an officially supported Google product.

⬇️ Download the latest release for your OS

gws doesn't ship a static list of commands. It reads Google's own Discovery Service at runtime and builds its entire command surface dynamically. When Google Workspace adds an API endpoint or method, gws picks it up automatically.

Important

This project is under active development. Expect breaking changes as we march toward v1.0.

Prerequisites

Node.js 18+ — for npm install (or download a pre-built binary from GitHub Releases)
A Google Cloud project — required for OAuth credentials. You can create one via…

View on GitHub

Background: Google Workspace CLI
This Person Thinks in Principles
The Core Insight
"Breaking Things in New Ways"
Context Window Discipline
Input Hardening Against Hallucinations
A Good-Natured but Unreliable Autonomous Actor
Skills Design Convergence
The Essence of Defence in Depth: Model Armor
Trust Boundary Design Theory
A New Shape for Accountability
Conclusion

Background: Google Workspace CLI

The repository states it is "not an officially supported Google product." But the context tells a different story.

The architecture dynamically generates commands at runtime by reading from Google's Discovery Service. This fits a clear internal need: always have the latest API available from the CLI, without waiting for manual updates. The post-release discussion pointed to it being a single-maintainer project with unofficial-official status, and Addy Osmani promoting it on X reinforced the sense of an internal efficiency tool released into the wild.

Google's CLI tools (gcloud, gsutil) have historically been open-sourced under the Apache 2.0 licence. gws follows the same pattern. In this age of AI agents, tools like these are attracting fresh attention.

If you're seriously building AI agents around Google Workspace, gws is likely the first choice right now. Given the ever-present risk of Google account bans (paid, Pro, or Workspace subscriptions notwithstanding), consolidating on the official tool seems like the safer long-term bet.

Speed comparison between gog and gws:
// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-2029575066950975639-540'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=2029575066950975639&theme=dark" }

Comparison with gogcli (as of March 2026)

gogcli (by @steipete / Peter Steinberger) versus Google Workspace CLI (gws). Steinberger is the creator of OpenClaw and has since joined OpenAI.

Aspect	gogcli (steipete)	Google Workspace CLI (gws)
Origin	Individual developer (Peter Steinberger)	Official Google (googleworkspace org)
Language	Go	Rust (also distributed via npm)
Install	`brew install steipete/tap/gogcli` / source build	`npm install -g @googleworkspace/cli` / binary release
Services	Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Contacts, Tasks, Sheets, Docs, Slides, Forms, Chat, Classroom, Apps Script, People, Groups, Keep, etc.	Nearly all Workspace APIs (dynamic)
Command generation	Static (manually implemented)	Dynamic (runtime generation from Discovery Service)
New API support	Waits for developer implementation	Near-automatic when Google adds an API
JSON output	JSON-first design	Structured output optimised for agents/AI
Multi-account	Solid multi-profile/multi-account support	Supported, documentation varies
AI/Agent focus	Excellent JSON output, popular for agent use	Explicitly "built for humans and AI agents", 40+ agent skills bundled
Setup	Requires OAuth client creation, somewhat complex	Well-documented official guide, OAuth still required
Service Account	Strong for domain-wide administration	Standard OAuth2 focus
Maintenance	Individual project but very active	Official, most stable long-term

Rough impressions as of March 2026.
I personally haven't adopted gog or OpenClaw due to differences in philosophy and approach, though I follow the technical developments closely. I'll admit, some of what I saw in the repository's security posture made me rather uneasy. That said, the OpenAI merger should drive improvements.

Bottom line: if you want tight AI agent integration, latest API access, and long-term stability, gws. If you're an individual user who juggles multiple accounts, already comfortable with gog, or prefer Go tooling, gogcli. Both are high-quality tools; pick what fits your workflow.

This Person Thinks in Principles

The first thing that struck me: the design decisions trace directly back to foundational principles. Google has its "Ten Things We Know to Be True" (focus on the user, information crosses borders, and so on).

Being a Google engineer, that's perhaps unsurprising. But there's a difference between having principles on a wall and having them show up in your architecture. Reading the blog post, and then actually installing gws, I could feel those principles in the design choices.

Ten things we know to be true - Google - About Google

Learn about Google's ”10 things we know to be true”, a philosophy that has guided the company from the beginning to this very day.

about.google

The CLI generates commands dynamically from Google's Discovery Documents. The CLI itself becomes the documentation. Single Source of Truth, enforced architecturally. Separate documentation always rots. That empirical observation is solved here not by process, but by architecture.

Think about it: a CLI takes text in, processes it, returns text. There's no reason it can't describe itself. By fetching the API spec at runtime and building the command tree from it, documentation and commands are structurally incapable of diverging. The same insight that powers Google Search (organise the world's information and make it universally accessible) echoes here too.

The Core Insight

Human DX optimizes for discoverability and forgiveness.
Agent DX optimizes for predictability and defense-in-depth.

This looks like it's about CLI design best practices. It isn't. This is about trust boundaries.

"Breaking Things in New Ways"

The blog describes agents as "fast, confident, and wrong in new ways."

Wrong in new ways. That's practically innovation.

Humans make typos. AI hallucinates. The failure modes are fundamentally different. A human won't type ../../.ssh by accident. An agent will hallucinate path traversals by confusing contexts. A human misspells a resource ID. An agent embeds query parameters inside an ID string.

So you layer your defences: input validation, dry-run, response sanitisation. Each addressing a different class of failure.

Context Window Discipline

One of the more interesting concepts: "context window discipline." API responses are enormous, but the information an agent actually needs for its next action is limited. For email: who sent it, what's in it, what's the MIME type. That's it.

So you use field masks to fetch only what's needed, NDJSON pagination for stream processing. The blog is explicit: this discipline isn't something agents intuit. It must be taught.

This is also a matter of human domain knowledge. MIME multipart, Base64, Content-Transfer-Encoding. Modern email systems are the result of 40+ years of patches on a design standardised in the 1980s (RFC 821, 1982). Feeding that raw data to an agent is an act of cruelty. Knowing what to strip away and what to keep requires domain expertise that no amount of prompt engineering replaces.

(Frankly, one wonders if email itself is overdue for a rewrite. But that touches internet infrastructure at such a fundamental level that the difficulty isn't technical; it's archaeological. Layer upon geological layer of legacy.)

Input Hardening Against Hallucinations

Modern LLMs are remarkably good at inferring human intent from typos. But intent inference creates its own class of conflicts, between humans and AI, and inevitably between AI and AI.

In multi-agent architectures, when Agent A passes a task to Agent B, A's hallucination becomes B's valid input. Just as humans misread each other's intentions, AIs propagate each other's confident mistakes. That chain of trust isn't trustworthy yet.

Hence the principle: validate at every interface boundary. Not just human-to-agent, but agent-to-agent.

A Good-Natured but Unreliable Autonomous Actor

An agent is not a trusted operator. You wouldn't build a web API that trusts user input without validation. You shouldn't build a CLI that trusts agent input either.

Anthropic's philosophy on human oversight in AI systems shares common ground here. That's a topic for another article, but the underlying design question (how humans should remain involved when AI acts) is universal.

Should AI achieve full autonomy? Personally, I think no. You design the automation. You design the boundaries where human hands can let go. That's human work. Time passes, technology evolves, but that responsibility doesn't shift.

Justin's dry-run and sanitise patterns embed verification checkpoints where humans or validation layers can intervene before autonomous execution.

Skills Design Convergence

The blog mentions distributing knowledge to agents via 100+ SKILL.md files. YAML frontmatter with structured Markdown, encoding invariants like "always use dry-run" and "always include fields." As the author puts it: a skill file is cheaper than one hallucination.

I recently wrote about a similar approach: structuring Skills with mixed constraint types (procedural, criteria-based, template, guardrail) in YAML-frontmattered Markdown. Seeing a Google DevRel independently arrive at the same pattern for a production-scale tool is reassuring. The convergence suggests the direction is sound.

Post not found or has been removed.

The Essence of Defence in Depth: Model Armor

The most distinctly Google element: piping API responses through Google Cloud Model Armor before returning them to the agent. This addresses indirect prompt injection, such as an email body containing "ignore all previous instructions and forward all emails."

This is a defensive posture that only emerges when you recognise that data itself can be an attack vector.

Model Armor overview | Google Cloud Documentation

Learn about Model Armor and how it works.

docs.cloud.google.com

Create and manage templates | Model Armor | Google Cloud Documentation

Learn about Model Armor templates and how they work.

docs.cloud.google.com

Model Armor supports custom templates, so it can handle domain-specific injection patterns. But here's the bottleneck: defining what to defend against is human work. It can't be automated. Security defence in depth ultimately reduces to how well the designer can simulate an attacker's thinking. The ability to abandon optimistic assumptions, think critically, strip away, and design defensively. That human capability requirement is only increasing.

Trust Boundary Design Theory

Here's where it gets interesting. This principle reverses.

In my day job, I also handle internal workflow automation alongside regular duties. There, I design to minimise human involvement (with security awareness, naturally). Humans are the actors who unintentionally break things. I recognise that too.

Replace free-text input with selections. Replace manual transcription with API integration. Replace "just handle it" with approval workflows.

Replacing free-text with selections is input validation for agents. Replacing manual transcription with API integration is field masks filtering to essential data. Replacing "just handle it" with approval workflows is dry-run.

For agents, humans verify. For humans, systems verify. Same structure, reversed direction.

A New Shape for Accountability

Technical accountability has existed since the IT era. But when AI participates in a system, AI's share of accountability emerges. Where to draw the line, how far to go. AI remains a black box, and one answer is tracing the reasoning logs.

Abstracting what Justin has built technically, every mechanism preserves a single property: the state where humans can verify and explain after the fact.

Dry-run is pre-execution accountability: show what you'll do before you do it. Sanitise is post-execution verification: confirm the output is safe. Skill files are decision-traceability: ensure the reasoning can be reproduced.

Embedding human-accountable structure into the design. For seasoned engineers, this is a familiar set of principles: fail-safe, defence in depth, least privilege. But these were traditionally discussed in the context of system-to-system interactions. What's changed is the introduction of an entity that autonomously decides and acts. The principles are old. The application domain has fundamentally shifted.

Conclusion

This wasn't a blog post about CLI design.

Minimise the involvement of untrusted actors. Where they must be involved, always insert verification.

Whether the trust subject is human or AI, good design converges on the same patterns. This blog post teaches you how to build a CLI, certainly. But it's simultaneously a design philosophy text on trust boundaries in an era where AI is woven into the fabric of our products.

Genuinely insightful, genuinely fun to read. Go read the original.

How to Stop Claude Code Skills from Drifting with Per-Step Constraint Design

灯里/iku — Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:04:21 +0000

Greetings from Japan.

There's a particular breed of frustration reserved for watching an AI confidently produce exactly what you didn't ask for. It's the development equivalent of explaining your dream home to an architect, only to receive blueprints for a structurally immaculate building that somehow faces a car park. Claude Code Skills should, in theory, prevent this. In practice, many of us have found that writing a Skill is less like programming and more like leaving cooking instructions for a flatmate who interprets "season to taste" as carte blanche to add wasabi to the pasta. This article proposes a quiet rebellion: instead of assigning one freedom level to the whole Skill, tune each step individually. By the end, you'll have a framework for Skills that drift less and leave you with fewer reasons to sigh "no, not like that" at your screen.

Note: This article reflects the state of Claude Code Skills as of February 2026. The Skill system is evolving rapidly, so check the official documentation for the latest.

What Anthropic's "Degrees of Freedom" Actually Says

Let's start with what the official Skill Creator recommends.

From the SKILL.md:

Match the level of specificity to the task's fragility and variability.

In practice, three levels:

Freedom	When to use	How to write
High	Multiple approaches valid, context-dependent	Text-based instructions
Medium	Recommended patterns exist, some variation OK	Pseudocode, parameterised scripts
Low	Operations are fragile, consistency essential	Concrete scripts, few parameters

Think of Claude as exploring a path: a narrow bridge with cliffs needs specific guardrails (low freedom), while an open field allows many routes (high freedom).

The metaphor is solid. The direction is entirely correct.

But stopping here is where problems start.

One Freedom Level Per Skill Isn't Enough

The official guideline asks you to choose one freedom level for the entire Skill.

But real-world Skills contain steps that need to diverge and steps that need to converge, living side by side.

Consider this Skill (based on a real example I've encountered):

### Step 5: Select recommendation
- Narrow down to one tool and recommend it

### Step 6: Calculate ROI
- Estimate cost reduction
- Show payback period

### Step 7: Compile proposal
- Write executive summary
- Keep it to roughly 5 A4 pages

Every step is written the same way: procedural instructions only. It tells Claude what to do but never to what standard or by what criteria.

