DEV Community: Buono Make Studio

Voltage and Ground (GND) — Why Voltage Always Needs a Reference, and What '0V' Really Means

Buono Make Studio — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:30:47 +0000

If you've ever wondered why voltage always needs two points, or what GND on a schematic actually means, or whether GND is "the ground" you stand on — this is the episode that clears all of that up.

In Episode 5 of the Electric Circuits Textbook series, we'll work through what voltage really is (and how it's different from current), why a single point's potential can't be stated without a reference, and how ground (GND) plays that role in every circuit. We'll also disentangle GND from the earth ground (a.k.a. "earthing") your wall outlet uses for safety — they're not the same thing.

If you missed Episode 4 (why current and electrons flow in opposite directions), that's the previous post. This one stands on its own.

Today's Goal

Five takeaways:

What voltage is — the difference between two points (not a property of a single point)
Voltage vs. current — applied across vs. flows through
Why you need a reference to state a single point's potential as a number
What GND is — the point you've chosen as 0V for that circuit
What changes (and what doesn't) when you re-pick the reference

Plus a 3-question quick check, and a critical field note: GND on a schematic ≠ earth ground on your wall socket.

What Is "Voltage"?

Voltage is the difference in electric potential between two points. That's it.

It's often described with the analogy of "a force pushing electricity" — and that's useful as long as you don't take it literally (it's not a force in the Newtonian sense). Physically, voltage tells you how much energy each unit of charge can be given as it moves between those two points. Episode 1's separation of charge and energy shows up again here: voltage is the energy-per-charge that can be released as positive charge moves from the high-potential point to the low-potential point (i.e. in the conventional-current direction from Episode 4).

The crucial property of voltage:

You can't measure the voltage at a point. You can only measure the voltage between two points.

That's not a quirk of the math. It's the definition. Voltage requires two points.

The height analogy

Voltage works exactly like height differences:

Height world	Electrical world
The height of a place	Potential (electrical "height" at a point)
The height difference between two places	Voltage (potential difference between two points)
A bigger height difference makes a ball roll faster	A bigger voltage delivers more energy per unit of charge

The unit of voltage is the volt (V). A wall outlet might be around 100V (Japan), 120V (US), or 230V (most of Europe). A standard AA battery is 1.5V.

The Decisive Difference Between Current and Voltage

This is the chapter's biggest point. Two words that sound similar but mean completely different things.

	Current	Voltage
What it is	The amount of charge crossing a cross-section per second	The potential difference between two points
Unit	Ampere (A)	Volt (V)
How it relates to a part	Flows through the part	Is applied across the part's two ends
Water analogy	Water actually moving in the pipe	Difference in water level between two points

The cleanest one-liner I've ever heard:

Current flows. Voltage is applied.

That's it. Internalize that phrasing and you'll never confuse the two again. The water analogy makes it concrete: water flows through the pipe (= current), driven by a water-level difference between two reservoirs (= voltage).

Without a Reference, a Point's Potential Isn't Defined

OK — voltage is a difference between two points. Easy enough.

But then there's a follow-up question that trips a lot of people up:

"What's the voltage at this point?"

In strict terms, that question is ill-formed. You can only state a voltage between two points. But practically, we often want to assign a number to a single point — "this pin is at 3.3V" — and we do. How?

By picking a reference. We choose one point in the circuit and declare it to be 0V. Once we've done that, every other point in the circuit has a well-defined potential relative to that reference.

A point's potential, measured relative to a chosen reference, is what we just call "the voltage at that point." It's shorthand for "the difference between that point and the reference."

The mountain-height analogy

Heights work the same way. "How tall is the difference between person A and person B?" is well-defined without picking a reference. But "How tall is Mt. Fuji?" depends on what you call zero. In most maps, the reference is mean sea level — the average height of the ocean surface. Mt. Fuji is 3,776m above mean sea level. Pick a different reference (e.g., the center of the Earth) and the number changes.

Same idea: to state a single point's potential as a number, you have to pick a 0V reference.

Ground (GND) — the `0V` Reference Point

Enter today's second main character: ground.

Ground (GND) is the point in a circuit that you've chosen to call 0V. That's the whole definition. It's a convention. It's whatever the designer picks.

On schematics, you mark this point with a dedicated ground symbol (a few horizontal lines that taper, or an inverted triangle). The symbol means "this is the 0V reference for that circuit or section."

In the height analogy: ground is the "mean sea level" you chose for this particular circuit. Once you've planted that flag, every other point has a definite electrical "height" — its voltage relative to GND.

The GND node is real wiring — but its value of 0V is not an absolute voltage handed to you by nature. It's a choice the designer makes. Different circuits choose different points.

The most common choice in DC circuits is the negative terminal of the battery / power source. That's just convention — there's nothing physically special about it.

What Changes (and Doesn't) When You Move the Reference

This is the cleanest demonstration of the whole "voltage = difference" idea. Take a 1.5V battery and try two different reference choices:

Choice 1: negative terminal = GND (`0V`) — the usual convention

Negative terminal: 0V
Positive terminal: +1.5V
Voltage across battery: 1.5V

Choice 2: positive terminal = GND (`0V`) — just to prove the point

Positive terminal: 0V
Negative terminal: −1.5V
Voltage across battery: 1.5V

Reference	Positive terminal	Negative terminal	Voltage across battery (= difference)
Negative = GND	+1.5V	0V	1.5V
Positive = GND	0V	−1.5V	1.5V

Look at the right column. The voltage across the battery is 1.5V either way. What changed is the labels on each terminal. What didn't change is the difference between them.

The takeaway — when you re-pick the reference, the single-point potentials shift, but every difference in the circuit stays exactly the same. Voltages between any two points are reference-independent. Potential at a point is reference-dependent.

This is why GND being "just a convention" doesn't matter for the physics: nothing the components actually do depends on which point you labeled 0V.

Field Note: GND ≠ Earth Ground

Here's a distinction that catches a lot of beginners — and even some experienced people who never had it pointed out:

The GND on your schematic is not the same as the earth ground (the dirt under your house) that wall sockets use for safety.

They have different symbols. They serve different purposes. And confusing them can be dangerous.

Two distinct concepts

Concept	What it is	Purpose
Circuit GND	A point in your circuit you've chosen as `0V`	A reference for measuring voltages
Earth ground	A protective earth conductor bonded to the building's earthing system	A safety return path / reference for fault currents

A circuit's GND can be floating — not connected to the physical earth at all. A battery-powered toy is a perfect example: its GND is just "the negative side of the battery," with no path to earth.

Why the confusion matters

If a fault inside a powered device causes its metal case to become electrically energized, and you touch the case while standing on the ground, you could complete the circuit through your body — that's an electric shock. Earth grounding is part of a system that prevents this: it gives fault currents a low-impedance path back to the source through the protective earth conductor, instead of through you. Overcurrent protection (fuses, circuit breakers) trips on that fault current, and GFCI / RCD devices catch leaks by comparing the outgoing and returning current in the live and neutral conductors — if any current is missing (e.g. it's flowing through a person or insulation defect), they shut the circuit down.

But earth grounding alone isn't a complete safety system — it needs to be paired with proper overcurrent protection and, ideally, residual-current devices, to actually keep you safe. The detailed mechanics are beyond today's scope.

What you should take away: circuit GND is about measurement; earth ground is about safety. They're not the same thing, even though they share a name. Pros always check both separately.

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Three questions to lock the ideas in. Pause before peeking.

Q1. Fill in the blank: "What is applied across the two ends of a component is ___."

Current, or voltage?

Q2. The GND symbol on a schematic is always physically connected to the actual earth ground.

True or false?

Q3. You leave the wiring alone but re-pick which point you call 0V (you move the GND reference). What changes?

Each point's potential (the number assigned to it)

The voltage between any two specific points

Got your answers?

Quick Check: Answers

Click to reveal the answers

#	Answer	Why
Q1	Voltage	Voltage is applied across the two ends of a component. Current is what flows through it. "Applied" vs. "flows" — that's the key.
Q2	False	GND on a schematic is just the point chosen as the `0V` reference for that circuit. Many circuits' GND has no physical connection to the earth — battery-powered devices are an obvious example. Earth grounding (for safety) is a separate concept.
Q3	1. Each point's potential changes	When you re-pick the reference, the numbers on individual points change (e.g., what was `+1.5V` might now be `0V`). But voltage = difference between two specific points, which stays the same no matter where you put the reference.

The Q3 insight is what makes circuit analysis actually work. Every node has a "potential," but those potentials are only meaningful relative to a chosen reference. Every difference — every voltage that matters for physics — is reference-independent.

