<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Arikatla Vijaya lakshmi</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Arikatla Vijaya lakshmi (@arikatla_vijayalakshmi_2).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/arikatla_vijayalakshmi_2</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/arikatla_vijayalakshmi_2"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>"Experimenting with Gin and FastAPI: Performance &amp; Practical Insights"</title>
      <dc:creator>Arikatla Vijaya lakshmi</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/arikatla_vijayalakshmi_2/experimenting-with-gin-and-fastapi-performance-practical-insights-b33</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/arikatla_vijayalakshmi_2/experimenting-with-gin-and-fastapi-performance-practical-insights-b33</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently, I heard a lot about Gin, a lightweight and fast web framework in Go, so I wanted to experiment with it and compare it to FastAPI, a popular Python framework for building APIs. I was curious about how they stack up in terms of speed and ease of use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I Did&lt;br&gt;
I built a simple REST API with both frameworks. The API just serves a list of music albums via a /albums endpoint.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FastAPI is known for its developer-friendly features and async support.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gin is praised for its minimalism and blazing speed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Code Snippets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Here’s a quick look at the endpoints I made:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FastAPI (Python):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;`from fastapi import FastAPI&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;app = FastAPI()&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;albums = [&lt;br&gt;
    {"id": 1, "title": "Blue Train", "artist": "John Coltrane"},&lt;br&gt;
    {"id": 2, "title": "Jeru", "artist": "Gerry Mulligan"},&lt;br&gt;
    {"id": 3, "title": "Sarah Vaughan", "artist": "Sarah Vaughan"},&lt;br&gt;
]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@app.get("/albums")&lt;br&gt;
async def get_albums():&lt;br&gt;
    return albums`&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gin (Go):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
`package main&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;import (&lt;br&gt;
    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"&lt;br&gt;
    "net/http"&lt;br&gt;
)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;type Album struct {&lt;br&gt;
    ID     int    &lt;code&gt;json:"id"&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    Title  string &lt;code&gt;json:"title"&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    Artist string &lt;code&gt;json:"artist"&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;
}&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;func main() {&lt;br&gt;
    router := gin.Default()&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;albums := []Album{
    {ID: 1, Title: "Blue Train", Artist: "John Coltrane"},
    {ID: 2, Title: "Jeru", Artist: "Gerry Mulligan"},
    {ID: 3, Title: "Sarah Vaughan", Artist: "Sarah Vaughan"},
}

router.GET("/albums", func(c *gin.Context) {
    c.IndentedJSON(http.StatusOK, albums)
})

router.Run("0.0.0.0:8080")
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;}`&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The Benchmark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Using wrk with 4 threads, 100 connections for 15 seconds, I tested both APIs.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;FastAPI handled about 959 requests/sec with average latency around 104 ms.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Gin handled roughly 2700 requests/sec with latency as low as 6.7 ms.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What I Learned&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Gin is much faster — thanks to Go’s compiled nature and lightweight concurrency model.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;FastAPI offers ease of development and async features, making it great for many projects.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If raw speed and low latency are critical, Gin is the winner.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If rapid development and Python ecosystem matter more, FastAPI is a fantastic choice.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This experiment showed me the strengths of both frameworks in a hands-on way. Gin really impressed me with its performance, while FastAPI remains an excellent option for Python developers looking for quick and clean API development.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you’re choosing between the two, consider your project needs — speed vs. development speed — and pick accordingly.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>go</category>
      <category>fastapi</category>
      <category>performance</category>
      <category>gin</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