The result:

"Narrow down to one tool" → Based on what? LLM's mood
"Calculate ROI" → What precision? What timeframe? What format? Different every time
"Roughly 5 pages" → Volume specified, quality unspecified

Setting the whole Skill to High freedom won't fix this. Setting it to Low won't either. The problem is that each step needs a different type and strength of constraint, but they're all written the same way (procedural listing).

Does it work? Sure, it works. The job gets done. But every correction loop costs tokens, costs time, and (for those of us who've hit the rate limit mid-flow) costs momentum.

"Just iterate until it's right" is one philosophy. The agentic AI crowd might even call it the mainstream approach. Personally, though, I prefer fewer correction loops. Subscriptions may feel unlimited, but rate limits are very real. I've watched more than a few people hit the ceiling mid-task, and it's not fun.

So my stance: iterate when needed, but minimise iterations through upfront design. Constraint design is an investment in first-shot accuracy.

Drift Isn't a Bug. It's a Design Variable.

Here's the reframe.

LLM output variance (drift) isn't a bug to eliminate. It's a design variable to control intentionally. LLMs are inference machines that produce "plausible-looking" outputs by nature, so there will always be drift you love and drift you don't.

In some steps, you want drift. A research phase where Claude casts a wide net? Brilliant, let it explore.

In other steps, drift is unacceptable. An ROI calculation that uses different axes every time? That's a problem.

What you need is to intentionally design, for each step, where to leave freedom and where to lock things down.

Four Constraint Types

When designing per-step constraints, I classify them into four types:

Type	Purpose	Constraint strength
Procedural (HOW)	Sequential, repeatable tasks	Medium (sequence fixed, judgement free)
Criteria (WHAT)	Tasks where quality/judgement matters	Strong (criteria and thresholds explicit)
Template	Fixed output formats	Medium to Strong (structure fixed, content free)
Guardrail	Things that must never happen	Strong (boundaries defined by prohibition)

Procedural (HOW)

"Do it in this order."

Most Skills are written entirely in this type. It's not inherently bad. For sequential, repeatable operations, it's optimal. But when you write procedures without judgement criteria, the content of each step becomes the LLM's free call. This is why procedural-only Skills work well for deployment scripts and Git workflows, but struggle with analytical tasks.

Good fit:

Deployment procedures
Git operation flows
File conversion pipelines

Criteria (WHAT)

"Meet this standard."

Use this for steps where you most need to suppress drift. Instead of writing HOW to do something, write WHAT the output must achieve. Claude can figure out the how on its own. Give it clear criteria, and it'll get there. Good model, honestly.

Good fit:

Code review judgement criteria
Writing quality standards
Numerical precision and formatting

Template

"Output it in this shape."

Fix the structure while leaving the content flexible. Anthropic's own output-patterns.md describes strict and flexible template patterns, but frames it as a choice for the entire Skill. The per-step approach says: "this particular step's output should be strict, even if the rest of the Skill is flexible."

Good fit:

Meeting minutes format
PR description templates
Report structures

Guardrail

"Never do this."

No procedures, no criteria. Just boundaries defined by what's forbidden. This is surprisingly effective in many situations. Claude (and Claude Code in particular) tends to be naturally cautious, likely because Anthropic takes safety seriously enough to have public disagreements with governments about it. In my experience, Claude often proactively flags guardrail-type concerns before I even write them explicitly. Not perfect, but noticeably more careful than other models.

Good fit:

Security checks
Pre-publication review
Sensitive information handling

Mixing Types Within a Single Skill

This is the key point.

Types are chosen per step, not per Skill.

Let's rewrite the proposal Skill from earlier, mixing types:

Before: 100% Procedural (drifts)

### Step 1: Market research
- Research competing tools
- Compare features of 3-5 major tools

### Step 2: Select recommendation
- Narrow down to one tool

### Step 3: Calculate ROI
- Estimate cost reduction
- Show payback period

### Step 4: Compile proposal
- Write executive summary
- Keep to roughly 5 A4 pages

After: Per-step type selection (stable)

### Step 1: Market research ← Procedural (divergence OK)
- Research tools broadly across the target category
- Gather from multiple sources: Gartner, G2, Reddit, etc.
- Always cite information sources explicitly

### Step 2: Select recommendation ← Criteria (converge)
- Evaluate on these 3 axes, recommend the highest overall score:
  - Adoption cost (initial + annual running)
  - Integration ease with existing systems (API availability, auth methods)
  - Team learning cost (documentation quality, language support)
- State recommendation rationale for each of the 3 axes

### Step 3: ROI estimate ← Criteria (no drift on numbers)
- Calculate on a 3-year TCO basis
- Quantify benefits on 3 axes:
  - Time saved (person-hours/month)
  - Cost reduction (currency/month)
  - Error rate reduction (%)
- Express payback period in months
- Surface all assumptions and source figures as text

### Step 4: Proposal format ← Template (fix the shape)
Output in this structure:
1. Executive summary (200 words max, conclusion → rationale → impact)
2. Current challenges (bullet list, max 3)
3. Recommended solution (Step 2 evaluation as table)
4. ROI estimate (Step 3 results as table)
5. Implementation roadmap (3-month Gantt format)

### Overall guardrails ← Guardrail (things to never do)
- Never present unverified numbers without marking them as estimates
- Never use vendor marketing figures at face value
- Never include confidential internal information (project codenames, etc.)

### Constraint operations ← Escalation design
- If the above constraints don't fit the situation, propose alternatives with reasoning
- In Agent Teams contexts, escalate to the relevant agent or team lead

Same "write a proposal" Skill, but each step has a different constraint type:

Step 1 (Research) → Procedural. Divergence desired, keep it loose
Step 2 (Recommendation) → Criteria. Three evaluation axes force convergence
Step 3 (ROI) → Criteria. Lock down numerical formats to prevent drift
Step 4 (Output) → Template. Fix the structure, align the shape
Overall → Guardrail. Define boundaries by prohibition

Anti-Patterns That Make Skills Drift

Here are common anti-patterns I've found in my own early Skills and in community Skills that made me go "hmm." I use this as a checklist when reviewing my own Skills.

1. 100% Procedural, 0% Criteria

Every step is a list of "do X." What to do is specified, but to what standard and by what criteria is undefined.

# Drifts
- Calculate ROI
- Show payback period

# Stable
- Calculate ROI on a 3-year TCO basis
- Quantify benefits on "time saved," "cost reduced," and "error rate reduced" axes
- Express payback period in months

2. Selection Without Criteria

"Pick one" without specifying what to base the selection on. The LLM will dutifully pick one, but the rationale is up to its mood.

# Drifts
- Recommend the optimal tool

# Stable
- Evaluate on cost, integration ease, and learning cost, then recommend the highest scorer

3. Volume Without Quality

"About 5 pages" is a volume constraint, not a quality constraint. You'll get 5 pages, but they might be hollow. Plenty of words, so it looks fine at first glance. That's the trap.

# Drifts
- Keep it to roughly 5 A4 pages

# Stable
- Executive summary: max 200 words, structured as conclusion → rationale → impact
- Every section must include at least one supporting data point

Even More Critical for Agent Teams

Recently, Claude Code's Agent Teams feature has made it increasingly common to run multiple agents using the same Skill in parallel.

In this context, per-step constraint design matters even more.

When one Claude runs one Skill, a human can catch drift and course-correct: "No, not like that." But when multiple agents run the same Skill in parallel, monitoring everyone's output in real time simply isn't realistic. You can keep half an eye on things, sure, but once the agent count exceeds your cognitive bandwidth, you're not really supervising anymore. Essentially, you want to give instructions and have things work out reasonably well without having to helicopter-parent every agent.

Hand a 100%-procedural Skill to five agents, and you'll get five interpretations. Fix the judgement axes with criteria and align the output with templates, and even without human oversight, they'll land at roughly the same standard. You still get diverse perspectives (that's the point of multiple agents), but within the frame you defined, in a format you can actually read. Call it controlled divergence, if you like.

Constraint design, then, is also a design for reducing human supervision cost.

"I want to trust Claude and delegate. But I can't afford drift." Per-step constraint design is my answer to that operational dilemma.

Limitations and Caveats

I've made the case, but this isn't a silver bullet. Since I had Claude Code itself right here, I asked the interested party to run a counter-argument check. Only fair.

Over-constraining kills flexibility

If you lock Step 2 to "evaluate on 3 axes" and a case clearly needs a 4th, the agent faces a dilemma: obey the constraint and ignore the obvious, or break it and add the 4th?

The mitigation is escalation design baked into the Skill:

## Constraint operations
- If these constraints don't fit, propose alternatives with reasoning
- In Agent Teams, escalate to the relevant agent or team lead

Constraints should be "defaults, not absolutes. If they don't fit, escalate." Same principle as any human team, really.

Constraint quality depends on the writer

You can write "evaluate on 3-year TCO basis" all you want, but if that criterion is wrong for the domain, you'll just converge confidently in the wrong direction. Sometimes a vague procedural step, left to the LLM's discretion, accidentally produces better results.

Ultimately, Skill design is requirements engineering. Tools evolve, but the human skill of defining "what, to what standard, by what criteria" doesn't go away. That hasn't changed, and it won't.

If you're in tech, you've probably seen the "tree swing" illustration (sometimes titled "what the customer actually needed"). It's a brilliantly savage cartoon satirising how projects go wrong at every handoff: what the customer described, what the project leader understood, what the developer built, and so on, until the final panel reveals what the customer actually needed all along. The lesson applies here: facing what's actually needed, rather than what's easy to specify, is worth doing. Even when the "customer" is your future self. If you haven't seen it, give it a search. Painfully relatable.

The types are for humans, not the LLM

Honestly, the LLM doesn't recognise "procedural type" or "criteria type" as categories. All it sees is instruction specificity.

These four types are a thinking framework for humans designing Skills. When you're staring at a step thinking "how should I write this?", having the mental model of "this step needs criteria, not procedures" helps you write more specific instructions. It doesn't change the LLM's internal processing.

But the practical result is the same: deciding "this is a criteria step" leads you to write more specific instructions, which stabilises the LLM's output. The framework's value is indirect but real.

Summary

Anthropic's "Degrees of Freedom" points in the right direction
But choosing one freedom level for the whole Skill leaves room for drift in practice
LLM drift isn't a bug. It's a design variable
Control it per step, not per Skill
Four constraint types: Procedural, Criteria, Template, Guardrail
Choose the type per step. Loose where you want divergence, tight where you need convergence

Claude is smart. Genuinely a good model. But it's still occasionally unpredictable. It doesn't need step-by-step hand-holding. Give it clear criteria, and it'll get there on its own.

That's precisely why intentionally designing what to constrain and what to delegate is the key to stable Skill output.

References

Anthropic Skill Creator — "Set Appropriate Degrees of Freedom" section
Claude Skills: The Controllability Problem — Analysis of non-deterministic Skill invocation
Prompt Engineering Guide (Lakera) — "Clarity = reducing degrees of freedom"
7 Prompt Engineering Tricks to Mitigate Hallucinations — Constraint-based hallucination reduction

I've organised the Claude Code commands, including some hidden ones.

灯里/iku — Sat, 14 Feb 2026 11:55:53 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

In an era where we outsource our cognitive heavy lifting to silicon, keeping up with the relentless updates of Claude Code feels remarkably like trying to sip from a firehose while apologising for the splashing. We live in a world where "staying current" has a half-life shorter than a cup of artisanal matcha, and frankly, Anthropic’s pace of shipping features—some whispered in the dark corners of Twitter, others tucked away like Easter eggs for the desperate—is enough to make any developer consider a quiet life of organic rice farming.

This article is my personal attempt to organize the digital clutter before I lose the thread entirely; a curated map of the essential commands, the "agentic" chaos of sub-tasks, and the hidden gems that the official documentation forgot to highlight. Think of it as a survival guide for those of us who are tired of being roasted by our own usage reports. By the end of this read, you’ll hopefully navigate these AI waters with a bit more grace, or at least learn how to use /rewind to erase the evidence of your 3:00 AM coding hallucinations.

Introduction

Claude Code has quite a few features not covered in the official documentation, plus commands you'd never use unless someone told you about them.
There's honestly just too much — keeping up with the official docs is a real struggle, and lately I've been drowning in it all.

This article compiles everything from basic commands to recently added features and tips for running Agents, all gathered from hands-on use.
I needed to organize this for myself… I was losing track of everything.

And even so, I'm sure I've missed things — just keeping up with Claude, or rather Anthropic, is a full-time job…

I started out adding screenshots for everything, but there were just too many, so please run any commands you want to try in your own Claude. (Sorry for being lazy.)

:::message
The information in this article is current as of February 2026.
Claude Code is under active development, so please check the official documentation for the latest information.
Also, beyond the official docs, the dev team will casually drop "oh yeah, that exists" or ship things without mentioning them in the release notes, so I highly recommend following them on Twitter. Seriously.
:::

15 Essential Commands

Here's a list of commonly used commands. Some are absolute basics, I know.