Section Summary

Today's single thread:

Voltage = potential difference between two points (V)
It's the energy-per-charge that's available as charge moves between those two points
Voltage is applied across a component; current flows through it. Both, not either
A point's potential is only well-defined relative to a reference
The reference you pick for the circuit is called ground (GND) — by convention 0V
Moving GND changes each point's potential value but not the voltage between any two points
GND on a schematic ≠ earth ground used for safety. Different concepts, different symbols, different purposes

This reference-frame idea — that some quantities are observer-dependent (potentials) while others are not (potential differences) — runs through all of physics, not just circuits. Once you see it here, you'll spot it again in mechanics (heights), thermodynamics (entropy reference states), and relativity (coordinate transforms).

Next episode: DC vs. AC — direct current vs. alternating current, the difference between a battery and a wall socket, and why the world's power grid uses one but our electronics mostly want the other. See you in Episode 6.

Why Current and Electrons Flow in Opposite Directions — Conventional Current Explained

Buono Make Studio — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:22:15 +0000

Here's a fact that confuses most electronics beginners: in a basic metal-wire DC circuit, the direction "current" flows is the exact opposite of the direction electrons actually move.

Wait — what?

In Episode 4 of the Electric Circuits Textbook series, we'll untangle this. What is current actually measuring? Why do electrons and current point in opposite directions? And — the question every beginner asks — why don't we just fix it? The answer involves Benjamin Franklin, an 18th-century convention, and an 1897 discovery that came too late to change anything.

If you missed Episode 3 (open vs. short circuits), that's the previous post. This one stands alone, so you can start here.

Today's Goal

Four things to take away:

What "current" actually means — the amount of charge crossing a point per second
What an "electron" is — the actual carrier inside a metal
Why the current direction is opposite to the electron direction — it's a historical convention
Why we keep using the "wrong" direction — and why it doesn't break anything

There's a 3-question quick check at the end.

What Is "Current"?

Current is the rate of flow of electric charge — the amount of charge crossing a cross-section of a wire per second.

That's the whole definition. Pick a cross-section anywhere along a wire. Watch how much electric charge passes through that cross-section in one second. That's the current at that point.

Picture water flowing through a pipe. Open the tap further, and more water passes a given point per second — more flow. Current works the same way for electric charge.

Important: current is the amount that passes through per second, not the speed of the things passing through. Speed and amount are different. (We saw this in Episode 3 — the electrons themselves drift surprisingly slowly.)

The unit of current is the ampere (A). For now, just remember the name. The actual numerical relationships come later in the series, when we hit Ohm's law.

The Particle That Carries Electricity — the Electron

So what actually flows inside that copper wire?

Tiny particles called electrons. Specifically the free electrons from Episode 2 — the ones that can move around freely inside a metal. They're the carriers. They're what physically moves when current is flowing.

Important property:

Electrons carry negative electric charge.

Inside a metal, current happens because these free electrons are drifting. And current is just the rate at which their charge crosses a given cross-section.

Electron vs. Current — Two Different Concepts

A common beginner trap is to think electron is current. They're not the same thing.

	Electron	Current
What it is	The particle (the actual carrier)	The amount of charge crossing per second
Analogy	A box on a conveyor belt	The number of boxes passing per second
Carries	Negative charge	(it's a measurement, not a particle)

Keeping these two straight is what makes the rest of this episode clean.

Electron Direction vs. Current Direction — They're Opposite

Here's the curveball. In a circuit, the direction electrons move is opposite to the direction current is drawn as flowing.

Electrons in the external circuit

In the wire connecting the two terminals of a battery on the outside (called the external circuit):

Electrons flow from the minus (−) terminal to the plus (+) terminal.

That's the actual physical motion. Negative charges, leaving the place that has too many of them, drifting toward the place that has too few.

Current — by convention

But in the usual battery-and-load picture, every circuit diagram and every Ohm's law calculation uses a current direction that goes:

Current flows from the plus (+) terminal to the minus (−) terminal.

Yes — the opposite of what the electrons are actually doing.

Summary, side by side

In the external circuit of a basic DC battery + resistor loop:

	Electrons	Current
Direction	− → + (actual physical motion)	+ → − (the convention used in calculations)

The actual particles point one way. The arrow on the schematic points the other way. They're literally flipped.

Why this still gives correct answers

This seems like it should break everything. It doesn't. Here's why:

"Negative charge moving left" and "positive charge moving right" are the same observable current. They're indistinguishable from the outside. So if you build all your equations and arrows around "current = the direction positive charge would move," the math works perfectly — even though the actual particles are negative and going the other way.

It's a bookkeeping choice. As long as everyone uses the same convention consistently, the answers come out right. And everyone in electrical engineering uses the same convention.

So the rule to remember: for basic metal-wire circuit calculations, treat current as flowing from + to −. The electron picture only really matters once you go into semiconductor physics, electrochemistry, vacuum tubes, or other places where the carrier types and signs become important.

Field Note: Why Don't We Just Fix It?

Reasonable question. Here's the history.

The convention came first

In the 1700s, when scientists like Benjamin Franklin were first studying electricity, they didn't know electrons existed. They observed effects, gave names (Franklin coined the positive and negative labels), and guessed which direction the "electric fluid" flowed: from positive to negative.

Decades of physics — equations, laws, conventions, diagrams — were built on that guess.

Then we discovered electrons (and they go the other way)

In 1897, J. J. Thomson discovered the electron. And it turned out:

The actual moving particles inside metals are negative electrons
They move from − to + — the opposite direction of "Franklin's flow"

So at this point, the obvious thing would be to flip the convention to match physics, right?

Why we didn't flip it

Because flipping wouldn't gain us much, and the cost would be enormous:

The math already works. As shown above, "positive charge moving one way" and "negative charge moving the other way" are indistinguishable as current. Every equation built on the old convention gives correct answers.
Re-teaching the world is expensive. Every textbook, every diagram, every datasheet, every diode and transistor symbol (arrows point in conventional current direction!), every habit of every engineer would have to flip.
There's no payoff. Flipping wouldn't make calculations easier, wouldn't reveal new physics, wouldn't fix any practical problem.

So we kept the convention. We just teach the asterisk: conventional current flows + to −, actual electrons flow − to +.

Once you know this, you'll spot it everywhere. The arrow on a diode symbol? Conventional current direction. The arrow on a transistor's emitter? Same. Almost every directional arrow in electronics is conventional, not electronic.

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Three questions, harder than they look. Pause before peeking.

Q1. Current is the speed at which electrons travel through a wire.

True or false?

Q2. Two wires, A and B. In the same 1 second, wire A sees 6 electrons cross a given cross-section, while wire B sees 3 electrons cross. Which has the larger current?

Q3. Electrons move from − to +. So is it correct to say the current direction we use in circuit calculations is from + to −?

Correct or incorrect?

Got your answers?

Quick Check: Answers

Click to reveal the answers

#	Answer	Why
Q1	False	Current is the amount of charge crossing per second, not the speed of the carriers. Confusingly, electrons drift very slowly (Episode 3) while still producing large currents.
Q2	Wire A	More charges crossing per second means more current. Wire A has twice as many electrons crossing per second, so its current is twice B's (assuming the per-electron charge is the same).
Q3	Correct	Conventional current is defined as the direction positive charge would flow — which is `+` to `−` in the external circuit. It's opposite to the actual electron motion, but that's the convention everyone uses.

If Q1 caught you, you're not alone — it's the single most common beginner trap on this topic. Most people instinctively equate "more current" with "faster moving electrons," but current is really about how much charge crosses per second, which depends on both how many carriers there are and how fast they're going. (For a typical metal, the speed barely changes; the number of carriers does the work.)

Section Summary

Today's thread:

Current = amount of electric charge crossing a cross-section per second. Unit: ampere (A)
The carriers inside a metal are free electrons, with negative charge
In the external circuit, electrons drift from − to +
But conventional current, used in every equation and schematic, is defined the other way: + to −
This is a convention that predates the discovery of the electron. The math works perfectly as long as everyone uses it consistently
So: use + → − for circuits. Remember − → + is the actual electron motion, for when physics asks

This convention is a quirk you'll meet again and again as you go deeper into electronics — every diode symbol, every transistor arrow, every datasheet plot. Knowing why it's "backwards" makes all of those instantly less confusing.

Next episode: voltage and the GND (ground) reference. Voltage is one of the most-used words in electronics and one of the most misunderstood. We'll figure out why voltage always needs a reference, what 0V actually means, and why "GND" became the universal zero. See you in Episode 5.

