DEV Community: Collabier

I got tired of bloated dev utility sites leaking tokens, so I built an 80-tool offline suite in Next.js 16 and WASM

Collabier — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:21 +0000

Title: I got tired of bloated dev utility sites leaking tokens, so I built an 80-tool offline suite in Next.js 16 and WASM

Link: https://omnikite.vercel.app

GitHub: https://github.com/nadim-chowdhury/omnikite-project

Hey everyone,

Like most developers, I regularly need quick tools throughout the day: formatting a JSON dump, checking an expired JWT signature, calculating a CIDR subnet, or merging two PDF files.

The problem is that 90% of the top Google results for these tools are either:

Sending your confidential strings/tokens to a remote backend API.
Covered in popups and auto-playing ads that shift the layout.
Slow and bloated.

So I spent the last few weeks building Omnikite — an open, zero-install workspace with 80 tools that run 100% client-side in your browser memory.

Features & Highlights:

🔒 Zero Data Transmission: Sensitive JSON, JWTs, and files never leave your machine. It works completely offline.
⚡ Instant Execution: Sub-millisecond speeds using WebAssembly (WASM), Web Workers, and the native crypto.subtle API.
⌨️ Command Palette: Press ⌘K anywhere to search and launch any tool instantly.
⭐ Local Favorites & Recents: Pin your daily tools with zero signup required.
📱 Clean UI & Dark Mode: Built with Next.js 16 App Router, React 19, and Tailwind CSS v4.

A few of the flagship utilities:

JSON Studio Pro: Formatter, Minifier, Tree Search, and TypeScript Type Generator.
JWT Debugger: Claim viewer and HMAC signature verifier with 0 network calls.
Shamir's Secret Sharing: $K$-of-$N$ cryptographic secret splitting and reconstruction.
CIDR / Subnet Calculator: Bitwise visualizer with instant ufw / iptables rules.
PDF Suite: Client-side PDF Merger, Splitter, and Image-to-PDF.
Salary & Take-Home Studio: Hourly ↔ Annual ↔ 1099 Contractor rate calculator with PTO deductions.

It’s completely free to use: https://omnikite.vercel.app

I'd really appreciate any feedback, bug reports, or suggestions for new tools!

Omnikite – 80 In-Browser Developer, Security & Math Tools (100% Private)

Collabier — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:43:43 +0000

Show HN: Omnikite – 80 In-Browser Developer, Security & Math Tools (100% Private)

URL: https://omnikite.vercel.app

GitHub: https://github.com/nadim-chowdhury/omnikite-project

Hey HN,

I built Omnikite (https://omnikite.vercel.app) because I got tired of having 15 different browser bookmarks for basic utility tools — half of which were sending my pasted payloads and tokens to remote servers or blasting my screen with intrusive video ads.

Omnikite is an open, client-side web application with 80 specialized tools across 12 domains that executes entirely in your local browser memory. No backend compute, zero data uploads, and works completely offline once cached.

What's inside:

Security & Cryptography:
- Shamir’s Secret Sharing (SSS) with threshold $K$-of-$N$ share recovery.
- BIP-39 mnemonic generator & PBKDF2 key derivation using the Web Crypto API.
- Shannon Entropy ($H = -\sum p \log_2 p$) analyzer with GPU brute-force cracking estimates.
- Level 3 CSP Builder with direct Nginx/Apache/Next.js export.
Developer & Data Tools:
- High-throughput JSON Formatter & JSON-to-TypeScript type generator.
- JWT claims inspector & client-side HMAC signature validator.
- IPv4 Subnet/CIDR visualizer with auto-generated Linux ufw & iptables firewall rules.
- RegEx Substitution, JSON Deep Diff, and Hex/ASCII Dump.
File & Graphics Suite:
- In-browser PDF Merger & Page Splitter (via client-side WASM).
- SVG Optimizer & Lossless Image Compressor (Canvas API).
Financial & Mathematics:
- Compounding Interest with inflation discount & annual step-up modeling.
- Historical US CPI (1980–2026) purchasing power calculator.
- 5-Way Salary converter (Hourly ↔ Annual ↔ 1099 Contractor rate) with PTO adjustments.

Technical Stack:

Framework: Next.js 16.3 (Static Site Generation, App Router)
UI Engine: React 19, Tailwind CSS v4, Lucide React
Local State: useSyncExternalStore for persistent tab favorites & recents without hydration jank
Cryptographic Primitives: Native window.crypto.subtle

The app is completely free, requires no signup, and has no tracking on user inputs.