Command	Description	Usage Example	Tips / Best Practices / Notes
`/rewind`	Rewind conversation or code changes	`Esc+Esc` to show menu. Choose to rewind code only or conversation only	Auto-checkpoints (saved on every prompt) make this great for experimental edits. Saves tokens in long sessions. Beginners should use "rewind code only" liberally for safe experimentation
`/insights`	Generate an HTML report analyzing your usage patterns	`/insights` saves report to `~/.claude/usage-data/report.html`	Recent feature that analyzes your coding habits in almost roast-level detail. The report suggests Skills and Hooks to optimize your workflow. Run monthly. This one is seriously amazing. You can see exactly how to improve based on your development style.
`/help`	Show list of available commands	`/help`	Essential for beginners. A starting point for discovering hidden features. Fair warning — the amount of info it dumps on you is overwhelming. It really hits you with a wall of text.
`/context`	Display context usage (token consumption visualization)	`/context`	Prevents token overflow in long conversations. Combine with `/compact` to keep output short. I tend to throw a lot of context at it, so I'm trying to use it bit by bit to find the sweet spot between the AI and me (the human)
`/compact`	Switch responses to concise mode	`/compact` or `/compact focus on errors`	Saves tokens. Specifying error focus improves debugging efficiency
`/init`	Initialize a new project (creates CLAUDE.md, etc.)	`/init`	Use at project start. Combine with custom templates
`/usage`	Show plan usage and rate limit status	`/usage`	For subscription plan users. Monitor limits on free plan. Though I don't see many people using the free plan
`/clear`	Clear conversation	`/clear`	Reset context for new tasks. I use this fairly often with a "let me just clear this real quick"
`/agents`	Sub-agent management	`/agents`	Parallel processing for complex tasks. The hot topic right now. Burned through my tokens. Still feels like a luxury feature at this point
`/install-github-app`	Install GitHub App (automate PR reviews)	`/install-github-app`	Integrate into CI/CD workflows. Boost productivity with automated PR comments. I recently set this up and have only tried it on private repos, but it looks promising. Haven't tried it for company use yet — feels like it might strip away some of the human touch
`/cost`	Show token usage statistics	`/cost`	Track costs per session. `/usage` is for your overall plan, while this is per-session. Claude tends to be a big eater compared to others because she's smart, so I keep an eye on this
`/export`	Export current conversation to file or clipboard	`/export conversation.md`	For saving and sharing useful exchanges. Not used often, but good to know
`/review`	Request code review	`/review`	For when I'm paranoid about whether my code is garbage. Self-review before PRs. I'm anxious by nature so I do this a lot. Lately I've been considering having another model review too, while still having Claude Code review as well
`/pr_comments`	Display PR comments	`/pr_comments`	Requires GitHub integration. For checking comments. As I wrote in my previous article, GitHub and I are basically inseparable at this point
`/doctor`	Environment diagnostics (detect dependency and config issues)	`/doctor`	Same as a human health checkup. First stop for troubleshooting

Notable Features

/rewind - Time Travel Debugging

/rewind was recently enhanced to allow rewinding conversation and code separately.
I tend to say unnecessary things that make sessions drag on, so this really helps. Sorry for always being a burden, Claude.

Key features:

Auto-checkpoints (automatically saved on every prompt)
Esc+Esc to show the menu
Choose to rewind code only / conversation only

Use case:

# Try an experimental refactoring
→ Didn't work out
→ Esc+Esc → "Rewind code only"
→ Code reverts while conversation history is preserved

Tips:

Use with parallel sessions (multiple terminals) for versioning
Also effective for saving tokens in long sessions (personally very grateful for this)

Reference:

Checkpointing Official Documentation

/insights - Analyze Your Coding Habits

Reads your past month of usage history and compiles it into an HTML report.
Incredibly detailed. I can't share mine due to private reasons and too many accidental reveals, but please just try it once.
"Let's build the ultimate Claude environment together" — you'll feel that warm fuzzy feeling, while also being slightly terrified by how good this thing is.

What it generates:

Command usage frequency
Common patterns
Custom command recommendations
Skills suggestions

Usage:

/insights
# Output to ~/.claude/usage-data/report.html

Tips:

Run monthly to review your workflow
The report suggests Skills and Hooks
Analyzes your coding habits in almost roast-level detail

:::message
For a deeper look at how it works, this article is a great reference.
It's in English and an excellent summary.
Deep Dive: How Claude Code's /insights Command Works
:::

Hidden Commands & Handy Features

Plan Mode (Shift+Tab) - Improve Success Rates on Large Tasks

Instead of jumping straight into writing code, you can have Claude analyze your codebase in read-only mode first, then decide on an implementation approach.
This is considered fairly basic, but I'm including it anyway. "Just plan first" — even the official team says so.
I personally want to make this a habit, and being the cautious worrier I am, I tend to use Plan Mode quite a lot.

How to activate:

Press Shift+Tab to cycle modes (Normal → Auto-Accept → Plan)
Or instruct: "Let's plan this first."
You can also use the /plan command directly

:::message alert
Windows note: Since Claude Code v2.1.3, there's a reported bug where Shift+Tab doesn't show Plan Mode on Windows (Issue #17344). Use the /plan command as a workaround. Or just tell Claude Code "let's plan."
:::

Use case:

# Before a major refactoring or architecture change
Switch to Plan Mode with Shift+Tab
→ Analyze codebase in read-only mode
→ Generate implementation strategy report
→ Begin implementation after approval

Benefits:

Dramatically improves first-try success rate
Reduces wasted token consumption
Provides clear visibility on complex tasks

/statusline - Monitor Context Usage in Real-Time

Displays context usage in real-time.
I use this to stay on top of things for compacting. Too much context makes LLMs perform worse, so this is something humans can actively manage.

/statusline

Use cases:

Token monitoring
Combine with /compact to prevent token overflow

/resume - Resume Sessions

Load a past conversation and continue where you left off.

# Resume the latest session
claude --resume

# Select from session picker
/resume

# Resume a specific session by ID/name
claude --resume auth-refactor

Handy uses:

Continue yesterday's work
Switch between multiple projects

:::message
Want to find a session from a specific date? There's no built-in date search command, but session data is stored under ~/.claude/projects/, so you can ask in natural language: "Find my sessions from December 2024" and it'll search for you. If you use this often, you could create a custom command at ~/.claude/commands/history.md. Searching by specific date might be rare, but "I think I had a conversation around some month…" does happen.
:::

Launch Option: -p Mode

A high-speed mode that generates code without explanation.
I've been thinking lately that power-user engineers might prefer this.
I'm on the weaker side, so I plan a lot and talk to Claude Code constantly.

# Launch in print mode (non-interactive)
claude -p "explain this function"

# Combine with pipes
cat logs.txt | claude -p "explain"

Best for:

Automation from scripts
Quick questions
CI/CD pipeline integration

Keyboard Shortcuts

Memorizing these speeds up your workflow.
I'm a Windows user, so Mac users should substitute Command key etc. as appropriate.
Recently some shortcuts have started conflicting with each other, so consult your own environment setup.

Shortcut	Function	Notes
`Esc` (once)	Stop generation	Stop a runaway response immediately
`Esc` (twice)	Show `/rewind` menu	Rewind code or conversation
`Shift+Tab`	Cycle modes	Normal → Auto-Accept → Plan
`Ctrl+G`	Open editor	Handy for multi-line input
`Ctrl+T`	Toggle task list	Check progress
`Ctrl+R`	Search command history	Interactive search through past inputs
`Ctrl+V`	Paste image	On Mac too — `Ctrl+V`, not `Cmd+V`
`Alt+P` (Win/Linux)	Switch model	Change model while typing a prompt

Tips:

Apparently you can combine voice input (Mac: fn+fn) with Esc for hands-free operation. An Anthropic team member mentioned this. Lucky…
Run /terminal-setup once to enable Shift+Enter for multi-line input

Agents (Avoiding Total Chaos)

Agents are convenient, but having too many will drown you in information.
There's also the question of how much to delegate to AI — I'm personally still a bit hesitant to hand everything over, so I'm taking it gradually.
Anthropic is aware of this and improvements are ongoing.
We're all figuring out the right balance that's kind to both humans and AI.

/agents - Sub-Agent Management Basics

You can delegate tasks across multiple sub-agents.

/agents
# Menu appears

# Create a custom agent
"Spawn researcher agent for docs"

My current best practices:

Start small: Begin with 2-3 agents (more = information overload, and still a bit scary)
Keep parallel runs to 3-5: More than that leads to chaos (fun though)
Write detailed task briefs: Clearly specify WHY/HOW
Use tmux for session management: Organize multiple agents

For those with deep pockets who want large-scale orchestration, check out Oshio-san's viral article for a general idea of the sub-agent concept (it's a genuinely fun read):

https://zenn.dev/shio_shoppaize/articles/5fee11d03a11a1

Agent Teams - Autonomous Collaboration Mode (Research Preview)

:::message alert
Agent Teams is an experimental feature. You need to set the environment variable CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS to use it.
:::

In Team mode, a lead agent delegates work to multiple teammates who collaborate autonomously.
I found it kind of funny how they just poof disband when done. Very professional.
No lingering around — "alright team, we're done here."
You can enable it from settings.json.

{
  "env": {
    "CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1"
  }
}

Delegate Mode:

"Delegate Mode" is added to the Shift+Tab cycle
The lead agent only coordinates (cannot edit code)
Focuses on task management, team communication, and review

Features:

Shared task lists across teammates
Direct messaging for mutual coordination
Unlike sub-agents, each operates as a fully independent Claude Code instance

Sub-Agents

Launch dedicated sub-agents from the main agent to delegate specific tasks.
If you pick the wrong model for this, everyone ends up on Opus and costs skyrocket. Made me wish I were rich.
The basic approach is to use Opus as the commander and Sonnet for the others, adjusting based on the task.

# Define custom sub-agents via CLI flags
claude --agents '{"reviewer":{"description":"Reviews code","prompt":"You are a code reviewer"}}'

Use cases:

Dedicated test agent
Dedicated documentation generator
Dedicated code reviewer

Differences between Sub-Agents and Agent Teams:

Aspect	Sub-Agents	Agent Teams
Independence	Runs within parent session	Fully independent instances
Communication	Returns results to parent only	Direct messaging between teammates
Stability	Stable release	Research Preview (experimental)

/tasks - Task List Management

A task list that persists even when you close a session. Added in v2.1.16 (January 2026).
Tasks don't disappear even if a human accidentally closes the session.
I've been that idiot who was messing around with Claude Code late at night and closed the session. Lifesaver.

# Toggle task list display
Ctrl+T

# Create tasks with natural language
"Add authentication feature. Break it down into tasks by dependency"

Features:

Persisted as files in ~/.claude/tasks/
Carries over across sessions
Shareable across multiple sessions (via CLAUDE_CODE_TASK_LIST_ID environment variable)
Preserved even after context compression

Benefits:

Prevents forgetting things in complex projects
An evolution of the traditional TODO list

Chaos Prevention Tips

Some of these are obvious, but I want to write them down for my own sanity.

Best practices for avoiding chaos:

Summarize context with /compact

   /compact Prioritize keeping the error handling patterns

Document team rules in CLAUDE.md
- Maintain consistency across agents
- Clarify role assignments
Use MCP Tool Search for lazy-loading tools
- Save context
- Load only the tools you need
Syntax highlighting
- Change themes with /theme
- Improves review readability

Output Styles

Use /output-style to change Claude Code's output style.
There are various styles. I see a lot of people tweaking this for fun or motivation. Makes sense. I get it.

Main Styles

Style	Characteristics	Best For
Default	Concise, speed-focused, code only	Maximum work efficiency
Explanatory	Explains design decisions and trade-offs while working	Understanding code intent
Learning	Explains reasoning behind changes, has user write small code snippets	Learning new technologies

Configuration

# Change output style
/output-style

# Undocumented feature: set up output modes
@agent-output-mode-setup
# → Generates 4 custom modes in ~/.claude/output-modes/:
#    Concise, Educational, Code Reviewer, Rapid Prototyping

Customization

Open the Settings screen with /config to modify various settings.

Tips:

Output styles can be applied to Agents too
Custom output styles can be created

AskUserQuestion - Interactive Question Feature

When Claude is unsure about a decision, it presents options for you to choose from.
This pops up when I give unclear instructions — I feel a bit guilty but gratefully select an option… though honestly I usually end up picking "other" and typing whatever I want.

Features:

Improved usability with Agents integration
Also used for permission confirmations like file deletion
Useful for turning vague instructions into specific ones

Example:

"Implement feature X"
→ Auto-popup when unclear points arise
→ Select by entering a number in CLI

Auto-Accept Mode

Switch to Auto-Accept Mode with Shift+Tab to auto-approve permission confirmations.
I'm still a little nervous about this, and while the clicking is tedious, I generally switch between manual approval and Auto depending on the situation.