Open vs. Short Circuits — Two Words That Tell You Everything About a Circuit's State

Buono Make Studio — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:13:43 +0000

"That circuit got shorted." "There's an open somewhere in the line." You've probably heard both. But what's actually happening physically? And how do you spot each one when you're staring at a schematic?

In Episode 3 of the Electric Circuits Textbook series, we'll nail down two of the most loaded words in circuit reading: open and short. They're not as scary as they sound — they boil down to one idea, applied in opposite ways. Once you see it, every schematic gets easier to debug.

If you missed Episode 2 (conductors, insulators, and resistors), that's the previous post. This one stands on its own, so you can start here. No math today.

Today's Goal

Five things to take away:

What a switch really does — just connects or breaks the path. Nothing more.
What an "open" circuit is — the path is broken. Infinite resistance, zero current.
What a "short" circuit is — a low-resistance bypass. Over-large current.
Why shorts are dangerous — heat, fire, and how fuses save you
The 2-step trick for spotting either one on a schematic at a glance

There's a 3-question quick check at the end, plus a bonus on why electrons are surprisingly slow (slower than a snail) but light bulbs still turn on instantly.

The Role of a Switch — Just Connect or Break

Let's start with the most familiar part: the switch.

A switch is just a part that connects or breaks the path of a circuit. It doesn't create the electricity. It doesn't destroy the electricity. It opens and closes a passage. That's the whole job.

Think of a drawbridge over a moat. Bridge down? People can cross. Bridge up? They can't. A switch is the drawbridge of the circuit: flipped on, current can flow; flipped off, the loop is broken and current stops.

A confusing language note. A regular door says "open = you can pass through." But in circuit talk, an open circuit means broken — nothing passes. The word "open" here means "the loop is opened up / broken." It's worth getting that mismatch out of the way now, because we'll meet it again in two minutes.

These two states — connect / break — are the foundation of everything that follows.

What Is an Open Circuit?

An open circuit is a state where the path is broken somewhere, so no current flows.

A switch in the off position is the canonical open. So is a snapped wire ("broken trace"). So is a component that fell off, or a connector that wasn't plugged in all the way. Anywhere the metal-to-metal connection is missing, you have an open.

Think of a road with a chunk missing. The car can't drive through the gap. The road isn't broken in any spiritual sense — it just has a hole, and that hole is fatal to anyone trying to cross it.

The resistance across that gap is treated as infinite. Why? Because there is no conducting path between the two sides under normal conditions — no continuous metal, no continuous wire, nothing for current to follow.

The Open trifecta
Path	Broken / not connected
Resistance	Infinite (∞)
Current	Zero (0 A)

These three are the same fact written three different ways. Lock them together.

What Is a Short Circuit?

A short circuit is the exact opposite of an open. Hold that thought — it's the cleanest way to get both definitions to stick.

A short circuit is a state where a near-zero-resistance shortcut forms across a place that wasn't supposed to be there, and over-large current rushes through it.

Picture this: the current was supposed to take the long road — through the load (a resistor, a motor, a microcontroller, whatever). Then suddenly someone bulldozes a brand-new highway around the load, with no toll booth. The current takes the easy road. Massively.

The textbook example: the rubber sheath on a power cord wears through, and the two copper conductors inside come into direct contact. Boom — a low-resistance bypass appears, and you have a short.

Open vs. Short, side by side

	Open	Short
What it is	Path broken	A bypass around the load with near-zero resistance
Resistance	Infinite	Near-zero
Current	Zero	Over-large

In this basic single-loop model, the two are useful opposites — flipped in both resistance and current. That symmetry is the key to telling them apart at a glance.

Why Is a Short Dangerous?

A short has near-zero resistance, which makes the current huge. Big current means heat:

Wires and components heat up
Insulation can melt
Parts burn out
In bad cases — fire

Even something as small as touching the + and – of a battery with a paperclip is a short. The battery gets hot fast.

One technical caveat. "Zero resistance" is the cleanest way to put it, but it's the idealization. In reality the battery itself, the wires, and the contacts all have a little resistance, so the current doesn't become literally infinite — it's limited to some enormous value. Which is still plenty enough to start a fire.

Fuses: The Deliberate Open

Here's the elegant part. The way most circuits protect themselves against shorts is by making an open on purpose, exactly where it's needed.

A fuse is a thin piece of metal that's designed to melt and break when too much current flows through it. Once it melts, the path is severed — that spot is now an open circuit. Current stops, and the chance of overheating or fire downstream is greatly reduced.

A blown fuse isn't a broken fuse. It's a fuse that did its job.

A fuse uses the first half of today's lesson (the open) to protect against the second half (the short). That's the kind of inversion that makes circuit theory satisfying once you see it.

(With the caveat that protection only works if the fuse/breaker is correctly rated and installed in the first place. Don't bypass them.)

Spotting Either One on a Schematic — 2 Steps

So when you're looking at a real schematic and want to find an open or a short, here's the recipe.

Step 1: Look for an Open

Trace the loop with your finger — source → load → back to source. Is there anywhere the path is broken? A switch that's off, a missing component, a wire that disappears into nowhere? If yes, that's an open, and no current flows through that loop.

Step 2: Look for a Short

Look for a bypass path. Is there a wire (or low-resistance connection) that skips around a load, or directly connects the two terminals of the source? Either pattern — bypassing a load, or connecting + and – directly — is a short.

That's the whole method. Two reads of the same diagram, with two different questions. Open is about missing connections. Short is about extra connections.

Field Note: Electrons Are Slower Than a Snail

Flip a switch and the bulb lights up instantly. So electricity must be moving through the wire at light speed, right?

Actually — the electrons in a copper wire move astonishingly slowly. The average drift velocity for a typical current is less than a millimeter per second. Slower than a snail.

So how does the bulb light up the moment you flip the switch?

Because what's moving fast isn't the electrons. It's the electromagnetic signal that tells them to start drifting.

Think of Newton's cradle. When you let the end ball drop into the others, the ball at the far end immediately pops out. The energy traveled across the row almost instantly, even though no single ball moved very far. The same thing is happening inside a wire: the electrons themselves drift slowly, but the signal pushing them propagates through the whole circuit at a large fraction of the speed of light, depending on the wiring and the surrounding insulator.

"Electricity travels like Newton's cradle." Once you see this, a lot of weird electrical phenomena suddenly make sense.

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Three questions to test the read. Pause before peeking.

Q1. A "short circuit" means the circuit has failed and current stops flowing.

True or false?

Q2. Two schematics: ① has a wire that's broken partway. ② has a wire that bypasses the bulb (the current never reaches the bulb). Which one has no current flowing in the loop — ①, ②, or both?

Q3. A fuse in your house has blown. Which best describes what happened?

The fuse broke (defective part)

The fuse broke on purpose to protect the circuit

The short got automatically fixed

Got them?

Quick Check: Answers

Click to reveal the answers

#	Answer	Why
Q1	False	The wrong half is "current stops flowing." In a short, an over-large current flows. Open is the one where current stops. They're the opposites of each other.
Q2	① (the broken wire)	No current flows when the path is broken — that's the open. The short (②) has more current than normal, not less.
Q3	2. It broke on purpose to protect the circuit	A fuse is designed to melt and break when the current gets dangerous. By breaking, it creates an open and shuts the dangerous current down. A blown fuse did its job.

Q1 catches a lot of people. The phrase "short circuit" sounds like "circuit is broken / not working," but the physics is the opposite: too much current, not too little. If you got Q1 right on the first try, you've actually understood the distinction at a real level.

Section Summary

Today, the single thread:

A circuit needs a complete loop for current to flow
Break the loop anywhere → open circuit. Infinite resistance, zero current
Add a near-zero-resistance bypass → short circuit. Tiny resistance, over-large current
Open and short are opposites in both resistance and current
A switch deliberately creates an open or a closed loop
A fuse uses the open's properties on purpose to defend against shorts

The whole episode collapses to "is the loop connected, or is it broken?" Switches and fuses are both just controlled instances of that single question.

This is the foundation for spotting trouble on a schematic. Whether you're debugging a hobby circuit, learning electronics, or just wondering why your living room breaker tripped — open and short are the first two things to check.

Next episode: current direction vs. electron direction — and why the two are drawn going opposite ways on every schematic in the world. The short answer involves Benjamin Franklin and a 200-year-old guess. See you in Episode 4.

