<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: almayce</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by almayce (@almayce).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/almayce</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/almayce"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>PriceProof.io - why should slow work pay more than fast work? {rate * time} formula isn't fair</title>
      <dc:creator>almayce</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/almayce/built-priceproof-to-help-explain-project-costs-to-clients-4oa5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/almayce/built-priceproof-to-help-explain-project-costs-to-clients-4oa5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;someone asked me to quote a project recently and I realized I had no good way to do it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the standard formula is rate × time, right? but that feels broken.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if I'm experienced and knock it out in a week - I get paid less than a junior who drags it for 2 months? doesn't make sense. the value delivered is the same, maybe mine is even better quality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;but how do you explain that to a client? "pay me more because I'm faster" sounds backwards.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;what I actually wanted&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;a way to show value beyond just hours. complexity matters. experience matters. what you're actually building matters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;two "simple contact forms" aren't the same if one needs custom validation, anti-spam, CRM integration, and the other is just name/email/submit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;started thinking - what if pricing was transparent about all these factors? not just "40 hours × $100" but breaking down why those 40 hours and what affects the rate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;so I built it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;priceproof.io - generates breakdowns that show what goes into a project estimate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;you input features, complexity factors, timeline constraints. it calculates based on multiple variables, not just time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;outputs a PDF that shows the reasoning - this feature is complex because X, this integration takes longer because Y, experience level affects quality here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;the technical part&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;built with next.js 14, hosted on vercel. all client-side PDF generation with react-pdf.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the calculation engine is &lt;a href="https://github.com/almayce/fast-decision" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/almayce/fast-decision&lt;/a&gt; - a rules engine I made for handling complex decision logic. lets you define pricing rules cleanly without spaghetti code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it's open source if anyone wants to look at how it works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;current state&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;works but rough around edges. made it functional enough to test the concept. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;you can try it at &lt;a href="https://priceproof.io" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://priceproof.io&lt;/a&gt; - takes a few minutes to generate a sample breakdown.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;what I'm wondering&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;does this pricing approach make sense? or is (rate × time) actually fine and I'm overthinking it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if you do project work, curious what you think. does showing complexity factors help or just overcomplicate things?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;trying to figure out if this is a real problem or just something that bothered me specifically.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;honest feedback appreciated - if the concept is flawed I'd rather pivot now than build more on top of it. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>nextjs</category>
      <category>freelance</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