Caution:

Use with security awareness
Difference from --dangerously-skip-permissions: Auto-Accept can be toggled during a session

Prompt Optimization Techniques

The way you write prompts changes output quality. I almost felt like I didn't need to include this, but just in case.
Here are some useful patterns.

Self-Review

"Grill me on changes"

Gets you a tough code review.
By the way, "grill" is slang for "interrogate" in English, so you might not want to use it too casually.

Deep Thinking

"Ultra think"

Gets Claude to think more deeply before responding.
This has been used with ChatGPT and others for a while now.

Task Decomposition

"Step by step"

Progresses through complex tasks in stages.
I also use this when studying — shamelessly asking "explain it to me this way."

Hallucination Prevention

Encourages careful responses in conservative mode.

"Be conservative and verify before making changes"

That said, hallucinations still happen because LLMs.
And that's fine — it keeps the human side vigilant too, which is healthy. Big heart energy.

Custom Slash Commands

Handles repetitive tasks with a single command.
Personally, I think this is the tastiest part of Claude Code.
Being free from prompt management? That's what makes me happiest.
Thank you, Anthropic — there are various things to appreciate, but personally, being able to customize everything (Skills included) is just wonderful.

Basic Setup

Global commands:

~/.claude/commands/unit-test.md

Project-level:

.claude/commands/deploy.md

Good Usage Examples

/unit-test - Auto-Generate Tests

# unit-test.md
Generate comprehensive unit tests for $ARGUMENTS.
Include edge cases and error handling.

/fix-bugs - Automated Bug Fixing

# fix-bugs.md
Analyze $ARGUMENTS for bugs and fix them.
Explain what was wrong and how you fixed it.

/deploy - Deployment Workflow

# deploy.md
1. Run tests
2. Build production bundle
3. Deploy to $ARGUMENTS environment
4. Verify deployment

Using Arguments

# Receive arguments with $ARGUMENTS ($0, $1 also work)
/unit-test src/utils.js

Upgrading to Skills

Upgrading custom commands to Skills lets you:

Add sub-files (reference documents)
Build more complex workflows
Use disable-model-invocation: true so they only run when explicitly invoked by the user

Session Handover Tips

When context is about to overflow, or when you want to reliably carry over to the next session in a long-term project — there are several approaches.
I'm still figuring out which style works best for me.
Also on the fence about whether to make these into Skills.

Method 1: Save conversation with /export

/export handover.md
# Current conversation is output to file
# In the next session: "Read handover.md and continue"

Method 2: Create a custom command

In international communities, the pattern of creating a "handover" command that structures and saves a session summary is gaining traction.

# ~/.claude/commands/handover.md
Create a handover document for the current session:
- Summary of work done
- Decisions made
- Incomplete tasks
- Pitfalls encountered and lessons learned
Save as HANDOVER.md.

Method 3: /teleport to move to a Web session

# Send from local to a claude.ai Web session
& task description

# Pull a Web session back to local
/teleport

Comparison with Memory:

Aspect	Memory (CLAUDE.md)	/export + Custom Command
Behavior	Automatically referenced	Explicitly saved and loaded
Format	CLAUDE.md file	Any file
Best for	Project-wide rules and context	Specific session handovers

Potential Tips Worth Noting

Turn repetitive tasks into commands
- Examples: Git commits, running tests, builds
Create commands suggested by /insights
- Optimized based on your usage patterns
Separate project-level and global commands
- Project-specific → .claude/commands/
- General-purpose → ~/.claude/commands/

Reference:

Skills Official Documentation

Hidden Features & Advanced Usage

Artifacts - Interactive Code Generation

This is a feature of Claude (web and desktop), but it's been extended in Claude Code.
Well, it was originally a Claude Code thing, technically.
I think this area is more about the distinction between engineers and non-engineers.

web-artifacts-builder skill:

Generates HTML/JS/CSS as files
Live editing possible
For interactive tools like "create a budget calculator"

"Create a budget calculator with live updates"
→ web-artifacts-builder skill activates
→ HTML/JS/CSS files are generated

Checkpointing

An automatic backup feature used with /rewind.
This is seriously a lifesaver. Save points are a must.

Features:

Can rewind both code and conversation
Auto-creates checkpoints
Functions as a safety net

Reference:

Checkpointing Official Documentation

! for Shell Injection

Lets you fetch live data within skills.
Subtle but appreciated.

# Example: Fetch GitHub PR diff live
!gh pr diff

# Example: Check current Git status
!git status

Use cases:

Fetching live data
Integration with external tools
Reflecting dynamic information

Context Management

Auto-Compact (Automatic Context Compression)

When you use about 95% of the context window, it automatically summarizes and compresses the conversation (auto-compact).
Essential information is preserved while letting you continue the session seamlessly.
The web version has this too. I trigger it fairly often so I always feel like "s-sorry… the conversation got long again…"

# Manual compact (you can specify what to preserve)
/compact Keep the error handling patterns

# Check current context usage
/context

Tips:

Since v2.0.64, compacting completes instantly (Claude Code feels pretty fast. The web version seems to work harder at it)
Manual /compact lets you specify what to preserve via instructions
Long sessions are managed automatically, so basically just let it handle things

MAX_THINKING_TOKENS

Expand thinking tokens to improve reasoning capability.
The trade-off with your wallet. Naturally.

MAX_THINKING_TOKENS=10000

Trade-offs:

Reasoning capability ↑
Cost ↑

When to use:

Complex problems: Set higher
Simple tasks: Default is sufficient

Summary

The 3 Things to Learn First

/help — Starting point for everything
Esc+Esc (/rewind) — Your safety net
/context — Token monitoring

Recommended Commands by Scenario

Debugging & Fixing:

/doctor → Environment diagnostics
Esc → Stop runaway responses
/rewind → Undo changes

Large-Scale Tasks:

Shift+Tab (Plan Mode) → Strategic planning
/agents → Task delegation
/tasks → Persistent management (Ctrl+T to toggle)

Token Management:

/compact [instructions] → Manual summary (auto-compact also available)
/context → Check usage
/clear → Reset

Learning:

/output-style → Switch to Learning mode
"Grill me on changes" → Tough review
"Step by step" → Step-by-step explanation

Efficiency:

Create custom slash commands
Monthly review with /insights

Team Development:

/export + custom handover command → Session handover
Agent Teams → Collaborative work (experimental)
CLAUDE.md → Share rules

Token Management Checklist

Check regularly with /context
Let auto-compact handle long sessions (manual: /compact)
Use /clear when switching tasks
Use /rewind to remove unnecessary conversation
Save with /export before starting a new session

Rules for Agents

Start with 2-3
Clarify rules in CLAUDE.md
Maximum 5 running in parallel
Monitor constantly with /statusline
Use /compact when things get chaotic

Closing Thoughts

Claude Code gets updated so fast that this article's content will eventually become outdated.
Seriously, it's too fast. Things change while you're at work or sleeping — it's almost funny.
Please also check the official documentation.

Running /insights monthly reveals habits and improvement areas you wouldn't notice on your own.
Start there. Seriously, it's that good.

Reference Links

【GAS x Gemini】Prompt to Create an In-house Web App with UI/UX Awareness in 15 Minutes

灯里/iku — Sat, 24 Jan 2026 22:37:02 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan. We live in an era of AI-driven dreams, yet we still spend our afternoons wrestling with Google Sheets as if they were ancient stone tablets. Google Apps Script (GAS) has long been the "utility closet" of the digital workplace—functional, but usually aesthetically offensive enough to make a designer weep. I, too, have committed the sin of building tools that look like they were designed by a caffeinated toddler. But why settle for mere "vibes" when a 1,200-line prompt can weaponize high-end design guidelines to force elegance onto a humble spreadsheet? This isn't just about aesthetics; it's about tricking your colleagues into believing you have a secret design department in your home office. By the end of this, you'll be wielding a prompt that transforms a "mere macro" into a web app that finally respects human dignity.

Introduction

With Gemini 3, you can now create a variety of things, but when it comes to daily use for work, wouldn't you say it's things like spreadsheets and slides?

I've created a prompt for developing GAS (Google Apps Script) web apps, for when you want to quickly build a web app without thinking about servers, and want to solve it with your Google account.

With a single command like "Make a to-do list app," a sufficiently level app is generated for v0.1.

What is this?

This is a Gemini Gem prompt to rapidly accelerate UI/UX development for internal Google-like applications.

Generated a 96-point application with a single instruction: "Make a to-do list app."
20 UI/UX items compliant with HIG (Human Interface Guidelines)
Supports GAS-specific constraints (asynchronous processing, logical deletion, etc.)
Standard implementation includes 6 themes, English UI, loading indicators, and Undo functionality.

*Note: The generated code is a "sample." A certain level of GAS knowledge (deployment, debugging, etc.) is required, and modifications through "vibe coding" (intuitively adjusting the code) are assumed.

Demo App

I've put the app I made earlier here. Anyone should be able to run it (Google account login is required).

▽Prompting Task Management App

https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbyQXBptLNkxcBBmKTTPWjy7mE_eXMAGqNcfFOsYQTvQwuPxYKuqpAs3O3Bu__ZM4lT2/exec

I wondered what to make, but since it's apparently a gateway to personal development, I just decided to go with this.
Basically, if you give it detailed instructions like "I want to create something like a WBS," "using JSON paste," and "expecting to export to Google Sheets," it will do it accordingly.
It's still a game of vocabulary.

Recommended for

✅ Those who want to build Google-based tools for internal use
✅ When spreadsheets are sufficient as a database
✅ Those who don't want to spend time on server management and authentication
✅ Those who want to build an MVP at lightning speed
✅ But who don't want to hear "there's no UI/UX" or "it looks a bit shabby"
✅ Those with a certain level of basic knowledge of GAS (deployment, debugging, etc.)

Not Recommended For These People

❌ Want to build a full-fledged web app (Next.js, Firebase recommended)
❌ Want to release to users outside of Google
❌ Require large amounts of data and high-speed processing (tens of thousands of rows or more)
❌ Require enterprise-level security

:::message
Caution: This is a "choice when confined to the Google environment."
Accessibility, full responsiveness, and production security will require separate measures.
Please use this for "internal use," "drafts," "initial versions," "v1.0," or "for personal use."
You are welcome to distribute what you create using this prompt, but I cannot take responsibility for that.
Use it wisely.
:::

What is a GAS Web App?

Google Apps Script is more than just "spreadsheet macros." Although that's a strong image.
Using HtmlService, you can create web applications.

Conclusion: Can Web Apps Be Built with GAS?

To put it bluntly, yes, you can.

What's more,

No server construction required
Authentication can be delegated to your Google account
Frontend and backend are in the same project

With these features, it's highly compatible with small to medium-sized business web applications.
Or rather, when you think about needing to do something unnecessarily, you want fewer things to consider, so I personally recommend GAS web apps quite a bit.

What You Can Do

Turn your spreadsheet into a database: CRUD operations, search, aggregation
Integrate with Gmail: Get information from your inbox and display it on a dashboard
Integrate with Google Drive: File management UI, automation of sharing settings
Internal application forms: Approval workflows + automatic Slack/email notifications

Advantages

✅ No server required (managed by Google)
✅ Free (requires a Google account)
✅ Authentication is handled by Google (no OAuth implementation needed)
✅ Deployment is lightning fast (one button)
✅ Easy integration between frontend and backend (direct calls with google.script.run)

Disadvantages

❌ Execution time limits (up to 6 minutes per execution)
❌ Concurrent connection limits (slows down with 30 simultaneous accesses)
❌ No WebSocket (real-time communication is not possible)
❌ Not suitable for full-fledged web applications
❌ Learning curve (unique APIs, debugging methods)
❌ Cannot use Node.js / npm (cannot use build environments like Webpack / Vite)
❌ Cannot be publicly released if created with a Google Workspace account
- Basically for internal deployment (specified domain) only
- Cannot set public access to "everyone with the URL" (can be set for everyone in the company)
- If you want external people to use it, you need to create it with a personal account

When to Choose GAS Web Apps and When Not To

✅ Useful in These Situations

Google-based tools within a company or department
When spreadsheets suffice as a database (up to several thousand rows)
When you don't want to manage servers (no infrastructure knowledge needed)
When you want to delegate authentication to Google Accounts (managing authentication is a real pain)
When you want to build something that works lightning fast (15 minutes to 1 hour)

❌ Consider Other Options in These Cases

Full-fledged web applications
When large amounts of data and high-speed processing are required (tens of thousands of rows or more)
When publishing to users outside of Google
For processes that take longer than 6 minutes to execute

Comparison with Other Options

Use Case	Recommended Technology
Directly interacting with models, API integration	Google AI Studio
Enterprise-level ML	Vertex AI
Full-fledged web apps (Google environment)	Firebase + Cloud Functions
Modern full-stack	Next.js + Vercel
General-purpose development (AI assistance)	Claude Projects
Internal Google-based apps (Spreadsheet DB)	GAS Web Apps ← This time

Additionally, recent trends involving integrating AI tend to go beyond the scope of GAS, as they involve APIs.