Conductors, Insulators, and Resistors — Why Free Electrons Decide Everything, and How a Resistor Saves Your LED

Buono Make Studio — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:04:26 +0000

A power cord has copper wire on the inside and rubber on the outside. They're both just stuff — but one carries current beautifully and the other refuses to. Why? "Because copper is metal" is a description, not an explanation.

In this Episode 2 of the Electric Circuits Textbook series, we'll unpack the real answer (it's about free electrons), explain what people actually mean by resistance, and look at why a tiny part called a resistor is the thing standing between your LED and the smoke that comes out of it.

If you haven't seen Episode 1 (circuits and schematic symbols), that's the previous post — but this article stands on its own, so you can start here. No hard math today.

Today's Goal

Three things to take away:

What separates conductors from insulators — and it's not "hardness" or "is it a metal"
What "resistance" actually means — how hard it is for current to flow
What a resistor does in a real circuit — including why every LED beginner needs one

There's a 3-question quick check at the end. A bonus: how to read a resistor's value from its colored bands (the color code).

What Conducts and What Doesn't

Look around. Some things conduct electricity well; others barely conduct at all.

Conductors — substances that carry electricity easily. Copper, aluminum, iron — most metals.
Insulators — substances that barely carry electricity. Rubber, glass, most plastics.

So where does the difference actually come from?

The key is the number of free electrons — electrons that can move freely inside the material.

Picture an open plaza with people running around. In a metal, there are huge numbers of these free-moving electrons, so a crowd can stream across the plaza easily. Push on one side and the motion ripples across instantly. That's a conductor.

In rubber, the electrons are bound tightly to their atoms. They're locked in place. So no matter how hard you push, almost nothing flows under normal conditions. That's an insulator.

The conductivity gap between a typical conductor and a typical insulator is over twenty orders of magnitude wide. That's not "a bit different" — that's a different universe.

A power cord is a tidy illustration of both at once: copper wire on the inside (conductor) carries the current; rubber or PVC sheath on the outside (insulator) keeps the current from leaking out. One cable, two jobs.

A Quick Heads-Up: Semiconductors Exist

I want to plant one name in your head before we move on.

We just framed materials as either "conduct well" or "barely conduct" — but there's a middle category too. Semiconductors sit somewhere between conductors and insulators in how easily they pass current. The brains of every phone, every laptop, every microcontroller are made from these.

Why semiconductors matter, what makes them so special — that's a major topic later in this series, in Part 2: Electronic Circuits. For today, just file the name away: there's an in-between class of material called a semiconductor.

What Is "Resistance"?

Resistance is just "how hard it is for current to flow."

Hard to flow → large resistance
Easy to flow → small resistance

Picture a garden hose. A thick hose lets water gush through. A narrow hose chokes the water down to a trickle. That "harder to push fluid through" feeling is what resistance is, electrically.

One caveat that beats a misconception. A conductor doesn't have zero resistance — even copper has a tiny amount. Likewise, an insulator isn't infinite resistance — its leakage current is astronomically small, but not literally zero. There's no perfect conductor and no perfect insulator. Every substance sits somewhere on a spectrum of "how hard is it for current to flow through me?"

This is one of the most useful mental switches in beginner circuit theory: don't think "conducts vs. doesn't conduct." Think "how easily does it conduct?" Conductors and insulators are just the two extremes of that spectrum.

The Resistor — A Part That Controls Current

Now to today's main character: the resistor.

A resistor is "hardness-to-flow" deliberately turned into a single, packaged part. You buy one from a parts store, drop it into your circuit, and it will limit and adjust the current — for a given source voltage and the rest of the loop, the resistor's value sets how much current actually flows.

Think of a faucet. Turn the handle and the water slows; turn it the other way and the water surges. A resistor is a faucet for current — except you don't turn it; you choose the size of resistor at design time, and the current in that part of the circuit settles accordingly.

Why You Need One: the LED Story

The cleanest example of "why a resistor matters" is the LED.

An LED has a property where, above a certain voltage, the current shoots up dramatically (the why behind that comes back when we cover semiconductors in Part 2). So if you connect an LED directly to a low-impedance voltage source, current floods through it and the LED burns out in milliseconds.

The fix is simple: put a resistor in series with the LED. The resistor limits current in that loop, so only a safe amount reaches the LED — and the LED happily lights up instead of self-destructing.

A resistor isn't a "thing that weakens electricity." It's a thing that decides the current's amount, on purpose. That's a very different framing.

Field Note: The Resistor Color Code

A real resistor is tiny. There's no room to print a number like 27000 Ω ±5% on the side. So someone invented a code: colored bands, read in a fixed order.

In the common 4-band type, the bands mean:

Band	What it encodes
1st	The first digit
2nd	The second digit
3rd	The number of zeros (i.e., the multiplier, ×10^n)
4th	The tolerance (e.g., gold = ±5%, silver = ±10%)

And the color-to-digit mapping is fixed worldwide:

Color	Digit
Black	0
Brown	1
Red	2
Orange	3
Yellow	4
Green	5
Blue	6
Violet	7
Gray	8
White	9

So "brown, black, red, gold" decodes as: 1, 0 → 10, then "add 2 zeros" → 1,000 Ω = 1 kΩ, ±5%.

You'll see this code on many through-hole resistors. Once you train your eyes — maybe 20 resistors of practice — you read the values like text.

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Three questions to lock the ideas in. Pause before peeking at the answers.

Q1. Why does a metal conduct electricity well?

Because it's hard

Because it has many electrons that can move freely inside

Because it's a metal

Q2. An insulator like rubber conducts no electricity at all — the flow is exactly zero.

True or false?

Q3. A resistor has bands red, violet, orange, gold. What's its value? (All choices ±5%.)

27 kΩ

22 kΩ

47 kΩ

2.7 kΩ

Got your answers?

Quick Check: Answers

Click to reveal the answers

#	Answer	Why
Q1	2. Because of free-moving electrons	Conducting isn't about hardness or about being a metal. Metals happen to have many free electrons, which is why they conduct. The free electrons are the cause; "metal" is just correlated.
Q2	False	An insulator isn't perfectly zero either. It's astronomically resistive, so the current is tiny — but not literally zero.
Q3	1. 27 kΩ ±5%	Red = 2, violet = 7 → `27`. Orange = "3 zeros" → ×1000. So `27 × 1000 = 27,000 Ω = 27 kΩ`. Gold = ±5%.

Common misreads for Q3:

22 kΩ — reading violet as red
47 kΩ — reading the first red as yellow
2.7 kΩ — reading orange as red (×100 instead of ×1000)

Read each color individually. Don't pattern-match the whole strip at once.

How did you do? If Q1 felt obvious, that's a good sign — the "free electrons" frame is going to keep paying off as the series goes on.

Section Summary

Today's story collapses into a single thread:

For everyday solids like metals, rubber, and glass, whether something conducts electricity is largely explained by its number of free electrons
Metals (lots of free electrons) are conductors; rubber and glass (few) are insulators
"How hard it is for current to flow through a material" is what we call resistance
A resistor is that hardness-to-flow turned into a part — used to set the current in a circuit on purpose
That's exactly why an LED, which would otherwise burn out, lights up safely when you put a resistor in series with it
And those resistors are labeled by color bands instead of printed numbers — the color code

The throughline: a material's electronic property at the atomic level (free electrons) is directly connected to a part's function in a real circuit (current control). Material → resistance → resistor → working LED. That continuity is what makes circuit theory beautiful once you see it.

Next time we look at one more piece of circuit-reading vocabulary: open and short circuits. What does "open" really mean, what does "shorted" really mean, and how do you spot each one on a schematic at a glance? See you in Episode 3.

Electric Circuits and Schematic Symbols — How to Read a Circuit Diagram as a Loop

Buono Make Studio — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:32:50 +0000

If you've ever stared at a circuit diagram and felt like a tangle of lines was just refusing to mean anything, this article is for you.

In this Episode 1 of the Electric Circuits Textbook series, we'll unlock what a "circuit" really is, and how to read a schematic. Both rest on one big idea — a circuit is a loop — plus four basic symbols. Get those, and circuit diagrams start looking like a map you can trace with your finger.

If you haven't read Episode 0 — the series roadmap, that's the orientation; this article is where the actual material starts. No hard math today, no prerequisites. Just careful reading.

Today's Goal

Three things to take away from this article:

What an electric circuit is — read as a one-way loop
What a schematic is — read as a map of connections
Four basic symbols — source, resistor, switch, and wire

There's a 3-question quick check at the end. Read with a pen handy and try the questions before peeking at the answers.

What Is an Electric Circuit?

Let's start with the definition.

