<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Christoph</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Christoph (@chranditho).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/chranditho</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/chranditho"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Your Ports Are Lying About Your Business</title>
      <dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/chranditho/your-ports-are-lying-about-your-business-k5m</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/chranditho/your-ports-are-lying-about-your-business-k5m</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Your hexagonal architecture ports might still be speaking HTTP instead of business.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In hexagonal architecture, ports exist to isolate your business logic from how&lt;br&gt;
it's delivered. In practice, most of them are still named after HTTP operations&lt;br&gt;
like &lt;code&gt;createUser&lt;/code&gt; or &lt;code&gt;updateUser&lt;/code&gt; — a habit inherited from years of REST-first&lt;br&gt;
development.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That mismatch isn't cosmetic. It turns your tests into database checks instead&lt;br&gt;
of real business specifications. And it's exactly the convention AI coding&lt;br&gt;
agents will pick up from your existing code and repeat at scale, for as long as&lt;br&gt;
the repo lives.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wrote about why ports keep lying about your business, and what it takes to&lt;br&gt;
name them so a domain expert would recognize what they actually do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.squer.io/blog/your-ports-are-lying-about-your-business" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on the SQUER blog →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The part people push back on most is the single-adapter case — if there's only&lt;br&gt;
ever going to be one adapter, is the port interface worth keeping? Curious&lt;br&gt;
whether you'd skip it.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>softwareengineering</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>cleancode</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