I'd love feedback on performance, edge cases, or tools you'd like to see added next.

Live App: https://omnikite.vercel.app

Why your next web app probably doesn't need a backend

Collabier — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:42:34 +0000

For the last decade, web development has followed a predictable pattern:

User clicks a button → send an HTTP request to an API route → parse in a container → return JSON.

Even for basic operations like converting an image to WebP, formatting a SQL query, calculating subnet masks, or generating a UUID, developers default to spinning up serverless lambdas or Docker containers.

A few months ago, I asked myself a simple question:

How much of a modern developer workspace can actually run 100% inside the user's browser without a single backend server?

The answer turned out to be: almost everything.

I spent the past few weeks putting this to the test, and ended up shipping Omnikite — a suite of 80 developer, security, and productivity tools that run with zero backend latency.

Here is what I learned about building truly client-side web applications in 2026.

1. WebAssembly Makes Heavy File Processing Instant

In the past, if you wanted to merge two PDF files or optimize a complex SVG, you had to upload the file to an S3 bucket, trigger a Python/Node worker, and wait for a signed download URL.

With WebAssembly and modern browser APIs:

The entire binary lives in the browser tab.
Files are read into memory using the FileReader and ArrayBuffer APIs.
Execution happens at near-native CPU speeds.

For example, on our PDF Suite and SVG Optimizer, combining a 50-page document or stripping unused XML nodes happens in roughly 40 milliseconds. No upload bar, no data leaves the user's laptop, and our hosting bill is virtually $0.

2. Web Crypto API is Massively Underutilized

Many developers still npm install heavy crypto libraries for basic hashing or key generation. But modern browsers ship with window.crypto.subtle, which is hardware-accelerated and cryptographically secure.

We used it to build:

PBKDF2 Key Derivation Studio: Derives 256-bit AES keys with 600,000 SHA-256 iterations in sub-second time.
HMAC Generator: Instant webhook signature testing.
BIP-39 Mnemonic Generator: Entropy-driven 12/24-word seed phrase generator running completely offline.

If you are dealing with sensitive developer secrets, doing it client-side isn't just faster — it's the only ethical way to prevent security leaks.

3. Real-Time Math Beats API Calls Every Time

Calculators are another area where legacy websites make unnecessary roundtrips.

Whether it is:

An IPv4 CIDR Subnet Calculator calculating binary octet masks and UFW firewall rules on every keystroke.
A Compound Interest & Wealth Matrix computing 30-year inflation-adjusted balances.
A Multi-Way Salary & Tax Calculator converting hourly rates to 1099 contractor equivalents.

When math runs synchronously in React state, you get 60fps real-time UI updates with zero loading spinners.

4. The Architecture We Settled On

To keep the platform feeling like a native desktop app:

Next.js 16 (App Router): All 99 pages are static HTML pre-rendered at build time.
Tailwind CSS v4: Zero runtime CSS overhead.
Dynamic Command Palette (⌘K): Instant search across all 80 tools with fuzzy keyword matching.
LocalStorage Sync: Built with React's useSyncExternalStore so users can pin their favorite utilities and jump back in across multiple tabs without layout shifts.

Check it out

If you are curious to see how snappy a 100% in-browser toolkit feels, check out the live site:

👉 https://omnikite.vercel.app

Everything is completely free and open for the community.

I'd love to hear your thoughts: what browser APIs are you finding most useful in your current projects? Are there any tools you still rely on a backend for that could be moved entirely client-side?

Why I stopped pasting production JWTs into random websites (and built an offline tool suite instead)

Collabier — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:39:12 +0000

Be honest: how many times this week have you pasted a bearer token, a customer payload, or an .env config snippet into an online formatter just to quickly see what went wrong?

I used to do it constantly.

Need to debug an expired JWT? Open the first Google result.

Need to format a 4MB JSON response from a legacy API? Paste it into a random tab covered in popup ads.

Need to merge two PDF invoices or test a RegEx? Another sketchy tab.

A few months ago, while debugging an auth issue on a client’s staging database, I caught myself about to paste an unhashed token payload into a random web tool. I paused and looked at the network tab on that site.

Sure enough: every keystroke was being sent as a POST request to an external analytics backend.