An electric circuit is a path where electricity leaves the source, passes through a part like a bulb or a motor, and returns to the source — a single loop that goes all the way around. The part that actually does the work with the electricity is called the load.

Picture a running track. You leave the start, run all the way around, and come back to the same place you started. Electricity leaves the source, travels through the load, and comes home to the source. That one full loop is what an electric circuit really is.

If you remember nothing else from this section, remember this: an electric circuit is a loop.

Everything else in this article builds on that one idea.

No Loop, No Flow

Here's the most important property of that loop: if the loop isn't complete, electricity won't flow.

Think of a switch in your living room. Flip it on, the path connects, the loop closes, current flows, the bulb lights up. Flip it off, the path is cut somewhere, the loop is broken — no current, no light.

This is where people get tripped up. You might think:

"If I just connect to the source, electricity flows."

That's not true. The source provides a voltage, but current only flows when there is a complete path back to the other terminal. Even if one side of the source is connected, current will not flow unless the path returns to the other side.

It flows only once it's connected. Hold that feeling — we'll come back to it in the symbol section.

The Current Doesn't Get "Used Up" — Energy Does

Another one people misunderstand: the current is not consumed by the load.

It's natural to think "electricity gets used up by the bulb." But the charge flowing around the loop doesn't disappear over the loop. As much as leaves the source comes right back to it.

So what's actually being consumed? Energy.

Here's an analogy. Imagine a waterwheel in a river. As the water turns the wheel, the amount of water doesn't drop — every drop that enters the wheel comes out the other side. What drops is the water's push (its energy).

A circuit works the same way:

The charge keeps circulating around the loop, unchanged in amount.
At the load, the energy changes form — into light, motion, or heat — and gets consumed.

	The charge	The energy
Inside the loop	Circulates around, unchanged in amount	Supplied by the source and transferred through the circuit
At the load	Passes through unchanged	Converts into light, heat, or motion
If the loop is broken	Nothing flows	Nothing is delivered

In everyday language we tend to lump both together as "electricity," but it really pays to separate them: what circulates is the charge, what's used is the energy. This will come up again in the quick check.

A Schematic Is a "Map of Connections"

Now let's look at how we put a circuit onto paper. That's the schematic.

A schematic is a diagram that represents each part — source, bulb, resistor — by a fixed symbol. The symbols themselves are called schematic symbols.

The key insight: a schematic is not a photo of the physical thing. Where the parts physically sit, whether the wires are long or short, straight or bent — none of that is preserved in the diagram. What a schematic shows is only what connects to what.

A familiar analogy is a subway map. The London Tube map doesn't accurately show the real distances between stations, the actual curves of the track, or the geography of the city. But you can see at a glance which station connects to which line. A schematic does exactly the same job for circuits — it's a map of connections, drawn for legibility, not for realism.

Tracing Lines: When Are Two Wires "One Piece"?

Before we get to the symbols, there's one skill beginners need first: how to trace the wires on a schematic. Once this clicks, schematics get dramatically easier to read.

Three rules cover almost everything you need:

Lines joined by wire are electrically one piece. No matter how long the wire is, or how many corners it bends through.
Cross a component, and you're in a separate piece. A resistor, a battery, anything that does something to the current — those break the "one piece" rule.
At a crossing, look for the junction dot. A black dot at the intersection means connected. No dot means the lines are just visually crossing, with no electrical connection.

A bit more on each.

"One piece" extends through any amount of wire

A wire bent into a corner, or running long across the diagram, or even appearing in two visually-separated areas — as long as it's all the same uninterrupted wire, it's electrically the same single point. Schematics bend wires purely so the diagram fits on the page.

Components break the connection

The moment a component (resistor, capacitor, battery, etc.) is inserted in the path, the wire before and after it are no longer the same piece. The component does something to the current — drops a voltage, stores energy, whatever — so they have to be treated as separate connection points.

Crossings: the dot is everything

When two wires draw a +, they might or might not be connected. The convention is:

Black dot at the crossing → connected (one node)
No dot at the crossing → not connected (the lines just visually cross)

This is a common source of misreading for beginners, so make a habit of checking the crossing every time.

Tip: a finger-tracing habit that prevents 90% of misreads
Whenever you spot a crossing in a schematic, physically trace each wire with your finger and look for a junction dot at every intersection. It feels slow at first, but it removes the single most common rookie mistake — and once your eyes know what to look for, you'll spot dots automatically.

The Four Basic Symbols

Now let's lock in the four most common symbols. With just these, you can already read most simple circuits as a loop.

Symbol	What it is	What to remember
Source	Provides electrical energy to the circuit (e.g. a battery)	The long line is + (positive), the short line is – (negative). Direction matters.
Resistor	A part that opposes current flow	Drawn as a rectangle (new JIS / IEC) or a zigzag (old JIS / ANSI). More on this in a moment.
Switch	Connects or breaks the path	Drawn as a line with one end lifted. Open = path broken. Closed = path connected.
Wire	Carries current between parts	Just a plain straight line.

Notice that the switch encodes "no loop, no flow" right into its symbol: when the lifted end is up, the loop is broken; when it's down, the loop is closed. The picture is the rule.

Once you can read these four — source, resistor, switch, wire — you can already trace a simple circuit as "leave the source, through the resistor, past the switch, back to the source." That's a loop.

Don't try to memorize every schematic symbol that exists. Start with these four. The rest build on top of them later in the series.

Field Note: The Resistor Has Two Symbols

One real-world wrinkle worth knowing about: the resistor is drawn two different ways, depending on which standard the diagram follows.

Symbol	Standard	Where you'll see it
Rectangle	New JIS / IEC (international standard)	Modern Japanese textbooks, most international datasheets, schematics drawn this decade
Zigzag	Old JIS / ANSI	Plenty of Japanese drawings still in use; the dominant style in the United States

Standards aren't strictly enforced in most settings, and the older zigzag has stuck around partly out of habit and partly because it visually suggests "something gets in the way of the flow." So you'll routinely see both styles in the same career, sometimes in the same project.

In a sentence: rectangle = new JIS / IEC, zigzag = old JIS / ANSI. Both mean the same resistor. Use whichever your team, school, or reference material has settled on.

If a single article had to teach you exactly one piece of unwritten field knowledge, it would probably be this one.

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Time to check your understanding. These three questions are deliberately chosen to trip you up if anything didn't fully land. Pause and think before peeking at the answers.

Q1. In a simple loop circuit (source, switch, bulb in a single loop, nothing else), the current measured after the bulb compared to before the bulb — what is it?

It's been used up, so smaller after

Unchanged

Drops to zero just before the bulb

Q2. Take the same set of parts (source, switch, resistor, wires) connected the same way. Draw schematic A as a square layout, then redraw the exact same connections as schematic B with a round, twisty layout. Are A and B "the same circuit"?

Yes / No

Q3. Two schematics show two wires crossing in a +. In figure A, there's a black dot at the crossing. In figure B, there's no dot. Which is electrically connected?

A (with the dot)

B (without the dot)

Both

Got your answers locked in? Let's check.

Quick Check: Answers

Click to reveal the answers

#	Answer	Why
Q1	2. Unchanged	What drops is energy. In a single-loop circuit with no branches, the current is the same at every point in the loop — including just before and just after the bulb. Don't confuse charge flow with energy.
Q2	Yes — same circuit	A schematic is a map of connections, not shape or position. Different visual layouts of the same connections describe the same circuit.
Q3	1. A (with the dot)	Without a junction dot, two lines just visually cross — they're not connected. The dot is what creates the connection.

How did you do?

If you missed any of those, revisit the corresponding section:

Q1 → "The Current Doesn't Get 'Used Up' — Energy Does"
Q2 → "A Schematic Is a 'Map of Connections'"
Q3 → "Tracing Lines: When Are Two Wires 'One Piece'?"

The Q1 misconception (electricity = energy = the same thing) is the single most common confusion in introductory circuit theory. If you got it on the first try, you're in great shape for what comes later.

Section Summary

Today's whole story collapses into one thread: electricity travels around a loop.

An electric circuit is one closed loop, source → load → back to source
If the loop is broken anywhere, nothing flows ("no loop, no flow")
The charge circulates and doesn't get used up; what gets consumed at the load is energy
A schematic is a map of connections, not positions or lengths
With just four symbols (source, resistor, switch, wire) you can already trace simple circuits as loops

This loop idea is the foundation for everything else in this series. The next episode picks up here: conductors, insulators, and resistors — why some materials let current flow and others don't, and how a resistor actually opposes the current.

Thanks for reading. If this clicked for you, the Episode 0 roadmap lays out the full series. Follow my profile to catch the next episode as it drops.

