<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Barun Saha</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Barun Saha (@barun_saha).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/barun_saha</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/barun_saha"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>WinDirStat vs WizTree vs Drive Sonar: Which Free Disk Space Analyzer Should You Use in 2026?</title>
      <dc:creator>Barun Saha</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/barun_saha/windirstat-vs-wiztree-vs-drive-sonar-which-free-disk-space-analyzer-should-you-use-in-2026-56lo</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/barun_saha/windirstat-vs-wiztree-vs-drive-sonar-which-free-disk-space-analyzer-should-you-use-in-2026-56lo</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let's face it — we have all had that dreaded moment when Windows screams almost full disk occupancy. You try Explorer, Storage Sense, and other existing tools, but nothing gives you a clear answer. Sometimes you get a cluttered visual experience, though. So, how do you get an easy answer to what's hogging your disk space?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://diskanalyzer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;WizTree&lt;/a&gt; is one of the well-known disk scanning solutions for Windows. Its ingenuity is in reading the Master File Table (MFT) directly from the disk, resulting in fast scan times. This, however, comes at the cost of having elevated (administrator) privileges to run it. On the other hand, if you like Open-Source, &lt;a href="https://windirstat.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;WinDirStat&lt;/a&gt; is a popular alternative that allows you to scan the disk either in admin or user mode.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, the question that you should ask yourself is: is disk scanning speed the primary success metric for you? Or is it a secondary aspect to the key utility of having meaningful disk scan results and actionable insights? Moreover, do you want your disk scanning process to occupy a bulk of your system memory, rendering your perhaps already slow system even slower?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I have often been frustrated by disk scanning software. And why do not we have the simplicity of &lt;a href="https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;ncdu&lt;/a&gt;? My own frustrations — and a desire to learn &lt;a href="https://rust-lang.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Rust&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://v2.tauri.app/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Tauri&lt;/a&gt; — led me to build &lt;a href="https://drivesonar.baruns.workers.dev/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Drive Sonar&lt;/a&gt; — a blazing-fast, unbelievably light, user-mode disk usage analyzer that is also cross-platform.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F41e7tmdcy6b1l0u91kfh.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F41e7tmdcy6b1l0u91kfh.png" alt="Drive Sonar: fast, lightweight, everyday disk usage analyzer" width="800" height="450"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, what can it do? Drive Sonar:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;scans disk occupancy and usage at a given location&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;does a directory listing, which can be navigated&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;shows the usage as a treemap — a proportionate visual representation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;plots a histogram of file types and sizes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;draws a size vs. age scatter plot to identify potentially older and large files&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;allows to print the scan report as a text file&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;opens file explorer in-app and allows to delete files post confirmation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although Drive Sonar is optimized for Windows, it is cross-platform and runs on Linux and macOS as well. But don't trust my words about its performance; trust the numbers instead. Experimental results, summarized in the table below, indicate that Drive Sonar consumes about 1/6th of the memory when running a disk scan as compared to one of its alternatives. The cold scan time is about 61% of a contemporary solution. On the other hand, the warm scan time is just about half of that software!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Metric&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Drive Sonar&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;WinDirStat&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;WizTree&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Version tested&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;0.6.0&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2.8.0&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4.3.1&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;License&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Apache 2.0&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;GPL v2&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Proprietary&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Runs in user mode (no admin required)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;✅&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;✅&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;❌&lt;a href="https://drivesonar.baruns.workers.dev/#fn1" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Installed size [MB]&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;5.7&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;7.1&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;20.0&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Peak memory usage (median)&lt;a href="https://drivesonar.baruns.workers.dev/#fn2" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; [MB]&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;108.7&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;239.6&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;635.2&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Warm scan time (median)&lt;a href="https://drivesonar.baruns.workers.dev/#fn3" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; [s]&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;3.3&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;9.1&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6.5&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Cold scan time (single run)&lt;a href="https://drivesonar.baruns.workers.dev/#fn4" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; [s]&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;10.6&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;22.9&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;17.2&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Runs on &lt;a href="https://drivesonar.baruns.workers.dev/#fn5" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Windows, Linux, macOS&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Windows only&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Windows only&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, disk scanning times can often be skewed. WizTree's MFT-read trick can be really fast in some cases, particularly when a cold scan is considered. On the other hand, WinDirStat is a long-trusted default in the Open-Source domain.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Drive Sonar is a new entrant to this field, aiming to provide fast, lightweight scanning, meaningful insights, and a clean user experience. If you don't mind running disk scans with admin privileges and want to make use of fast MFT reads, try WizTree. If you like Open-Source and want to have the flexibility of running disk scan in either user or admin mode, try WinDirStat. However, if you prefer a clean and meaningful insights, and you don't mind trying out a new software, Drive Sonar is here to help you!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Drive Sonar is an &lt;a href="https://github.com/barun-saha/drive-sonar" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Open-Source (Apache-2.0 license)&lt;/a&gt; solution. &lt;a href="https://github.com/barun-saha/drive-sonar/releases" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Cross-platform binaries&lt;/a&gt; (unsigned) are available for different architectures. Drive Sonar will soon also be available as a &lt;a href="https://snapcraft.io/drivesonar" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Snap package for Linux&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do you think about Drive Sonar? How was your disk usage scanning experience? Did you print a scan report? Let me know in the comments!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>tauri</category>
      <category>rust</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
