<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: crisz</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by crisz (@crisz).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/crisz</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/crisz"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why the most visited websites don't have animations?</title>
      <dc:creator>crisz</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 19:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/crisz/why-the-most-visited-websites-dont-have-animations--3poh</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/crisz/why-the-most-visited-websites-dont-have-animations--3poh</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If we check the most famous websites such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, Youtube and so on, we can notice the lack of transitions and animations, with few exceptions (e.g. the facebook reactions).&lt;br&gt;
Transitions in dropdown menus or in popup openings can be found in almost all amateur websites, so I wonder why not in the most famous. Should we worry? Are there drawbacks that I'm ignoring?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>animations</category>
      <category>transitions</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