Starting the Electric Circuits Textbook Series — A roadmap from zero to a field-ready foundation

Buono Make Studio — Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:36:12 +0000

If you've ever tried to "properly learn electricity" and ended up bouncing between fragments — a YouTube video here, a textbook chapter there — without ever feeling like the pieces connect, this post is for you.

I'm Bono. I run a YouTube channel and a blog around electronics, and from this week I'm starting a long-running series called the Electric Circuits Textbook. Its job is to take you from zero all the way to a foundation in circuit theory that actually holds up in the field — covering electric circuits, electronic circuits, logic circuits, and power electronics with control, in that order.

This article is the Episode 0 — an orientation before the main series begins. By the time you finish reading, you'll know who this series is for, how far it goes, what each of the four parts contains, and how to actually get through a long series without burning out.

Note on numbering. In the video version this is labeled as "#1," because YouTube counts the introduction. On the blog I'm calling it Episode 0, since the content of this article is roadmap-only — the actual material starts in the next episode.

Welcome

The Electric Circuits Textbook is a structured course that walks you through the theory of electricity from zero, in order, and systematically. Once the theory is solid, a separate practical edition is planned to follow.

I spent more than a month designing this series — deciding what to teach, in what order, and where to slow down. I've also gone through every piece of the content myself. So I'm shipping it with confidence.

This first article lays out the big picture: what we're going to learn, and how.

Who This Series Is For

You can start with middle-school-level math. That part is honest.

What I also want to be honest about: this is not a course you can follow with no math at all. Around AC, transient phenomena, and control, we use high-school-level ideas — trigonometry, complex numbers, calculus. I break each one down as it appears, so a non-STEM background, a beginner background, or a long-pause-and-restart background is all fine. You don't need to brace yourself before starting.

But it's also not a shortcut. Real understanding takes time working through examples yourself. With that caveat in mind, the series is especially aimed at:

People who want to work in the field one day, and need a real foundation
Self-learners and working engineers who want to rebuild from first principles
Anyone who is willing to take it one step at a time

If that's you, I'll take you all the way.

Why I Made This Series

A short backstory. There are three reasons this series exists.

There aren't many beginner-friendly paths that put the pieces in order. I've been making electronics content on YouTube for years, and I kept seeing the same gap: plenty of individual lessons, but very little that walks you through circuit theory as one ordered sequence.
Demand in the field is growing. With AI everywhere and the working-age population shrinking, I keep hearing from both sides — companies that need people who can handle real electricity, and learners who want a way in. I want to help bridge those two.
The tools to make a proper textbook finally exist. I've wanted to build something like this for years but never had the bandwidth. AI as a writing and review partner is what finally made it possible.

How Far You'll Go

Where will you end up after the theory edition?

The goal is a theoretical foundation in electricity that holds up in the field. Not formula memorization. The aim is to understand the basic theory of electricity, electronics, logic, and control through the reasons behind each result, not just the result itself.

Concretely, that means:

You can read what a circuit diagram and its symbols actually mean
You can explain how a circuit works in your own words
You can follow conversations and reference material that engineers exchange day-to-day

Component selection, measurement technique, and design judgment — the hands-on side — belong to the practical edition that follows the theory edition. The theory edition's job is to make sure that foundation is built solidly.

The Whole Map of the Series

The theory edition is structured as four parts.

Part 1 — Electric Circuits
Part 2 — Electronic Circuits
Part 3 — Logic Circuits
Part 4 — Power Electronics and Control

The order matters. Each part is the foundation for the next, so working through them front-to-back is the shortest path. And the theory edition doesn't actually stop at Part 4 — I plan to keep adding topics beyond it as the series grows.

Part 1: Electric Circuits

Let me walk through each part briefly.

Part 1: Electric Circuits. We start from the basics of DC circuits, work through Ohm's law and AC, and finish at transient phenomena that change over time. This is where you build basic stamina in electricity. Everything that follows rests on this part.

Part 1 — Contents

A closer look at what Part 1 covers.

It starts with the fundamentals of DC circuits — circuit symbols, current and voltage, and ground. From there we move to Ohm's law and the calculations around power and series/parallel resistance. Then the circuit theorems for solving circuits, then capacitors and inductors that store energy, then AC circuits. We close on AC power, three-phase AC, and transient phenomena.

Topic	What you'll get
DC fundamentals	Symbols, current, voltage, ground
Ohm's law and calculations	Power, series/parallel reasoning
Circuit theorems	Tools for solving real circuits
Capacitors and inductors	The energy-storage elements
AC circuits	Complex numbers as a working tool
AC power and transients	Three-phase AC, time-varying behavior

By the end of Part 1, you'll have the basic circuit intuition you need for the rest of the series.

If a word like "transient phenomena" looks intimidating, don't worry — that's a Part 1 topic and we walk into it from scratch with diagrams. Right now it's enough to know the word exists.

Part 2: Electronic Circuits

Part 2: Electronic Circuits. Semiconductors, diodes, transistors, op-amps — the components that do something to signals. You'll learn the techniques for handling signals: amplifying small ones, reshaping their form, generating new ones. This is where the insides of the electronic devices around you start to make sense.

Part 2 — Contents

Part 2 covers, in order:

How semiconductors and diodes work
Rectifier circuits and power supplies — turning electricity into clean DC
Transistor operation
Amplifier circuits — making small signals larger
Op-amps — the workhorse of practical amplification
Oscillators, modulation, and demodulation — generating and carrying signals

After this part, you'll know what each common component is for, not just what it's called.

Part 3: Logic Circuits

Part 3: Logic Circuits. This part shifts gears. Here, using only two numbers — 0 and 1 — we look at how the insides of a computer are actually built. You'll combine logic gates to compute and to store state. This is where you touch the deepest layer of the device you're reading this article on.

Part 3 — Contents

Part 3 has four chapters:

Binary and the basics of logic circuits — binary, Boolean algebra, logic gates
Combinational circuits — combining gates to compute
Sequential circuits and flip-flops — circuits that remember; counters and registers
Memory and AD/DA conversion — storage, and the bridge between analog and digital

By the end, you can see how a computer does both calculation and memory — the two things that make it a computer.

Part 4: Power Electronics and Control

Part 4: Power Electronics and Control. Everything you learned in Parts 1–3 — electricity, electronics, logic — gets used here. Power supplies, motor drives, and the control engineering that commands them. The power-supply circuits that convert electricity efficiently, the drive circuits that actually turn motors, and the control that makes them move the way you intend. This is the part where everything ties back to the real world.

Part 4 — Contents

Part 4 covers:

Power-supply circuits — DC-DC converters and switching power supplies, for efficient conversion
Motor drive — the various motor types and the circuits that drive them
Control engineering — fundamentals — the idea of feedback
System response and stability
PID control — the workhorse of practical control

By the time you get to the end of Part 4, you have the toolbox to drive a piece of physical hardware and command it the way you intend.

How to Actually Get Through a Long Series

A series this long needs three habits to survive. Keep these in mind:

Follow the episodes in order, along the map. Each block is the foundation for the next. Skipping breaks the chain.
When you get stuck, go back without hesitation. Almost every "I don't get it" has its cause one step earlier. Walking back is cheap; pushing forward confused is expensive.
One episode, one theme. Take it at your pace. Each episode is self-contained for that one theme, so it's perfectly fine to move slowly. Real ability builds either way.

It will feel hard at times. But it's designed so that if you keep moving — even slowly — you'll reach a place where it makes sense.

A Quick Note on Some Common Misconceptions

A few things readers often expect from an introduction like this. Worth clearing up before the main series starts:

What people often expect	What this is actually
The introduction teaches Ohm's law, basic circuits, etc.	This is the map only. Real content begins in the next episode.
"I'm not a STEM person, so electricity isn't for me."	The required math is filled in as it appears. You can start from zero, as long as you're willing to work through the math when it shows up.
"If I can't binge the whole ~140-episode series, there's no point."	Each episode is one self-contained theme. Go in order, back up when you need to, that's enough.

Where We Go Next

That was the Episode 0 — who this series is for, how far it goes, what the four parts contain, and how to actually get through it.

The most important takeaway: electricity, taken one step at a time in the right order, is reachable — for non-STEM backgrounds, for total beginners, for people coming back to it years later. If you want to follow technical conversations and read manufacturer documentation comfortably, this series is built for exactly that.

In Episode 1, the actual content begins: Electric Circuits and Schematic Symbols. We unpack what a "circuit" really means, and how to read a schematic diagram, starting from zero. See you there.