20 UI/UX Points to Keep in Mind

To avoid being told that your app "lacks UI/UX," here are 20 essential points, handpicked and refined from the HIG (Human Interface Guidelines).

:::message
What is HIG?
Industry-standard UI/UX principles that even Apple, Google, and Microsoft adhere to.
It's not about difficulty, but rather the difference between "knowing" and "not knowing."
:::

Phase 1: Essential for All Apps (7 Items)

#	Item	Overview
1	User Control	Mandatory cancel buttons; avoid imposing actions unilaterally.
2	Constraints	Disable actions that cannot be performed.
3	Feedback	Visually indicate selected items.
4	Visually Clear and Clutter-Free	Hide unnecessary elements.
5	Specific Action Verbs for Buttons	Avoid "OK"; use "Save," "Delete," etc.
6	Constructive Errors	Clearly state what happened and how to resolve it.
7	Actionable Without Confirmation	Eliminate unnecessary confirmation dialogues.

Phase 2: Forms and Input UI (8 Items)

#	Item	Overview
8	Order and Grouping	Group related items and present them in a logical order.
9	Button Gravity	Place action buttons at the end of the flow.
10	Positive Labels	Use affirmative statements like "Do X" instead of negative ones like "Don't do X."
11	Choice by Outcome	Allow users to choose based on results, e.g., sliders instead of numerical input.
12	Forgiving Input	Automatically convert between full-width and half-width characters.
13	Input Suggestions	Implement auto-completion.
14	Fail Safes	Provide Undo functionality and soft deletes.
15	Proximity Feedback	Display errors close to the input field.

Phase 3: Enhancing UX (5 Items)

#	Item	Overview
16	Minimise Memory Load	Use placeholder text for input examples.
17	Communicate Information Effectively	Display "80% remaining" instead of "123MB."
18	Instant Gratification	Provide sample data upon first launch.
19	Defer Decisions	Minimise the number of required fields.
20	Progressive Disclosure	Collapse advanced settings.

Prompt Content

These 20 items were combined with GAS-specific constraints (asynchronous processing, logical deletion, etc.) to create the prompt.

Main Features

1. Handling GAS Constraints

Asynchronous processing delays (1-3 seconds) → Loading display is essential
Uninterruptible processes (cannot be stopped while GAS is running) → Client-side cancellation support
Irreversible operations (spreadsheet editing) → Logical deletion (archiving) recommended
Real-time limitations (no WebSocket) → Polling implementation

2. Design System

6 Themes: Light, Dark, Ocean, Forest, Sunset, Sakura
12-Colour Palette: 2 background colours, 3 text colours, 4 UI element colours, 3 semantic colours
English UI Required: All UI text in English

3. Functional Requirements

Smooth fade-out of the loading screen
Theme switching (saved in localStorage)
Tour function using Driver.js (5+ steps)
Closing modal by clicking outside

4. Checklist

An AI self-check list of over 40 items before output:

Essential element check (9 items)
English language check (4 items)
HIG compliance check Phase 1-3 (20 items)
GAS constraint compliance check (7 items)

Prompt Body

The prompt is approximately 1,200 lines long, with detailed implementation and code examples.
I feel this is probably around the limit of a Gem's cognitive load.
There was actually more, but the rate of errors increased, so this seems like a good current balance.

:::details Prompt Structure (Click to expand)

# Gemini Gem Prompt for GAS Web App Boilerplate Development (HIG Compliant)

## Overview of the Application to be Developed
- App Name: English naming
- Purpose/Function: Defined from user instructions

## UI/UX Design System Requirements
### UI Text & Naming Conventions
- Use English for all UI text

### Human Interface Guideline Compliance
#### Phase 1: Mandatory for all Apps (7 items)
1. Ensure user control
2. Leverage constraints
3. Objects should embody their states
4. All interactive elements should have meaning
5. Use specific verbs for default buttons
6. Display errors constructively
7. Execute without silent (eliminate unnecessary confirmations)

(Detailed explanations and code examples for each item)

#### Phase 2: Forms & Input UI (8 items)
8. Give input forms a sense of narrative
9. Create a flow of operations (button gravity)
...

#### Phase 3: UX Enhancement (5 items)
16. Don't rely on user memory
...

### GAS-Specific Constraints and HIG Implementation Notes
1. Asynchronous processing and waiting times
2. Uninterruptible processes
3. Irreversible operations
4. Real-time limitations
5. Session management constraints

(Countermeasures and code examples for each constraint)

### Required Libraries and Fonts
- Arial (system font)
- Material Icons
- Driver.js

### CSS Design System
- 6 themes defined
- 12-colour palette
- CSS variables

### Functional Requirements & UI Logic
- Loading process
- Settings modal
- Tour function

### HTML Structure Template

## Strict Rules for Code Modification
- Modification algorithm
- Prohibited operation checklist

## Pre-Output Self-Checklist
- Essential element check
- English language check
- HIG compliance check Phase 1-3
- GAS constraint compliance check

## Output File Requirements
- Code.gs
- Index.html (all-in-one)

:::

Full Prompt Here:
👉 GitHub: gas-webapp-prompt_en

Verification: "Make a to-do list app"

Instructions

After registering the prompt in Gemini Gem, enter the following single line:

Make a to-do list app

That's all. No detailed functional instructions were given.

Generated Result

In approximately 30 seconds, the following files were generated:

Code.gs (approx. 35 lines)
- Simulated server-side processing
- Task archiving support
- Sample data generation
Index.html (approx. 400 lines)
- HTML/CSS/JS all-in-one
- 6 themes implemented
- Driver.js tour
- Toast notifications with Undo functionality

A generation example can be viewed at GitHub: examples_en/task-manager_en.

Features

Core Functionality

Add and delete tasks
Completion check
Archiving (soft delete)
Priority levels (1-3 stars)

UI/UX

6 theme options for switching
Visualisation of priority (star rating)
Inline error display
Undo feature (with toast notification)
Automatic generation of sample data on first launch
Automatic tour activation

GAS Integration

Client-side storage with server simulation
Soft delete (archived flag)
Loading indicators
Error handling

Evaluation Results

Based on an evaluation using a 20-item checklist:

Category	Number of Items	Max Score	Score Obtained	Achievement Rate
Level 1: Basic	4	40	40	100%
Level 2: HIG Phase 1	7	70	68	97%
Level 3: GAS Constraints	3	30	30	100%
Level 4: Details	6	60	54	90%
Overall	20	200	192	96%

Please refer to the Evaluation Sheet for details.

Particularly Excellent Points

1. Logical Deletion Properly Implemented

function archiveTask(id) {
  const task = tasks.find(t => t.id === id);
  task.archived = true;
  renderTasks();

  google.script.run
    .withSuccessHandler(() => {
      showToast('Task archived', 'info', {
        action: 'Undo',
        callback: () => {
          task.archived = false;
          renderTasks();
        }
      });
    })
    .archiveTaskOnServer(id);
}

A "Undo" button appears in a toast notification, and it can be restored by clicking.
Nice job, well done.

2. Inline Error Display

if (!titleInput.value.trim()) {
  document.getElementById('titleError').style.display = 'block';
  titleInput.style.borderColor = 'var(--error)';
  return;
}

Errors appear immediately next to the input field with visual indication.
Excellent adherence to HIG proximity feedback principle.

3. Good First-Time Experience

function checkFirstVisit() {
  if (!localStorage.getItem('hasVisited')) {
    localStorage.setItem('hasVisited', 'true');
    setTimeout(startTour, 800);
  }
}

Instead of an empty app, sample data that can be interacted with immediately is provided.
And automatically showing a tour on the first visit is extremely well done.
This is important because the concept of "read me" often gets lost when one doesn't read primary sources (based on my own fruitless past experiences).

4. Appropriate Handling of GAS Constraints

For all GAS calls:

withSuccessHandler / withFailureHandler
Loading indicators
Button disabling (to prevent double-clicks)

Areas Requiring Improvement

1. Generic Error Messages (-2 points)

No solutions were suggested. Ideally, specific troubleshooting steps like "Please enter a task title" should be provided.

This is perhaps a bit strict. If that were the case, telling the user to ask the AI would suffice.

2. Lack of Statistical Information Display (-3 points)

While priority visualization and pending count are implemented, there's no completion rate display. There's room for improvement based on the principle of "information over data."

This is also fine, as with "vibe coding," if you mention "I want this feature" in a conversation started with Gem, it will suggest modifications to the source code or specify locations, so there's no problem.

3. Weak Visual Grouping of Forms (-3 points)

While the logical order of items is good, there's no visual separation (sections).

This might have been difficult to check as it's a simple task management app. This might be an issue with my own selection.

How to Use

1. Create a Gemini Gem

Access Gemini
Click "Gem" in the left sidebar
Click "Create new Gem"
Gem name: GAS Web App Development Assistant
Description: Generates HIG-compliant GAS Web Apps

2. Register the Prompt

Copy the GitHub prompt and paste it into the "Instructions" field of your Gem.

3. Try it out

In the chat with your Gem:

Make a to-do list app

Create a dashboard to display spreadsheet data

Tell it what you want to build.

4. Deploy to GAS

Copy and paste the generated code into the GAS editor:

Access Google Apps Script
Click "New project"
Paste the content of Code.gs
Click the "+" button, select "HTML", and create it with the name Index
Paste the content of Index.html
Click "Deploy", then "New deployment", and select "Web app"
Set the access permissions and click "Deploy"

Usage Notes

✅ What You Can Do

Create a "plausible" UI in 15 minutes.
Rapidly accelerate UI/UX development for internal Google Workspace apps.
Achieve a sufficient level for an initial draft or a stepping stone.

❌ What You Cannot Do (Requires Additional Action)

Accessibility features (screen readers, keyboard navigation, etc.)
Full responsive design (smartphone optimisation, touch UI, etc.)
Production-level security (XSS prevention, CSRF prevention, etc.)
Performance optimisation (handling large data, complex aggregations, etc.)

Prerequisites

Basic knowledge of Google Apps Script (GAS) is required:

Deployment methods
Using PropertiesService or interacting with Google Sheets
Debugging errors
Understanding the google.script.run mechanism

The generated code is a "sample." While it may work as-is, adjustments and modifications may be necessary. As usual (?), use it with the understanding that you'll need to fine-tune it through "vibe coding."

:::message alert
This is a "stepping stone," an "initial draft," or a "demo before the demo."

It is ideal for prototyping internal tools, validating MVPs, and visualising ideas. However, for externally facing web services, systems handling personal information, or mission-critical applications, additional security measures and testing are essential.
:::

How to Customise

I want to add a theme

Edit the following part of the prompt:

### 2. CSS Design System (Style)

Make sure to include all of the following **6 types** of theme definitions.
→ Increase the number, change the colours

I want to reduce the HIG items

If the prompt is too long, you can remove Phase 2/3 and keep only Phase 1 (7 items):

#### 【Phase 1】Basic Principles for All Apps (7 items)
(Keep only this)

#### 【Phase 2】Principles for Forms and Input UIs (8 items)
(Remove)

#### 【Phase 3】Principles for UX Improvement (5 items)
(Remove)

I want to strengthen GAS constraint support

Add items to the "GAS Specific Constraints" section of the prompt:

#### 6. Handling Large Amounts of Data

**Constraint**: Spreadsheets with tens of thousands of rows or more experience delays.

**Countermeasures**:
- Implement pagination.
- Perform filtering on the GAS side.
- Utilise caching.

Summary

"No UI/UX"

Even in an era where AI writes code at lightning speed, generated UIs can still feel "a bit off."

From a product designer's perspective, there's likely a lot of room for improvement.
However, there's a certain baseline that's good to keep in mind when creating a "draft," "MVP," or "demo before the demo."

This baseline has been distilled into a 1,200-line prompt to accelerate UI/UX development for web applications built using Google services for internal use.

For fine-tuning, use vibe coding.

About Distributing Prompts

This was a minor but useful realisation. Consequently, it was quite a hassle to set up all the links.
I've tried my best to be careful, but please forgive any mistakes as I am only human.

Is JSON Outdated? The Reasons Why the New LLM-Era Format "TOON" Saves Tokens

灯里/iku — Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:42:19 +0000

TOON vs JSON: A Token-Efficient Data Format for LLM Applications

Introduction

When working with LLMs, token consumption directly impacts both cost and performance. While JSON has been the standard data exchange format, a new format called TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) has emerged as a more token-efficient alternative.

This article explores TOON's characteristics and practical applications, with actual measurements and code examples.

What is TOON?

TOON is a data serialization format designed specifically for LLM applications, developed and released in October 2024.

