<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Deepak Sir</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Deepak Sir (@deepak_sir__).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/deepak_sir__"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>ColdFusion MVC With ColdBox: Moving From Spaghetti .cfm to Testable, Modular Code</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-mvc-with-coldbox-moving-from-spaghetti-cfm-to-testable-modular-code-5g8m</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-mvc-with-coldbox-moving-from-spaghetti-cfm-to-testable-modular-code-5g8m</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ColdBox is the mature, conventions-based HMVC framework for ColdFusion (CFML), built by Ortus Solutions, and it’s the standard path out of tangled .cfm files where SQL, business logic, and HTML all live in one template. It gives you a clean separation — handlers (controllers), views (presentation), and models (business logic) — wired together by convention, with WireBox dependency injection so your models are testable in isolation, a router that maps clean URLs to handler actions, and tight TestBox integration so you can actually unit- and integration-test your app. The move is incremental, not a rewrite: you scaffold a ColdBox app with CommandBox (coldbox create app), then migrate page by page — pulling logic out of .cfm spaghetti into models, thinning views down to presentation, and routing requests through handlers. The payoff is code that's modular, reusable, team-friendly, and — critically — testable, which is nearly impossible with logic buried in procedural templates. This guide shows the architecture, the conventions, and the migration path with verified ColdBox specifics.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/coldfusion-mvc-with-coldbox-moving-from-spaghetti-cfm-to-testable-modular-code-2bd82d096d67?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BoxLang vs ColdFusion 2025: What Ortus Solutions’ JVM Alternative Means for Your Stack</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 06:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/boxlang-vs-coldfusion-2025-what-ortus-solutions-jvm-alternative-means-for-your-stack-49ac</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/boxlang-vs-coldfusion-2025-what-ortus-solutions-jvm-alternative-means-for-your-stack-49ac</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;BoxLang is a modern, open-source dynamic JVM language from Ortus Solutions (the makers of ColdBox, CommandBox, and ForgeBox) that reached its stable 1.0 release on May 6, 2025. It is CFML-compatible but is not a ColdFusion engine — it’s a new language, built from scratch, that can run your existing Adobe ColdFusion or Lucee applications through its bx-compat-cfml compatibility module, while also offering a modern language of its own. The pitch to CFML shops is concrete: Apache-2.0 open source with no per-core licensing (versus Adobe ColdFusion's paid per-instance licensing), multi-runtime deployment (JVM, servlet containers, Docker, AWS Lambda), and Ortus's own benchmarks claiming it's faster than Adobe ColdFusion 2021–2025. But the honest caveats matter: Ortus itself says zero-code migration is "HOPEFULLY, this is not guaranteed" because "every codebase is different," some Adobe/Lucee functionality may not be present, and there are documented syntax differences (e.g., cfsqltype becomes sqltype, no native client scope). This is a genuine strategic option for CFML teams — but it's an evaluation to run carefully, not a switch to flip blindly. Here's what it actually means for your stack.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/boxlang-vs-coldfusion-2025-what-ortus-solutions-jvm-alternative-means-for-your-stack-4270366c7c5c?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ColdFusion Code Review Checklist: What Senior Devs Check Before Merging CFML</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-code-review-checklist-what-senior-devs-check-before-merging-cfml-1e50</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-code-review-checklist-what-senior-devs-check-before-merging-cfml-1e50</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A senior ColdFusion reviewer isn’t reading for style — they’re scanning for the specific CFML mistakes that cause security holes, production outages, and hard-to-debug behavior. The non-negotiables: every database query uses  (or parameterized queryExecute()) — string-concatenated SQL is an automatic block, because SQL injection is the top ColdFusion threat; all user-controlled output is encoded with the context-appropriate encodeForHTML() / encodeForJavaScript() / encodeForURL() to stop XSS; every function-local variable is var/local-scoped and every variable reference is explicitly scoped, because unscoped variables cause race conditions and collisions; errors are handled with try/catch and logging, not swallowed or dumped to the user; debugging output is off and no sensitive data (keys, connection strings, stack traces) leaks; and the change is tested, readable, and doesn't introduce N+1 queries or session-scope bloat. The best teams automate the mechanical half of this with CFLint so humans focus on logic and security. This guide is the field-tested checklist, grouped the way an experienced reviewer actually works through a CFML pull request.