<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Arkajit Das</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Arkajit Das (@arkajit).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/arkajit</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/arkajit"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>BlackRock manages roughly 11.6 trillion dollars in assets</title>
      <dc:creator>Arkajit Das</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/arkajit/blackrock-manages-roughly-116-trillion-dollars-in-assets-3l8</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/arkajit/blackrock-manages-roughly-116-trillion-dollars-in-assets-3l8</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;BlackRock manages roughly 11.6 trillion dollars in assets. That scale alone would be an AI story. The more interesting part is how they funded the AI investment without touching the business that actually pays their bills.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the structural setup most people miss. BlackRock's core investment advisory business, over 80% of total revenue, isn't where the AI budget comes from. Their Aladdin platform, originally built as internal infrastructure to manage BlackRock's own portfolios, became a separate Technology Services business they now license to other asset managers, including direct competitors. That division alone generated roughly 𝟰𝟯𝟲 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀 in Q1 2025, on pace toward over 𝟰.𝟰 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's the real unlock. BlackRock isn't funding AI Labs and cutting-edge model research by justifying cost savings against their core advisory business the way most companies have to. They're funding it with a dedicated, non-discretionary revenue stream that exists specifically because other firms pay to run their own portfolios on Aladdin.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's what that funding built. Aladdin Copilot, launched in 2023, sits across the entire platform surfacing instant answers to support investment decisions, described internally as strengthening the connective tissue between previously disconnected parts of the system. By 2026, BlackRock extended this into agentic capabilities that go beyond simple workflow assistance into areas that directly shape trade execution, exception management, compliance interpretation, and portfolio decision support, according to industry analysts tracking the space.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Competing platforms including State Street Alpha, SimCorp, and Linedata are now racing to build similar automation around reconciliations and compliance rule translation, essentially responding to the standard Aladdin set.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the flywheel effect underneath all of it. More assets under management generates more proprietary transaction and portfolio data. That data trains better risk models and better AI. Better AI attracts more institutional clients to the platform, both for asset management and for licensing Aladdin itself. Each part of that loop reinforces the next one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the lesson for product leaders.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BlackRock didn't just build a great internal AI tool. They turned their internal AI infrastructure into a separate, licensable product line, and used the resulting revenue to fund research their core business alone couldn't easily justify. If your company has built genuinely valuable internal tooling, it's worth asking honestly whether that tool is actually a hidden second business, one that could fund the next generation of AI investment without ever touching your primary revenue line.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which Global 2000 company should I break down next.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  ArtificialIntelligence #ProductLeadership #AssetManagement #Fintech #AIStrategy
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[follow, save, comment, share, repost]&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman Sachs gave 10,000 employees secret access to an internal AI tool</title>
      <dc:creator>Arkajit Das</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/arkajit/goldman-sachs-gave-10000-employees-secret-access-to-an-internal-ai-tool-10b5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/arkajit/goldman-sachs-gave-10000-employees-secret-access-to-an-internal-ai-tool-10b5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Goldman Sachs gave 10,000 employees, roughly a quarter of its entire workforce, secret access to an internal AI tool for over a year before anyone outside the company knew it existed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That quiet pilot phase is worth noting on its own. While competitors were announcing AI initiatives in press releases, Goldman spent a year running a closed test with a meaningful chunk of its actual staff before deciding it was ready for a real rollout.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When they did launch publicly in mid-2025, they didn't ease in. The GS AI Assistant went to all 46,500-plus employees worldwide, firewalled entirely behind Goldman's own infrastructure specifically so no sensitive client or trading data could ever leak into an external model. CIO Marco Argenti, hired from Amazon, built it as a simple chat interface, but with something more sophisticated running underneath.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the architecture decision that actually matters. Goldman built a multi-model system with role-based behavior, meaning a banker's version of the tool is tuned differently than a research analyst's or a developer's, and access to the most capable, most expensive models is reserved specifically for genuinely hard problems, while routine tasks run on smaller, faster models. That's a deliberate cost and capability tradeoff most companies skip entirely by giving everyone the same generic access.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The results reported internally: adoption crossed 𝟱𝟬% 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗲𝘀, with a stated goal of 100% by 2026. Developers using the AI Developer Copilot saw a 𝟮𝟬% 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 and a 𝟭𝟱% 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁-𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗴𝘀. For investment bankers, internal estimates suggest AI-assisted document drafting and financial modeling can cut M&amp;amp;A deal preparation time by up to 𝟰𝟬%. Their Legend Copilot tool lets analysts run natural language searches across Goldman's proprietary data repositories instead of manually digging through internal systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the honest caveat worth including. Goldman's own equity strategy team built a stock portfolio called GSXUPROD, specifically betting on companies positioned to benefit most from AI-driven productivity gains. As of their 2026 report, that portfolio was actually underperforming the broader market year to date, even excluding the largest tech stocks, though Goldman's analysts still argue its long-term earnings growth potential exceeds major indices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the lesson for product leaders.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even the bank betting the most confidently on AI's future value hasn't seen that thesis play out cleanly in the market yet. Internal productivity gains and external investment returns are two completely different measures of whether an AI bet is working, and it's worth being honest that only one of them is showing up clearly right now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which Global 2000 company should I break down next.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  ArtificialIntelligence #ProductLeadership #Banking #EnterpriseAI #AIStrategy
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[comment, follow, save, share, repost]&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>infrastructure</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
