<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Anitha Ramachandran</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Anitha Ramachandran (@anitha_ramachandran_85496).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/anitha_ramachandran_85496</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/anitha_ramachandran_85496"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Go Beyond Built-In Retries in Playwright: Intelligent Retry Strategies Based on Error Types &amp; Test Context</title>
      <dc:creator>Anitha Ramachandran</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 13:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/anitha_ramachandran_85496/go-beyond-built-in-retries-in-playwright-intelligent-retry-strategies-based-on-error-types-test-1ag4</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/anitha_ramachandran_85496/go-beyond-built-in-retries-in-playwright-intelligent-retry-strategies-based-on-error-types-test-1ag4</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In this post, we’ll go beyond Playwright’s built-in retries and explore how to implement custom retry logic based on:&lt;br&gt;
    • Error types&lt;br&gt;
    • Test metadata (like severity or tags)&lt;br&gt;
    • Dynamic thresholds (e.g., flaky test detection using error patterns)&lt;br&gt;
Playwright lets you configure a retry count via retries in playwright.config.ts. This is great for quick fixes—but:&lt;br&gt;
    • It treats all failures equally (a timeout vs. a visual diff? same reaction).&lt;br&gt;
    • No understanding of test importance or severity.&lt;br&gt;
    • No room for intelligent decision making during the retry phase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We’re going to fix that using a combination of:&lt;br&gt;
    • test.info()&lt;br&gt;
    • test.skip()&lt;br&gt;
    • Error pattern matching&lt;br&gt;
    • Conditional logic&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Strategy Overview: Rethinking Retries&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We’ll create a custom retry plugin that:&lt;br&gt;
    • Intercepts failed tests&lt;br&gt;
    • Analyzes test.info().errors&lt;br&gt;
    • Uses error types (e.g., timeout vs. network vs. assertion)&lt;br&gt;
    • Applies logic like:&lt;br&gt;
“Retry only if it’s a network glitch and the test is not critical.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1.**&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Tagging Tests Based on Severity
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;**&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fd96i7hsn2wqpvcxqc54j.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fd96i7hsn2wqpvcxqc54j.png" alt="Image description" width="800" height="187"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  2. Detecting Error Types After Failure
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fveo606gn2fumyoc9d1vf.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fveo606gn2fumyoc9d1vf.png" alt="Image description" width="800" height="490"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  Retry only tests that failed due to network issues
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fiskvzuro1yz04pcs5xwd.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fiskvzuro1yz04pcs5xwd.png" alt="Image description" width="800" height="72"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let’s Collaborate!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you doing something similar in your Playwright test strategy?&lt;br&gt;
Have thoughts on improving flaky test handling?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let’s connect on LinkedIn or drop a comment below!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Share This If You Hate Flaky Tests!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this saved your  time or your sanity, give it a ❤️ and a 🔁.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>playwright</category>
      <category>typescript</category>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>testing</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