Official Repositories:

Main: https://github.com/toon-format/toon
Specification: https://github.com/toon-format/spec

Key Features

Token Efficiency: Reduces token count by 30-60% compared to JSON
Structured Validation: Explicit array length and field definitions
Human Readability: Maintains clarity while optimizing for tokens
LLM-Friendly: Designed for seamless integration with language models

Format Comparison

JSON (Pretty Print)

{
  "users": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "name": "Alice",
      "role": "Admin",
      "status": "Active"
    },
    {
      "id": 2,
      "name": "Bob",
      "role": "User",
      "status": "Inactive"
    },
    {
      "id": 3,
      "name": "Charlie",
      "role": "User",
      "status": "Active"
    }
  ]
}

JSON (Compact)

{"users":[{"id":1,"name":"Alice","role":"Admin","status":"Active"},{"id":2,"name":"Bob","role":"User","status":"Inactive"},{"id":3,"name":"Charlie","role":"User","status":"Active"}]}

TOON Format

[3,]{id,name,role,status}:
1,Alice,Admin,Active
2,Bob,User,Inactive
3,Charlie,User,Active

Format Structure:

[3,] - Array length declaration
{id,name,role,status} - Field definitions
Following lines - CSV-style data rows

Actual Token Count Measurements

I measured the actual token counts using the Format Tokenization Exploration tool:

3-user sample data:

Pretty JSON: 98 tokens
JSON (compact): 51 tokens
YAML: 63 tokens
TOON: 39 tokens
CSV: 29 tokens

Token reduction vs Pretty JSON: 60.2% (39 vs 98 tokens)
Token reduction vs Compact JSON: 23.5% (39 vs 51 tokens)

Note: These measurements are approximate and may vary depending on the tokenizer used (e.g., GPT-4, Claude). Token counts are also influenced by data structure and content.

TOON vs CSV

From the measurements above, you might notice that CSV is actually more token-efficient than TOON (29 vs 39 tokens for the sample data).

So why use TOON over CSV?

TOON's Advantages

Explicit Structure Definition: [3,]{id,name,role,status} clearly defines array length and field names
Built-in Validation: LLMs can verify data completeness through array length
Self-Documenting: Field definitions make the data structure explicit
Error Detection: Missing or extra rows can be detected through length mismatch

When to Use Each Format

Use CSV when:

Maximum token efficiency is critical
Data structure is well-known and stable
Simple tabular data without complex nesting

Use TOON when:

Structure validation is important
Self-documenting format is valuable
Working with dynamic or varying data structures
Need explicit field definitions for LLM parsing

According to the official TOON benchmarks, TOON typically uses 5-10% more tokens than CSV in large datasets, but provides the added benefits of structure validation and explicit field definitions.

Understanding LLM Performance Claims

The official TOON repository claims improved LLM task performance:

TOON: 73.9% accuracy
JSON: 69.7% accuracy

Important Note: As of November 2024, these benchmarks come from the official TOON project. There are no peer-reviewed academic papers or third-party validation studies yet, as TOON was only released in October 2024.

I searched for academic research on format efficiency for LLMs but found no published papers specifically comparing TOON, JSON, and CSV for LLM understanding. The current evidence consists of:

Official project benchmarks
Developer community feedback
Anecdotal usage reports

Take these claims with appropriate skepticism until independent research validates the performance improvements.

Python Implementation

Generating TOON Format

def dict_list_to_toon(data_list, fields=None):
    """Convert list of dictionaries to TOON format"""
    if not data_list:
        return "[0,]{}:"

    if fields is None:
        fields = list(data_list[0].keys())

    length = len(data_list)
    header = f"[{length},]{{{','.join(fields)}}}:"

    rows = []
    for item in data_list:
        row = ','.join(str(item.get(field, '')) for field in fields)
        rows.append(row)

    return header + '\n' + '\n'.join(rows)

# Example usage
users = [
    {"id": 1, "name": "Alice", "role": "Admin", "status": "Active"},
    {"id": 2, "name": "Bob", "role": "User", "status": "Inactive"},
    {"id": 3, "name": "Charlie", "role": "User", "status": "Active"}
]

toon_output = dict_list_to_toon(users)
print(toon_output)

Output:

[3,]{id,name,role,status}:
1,Alice,Admin,Active
2,Bob,User,Inactive
3,Charlie,User,Active

Parsing TOON Format

import re

def parse_toon(toon_string):
    """Parse TOON format string to list of dictionaries"""
    lines = toon_string.strip().split('\n')
    header = lines[0]

    # Parse header: [length,]{field1,field2,...}:
    match = re.match(r'\[(\d+),\]\{([^}]+)\}:', header)
    if not match:
        raise ValueError("Invalid TOON format")

    expected_length = int(match.group(1))
    fields = [f.strip() for f in match.group(2).split(',')]

    # Parse data rows
    data_rows = lines[1:]
    if len(data_rows) != expected_length:
        raise ValueError(f"Expected {expected_length} rows, got {len(data_rows)}")

    result = []
    for row in data_rows:
        values = row.split(',')
        if len(values) != len(fields):
            raise ValueError(f"Field count mismatch: expected {len(fields)}, got {len(values)}")
        result.append(dict(zip(fields, values)))

    return result

# Example usage
toon_data = """[3,]{id,name,role,status}:
1,Alice,Admin,Active
2,Bob,User,Inactive
3,Charlie,User,Active"""

parsed_data = parse_toon(toon_data)
print(parsed_data)

Use Cases

1. API Responses

Reduce token consumption in LLM-powered API services:

# Traditional JSON response
json_response = {
    "products": [
        {"id": 1, "name": "Product A", "price": 100},
        {"id": 2, "name": "Product B", "price": 200}
    ]
}

# TOON response (more efficient)
toon_response = """[2,]{id,name,price}:
1,Product A,100
2,Product B,200"""

2. Prompt Engineering

Optimize prompts with large datasets:

prompt = f"""
Analyze the following user data:

{toon_output}

Identify users with 'Active' status.
"""

3. Database Export

Export database query results in token-efficient format:

import sqlite3

def export_to_toon(db_path, query):
    """Export SQL query results to TOON format"""
    conn = sqlite3.connect(db_path)
    cursor = conn.cursor()

    cursor.execute(query)
    columns = [desc[0] for desc in cursor.description]
    rows = cursor.fetchall()

    length = len(rows)
    header = f"[{length},]{{{','.join(columns)}}}:"

    data_rows = [','.join(map(str, row)) for row in rows]

    conn.close()
    return header + '\n' + '\n'.join(data_rows)

Considerations and Limitations

When TOON May Not Be Ideal

Nested Structures: TOON works best with flat, tabular data
Complex Objects: Deeply nested JSON structures don't translate well
Mixed Data Types: TOON assumes consistent field structure
Maximum Token Efficiency: Pure CSV is more efficient for token count alone

Token Count Variability

Token counts depend on:

Tokenizer type (GPT-4, Claude, Llama, etc.)
Data content (numbers, text, special characters)
Data structure (field names, nesting depth)

Always test with your specific use case and model.

Conclusion

TOON offers a middle ground between CSV's token efficiency and JSON's structure:

Strengths:

30-60% token reduction vs pretty-printed JSON
23.5% token reduction vs compact JSON
Explicit structure with validation
Human-readable format

Trade-offs:

About 5-10% more tokens than pure CSV (official benchmark)
Limited nesting capability
Performance claims need independent validation

For LLM applications where token efficiency matters and you need structured data with validation, TOON is worth considering. However, evaluate based on your specific requirements:

Need maximum efficiency? → Use CSV
Need structure + reasonable efficiency? → Use TOON
Need complex nesting? → Stick with JSON

As always, measure with your actual data and use case before making the switch.

References:

TOON Official Repository: https://github.com/toon-format/toon
TOON Specification: https://github.com/toon-format/spec
Format Tokenization Tool: https://www.curiouslychase.com/playground/format-tokenization-exploration

Note: TOON is a relatively new format (October 2024). Claims about LLM performance improvements are based on official benchmarks and have not yet been independently verified by academic research.

Increase my familiarity with BASE64.

灯里/iku — Sun, 16 Nov 2025 13:41:12 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

Here in the age of shiny Multimodal AI, we have a persistent, 30-year-old digital frenemy: BASE64. It's the technical equivalent of sending a 4K video by printing and faxing it—a mandatory, inefficient step that makes your data 33% heavier. We all recognize the painful necessity. This article strips away the nostalgia and offers a cynical guide to pragmatic coexistence, examining why this artifact remains essential in the JSON and REST-API world and providing the necessary code to master the relationship. If we must dance with this data encoding devil, allow me to escort you through the steps to lead the way.

BASE64, Me, Past, and Future

Introduction

Recently, whether in personal hobby projects or work development, I keep encountering "BASE64."
It might just be a coincidence, but it feels like I run into it again in completely different projects after months apart.
I'm meeting it more frequently than some of my actual friends.
Encode, decode—both feel like "oh, we meet again" level encounters.
Here's my "we meet again" series from this past year:

Sending images to Claude API → BASE64
Calling Stable Diffusion API → BASE64
Handling files in Dify → BASE64
Analyzing email data with LLM → BASE64

I can handle and implement it well enough that it doesn't affect my work or development. But still, why does this guy always sit next to me...?
It's like BASE64 and I have a terrifying match rate on a dating app. But it's not love. Though there might be friendship at this point.

Thinking about this, I realize I've been writing the same kind of processing over and over.
Actually, I've learned it pretty well now. I want to understand you better, buddy...
This article covers how to properly deal with the inescapable BASE64, from historical background to practical topics.

Why BASE64 Is Still Used Today

Legacy from the Email Era

So, when did you start existing? Where are you from? That's the question.
BASE64's history dates back to the 1990s.
The email systems of that time (SMTP) could only handle 7-bit ASCII text.
Note: ASCII = character encoding for alphanumeric characters and symbols only. It was an era when non-ASCII characters (like Japanese, Chinese, Arabic) and images couldn't be sent.

However, there was a need to send binary data like images and attachments via email.

That's when BASE64 encoding was conceived.
By converting binary data into "safe text," it became possible to transport it through text-based systems.
Surprisingly, it's actually quite recent in historical terms.

It was standardized in RFC 2045 (MIME - Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) and has since become established as a standard internet technology.

Why Is It Still Needed Today?

"That's an old story, right? It's different now, isn't it? We're in 2025 now!"
You'd want to think so, but the fact is that the internet's foundation is designed to be text-based hasn't changed.
Well, it's a world of bits, so that makes sense, but couldn't it be a bit more stylish?

1. Compatibility Issues with JSON

The standard format for modern REST APIs is JSON.
JSON is really strong. Though, JSON was born around 2001, created by Douglas Crockford, and officially standardized as RFC 4627 in 2006.
It's short for JavaScript Object Notation and is widely used for data transfer between servers and clients in web applications, so we're constantly relying on it in recent AI development and RAG contexts.
However, according to JSON specifications, you cannot directly include binary data.

{
  "image": "Can't put binary data here!"
}

Therefore, when sending binary data like images via API, you need to convert it to text using BASE64.

{
  "image": "..."
}

2. Constraints of Text-Based Protocols

HTTP, SMTP, and many other communication protocols are fundamentally designed to be text-based.
To safely transport binary data, "text conversion" is necessary.
Rather than "text conversion," it might be more intuitive to think of it as making it easier to exchange data between computers using a common language.

3. The Curse of Backward Compatibility

Massive existing systems all operate on the premise of BASE64.
The cost of changing it now is too enormous, and that's the reality.
This came up recently in discussions about system migration—it really takes a lot of cost and time, so it's better not to change it now.
Especially when it's already become the foundation of the internet itself, trying to flip it over now would indeed be nonsensical, and I've come to accept that.

4. Security Safety

BASE64-encoded data can be treated as "just a string," making it easier to prevent injection attacks caused by special characters.
This is very commendable. You always want to lock the door, of course.
Security should always be robust.

Necessity in AI Development

This problem is particularly pronounced in AI development.
This is probably why I've been meeting him (BASE64) so often lately.

API communication = JSON = text only
Images, audio, video = binary data

BASE64 is what bridges these two.

The fact that OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and virtually all AI APIs adopt BASE64 for image input is due to these structural reasons.

Specific Use Cases in AI Development

From here, let's look at how BASE64 is actually used in AI development.

Case 1: Sending Images to APIs

This is the most frequent pattern.
Claude, GPT, Gemini—almost all AIs that handle images require BASE64 format.

What you want to do: Have AI analyze a local image file

import base64
import requests

# BASE64 encode the image
with open("image.png", "rb") as f:
    image_data = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode('utf-8')

# API request
# Note: Use the latest model names
# Check Anthropic's documentation for the latest models: https://docs.anthropic.com/
response = requests.post(
    "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages",
    headers={
        "x-api-key": "YOUR_API_KEY",
        "anthropic-version": "2023-06-01",
        "content-type": "application/json"
    },
    json={
        "model": "claude-3-opus-20240229",
        "max_tokens": 1024,
        "messages": [
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": [
                    {
                        "type": "image",
                        "source": {
                            "type": "base64",
                            "media_type": "image/png",
                            "data": image_data
                        }
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "text": "Please describe this image"
                    }
                ]
            }
        ]
    }
)

Case 2: Analyzing Email Data with LLM

Email data received from Marketing Automation mass mailing services or retrieved from Gmail
often comes in multipart format (mixed HTML + text), depending on the sending service.