That was the breaking point.

The Problem with Modern "Free" Dev Tools

Most utility websites on the first page of Google share the same annoying traits:

Your data leaves your machine: Many tools send your raw strings, files, or tokens to a remote server for processing.
Aggressive ads & layout shift: Five sticky video banners jumping around while you are trying to read a diff.
Slow load times: Heavy server-rendered overhead for a task that modern JavaScript can do locally in under 5 milliseconds.

Modern browsers have WebAssembly, the Web Crypto Subtle API, Web Workers, and Canvas APIs. There is zero technical reason why formatting a JSON string, calculating a CIDR subnet, or splitting a PDF should ever hit a backend server.

So over the past few weeks, I decided to build a clean, unified alternative: Omnikite.

What I Built (80 Tools, 0 Server Uploads)

I wanted a single, ad-light workspace that runs 100% inside your browser memory. If you disconnect your Wi-Fi, the entire suite still works.

Here are a few tools I ended up building into it:

1. Zero-Leak Cryptography & Security

Shamir's Secret Sharing: Split master recovery keys or secrets into $N$ mathematical polynomial shares with a threshold $K$ directly in memory.
Content Security Policy (CSP) Level 3 Builder: Generates strict nonce/hash CSP headers with instant export for Nginx, Apache, and Next.js.
Shannon Entropy & Password Strength: Calculates true bit-entropy ($H = -\sum p \log_2 p$) and estimates offline GPU brute-force cracking times.

2. Everyday Developer Staples

JSON Formatter & Schema Validator: Handles multi-megabyte payloads without crashing the tab, with tree search and JSON-to-TypeScript type generation.
Interactive JWT Debugger: Inspects claims, verifies HMAC signatures using local WebCrypto, and checks expiration timestamps with zero external requests.
IPv4 CIDR & Subnet Calculator: Bitwise octet visualizer with auto-generated Linux ufw and iptables firewall rules.

3. File & Media Processing

In-Browser PDF Merger & Splitter: Uses client-side WebAssembly to re-order, extract, and combine PDF pages without uploading documents to remote cloud buckets.
Client-Side Image Converter & SVG Minifier: Lossless compression and format conversions (WebP, PNG, JPEG, AVIF) using the HTML5 Canvas API.

How it works under the hood

The tech stack is deliberately simple:

Next.js 16 (App Router) with Static Site Generation (SSG) for instant page loads.
Web Crypto Subtle API for cryptographic hashing (SHA-256, HMAC, PBKDF2).
React 19 & Tailwind CSS v4 with a dark/light mode engine that doesn't cause hydration flash.
useSyncExternalStore for persistent local favorites and recents without layout jank.

Here is a quick example of how simple it is to do native client-side SHA-256 in the browser without any third-party npm crypto libraries:

async function computeSha256(message: string): Promise<string> {
  const msgUint8 = new TextEncoder().encode(message);
  const hashBuffer = await crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-256", msgUint8);
  const hashArray = Array.from(new Uint8Array(hashBuffer));
  return hashArray.map((b) => b.toString(16).padStart(2, "0")).join("");
}

Try it out & feedback welcome!

I opened up the full directory of tools here:
👉 https://omnikite.vercel.app

The entire platform is free, doesn't require any login or API key, and will never send your inputs over the wire.

If you are a developer, security engineer, or someone who just hates bloated utility sites, take it for a spin. I would love to hear your thoughts, feature requests, or any edge-case utilities you think I should add next!

What is the one utility tool you find yourself searching for every single week? Let me know in the comments below!

Why your next web app might not need a backend for every operation

Collabier — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:34:45 +0000

I've noticed a pattern in a lot of web applications I've worked on.

Something happens in the browser, so we send it to the server.

The server processes it, sends the result back, and the browser renders it.

For most applications, that's completely reasonable.

But sometimes we build an API endpoint simply because that's how we've always built web applications.

Take a few simple examples:

Formatting JSON
Generating a UUID
Calculating a subnet
Hashing a string
Converting an image
Encoding a URL
Parsing a JWT
Doing a percentage calculation

None of these inherently require a server.

That realization became more interesting to me when I started building Omnikite, a collection of developer and productivity utilities.

The project became an experiment in figuring out how much work I could reasonably move into the browser.

The browser is much more capable now

When I started writing frontend applications, I mostly thought of the browser as a place for rendering UI and making HTTP requests.

