<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Evgeny Arsentev</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Evgeny Arsentev (@arsentevai).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/arsentevai</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/arsentevai"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Four lessons from a year of running AI agents on boring tasks</title>
      <dc:creator>Evgeny Arsentev</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 10:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/arsentevai/four-lessons-from-a-year-of-running-ai-agents-on-boring-tasks-457n</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/arsentevai/four-lessons-from-a-year-of-running-ai-agents-on-boring-tasks-457n</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I spent the last year wiring AI agents into small, boring workflows: email triage, deploy checks, content pipelines. Most advice online is about building agents. Almost nobody talks about &lt;em&gt;operating&lt;/em&gt; them week after week. Here is what actually mattered.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1. The brief beats the prompt
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every reliable agent run in my setup starts from a task file: goal, constraints, stop conditions, and where to write results. Prompts evolved constantly; the brief format barely changed in a year. When a run goes sideways, ninety percent of the time the brief was ambiguous and the agent guessed. Fix the brief, not the temperature.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  2. Agents need an audit trail more than they need memory
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fancy memory systems kept disappointing me. A plain append-only ledger — CSV or markdown, one line per action — outperformed all of them. The agent reads its own ledger at start, humans grep it when suspicious, and git history doubles as a timeline. Boring wins.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  3. Give every agent its own blast radius
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Separate browser profile, separate tokens, separate working directory. The first time an agent wiped the wrong folder, it was &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; folder because I was lazy about isolation. Never again. Cleanup after a bad run should be &lt;code&gt;rm -rf sandbox&lt;/code&gt;, not an incident report.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  4. Verification is the feature
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An agent that claims success is worthless; an agent that proves it is priceless. Every task in my system ends with an independent check: curl the page, count the rows, diff the output. If the check cannot be automated, the task is not ready for an agent yet.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;I write longer, less dev-flavored versions of these notes — aimed at people who want to use agents without becoming engineers — at &lt;a href="https://arsentev.ai/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;arsentev.ai&lt;/a&gt;, including a free hands-on course that goes from AI user to AI builder in 11 modules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is the least glamorous thing you have automated with an agent? The unglamorous ones are the keepers.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