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/coldfusion-code-review-checklist-what-senior-devs-check-before-merging-cfml-f66469b9cf84?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>aws</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Migrating From Tag-Based CFML to CFScript: A Practical Refactoring Guide</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/migrating-from-tag-based-cfml-to-cfscript-a-practical-refactoring-guide-2l9m</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/migrating-from-tag-based-cfml-to-cfscript-a-practical-refactoring-guide-2l9m</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You can migrate tag-based CFML to CFScript incrementally and safely, because since ColdFusion 11 you can use essentially all tags inside cfscript — Adobe publishes an official table mapping every tag to its script equivalent. The high-value conversions are the common ones:  becomes a plain assignment, // become if/else if/else,  becomes for/while,  becomes function, / become try/catch,  becomes queryExecute(), and  becomes new http(). One current, critical caveat that changes how you should write script queries: the old "tags as script CFCs" approach (new Query()) was deprecated in ColdFusion 2018 and removed as of ColdFusion 2025 — so queryExecute() is the correct, future-proof way to run queries in script, not new Query(). The right strategy is not a big-bang rewrite: convert new code and CFCs (business logic) to script first, leave view/markup templates in tags where tags read better, and refactor file-by-file with a test suite guarding you. This guide gives the complete conversion reference and a safe migration plan.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/migrating-from-tag-based-cfml-to-cfscript-a-practical-refactoring-guide-08a2fbf95533?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Integrating Claude and ChatGPT APIs Into Legacy ColdFusion Applications</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 07:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/integrating-claude-and-chatgpt-apis-into-legacy-coldfusion-applications-3p6g</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/integrating-claude-and-chatgpt-apis-into-legacy-coldfusion-applications-3p6g</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ColdFusion is exceptionally well-suited to calling AI APIs, because both Claude (Anthropic) and ChatGPT (OpenAI) are plain HTTP/REST + JSON services — and cfhttp, serializeJSON(), and deserializeJSON() are exactly the tools CFML has always had. You don't rewrite your legacy app; AI integration is additive. You POST a JSON request to the provider's endpoint with your API key in a header, parse the JSON response, and use the result. For Claude, that's POST &lt;a href="https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages&lt;/a&gt; with an x-api-key header and the anthropic-version: 2023-06-01 header. For ChatGPT, it's POST &lt;a href="https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions&lt;/a&gt; with an Authorization: Bearer header. The one ColdFusion-specific gotcha that trips everyone up: LLMs are slow (they generate token by token), so you must set cfhttp timeout high and set the page requesttimeout higher still, or ColdFusion kills the thread before the model responds. Newer ColdFusion (the 2025 release) even ships a native ChatModel() abstraction, but the cfhttp approach works on any CF version back to legacy installs. This guide shows both providers, both syntaxes, and the production concerns that matter.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/integrating-claude-and-chatgpt-apis-into-legacy-coldfusion-applications-f746bde3e57b?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>chatgpt</category>
      <category>api</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Testing ColdFusion With TestBox: From Zero to a CI-Passing Test Suite in One Sprint</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/unit-testing-coldfusion-with-testbox-from-zero-to-a-ci-passing-test-suite-in-one-sprint-1i9f</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/unit-testing-coldfusion-with-testbox-from-zero-to-a-ci-passing-test-suite-in-one-sprint-1i9f</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You can go from no tests to a CI-passing ColdFusion test suite in a single sprint, because the tooling is free, mature, and fast to adopt. TestBox is the standard CFML testing framework from Ortus Solutions — a BDD/TDD framework that ships with a test runner, an assertions and expectations library, and MockBox for mocking and stubbing built in. The one-sprint path is concrete: install TestBox as a dev dependency with box install testbox --saveDev, scaffold a /tests harness, write specs as CFCs extending testbox.system.BaseSpec using the clean describe() / it() / expect() syntax, mock your dependencies with createMock() so units test in isolation, run the suite locally with testbox run from CommandBox, and wire it into CI (GitHub Actions, Jenkins, GitLab) so every push runs the tests and fails the build on a red test. TestBox produces JUnit and other CI-friendly reports out of the box, and free GitHub Actions exist to run it against your chosen ColdFusion engine. This guide is the day-by-day plan to get there in one sprint.