The Goal for English Learners Is to Have a Dream in English

Buono Make Studio — Tue, 12 May 2026 03:53:28 +0000

Hi, this is Buono.

I had a dream in English 2 times before.

1st time: When I was working as a project manager with foreign people in an automobile company.
2nd time: When I was reading many English books.

Not so many. And the durations were short. (Furthermore, I didn't remember the contents very well.)

But I guess there is a significant gap between 0 and 1 (or more) because a tremendous effort is needed in order to have a dream in English.

I can say it confidently based on my experience.

How to Have a Dream in English

The key to having a dream in English is: Fill your brain with English. That's all.

Before I saw an English dream for the first time in my life, I had held meetings with foreign people on Zoom almost every day.

Since my English skills were poorer than they are now, I was struggling to catch up with their conversation.

So, naturally, my brain filled with English.

But after quitting the position and the job, I haven't seen any dreams in English. (Very sadly for me.)

Then, how about the 2nd time?

All of a sudden, it happened to me one day.

As I mentioned in the other article, I have read many English books recently. Sometimes 30 minutes a day, sometimes 4 hours a day.

When I got up in the morning, I found that I had had a dream that I was having a hamburger with foreign friends somewhere in McDonald's.

Even though I was not sure why I dreamt this kind of dream (because I haven't read such kind of books), I was very happy to have an English dream again, long after the 1st dream.

Fill Your Brain With English

So I encourage you to fill your brain with English through these activities:

To read many English books
To watch many English videos/movies
To have conversations many times online. (Like Native Camp)

Catch you later👍

The reason why we should not read English books using dictionary

Buono Make Studio — Thu, 07 May 2026 13:37:55 +0000

The Reason Why We Should Not Read English Books Using Dictionary

Hi, this is Buono.

I love reading English books recently and have read around 30 books over the last year.

Below is the list I read during this period:

The Giver
Darren shan (#1 to #6)
Wonder
Factfulness
The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas
The House With Chicken Legs
It Ends With Us
There's a Boy in the Girls' Bathroom
Danny the Champion of the World
Atomic Habits
Tuesdays with Morrie
etc…

As you can see, I'm open-minded and read books of several genres.

Disadvantages of Using a Dictionary

Since I'm a middle-level English learner, I often see a word I don't know whenever I turn a page.

The frequency depends on the genre and the target of the book.

Anyway, I don't use a dictionary at all nowadays.

You might think about how you proceed to read ahead without understanding the detailed meaning.

But I can say from my experience that you don't have to worry about that point.

Even if you catch only 60% of 70% of all sentences or wordings, you can figure out the overall story and what the author wants to tell us. I'm sure it doesn't matter.

You don't have to be a perfectionist. You must not.

On the other hand, below are the disadvantages of using a dictionary to look up all the meanings of a word you see.

The rhythm of reading turns bad
The power of anticipating the meaning of a word you don't know diminishes

In order to avoid these cons, we should read books using the dictionary as little as possible.

How to Assume the Meaning of a Word You Don't Know

Let me show you my idea for how I determine the meaning of a word I don't know when I encounter it.

We can predict the meaning if we find these words listed below. (In this case, A is your familiar word, whereas X is not familiar to you.)

A and X: The meaning of X is almost the same as A.
A but X: The meaning of X is the opposite of A.
Although A, it's X: The meaning of X is the opposite of A.
A, so X: X is a result of A.
X so that / therefore A: X causes A.

These are just examples.

Additionally, we can use the "context" power to predict the meaning.

If that paragraph contains several positive emotional words like smiled, empowered, and happiness, the X in the paragraph should be a positive word or something related to positive words.

In that way, I succeeded in reading many books.

Catch you later👍

Those Who Ask If They Need To Study English Don't Need To Study English.

Buono Make Studio — Wed, 06 May 2026 07:58:24 +0000

Hi, it's Buono.

I'm often asked by friends and subscribers of my channel if they need to study English.

The background of the question is obviously the era of AI.

In this era, AI can translate any language into any language they want. Some devices like a pocket-talk allow us to have a conversation with anyone who has a different mother tongue in real time.

No wonder they have such a kind of question in these circumstances.

But, I hate to tell you this: if you have this question, you don't need to study English.

The Purpose of Studying English

Why are you interested in learning English in the first place?

Some people might say that they want to travel abroad alone without a tour guide.

Some people might say that they want to exchange different cultures.

For me, the reason why I learn English is related to the foundational experience when I was young.

I've been to a language school in Sydney for 1 month.

It was so memorable for my entire life that I couldnt't forget. English class with a funny teacher, a passionate Brazilian girl, and wild European boys.

But what I cannot forget most is the moment I saw at the gathering held one night.

Korean, French, and other friends who are from other countries were talking about Manga.

Japanese was only me there.

I was right there at the moment when they wanted to ask something about Manga. They asked me some questions and opinions to me when I was found.

But I couldn't reply with an appropriate answer and opinion to them.

"Why don't you know Manga at all, even though you're Japanese?" is written in their faces.

After that regrettable happening, my top priority in learning English became to discuss Manga with foreign people.

Do You Have Emotional Motivations to Learn English?

The previous story is mine. All of you have different stories.

But, no matter what story you have, I can say that "emotional motivation" is mandatory to keep you learning English.

You can see two main reasons why we learn language:

Useful motivation: To earn more wages, to be helpful in daily life
Emotional motivation: To conquer regrettable/unforgettable things. To be cool. To be what they want to be.

You can easily imagine that the first one can be represented by AI. If you're learning a language for the number one reason, you must quit learning it immediately because AI will obtain that skill in the near future and speak/translate just for you. You don't have to ruin your precious time.

But, on the other hand, if you're currently learning a language for the number two reason, you must keep going.

In my experience and feeling, those who ask me if they need to study English are learning or seeing just for the number one reason.

I'm absolutely sure that those who have the number two reason are driven from their hearts.

Like the experience I faced in Sydney, we need firsthand experience regardless of the place, type, or situation.

I strongly recommend you remember that you have had such kind of things in the past.

Catch you later👍

Why Isn't There a Reward for Obtaining TIME Instead of MONEY?

Buono Make Studio — Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:45:43 +0000

Hi, this is Buono.

Let me talk about the reward system spreading around the world today.

What can we get as a result of working?

You're right, it's money.

But this time I'd like to ask you, "Is money all you need?"

We Need Money, But…

Needless to say, money is important for our lives, especially to provide for our families.

We need it when we go out anywhere, go to the restaurant with friends, enroll our children in school, and more and more (Since I'm a father, I understand how you feel).

But please ask yourself this: Do we need money INFINITELY?

I suggest you calculate the exact value you need in a year.

If the value exceeds the money you earn, you must keep working continuously and maybe more.

But if your earnings exceed the threshold, this article is written for you.

You have to make a decision that you keep earning as you have been, or focus on more important things in your life.

Prioritize TIME Over MONEY

My suggestion is that we apply a new work style where we work only 2 or 3 days a week, instead of 5.

It sounds like a freelancer. In a sense, it's true. However, my suggestion covers all work styles.

Why is it that we only have the option that we proceed going up?

The more we work and make achievements, the more we earn money, and more importantly, the busier we are.

That situation comes from the fact that the opportunity loss of a high-earning person is greater than that of others if he is free. That's why such a person is demanded everywhere to minimize the loss, ending up always occupied.

Does it ring a bell?

I'm very sorry for you.

This is one of the reasons I don't want to promote myself and become a boss.

I need time rather than money very much. I love free time. I have many things I want to do in my life.

After considering many hours, I came up with one idea.

Companies offer two options as a reward of something great like below:

Money and position: Same as the current way
Time: We can reduce our working time with same wages

The latter one represents more high cost performance.

Imagine that you are currently working 5 days a week and earn $3,000 a month. After getting this reward, you will work only 3 days a week with same wage $3,000.

Conglaturation! You obtain completely free 2 days a week.

You can go everywhere you want, you can do everything you want using this space.

This is my suggestion.

I hope many long-sighted companies apply this work style in the near future.

What do you think about it?

Catch you later👍

What Is the Significance of Reading The Giver Now, in the Age of AI?

Buono Make Studio — Mon, 27 Apr 2026 06:18:09 +0000

Hi, this is Buono.

Recently, I have loved reading foreign books. It gives me many chances to face new things and thoughts.

"Can't find good books to read?"

I'd like to introduce a book for you today.

https://amzn.asia/d/02wpNgHZ

Outline

The Giver depicts a so-called dystopia in the distant future. (The exact year is not described, though.)