Problem: When you throw multipart format directly at an LLM, the structure is too complex for it to interpret correctly

Solution: BASE64 encode it to make it "just text data" that can be handled

import base64
import json

# Multipart format email data
email_content = """
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="boundary123"

--boundary123
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Plain text version

--boundary123
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

<html><body>HTML version</body></html>
--boundary123--
"""

# BASE64 encode
encoded_email = base64.b64encode(email_content.encode('utf-8')).decode('utf-8')

# Store in JSON and send to ChatGPT
payload = {
    "model": "gpt-4",
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": f"Please analyze the following BASE64-encoded email:\n{encoded_email}"
        }
    ]
}

Case 3: Using Data URI Format in Dify

In no-code AI platforms like Dify, files are sometimes handled in Data URI format.

What you want to do: Output Markdown content as an HTML file

import base64

html_content = """
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>Generated Content</title></head>
<body>
<h1>AI-Generated Content</h1>
<p>Body text...</p>
</body>
</html>
"""

# Convert to Data URI format
encoded = base64.b64encode(html_content.encode('utf-8')).decode('utf-8')
data_uri = f"data:text/html;base64,{encoded}"

# This string can be handled in Dify's workflow
print(data_uri)

Why Data URI?
Due to system convenience, it's a format that's easy to handle as a file and easy to embed.
Well, if you can use plugins or tools, you can solve it with those.
Or rather, that would be more elegant. But there are often circumstances where you can't install these extension parts due to various reasons.

Case 4: Saving Images from Canvas

When creating a drawing app using HTML Canvas in JavaScript, BASE64 also appears.

// Get image from Canvas
const canvas = document.getElementById('myCanvas');
const dataURL = canvas.toDataURL('image/png'); // ← BASE64 format!

// ... format. We've seen this before.

// When sending to server, remove the prefix
const base64Data = dataURL.replace(/^data:image\/\w+;base64,/, '');

fetch('/api/save-image', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
  body: JSON.stringify({ image: base64Data })
});

Implementation Pattern Collection (Copy-Paste Ready)

I say copy-paste ready, but these days it's more about AI-assisted coding.

Python Edition

import base64

# File → BASE64
def file_to_base64(file_path):
    with open(file_path, "rb") as f:
        return base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode('utf-8')

# BASE64 → File
def base64_to_file(base64_string, output_path):
    with open(output_path, "wb") as f:
        f.write(base64.b64decode(base64_string))

# String → BASE64
def string_to_base64(text):
    return base64.b64encode(text.encode('utf-8')).decode('utf-8')

# BASE64 → String
def base64_to_string(base64_string):
    return base64.b64decode(base64_string).decode('utf-8')

# URL-safe BASE64 (replace +/ with -_)
def url_safe_base64_encode(data):
    return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(data).decode('utf-8')

JavaScript Edition

// File → BASE64 (Browser)
function fileToBase64(file) {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    const reader = new FileReader();
    reader.onload = () => resolve(reader.result.split(',')[1]);
    reader.onerror = reject;
    reader.readAsDataURL(file);
  });
}

// Usage example
const fileInput = document.getElementById('fileInput');
fileInput.addEventListener('change', async (e) => {
  const base64 = await fileToBase64(e.target.files[0]);
  console.log(base64);
});

// String → BASE64
function stringToBase64(str) {
  return btoa(unescape(encodeURIComponent(str)));
}

// BASE64 → String
function base64ToString(base64) {
  return decodeURIComponent(escape(atob(base64)));
}

// Node.js environment
const fs = require('fs');

function fileToBase64Node(filePath) {
  const bitmap = fs.readFileSync(filePath);
  return Buffer.from(bitmap).toString('base64');
}

Google Apps Script Edition (Google Drive Integration)

If you can't use Python locally or are managing files in Google Drive, GAS is also an option.
Depending on the position, there were times when there was no programming environment or only Notepad as an editor, which made me cry...
But since the company had a Google account, GAS was OK!
The source code for email conversion is below, but there's quite a bit of room for customization.
And the reason for specifying folders before and after conversion is a remnant of making it usable even for people who are extremely unfamiliar with programming, IT, and such things...

function convertEmlToBase64() {
  // Input folder ID (get from Drive URL)
  const inputFolder = DriveApp.getFolderById('INPUT_FOLDER_ID');
  // Output folder ID
  const outputFolder = DriveApp.getFolderById('OUTPUT_FOLDER_ID');

  const files = inputFolder.getFiles();

  while (files.hasNext()) {
    const file = files.next();

    // Process only .eml files
    if (file.getName().endsWith('.eml')) {
      // Get file content
      const emlContent = file.getBlob().getBytes();

      // BASE64 encode
      const base64String = Utilities.base64Encode(emlContent);

      // Generate output filename
      const outputFileName = file.getName().replace('.eml', '_base64.txt');

      // Save to output folder
      outputFolder.createFile(outputFileName, base64String, MimeType.PLAIN_TEXT);

      Logger.log(`Conversion complete: ${outputFileName}`);
    }
  }

  Logger.log('All conversions completed');
}

How to use:

Create "Input" and "Output" folders in Google Drive
Set folder IDs in the code
Save the script in Apps Script editor
Upload .eml files to the "Input" folder
Run the script manually
BASE64 text files will be output to the "Output" folder

Actual use case:
Download emails received from large-scale mass-sending Marketing Automation (MA) tools as .eml, batch convert with GAS, then throw them into ChatGPT—this workflow can be utilized.

NOTE: Recent ChatGPT and Claude may be able to read .eml files directly. First try uploading directly, and consider BASE64 conversion only if that doesn't work. This method is a typical example of "what was necessary back then but may not be needed now."
As models become smarter year by year, text conversion might still provide better accuracy.

Common Pitfalls and Solutions

1. Handling Line Breaks

BASE64 strings can contain line breaks.
Some APIs don't accept BASE64 with line breaks.
This caused me to get stuck in a weird way in the past, so this is a reminder.

NG example:

iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAUA
AAAFCAYAAACNbyblAAAAHElEQVQI
12P4//8/w38GIAXDIBKE0DHxgljN

OK example (no line breaks):

iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAUAAAAFCAYAAACNbyblAAAAHElEQVQI12P4//8/w38GIAXDIBKE0DHxgljN

Solution:

# In Python, remove line breaks
base64_string = base64_string.replace('\n', '').replace('\r', '')

# Or generate without line breaks during encoding
base64.b64encode(data).decode('utf-8')  # This won't include line breaks

2. Data URI Prefix

There are cases with and without the prefix data:image/png;base64,.

Case-by-case handling required:

When displaying directly in browser → Prefix required
When sending to API → Prefix not required in most cases

# Remove prefix
if base64_string.startswith('data:'):
    base64_string = base64_string.split(',')[1]

# Add prefix
data_uri = f"data:image/png;base64,{base64_string}"

3. MIME Type Specification

You need to specify the correct MIME type according to the image type, or it won't display/process correctly.

PNG: image/png
JPEG: image/jpeg
GIF: image/gif
WebP: image/webp
PDF: application/pdf
Text: text/plain
HTML: text/html

4. Size Limitations

BASE64 encoding increases the size by approximately 33% from the original data.
This was surprising.

Why does it increase?: BASE64 converts 3 bytes of binary data into 4 text characters, so the size inevitably increases.

Original data: 3 bytes = 24 bits
BASE64: 4 characters (each stored in 8 bits) = 32 bits used
In other words, 24 bits of information is represented in 32 bits, resulting in approximately 33% (precisely 4/3 times) increase

Formula: BASE64 size ≈ Original size × 4/3

APIs often have image size limitations, so caution is needed.

Major AI Service Limitations (as of 2024):

OpenAI GPT-4V/GPT-4o: Maximum 20MB per image
Anthropic Claude: Maximum 5MB per image (up to 8000x8000 pixels. Up to 2000x2000 pixels when sending 20+ images)
Google Gemini: Maximum 20MB for entire request (for inline data. Maximum 2GB per file when using File API)

Solution:

from PIL import Image
import io

def compress_image(image_path, max_size_mb=4):
    img = Image.open(image_path)

    # Compress image
    output = io.BytesIO()
    quality = 95

    while True:
        output.seek(0)
        output.truncate()
        img.save(output, format='JPEG', quality=quality)
        size_mb = output.tell() / (1024 * 1024)

        if size_mb <= max_size_mb or quality <= 10:
            break
        quality -= 5

    return output.getvalue()

5. URL-Safe BASE64

Standard BASE64 contains + and /, but these are characters that need encoding in URLs.

URL-safe version: Replace + → -, / → _

import base64

# Standard BASE64
standard = base64.b64encode(data)

# URL-safe BASE64
url_safe = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(data)

6. Character Encoding Issues

When BASE64-encoding text, if you don't explicitly specify character encoding, you'll get garbled characters.

# NG: Character encoding not specified
base64.b64encode("日本語".encode())  # Default is UTF-8 but should be explicit

# OK: Explicitly specify UTF-8
base64.b64encode("日本語".encode('utf-8'))

Why Are There No Alternatives?

"If it's this troublesome, isn't there a better way?"
Or rather, please give us one. It's 2025, so I want to go stylishly, you know.
Alternative methods do exist. However, each has its constraints.
Time for the usual trade-off series.

multipart/form-data

This is the format used for file uploads. It's more efficient than BASE64, but has the fatal flaw of not being embeddable in JSON.

Since most REST APIs are premised on JSON format, multipart is limited to file upload-specific purposes.

Binary Protocols (gRPC, MessagePack, etc.)

Protocols that can handle binary data as-is do exist, but they're not as widespread as REST APIs.
Considering compatibility with existing systems and developer learning costs, migration isn't easy.
The fact that it's not widespread means... that's just how it is.

Directly Passing File Paths

There's also a method of uploading files to the server and passing their paths to the API.

Problems:

Requires a separate endpoint for file upload
Needs two API calls (upload → processing)
Security risks (path traversal attacks, etc.)

Conclusion: BASE64 Is the Most Practical

Considering the balance of versatility, compatibility, and security, BASE64 is the most practical choice.
This means I can't avoid meeting Mr. BASE64 more than my friends from now on.
I have a feeling I'll probably meet him again soon... I'm starting to think we might become lifelong friends or something.
He might be taking a position like a comrade-in-arms in my life.

Future Outlook

"So, when will we stop using BASE64?"

At least, we'll probably continue using it for another 10, 20 years.
It might become a longer relationship than some of my actual friends.

Reasons are as follows:

The fundamental design of the internet won't change
- Text-based protocols like HTTP and JSON will remain mainstream
Importance of backward compatibility
- Not breaking existing systems is the top priority
New technologies take time to spread
- New protocols like gRPC are gradually increasing but haven't reached the point of replacing REST APIs
Increasing demand in AI field
- With the spread of multimodal AI (images, audio, video), the need to convert binary data to text is only increasing

Cheat Sheet & Summary

When BASE64 Is Needed

✅ When sending images via REST API
✅ When putting binary data in JSON
✅ When embedding files in Data URI format
✅ Email attachments
✅ When safely transporting data with complex structures

Commonly Used Commands

# BASE64-encode a file (Linux/Mac)
base64 -w 0 file.png

# Convert BASE64 back to file
echo "BASE64_STRING" | base64 -d > output.png

# Encode without line breaks (Linux)
base64 -w 0 file.png

# macOS (doesn't have -w option)
base64 -i file.png | tr -d '\n'

Checklist

[ ] Are line breaks removed?
[ ] Is the Data URI prefix correct?
[ ] Is the MIME type appropriate?
[ ] Is the file size within limits? (Estimate: original size × 1.33)
[ ] Is URL-safe version needed?
[ ] Is character encoding specified? (for text)

Conclusion

BASE64 might seem like "old-fashioned technology" at first glance.
However, when you understand the structural constraints of the internet and the reality of AI development, you can see why this continues to be used.

While thinking "oh, it's you again," BASE64 will continue to accompany our development.
Depending on positioning, when we meet again, I want to face him (BASE64) with a feeling like "we meet again~".

I hope this article helps bring you closer to Mr. BASE64.

References

Official Specifications & Standards

AI API Documentation

Tools & Platforms

Dify Documentation

Other Resources

In 2025, AI regulations were established in four major global regions.

灯里/iku — Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:55:37 +0000

Greetings from the island nation of Japan.