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/unit-testing-coldfusion-with-testbox-from-zero-to-a-ci-passing-test-suite-in-one-sprint-10e25bb46220?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ColdFusion with VS Code in 2025: Best Extensions, Debugger Setup, and Productivity Config</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-with-vs-code-in-2025-best-extensions-debugger-setup-and-productivity-config-k1k</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-with-vs-code-in-2025-best-extensions-debugger-setup-and-productivity-config-k1k</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Visual Studio Code is now the mainstream ColdFusion editor, and in 2025 you have three serious extension choices. Adobe ColdFusion Builder extension for VS Code is Adobe’s official offering — it bundles a Server Panel, RDS, PMT integration, an interactive step debugger, code assist, and a security code analyzer; it requires VS Code 1.68+ and Java 11+. KamasamaK’s vscode-cfml is the long-trusted community extension (the now-abandoned ilich/vscode-coldfusion explicitly named it as its successor), giving syntax highlighting, hover docs from CFDocs, signature help, and component indexing. cfmleditor is an actively-maintained community fork many developers now prefer for day-to-day work — lighter than Adobe's, pulling docs from CFDocs (or full Lucee docs) with hover documentation and signature help. For linting you add CFLint (via KamasamaK's vscode-cflint), for formatting you add a CFFormat extension backed by the CommandBox cfformat module with a shareable .cfformat.json, and for the debugger you enable RDS + Allow Line Debugging + Request Debugging Output in the ColdFusion Administrator, restart CF, and use the extension's "CFML Debug" profile. This guide gives the complete 2025 setup — extensions, a working debugger, and productivity config.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/coldfusion-with-vs-code-in-2025-best-extensions-debugger-setup-and-productivity-config-40ebfc224996?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ColdFusion on AWS EC2 vs Elastic Beanstalk vs ECS: Which Deployment Model Fits?</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-on-aws-ec2-vs-elastic-beanstalk-vs-ecs-which-deployment-model-fits-lnl</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-on-aws-ec2-vs-elastic-beanstalk-vs-ecs-which-deployment-model-fits-lnl</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;All three run ColdFusion — it’s a Java application (Tomcat/CFML), so anywhere Java runs reliably, ColdFusion runs — but they sit at different points on the control-vs-convenience spectrum, and one has an important ColdFusion-specific caveat. EC2 gives you full control: a virtual machine where you install ColdFusion (or launch Adobe’s official ColdFusion AMI from the AWS Marketplace) and manage everything yourself — best for lift-and-shift migrations, legacy apps, and teams that want OS-level control. Elastic Beanstalk is a managed PaaS layer over EC2 that handles provisioning, load balancing, scaling, and health monitoring for you — but note it has no native ColdFusion platform, so you run CF on Beanstalk via its Docker platform (a container), which makes “EB for ColdFusion” effectively a simpler on-ramp to containers. ECS (with AWS Fargate) is the modern, container-native path: you package ColdFusion in Docker and run it serverlessly with no servers to provision — AWS itself has published a reference architecture for running Adobe ColdFusion on ECS/Fargate with blue/green deployments. The decision rule: EC2 for control and lift-and-shift, ECS/Fargate for scalable modern container deployments, and Beanstalk (via Docker) as a middle ground when you want managed simplicity without hand-building an ECS setup. This guide compares all three with the ColdFusion-specific detail that matters.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/coldfusion-on-aws-ec2-vs-elastic-beanstalk-vs-ecs-which-deployment-model-fits-f833365df183?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>aws</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>devops</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automating ColdFusion Security Patch Rollouts: A Safe, Repeatable Process</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 06:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/automating-coldfusion-security-patch-rollouts-a-safe-repeatable-process-l5d</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/automating-coldfusion-security-patch-rollouts-a-safe-repeatable-process-l5d</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ColdFusion security updates ship on a regular cadence (Adobe releases them alongside its second-Tuesday-of-the-month security cycle), they’re frequently rated Priority 1 / Critical — recent ones have carried CVSS scores up to 9.9 and at least one 2026 vulnerability was exploited in the wild — so a slow, manual, click-through-the-Administrator patch process is a genuine risk. The safe, repeatable answer is to automate the mechanics while keeping human gates where they matter. The core building blocks are all built-in or free: install hotfixes silently from the command line with java -jar hotfix.jar -i silent -f hotfix.properties, update packages with cfpm update --core and cfpm update-all, orchestrate the whole thing across servers with Ansible (Adobe publishes an official playbook), and always snapshot before patching and test in a staging mirror before production. The non-negotiable process: monitor Adobe's bulletins → snapshot/back up → apply in staging → smoke + load test → verify the build number matches the update → promote to production → keep the uninstaller.jar rollback path ready. This guide gives the complete automated, gated workflow with verified commands.