<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Alfonso Morcuende</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Alfonso Morcuende (@alfonso_morcuende_dd2ca01).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/alfonso_morcuende_dd2ca01</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/alfonso_morcuende_dd2ca01"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Stop building AI products from the solution. Start from the problem.</title>
      <dc:creator>Alfonso Morcuende</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/alfonso_morcuende_dd2ca01/stop-building-ai-products-from-the-solution-start-from-the-problem-1e3j</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/alfonso_morcuende_dd2ca01/stop-building-ai-products-from-the-solution-start-from-the-problem-1e3j</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The pattern
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Teams get access to AI and the first question is always the same: &lt;br&gt;
"We have GPT-4/Claude, what can we build?"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That question is the problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A poorly defined problem fed into an AI produces a well-crafted wrong answer — at scale, in minutes. That's not progress. That's acceleration in the wrong direction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The methodology
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I built &lt;strong&gt;Problem-Driven AI&lt;/strong&gt;, an open methodology that structures &lt;br&gt;
the work &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the build. The core idea: the bottleneck was never execution. It was always understanding the problem deeply enough to deserve a solution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's organized in 5 phases with quality gates. You can't move forward until the current phase is complete:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  1. Problem Phase
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Define and validate the real problem with the people who live it &lt;br&gt;
every day. If the team can't agree on the problem, nothing gets built.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  2. Solution Phase
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Align product, engineering, and business on a solution that deserves to be built. Not the first idea — the right one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  3. Context Phase
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Build the structured knowledge the AI needs to work well. Not &lt;br&gt;
improvised prompts — organized context documents that tell the AI &lt;br&gt;
exactly what it needs to know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is where most teams fail. They jump from a vague problem &lt;br&gt;
to a prompt and expect good results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  4. AI Build Phase
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Build with prepared context, not against ambiguity. The AI becomes &lt;br&gt;
a collaborator, not a slot machine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  5. Market Phase
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Iterate with real usage data. Validate with the market, not with &lt;br&gt;
assumptions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why gates matter
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each phase has defined roles, artifacts, and exit criteria. The &lt;br&gt;
friction is intentional. Skipping the Problem Phase to start coding &lt;br&gt;
feels fast. Rebuilding because you solved the wrong problem feels &lt;br&gt;
slow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What this is not
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Not a prompt engineering guide&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Not an AI tutorial&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Not a product for sale&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's an open, documented methodology for teams building AI products &lt;br&gt;
who want to stop confusing speed with progress.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Try it
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The full methodology is open and bilingual (EN/ES):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.problemdriven.ai" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.problemdriven.ai&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It covers principles, a step-by-step framework with artifact &lt;br&gt;
templates, anti-pattern detection, a glossary, and a roadmap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Built with Docusaurus. Everything is documented. No paywalls.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;I'd appreciate honest feedback — especially from anyone who's &lt;br&gt;
shipped AI products and dealt with the gap between what the AI &lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; do and what it &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; do.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
