<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: alanharrryy-wq</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by alanharrryy-wq (@alanharrryywq).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/alanharrryywq</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/alanharrryywq"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for a volunteer software developer for an independent code review study</title>
      <dc:creator>alanharrryy-wq</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026 07:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/alanharrryywq/looking-for-a-volunteer-software-developer-for-an-independent-code-review-study-3f7j</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/alanharrryywq/looking-for-a-volunteer-software-developer-for-an-independent-code-review-study-3f7j</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi DEV Community! 👋&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm looking for an experienced software developer or code reviewer interested in participating in an independent evaluation of PRISMA Change Assurance, a tool designed to help developers understand and verify software changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What does the study involve?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You'll review 12 blinded evidence packets covering six historical open-source software changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The study focuses on identifying affected components, technical risks, appropriate tests, and remaining uncertainties.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Who can participate?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A developer with practical experience reading code, reviewing changes, or assessing software quality, who has not contributed to PRISMA Change Assurance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Participation details&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Voluntary and unpaid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fully remote and asynchronous.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No software installation or repository modification required.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No credentials or access to private repositories needed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Responses recorded under a pseudonymous identifier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Study instructions and full participation requirements provided before starting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The evaluation follows a predefined protocol. Participants will not receive the historical answers or scoring material.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Interested in participating?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please leave a comment or contact me privately so we can discuss eligibility and the study requirements.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm looking for genuine technical feedback, including negative findings. The goal is to understand whether this kind of evidence actually helps people review software changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for supporting independent software engineering research! 🔬&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What would make an independent software change-review study credible and useful to you?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>softwareengineering</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
