<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: BAKTYBEK ASANOV</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by BAKTYBEK ASANOV (@baktybek_asanov_cbde8afc2).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/baktybek_asanov_cbde8afc2</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/baktybek_asanov_cbde8afc2"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Manual Data Entry in 2026 is Professional Negligence</title>
      <dc:creator>BAKTYBEK ASANOV</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/baktybek_asanov_cbde8afc2/manual-data-entry-in-2026-is-professional-negligence-4jdd</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/baktybek_asanov_cbde8afc2/manual-data-entry-in-2026-is-professional-negligence-4jdd</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I just completed the first Economic Work Object (EWO) for "Manual Data Transfer Between Systems" — and the numbers are staggering:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;💰 $28,500 per employee annually — that's what US companies lose on manual data transfer&lt;br&gt;
⏱️ 2 hours per day — average time employees spend copy-pasting between systems&lt;br&gt;
📊 137,000+ job postings worldwide — require manual data entry skills right now&lt;br&gt;
🤖 50-90% reduction — what RPA automation delivers predictably&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn't anecdotal. This is based on 27 verified sources: enterprise case studies (NHS, JLL), industry reports, Stack Overflow discussions, and real job postings.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We're building the world's first open ontology of repetitive human labor — a graph database that maps every repeatable work pattern to its economic cost and automation potential.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why this matters:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For CFOs: Calculate your exact exposure to manual work&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For Operations: Identify which processes to automate first&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For RPA vendors: Understand real customer pain points with evidence&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For researchers: Access structured data on work patterns&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm looking for 5-7 experts to validate this first EWO:&lt;br&gt;
→ CFOs / Financial Controllers&lt;br&gt;
→ Operations Managers&lt;br&gt;
→ HR Directors&lt;br&gt;
→ RPA Consultants&lt;br&gt;
→ Data Engineers / SREs&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you work with repetitive manual processes and want to see if our data matches your reality – fill out this 3-minute form:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://forms.gle/hmAoNKEABUxmxYBP8" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://forms.gle/hmAoNKEABUxmxYBP8&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is just the first of hundreds of work objects we'll map. The goal: make invisible toil visible, measurable, and automatable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  Operations #Automation #RPA #DataEntry #FutureOfWork #Productivity #DigitalTransformation
&lt;/h1&gt;

</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