That's obviously an outdated mental model.

Modern browsers provide APIs for things such as:

Cryptographic operations
File handling
Background processing
Binary data
Image manipulation
Persistent storage
Streams
WebAssembly
Workers

Once you start using these APIs, some traditional backend operations start looking unnecessary.

Not all of them, obviously.

But more than I initially expected.

Start with the simplest question: does the server actually need the data?

This became my rule of thumb while working on the project.

Before creating an API endpoint, I ask:

Does the server actually need to see this input?

If the answer is no, I look for a client-side implementation first.

For example, suppose I want to calculate a SHA-256 hash.

There is no reason to send the input to an API just to calculate the hash.

The browser already has the Web Crypto API:

async function sha256(value: string) {
  const data = new TextEncoder().encode(value);

  const hash = await crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-256", data);

  return Array.from(new Uint8Array(hash))
    .map(byte => byte.toString(16).padStart(2, "0"))
    .join("");
}

The implementation is small, and more importantly, the original input doesn't need to leave the browser for this operation.

That distinction matters when the input happens to be sensitive.

File processing is where things get interesting

PDFs and images initially seemed like a different category.

Large files can be expensive to process, and traditionally it's common to upload them to a server and let some backend worker do the heavy lifting.

But browsers can work with binary files directly.

A file selected through an <input type="file"> is available to JavaScript as a File object.

From there you can work with:

const buffer = await file.arrayBuffer();

Now you have the file's binary data in the browser.

For some workloads, that's enough.

For more CPU-intensive processing, WebAssembly can be useful because existing native libraries can sometimes be compiled to run inside the browser.

That's the approach behind some of the file utilities in the Omnikite PDF tools.

There is an important caveat, though.

Client-side processing doesn't magically make large files cheap.

You still have memory limits, CPU limitations, mobile-device constraints, and browser-specific behavior to consider.

"Runs in the browser" isn't the same thing as "runs instantly."

Web Crypto is another good example

I still see projects pulling in additional dependencies for operations that modern browsers already support.

For basic cryptographic operations, the Web Crypto API provides primitives such as:

SHA-256
HMAC
AES
PBKDF2
Random values

For example:

const bytes = new Uint8Array(32);

crypto.getRandomValues(bytes);

That's enough to generate cryptographically strong random bytes using the browser's secure random number generator.

The important part is understanding what the API actually provides.

A browser API doesn't automatically make an application secure.

You still need to choose appropriate algorithms, parameters, key sizes, storage mechanisms, and threat models.

Moving something client-side is an architectural decision, not a security guarantee.

Calculators don't need APIs

This sounds obvious, but it's surprisingly easy to over-engineer.

If a calculator needs to perform:

principal × rate × time

there isn't much value in:

Browser
   ↓
POST /calculate
   ↓
Server
   ↓
JSON response
   ↓
Browser

The browser can perform the calculation immediately.

That's why tools such as the IPv4 subnet calculator can update their results as the user types.

There's no loading state because there isn't a network operation to wait for.

The same principle applies to things like:

Unit conversion
Percentage calculations
Date calculations
CIDR calculations
Compound interest
Number conversions
Color conversion

For small deterministic operations, local computation is usually the simpler architecture.

Where the backend still makes sense

This experiment also made me more aware of where a backend is genuinely necessary.

You still need a server when you have things such as:

Authentication

User accounts, sessions, permissions, password management, and identity systems require server-side infrastructure.

Persistent shared data

If multiple users need to access the same state, local browser storage obviously isn't enough.

Secrets

API keys and other server-side credentials shouldn't be moved into frontend JavaScript just because you're trying to avoid a backend.

Anything shipped to the browser should be considered accessible to the user.

Heavy processing

Some workloads simply don't belong on a user's laptop or phone.

A 10-year-old laptop and a modern desktop shouldn't necessarily be expected to perform the same computation.

External integrations

If you're communicating with a private database, payment provider, internal service, or another system requiring credentials, a backend is often the correct boundary.

So I don't think the lesson is:

"Backends are dead."

It's closer to:

Don't create a backend operation when the browser can safely and efficiently do the job itself.

The architecture I ended up with

For Omnikite, I wanted the application layer to remain relatively simple.

