<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: ArchUnitTS</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by ArchUnitTS (@archunit).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/archunit</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/archunit"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The brutal REALITY of software architecture</title>
      <dc:creator>ArchUnitTS</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 16:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/archunit/the-brutal-reality-of-software-architecture-5h03</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/archunit/the-brutal-reality-of-software-architecture-5h03</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The reality of software architecture: far too often we define a “clean architecture”… only to see it not being followed ⛔&lt;br&gt;
You’re not alone.&lt;br&gt;
We document architecture.&lt;br&gt;
We draw diagrams.&lt;br&gt;
We align in meetings.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And then… reality happens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;💡 That’s where architecture fitness functions come in. Instead of hoping conventions are followed, you verify them continuously.&lt;br&gt;
If you’re working in TypeScript, the best tool is ArchUnitTS.&lt;br&gt;
➡️ Inspired by ArchUnit (Java)&lt;br&gt;
➡️ Lets you express architectural rules as tests&lt;br&gt;
➡️ Fails your CI when boundaries are violated&lt;br&gt;
➡️ Keeps architecture alive, not just documented&lt;br&gt;
📈 ArchUnitTS has been gaining significant traction lately, with growing adoption across teams and enterprises that want scalable, maintainable TypeScript codebases.&lt;br&gt;
Examples of what you can enforce:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Layered architecture rules&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Module boundaries&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Dependency direction&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Naming and structural conventions
Architecture shouldn’t be a PDF nobody reads.
It should be executable, testable, and enforced.
If you’re tired of architecture erosion, here is the repo.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
