<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: creatorsres-lab</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by creatorsres-lab (@creatorsreslab).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/creatorsreslab</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/creatorsreslab"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Webflow vs Framer: which one we'd actually pick for a client site?</title>
      <dc:creator>creatorsres-lab</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 23:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/creatorsreslab/webflow-vs-framer-which-one-i-would-actually-pick-for-a-client-site-5d36</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/creatorsreslab/webflow-vs-framer-which-one-i-would-actually-pick-for-a-client-site-5d36</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We get this question a lot, usually from designers who just got their first "can you also build it?" request from a client.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Short answer:&lt;/strong&gt; If it's a marketing site, a launch page or a portfolio, go with Framer. If it's a big CMS, lots of pages, or a client team editing content every week, go with Webflow. Stuck in between? Think about how much content the site will have a year from now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's why.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Framer is fast. Almost annoyingly fast.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you already design in Figma, Framer won't feel new. Stacks behave like auto-layout, you drag things where you want them, and you can have a live site by the end of the afternoon. For a landing page or a portfolio, we honestly don't think anything beats it right now. Animations are a lot easier to get right too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The CMS is where it starts to pinch. A simple blog is fine. But once a client asks for filtering, references between collections, or a few hundred items with some logic behind them, you start working around the tool instead of with it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Frseh53skoch8661v1pes.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Frseh53skoch8661v1pes.png" alt="Framer vs Webflow ratings for CMS and custom code, from the CreatorsRes comparison" width="800" height="306"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Webflow makes you think like a developer. That's kind of the point.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The first week in Webflow is rough, no way around it. Classes, combo classes, divs inside divs, staring at a grid that broke for no obvious reason. But that same structure is why it holds up on bigger sites. When a project is content-heavy, like a directory, a resource hub, or a site the client's team updates every week, Webflow is the one we trust to still be in good shape six months later.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The downside is cost. Add localization or bump up your CMS limits and the bill grows faster than most small clients expect. Check that before you send a quote, not after.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So which one?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quick summary:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Framer&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Webflow&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Getting a site live&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Very fast&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Slower, more setup&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Animations&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Easy, mostly built in&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Powerful, more work&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;CMS with filters and references&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Gets limiting&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Handles it well&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Big content sites&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Can struggle&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Built for it&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Cost as the site grows&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Usually lower&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Add-ons add up&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want the actual numbers, we wrote up &lt;a href="https://creatorsres.com/framer-vs-webflow/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;a full Webflow vs Framer pricing breakdown on CreatorsRes&lt;/a&gt;, including renewal costs and the plan limits that don't show up on the pricing page.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curious what everyone else is using. Has anyone switched from one to the other in the middle of a project? How did that go?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>uidesign</category>
      <category>nocode</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>webflow</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