The general structure is roughly:

Next.js
   │
   ├── Static UI
   │
   ├── Tool pages
   │
   ├── Browser APIs
   │     ├── Web Crypto
   │     ├── File APIs
   │     ├── Canvas
   │     └── Web Workers
   │
   └── WebAssembly
         │
         └── CPU-heavy processing

The exact implementation varies from tool to tool.

That's another thing I learned during the project: there isn't one "client-side architecture."

A JSON formatter has completely different requirements from a PDF processor.

A calculator has completely different requirements from an image converter.

The right architecture depends on the workload.

Next.js is still useful even when the tool itself is client-side

One misconception I had initially was that a client-side application somehow means you don't need a framework like Next.js.

That's not really the case.

Next.js can still handle:

Routing
Metadata
Static generation
SEO
Layouts
Code splitting
UI composition

The actual tool operation can then happen entirely in the browser.

For a utility website, this combination works particularly well because each tool can have its own URL.

For example:

JSON Formatter

can exist independently from:

JWT Debugger

while still sharing the same application shell.

Performance isn't the only reason

Initially, I was mostly interested in performance.

No request means no network round trip.

That obviously helps.

But after building more tools, I started appreciating another benefit.

Privacy becomes easier to reason about.

If a tool processes a piece of text locally, there's no server endpoint sitting between the user and the result.

That's not a substitute for proper security engineering, but it can remove an entire category of data-handling concerns.

There's also less infrastructure to maintain.

No API endpoint.

No request validation for that operation.

No server-side worker.

No temporary upload bucket.

No cleanup job.

Sometimes the simplest architecture is simply the one with fewer moving parts.

There are trade-offs

Client-side processing isn't automatically better.

You have to think about:

Browser compatibility
Memory consumption
CPU usage
Mobile performance
Large files
Web Worker communication overhead
WebAssembly bundle size
Accessibility
Error handling

And some operations are simply better suited to a server.

The goal isn't to move everything into JavaScript running in the browser.

The goal is to put the computation in the place where it makes the most sense.

What I'm taking away from the experiment

The biggest lesson for me wasn't a specific API.

It was questioning the default architecture.

When building something new, it's easy to start with:

Frontend → API → Database

because that's the architecture we're used to.

But sometimes the better architecture is:

Frontend → Browser API → Result

And sometimes it's:

Frontend → Web Worker → Result

And sometimes:

Frontend → API → Worker → Database

The interesting part is deciding which one you actually need.

I've been using that mindset while continuing to build Omnikite.

It's basically become my testbed for small browser-based utilities and experiments.

If you're building a developer tool yourself, I'd recommend starting with a simple question:

Does this operation actually need my server to exist?

You might be surprised by how often the answer is no.

Why I stopped pasting sensitive data into random developer tools

Collabier — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:31:13 +0000

I probably don't need to explain how often developers use online utility websites.

Need to decode a JWT? Search Google.

Need to format some ugly JSON? Search Google.

Need to convert an image, calculate a subnet, generate a regex, or inspect a timestamp? Search Google again.

I've done this for years.

The problem is that eventually you stop thinking about what you're actually pasting into those websites.

A JWT might contain information that shouldn't be shared. An API response might contain customer data. A configuration file might contain internal URLs. A PDF might contain confidential information.

And yet the workflow is usually:

Copy → Paste → Get the result → Close the tab.

That bothered me enough that I started building my own collection of browser-based tools.

The thing that changed my mind

A while ago I was debugging an authentication problem.

I had a token in my clipboard and was about to paste it into one of the many JWT decoder websites I had bookmarked.

Then I stopped.

I opened DevTools first.

It made me think about something that I usually ignore: where does the data go after I paste it?

Obviously, not every online utility is doing something malicious. Some are perfectly legitimate and have good privacy policies.

But I realized that I didn't actually need a server for many of the tasks I was performing.

Modern browsers are surprisingly capable.

JavaScript can handle JSON parsing, hashing, image processing, file manipulation, encoding/decoding, and plenty of other operations directly on the user's machine.

So why send the data anywhere in the first place?

Building my own toolbox

That idea eventually became Omnikite.

The goal wasn't to build another huge SaaS platform.

I wanted something closer to a developer's toolbox:

Open a tool
Do the job
Copy the result
Close it

No account required for basic utilities.

No unnecessary dashboard.

No complicated workflow.

Just tools.

Some of the tools

I started with the things I personally use most often.