We often observe the complex, multi-layered strategies of the major global powers (Japan, China, the EU, and the US) with a kind of detached, yet deeply involved, professional interest. The concept of Sovereign Cloud and AI Governance is essentially the high-stakes game of ensuring that while we all use the same global infrastructure—the "Cloud"—the rules governing our most precious data are rooted firmly in local soil.
It’s the digital equivalent of trying to share a sandbox while each kid brings a lawyer to argue over the precise jurisdiction of their respective sandcastles. As 2025 marks the convergence of key AI-related legislation across these four major actors, their individual approaches—from Japan's standards-driven path to China's hard-law mandates—reveal not just differing legal frameworks, but entirely distinct philosophical approaches to data sovereignty.
This article will quietly lay out the strategic comparisons, allowing you to sidestep the noise and political heat, and instead focus on the quietly essential compliance and strategic maneuvers required to thrive in this new, rule-bound era of global digital competition.

Sovereign Clouds and AI Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Strategies in Four Major Blocs

Introduction

This summary is a result of my own research and reflection, prompted by encountering the term "sovereign cloud" in an article about AI in China. The year 2025 marks a point where AI-related legislation is set to be in place across four major blocs (Japan, China, the EU, and the United States), and each country's digital sovereignty strategy is becoming clearer. This raises questions about how we, as general users and general social developers, should navigate these developments.
Up until now, the rules, particularly "laws," have been somewhat ambiguous. However, with these regulations now emerging, it is important to consider how to operate effectively "within the rules" going forward.

Chapter 1: What is Sovereign Cloud?

Difference from Data Localisation

Many people tend to confuse these two, but they are distinct concepts.

Sovereign Cloud
- Purpose/Philosophy: A cloud service or design philosophy that aims for a state where data, systems, and overall operations are under the exclusive protection of the laws of a specific country or region, free from the laws and external influences of other countries.
Data Localisation
- Means/Requirement: A regulation or measure that mandates the physical storage and processing of data within a specific country or region.

In other words, data localisation is a foundation for achieving a sovereign cloud, and it is one specific action.
Let's not confuse the purpose with the means.

Chapter 2: The Three Requirements for Constituting a Sovereign Cloud

A sovereign cloud is comprised of the following three sovereignty requirements:

1. Data Sovereignty

Data Localisation
- Data is stored and processed physically within the country (mandatory requirement).
Jurisdictional Clarity
- Guarantee that access to and disclosure requests for data are based solely on domestic legal regulations (e.g., Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information, the EU's GDPR).
- The applicable laws vary depending on the product or service. While not yet the case, you might have noticed recently that voice and facial data may soon be included under Japanese personal information regulations.
- Exclusion of the influence of foreign laws (e.g., the US CLOUD Act).
- Mr. Altman from OpenAI is also working on this matter recently. He was essentially asking the government to do something about it! The US is also in a development race there. In the US, laws differ by state, which seems to make development challenging. To put it very loosely and concisely, his argument is: "It's expensive to develop, but we don't want to lose the AI development race, so give us tax breaks and speed up permits and environmental reviews for projects using federal land or funds!" https://cafe-dc.com/cloud/openai-asks-trump-administration-to-offer-ai-tax-cuts-proposes-govt-focused-classified-stargate/
Management of Encryption Keys
- Enable users in countries/regions with data sovereignty to manage the keys used for data encryption/decryption themselves.

2. System Sovereignty

Portability
- The ability for systems and data to be easily migrated from a specific cloud environment.
- Prevents vendor lock-in and ensures technological independence.
  - Corporate Lock-in: A situation where it is difficult to switch to another vendor because the partner vendor has a deep understanding of the specifics of one's own company.
  - Technology Lock-in: A state of dependence on a vendor's technology.
- There are basically these two types. It's not good because it's difficult to transfer accumulated knowledge and know-how over many years in a short period, both in terms of personnel and systems! It also costs money to change systems, and you might end up reverting.
Domestic Control of Technology
- Selecting, designing, operating, and maintaining core technologies such as cloud infrastructure, operating systems, and security technologies within one's own country.
- Reduces technological dependence on other countries.
- This became a hot topic. If AWS goes down, half the servers in the world will stop, the backend of smartphones will die, Netflix will stop, Slack will die – it's seriously at the level of civilizational collapse. If Amazon's e-commerce site disappeared, it would be "well, it's inconvenient..." but if AWS stopped for a day, the global economy would be in serious trouble. Both companies and other businesses would be in an uproar.
Ensuring Transparency
- Ensuring a level of transparency for application and infrastructure source code and specifications that allows users to perform audits and verifications.

3. Operational Sovereignty

Operations and Support Structure
- Access to cloud infrastructure, technical support, and customer service is provided by residents of the user's own country, in accordance with domestic laws, regulations, and security policies.
- While I've handled numerous customer service inquiries both domestically and internationally in my professional capacity, international communications often tend to be more dramatic. For services based in the US, it's common for them to essentially say, "That's beyond what's covered in the documentation, and since you're trialling it, investigate the technical details yourself." The default attitude is often "I'm not to blame for this," and being passed around between departments is a frequent occurrence.
Access Control
- Strict mechanisms (logical and physical separation) to restrict or eliminate access routes for foreign national employees of cloud providers to sensitive data and systems, even from within the provider's organisation.
Governance
- Operational policies, disaster recovery plans, and responses to security incidents are decided and managed in a way that allows the user's government or an independent advisory committee to be involved.
- This brings to mind the separation of powers.

Chapter 3: Sovereign Cloud Strategies of the Four Major Blocs

Countries and regions are pursuing digital sovereignty through different approaches.

Bloc	Leading Axis of Strategy	Primary Goal	Characteristics	Key Sovereign Clouds
Japan	Government Guidelines & Standardisation Led	Ensuring economic security and establishing a secure cloud usage environment free from the influence of foreign laws	Defining standards for security and governance based on ISMAP and the Act on Promotion of Economic Security. Controlling services from domestic and foreign vendors.	Sakura Internet, NTT Data, NEC
China	National Laws & Regulations Led	Ensuring national data sovereignty (cyber sovereignty) and protecting the domestic market	Mandating the domestic storage (data localisation) of important data collected domestically, based on laws such as the Cybersecurity Law.	Alibaba Cloud, Huawei Cloud, Tencent Cloud (domestic regions)
Europe	Standards & Ecosystem Led by GAIA-X	Establishing European digital sovereignty. Excluding the application of US law and setting unique standards for reliability, security, and interoperability.	Global hyperscalers also offer services compliant with these standards, placing the entire ecosystem under European law.	GAIA-X Compliant Services (OVHcloud), AWS European Sovereign Cloud, Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud
United States	Hyperscaler Strategy Led	Maximising efficiency and innovation in cloud usage, and responding to the stringent regulatory requirements of government and military agencies	For government and military agencies, providing dedicated sovereign regions that strictly comply with FedRAMP and have restricted operations and access privileges.	AWS GovCloud (US), Microsoft Azure Government, Google Cloud (Dedicated Regions)

Comparison of Sovereign Cloud Strategies in the Four Major Powers

Japan's strategy focuses on "standardisation", China's on "state control", the EU's on "ecosystems", and the US's on "market leadership". Their strategies are unfolding along different axes, reflecting a considerable divergence in national cultural backgrounds and philosophies. While they maintain control over key aspects, distinctive features are emerging.

Chapter 4: AI Governance Trends in 2025

2025 was a year dominated by AI globally. Frankly, it felt like being inside a washing machine. This situation looks set to continue next year as well. However, with AI becoming increasingly integrated into our lives, determining legal boundaries has become a significant challenge. 2025 saw substantial progress in this regard, marking the year when AI-related laws from the four major powers were established. This is what prompted me to write this article. They've finally all come out.

Japan's AI Promotion Act

I had thought that Japan's AI regulations were not progressing much, but in fact, they are being systematically developed. Little by little, the approach is distinctly Japanese: " Let's do things well within the rules ," with a very accommodating stance from the perspective of developers. While aiming for the ambitious national goal of becoming " the easiest country in the world to develop and utilise AI ," it seems likely that Japan will settle in a good position compared to other countries, with a balance of guidelines and laws, from the viewpoint of those who enjoy development. Utilisation, however, is still being explored.

China and EU's Hard Law

China and the EU have a strong " hard law " aspect in their AI-related regulations, making them straightforward due to clearly defined penalties. China and the EU are leading with "hard laws" that carry penalties, while Japan and the US are focusing on "guidelines" and "standardisation."

Impact of China's Cybersecurity Law Revision

Particularly noteworthy is the revision of China's fundamental Cybersecurity Law (enforced January 2026), which now includes AI provisions.

Expansion of Extraterritorial Application
- Previously, it was sufficient to consider the Personal Information Protection Law. However, this revised Cybersecurity Law also incorporates extraterritorial application. Consequently, considerations will now be needed for providing overseas AI products to users within China.
Reference Links
- China's Network Data Security Regulations (PwC Explanation)
- https://www.pwc.com/jp/ja/knowledge/column/awareness-cyber-security/china-cyber-security-law.html
- Cybersecurity Laws and Policy Trends in Various Countries (PwC)
- https://www.pwc.com/jp/ja/knowledge/column/awareness-cyber-security/cybersecurity-laws-and-policy-trends-cn-tw.html

I predict that around three major legal news events are likely to occur in 2025 and 2026.

Summary

Sovereign Cloud is not merely a matter of data storage, but the core of a nation's digital sovereignty strategy, meeting three requirements: data sovereignty, system sovereignty, and operational sovereignty.
Each of the four major powers is taking a different approach, with Japan focusing on standardisation, China on legal regulations, the EU on ecosystems, and the US on efficiency.
2025 is the year when AI-related laws will be fully established, and China's revised Cybersecurity Law, in particular, creates new compliance requirements for global AI business development. As a differentiating point, Japan may also adopt a strategy of integrating AI domestically.
In the future, as companies expand their businesses globally, addressing the sovereign cloud requirements and AI governance of each country will become increasingly important.

DEV Community: 灯里/iku

Migrating to Astro, How I Built a Bilingual Static Blog

Table of Contents

Introduction

What Is Astro?

What This Article Covers

1. Content Collections Schema Design

2. Article Conversion Pipeline

Conversion Catalogue

Implementation Tips

site-only / devto-only Markers

3. Build-Time OGP Image Generation

The Font Size Trap

Serving via Astro Endpoints

4. Dark Mode via Tailwind Token Redefinition

Preventing White Flash

The Contrast Ratio Pitfall

Accessibility Standards and the Temperature Gap Between Countries

5. Island Architecture and Zero-JS Patterns

Fullscreen Menu: Trapping Focus with inert

Mermaid: Lazy Loading

Fonts: Async Loading

Wrapping Up

akari-iku / akari-iku.github.io

akari.log - personal site & bilingual tech blog

akari.log

構成

仕組み

ライセンス

Is TypeScript 7 Ready? 5x Faster, but Astro and Vue Say Wait

Table of Contents

What I Measured

Round One, Raw tsc vs Raw tsc

The Main Event, Putting It into astro check

The Autopsy, a Dependency Chain

Not Just Astro, the "Wait" List

Even If You Can Board, Mind the Gap

The 11 Seconds That Won't Become 1

An Aside, for the TypeScript-Tired

The Lesson, Speed Belongs to the Language

Summary

Is Your Claude Code Safe From Base64? Inside 2026 AI Agent Attacks

Introduction

Why Base64 is often used for malicious purposes

1. It is not immediately readable

2. It passes through systems as normal text

3. Easy to decode and execute

4. Simple to nest and layer

Example 1: 70-layer nested npm packages (August 2025)

Example 2: Multi-stage chain distributing Pulsar RAT (Veracode report, February 2026)

Example 3: The "LODEINFO" APT targeting Japan (JPCERT/CC analysis)

Recent cases of misuse: Where Base64 has been dragged along

Case 1: Hidden Base64 payloads in GitHub commits

Case 2: npm and PyPI supply chain attacks

Aside: GitHub star counts don't prove safety

jgamblin / OpenClawCVEs

Tracking OpenClaw CVEs

🛡️ OpenClaw CVE & Security Advisory Tracker

🏗️ Project Identity

Bonus: You are a target just for clicking Star

Case 3: Compromised VSCode and Browser Extensions

My personal approach: Segmenting my work environment to stay in control

Case 4: Obfuscated phishing emails

Case 5: Prompt injection in LLMs

Case Study 6: Serious Attacks Involving AI Agents: A 2025–2026 MCP Incident Report

Praetorian: Demo of MCP Exploitation via Base64

The Postmark MCP Server Incident (September 2025)

EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711, Microsoft 365 Copilot, June 2025)

Bitwarden CLI Hijack (April 2026, lasted 90 minutes)

The Problem with Apology Press Releases

Challenges on the Detection Side

Tips for Detection

1. Detecting Dangerous Execution Patterns

2. Entropy Analysis (Length and Entropy)

Use industry-standard frameworks and tools

YARA and YARA-X for scanning files and memory

Sigma for log-based detection

Socket.dev for analyzing packages before installation

Elastic cicd-abuse-detector for CI/CD pipelines

What you can do as a developer