No pain, no stress, no out-of-control…

And all of the memories and experiences have disappeared from them (except a small portion of people, as I'll explain later.)

Even emotions don't exist.

That word seems like an eutopia rather than a dystopia at a glance.

But…

Can you imagine a world that ACTUALLY doesn't have these pains?

The boy, the main character in this book, is one of the "normal" people in such a world. He spent his daily life until 12 or 13 years old (I forgot the detail.) by the time he was sentenced to be "The Giver" as his profession.

What is The Giver?

These are the people who have all the memories and experiences instead of other people.

They know how chill the snow is, they know how beautiful the flowers are, and they know how terrifying the war is.

The process of being The Giver is no longer easy, but the boy ends up taking after the man who currently holds the role.

Despite the fact that these memories and experiences affect the boy, he struggles to put up with them and gradually changes his thoughts and feelings.

Then, finally, he decided to do one thing one day.

Why Should We Read This One at This Moment?

This book hints at a lot of things we all have to consider for our future.

We all believe a completely controlled world is like heaven. That's why we develop technologies and industries every day.

If it is raining when we go out, we wish it could be fine. So we improve weather forecast accuracy, and we will develop a weather control machine someday.

If our body is hurt by injuries, we wish the pain could be away. So we give the first-aid in no time, and all pain will vanish just by swallowing a pill.

However, what will happen if all of these wishes really come true?

I'm sure you have this answer because the answer is completely the same as the feeling you feel right now when you use AI (like ChatGPT, Claude code, and so on)

Do you realize you lack knowledge and skills day by day?

The more we use AI, the more we become foolish.

And we continue this… The goal is obvious. The Giver depicts the scene we end up reaching in the future.

But needless to say, we don't want to lose our precious memories, emotions, and experiences.

If so, what we should do from now on is also obvious.

We must stop to improve and grow everything someday.

Firsthand Experiences Are the Key to the AI Era

Even if technologies help us keep safe, be useful, and make everything easy, we should not abandon firsthand experiences.

That is the right that only a human being can enjoy.

What do you think about it? I hope I can hear your thoughts!

Catch you later👍

Doing Everything You Want to Do Is Actually the Fastest Path Forward

Buono Make Studio — Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:00:00 +0000

Hey it's Buono. This one might not apply to everyone, but if you're the type of person who constantly wants to try new things — what I'd call "multi-passionate" syndrome — this might hit hard.

I'm not talking about ADHD in the clinical sense. I mean the kind of person who just can't stop getting excited about new projects. Can't sit still. Can't commit to one lane.

That's me. Always has been.

Society calls it "unfocused" or "jack of all trades." Not exactly flattering. And honestly, I used to believe them.

The Problem With Having No Specialty

Every time I hit a wall in life — career setbacks, pivots, difficult decisions — the same thoughts came up: "What's my specialty even?" and "Man, if I just had one clear weapon this would be so much easier."

I hated being this way. So I tried to fix it. Over and over.

"From now on, THIS is the only thing I'm doing for the rest of my life." I've made that vow to myself probably 10 times. Maybe more.

It never stuck. Sometimes it lasted a month. Sometimes I'd wake up the next morning and the conviction was already gone.

Every time it fell apart, I'd spiral: "Guess I'll never be a real expert at anything." Brutal cycle.

You Can't Fix This (And You Shouldn't Try)

Here's what I finally figured out: this isn't fixable. And more importantly — it doesn't need to be.

Two books helped me see this. "How to Find the Impulse to Leave the Rails of Life" and Koichiro Kokubun's "The Ethics of Boredom and Idleness."

Kokubun's argument blew my mind. His stance is basically: decision is the enemy.

Think about it. You quit your corporate job and declare "THIS is my path now!" Feels liberating, right? But then you spend the next five years trapped by that decision. Bending your life around it. Defending it to yourself.

And at some point you realize... how is this different from being trapped at the company? You just swapped one cage for another.

His proposal? Be more like an animal. Stop overthinking. Let yourself move toward whatever pulls you in the moment. Give yourself permission to not have a master plan.

When I read that, I nearly fell out of my chair. It was saying the exact same thing as the impulse book — from a completely different angle. That can't be a coincidence.

What Happened When I Stopped Deciding

This newsletter? Started on impulse. No plan. No idea how long it'll last.

Once I started trusting impulse over decision, I tried a bunch of stuff without asking permission from my own brain:

Newsletter
English vocab learning app
Cooking (went deep on pasta, now eyeing homemade pizza)
Unity + electronics projects
Netflix foreign dramas
AI image generation

Looking at that list, it makes zero sense. No common thread. No strategic narrative.

And that's fine.

The Time You Spend Hesitating Is the Real Waste

When I believed "commitment" was the only valid approach, I'd suppress every urge that didn't align with my Chosen Path. I'd resist the pull toward new things and force myself to stay in one lane.

But every time I resisted, this massive internal conflict would build up. "Is this really the right direction? Am I sure? What if I'm wrong?"

That hesitation phase was the real killer. Not the switching. The agonizing. Zero motivation, zero output, zero joy. Just sitting in indecision burning through days and weeks.

Eventually I realized: trying the thing and moving on quickly is WAY more efficient than debating whether to try it for months.

Horiemon said it best: "Get obsessed like a monkey." I used to think that was reckless. Now I think it's genius.

If you try something and it doesn't stick, leave it. Come back a year later if the itch returns. That's perfectly fine. Way better than staring at it sideways while forcing yourself to do something else.

This is partly a reminder to myself. But if you're stuck in the same loop — paralyzed between what you "should" do and what you actually want to do — I hope this helps even a little.

Just go do the thing.

Catch you later ✌️

DEV Community: Buono Make Studio

Voltage and Ground (GND) — Why Voltage Always Needs a Reference, and What '0V' Really Means

Today's Goal

What Is "Voltage"?

The height analogy

The Decisive Difference Between Current and Voltage

Without a Reference, a Point's Potential Isn't Defined

The mountain-height analogy

Ground (GND) — the 0V Reference Point

What Changes (and Doesn't) When You Move the Reference

Choice 1: negative terminal = GND (0V) — the usual convention

Choice 2: positive terminal = GND (0V) — just to prove the point

Field Note: GND ≠ Earth Ground

Two distinct concepts

Why the confusion matters

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Quick Check: Answers

Section Summary

Why Current and Electrons Flow in Opposite Directions — Conventional Current Explained

Today's Goal

What Is "Current"?

The Particle That Carries Electricity — the Electron

Electron vs. Current — Two Different Concepts

Electron Direction vs. Current Direction — They're Opposite

Electrons in the external circuit

Current — by convention

Summary, side by side

Why this still gives correct answers

Field Note: Why Don't We Just Fix It?

The convention came first

Then we discovered electrons (and they go the other way)

Why we didn't flip it

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Quick Check: Answers

Section Summary

Open vs. Short Circuits — Two Words That Tell You Everything About a Circuit's State

Today's Goal

The Role of a Switch — Just Connect or Break

What Is an Open Circuit?

What Is a Short Circuit?

Open vs. Short, side by side

Why Is a Short Dangerous?

Fuses: The Deliberate Open

Spotting Either One on a Schematic — 2 Steps

Step 1: Look for an Open

Step 2: Look for a Short

Field Note: Electrons Are Slower Than a Snail

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Quick Check: Answers

Section Summary

Conductors, Insulators, and Resistors — Why Free Electrons Decide Everything, and How a Resistor Saves Your LED

Today's Goal

What Conducts and What Doesn't

A Quick Heads-Up: Semiconductors Exist

What Is "Resistance"?

The Resistor — A Part That Controls Current

Why You Need One: the LED Story

Field Note: The Resistor Color Code

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Quick Check: Answers

Section Summary

Electric Circuits and Schematic Symbols — How to Read a Circuit Diagram as a Loop

Today's Goal

What Is an Electric Circuit?

No Loop, No Flow

The Current Doesn't Get "Used Up" — Energy Does

A Schematic Is a "Map of Connections"

Tracing Lines: When Are Two Wires "One Piece"?

"One piece" extends through any amount of wire

Components break the connection

Crossings: the dot is everything

The Four Basic Symbols

Field Note: The Resistor Has Two Symbols

Quick Check — 3 Questions

Quick Check: Answers

Section Summary

Starting the Electric Circuits Textbook Series — A roadmap from zero to a field-ready foundation

Welcome

Who This Series Is For

Why I Made This Series

Ground (GND) — the `0V` Reference Point

Choice 1: negative terminal = GND (`0V`) — the usual convention

Choice 2: positive terminal = GND (`0V`) — just to prove the point