JSON

One of the first tools was a JSON Formatter & Validator.

This is probably one of the most boring developer tools on the internet, but I use it constantly.

The useful part isn't formatting JSON. That's easy.

The useful part is making it comfortable to work with large payloads, search through nested objects, validate syntax, and generate useful representations such as TypeScript types.

JWT debugging

Another one is an online JWT debugger.

Instead of sending a token somewhere just to inspect its header and payload, the browser can decode the token locally.

For cryptographic operations, browser APIs such as SubtleCrypto can also handle algorithms such as SHA-256 and HMAC.

One important distinction here:

Decoding a JWT is not the same thing as verifying its signature.

A JWT payload is encoded, not encrypted.

That's an easy detail to forget when you're debugging authentication.

IP and subnet calculations

I also built an IPv4 subnet calculator.

This started as a small utility because I kept looking up CIDR calculations while working with APIs, servers, and network configurations.

Eventually it became more useful than I expected.

Seeing the binary representation of the address makes subnet calculations much easier to understand than simply getting an answer like:

192.168.1.0/24

Security utilities

There are also several security-related utilities.

For example:

Shamir's Secret Sharing

It's a useful concept when you need to split a secret into multiple shares where a predefined number of shares are required to reconstruct it.

I also added an entropy analyzer for looking at password randomness and estimated entropy.

These aren't replacements for proper security tooling, but they're handy for quick experimentation and understanding.

Browser APIs are doing more work than people realize

One of the interesting parts of building this project has been realizing how much can be done without a backend.

For example, calculating a SHA-256 hash doesn't require an npm package or API endpoint.

The browser already provides the functionality:

async function sha256(value: string): Promise<string> {
  const data = new TextEncoder().encode(value);

  const hash = await crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-256", data);

  return Array.from(new Uint8Array(hash))
    .map(byte => byte.toString(16).padStart(2, "0"))
    .join("");
}

That's it.

The data goes into the browser's Web Crypto API and the resulting hash comes back.

No HTTP request is necessary for that operation.

That's the approach I'm trying to follow throughout the project whenever the operation can reasonably be performed locally.

Files are another interesting case

File processing gets a little more complicated.

PDFs, images, archives, and other binary formats can require considerably more processing than a simple string operation.

But even here, there are browser technologies that make local processing possible.

Depending on the format and operation, you can use:

Web Workers
WebAssembly
Canvas
File APIs
Streams
IndexedDB
Web Crypto

For example, the PDF tools are designed around browser-side processing rather than automatically uploading documents to a server.

That's particularly useful for documents you don't want leaving your computer.

Of course, I still recommend checking the actual implementation and privacy behavior of any tool before putting genuinely sensitive information into it.

The stack

The project is built with technologies that I already use regularly:

Next.js
React
TypeScript
Tailwind CSS
Web APIs
Web Crypto
Web Workers
WebAssembly where appropriate

One thing I intentionally avoided was creating a backend for every tiny operation.

If the browser can safely perform a task, I'd rather let the browser do it.

That also has another nice side effect: less infrastructure.

Less server code means fewer things to deploy, monitor, scale, and maintain.

I'm still adding tools

The interesting part about a toolbox project is that there is almost no shortage of things to add.

There are always those tiny utilities that developers search for repeatedly:

UUID generators
Regex testers
Cron expression helpers
Timestamp converters
Base64 tools
URL encoders
Color converters
Markdown utilities
Hash generators
SQL formatters
CSS generators
Image converters
PDF utilities
Text comparison tools

Some are trivial to build.

Some aren't.

And some look trivial until you start thinking about edge cases.

That's actually been one of the more enjoyable parts of the project.

One thing I'm trying to avoid

I don't want this to become another website where every tool is surrounded by five advertisements, three popups, and a newsletter form.

When I'm looking for a JSON formatter, I want a JSON formatter.

Not a 2,000-word article before the textarea.

Not a signup flow.

Not a notification asking me to download an app.

Just the tool.

That's the experience I'm trying to build with Omnikite.

It's still a work in progress, but I'm gradually adding more utilities and improving the existing ones.

If you work with APIs, frontend development, networking, security, or just spend too much time searching Google for tiny utilities, you might find something useful there.

Browse the Omnikite tools

And if you have a small developer utility that you use all the time, I'd genuinely like to know what it is.

Those are usually the best tools to build next.