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/automating-coldfusion-security-patch-rollouts-a-safe-repeatable-process-9e07d956790f?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>automation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ColdFusion CAR Archive Build Failures: The cfusion/packages Directory Bug and Its Fix</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-car-archive-build-failures-the-cfusionpackages-directory-bug-and-its-fix-1fk3</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-car-archive-build-failures-the-cfusionpackages-directory-bug-and-its-fix-1fk3</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If your ColdFusion Archive (CAR) build terminates with an error instead of producing a .car file, you have almost certainly hit a documented Adobe bug: the CAR build process fails if the cfusion/packages directory does not exist. The CAR file must be written specifically into that folder — and rather than creating the missing directory automatically (which is the expected behavior), the build simply terminates with an error. Adobe lists this as a known issue in the tech notes for ColdFusion 2021 Update 20 and 21, ColdFusion 2023 Update 15, and ColdFusion 2025 Update 3, and publishes an explicit workaround: create a folder named packages inside /cfusion/ if it isn't already there, then re-run the build. That's the entire fix — one directory. This guide covers how to confirm you've hit this specific bug, how to apply and automate the fix (including in containers and CI/CD), how to verify the archive actually built correctly, and the related CAR change in ColdFusion 2025 Update 5 that can cause a different failure you shouldn't confuse with this one.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/coldfusion-car-archive-build-failures-the-cfusion-packages-directory-bug-and-its-fix-f6488d387a87?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>devops</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environment-Specific Configuration in ColdFusion: Dev, Staging, and Production Done Right</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/environment-specific-configuration-in-coldfusion-dev-staging-and-production-done-right-2cjk</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/environment-specific-configuration-in-coldfusion-dev-staging-and-production-done-right-2cjk</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The right way to handle per-environment configuration in ColdFusion is to keep configuration out of your code and out of the ColdFusion Administrator, and put it in environment variables — then read it through a single, centralized configuration component. In practice that means: detect the current environment from an env var (ENVIRONMENT=production) rather than by sniffing hostnames; read values with System.getenv() (real-time) rather than server.os.environment (a snapshot taken at server start that does not refresh when you add a variable); never read config from the CGI scope (those aren't OS environment variables and clients can spoof them); manage ColdFusion Administrator settings — datasources, mail, memory — as version-controlled code with CFConfig and its cfconfig_ environment variables instead of clicking through the UI; and centralize every environment lookup in one Config.cfc so there's a single source of truth with fallbacks and validation. The litmus test for whether you've done it right: could you open-source your repository right now without leaking a single credential? If not, config is still living in your code. This guide shows the complete pattern.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/environment-specific-configuration-in-coldfusion-dev-staging-and-production-done-right-4ca4671f0032?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ColdFusion Docker Containers Hanging During Security Updates</title>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Sir</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-docker-containers-hanging-during-security-updates-1gn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deepak_sir__/coldfusion-docker-containers-hanging-during-security-updates-1gn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When a ColdFusion Docker container hangs during or after a security update, the cause is almost never “the update” itself — it’s one of a handful of container-specific problems the update exposes. The big ones: (1) cfpm (the package manager) needs network access during the build/startup to download modules, so behind a proxy or with no egress it hangs waiting on a download that never completes; (2) the OSGi/Felix bundle cache conflict (the same July-2025 issue that broke ) gets baked into an image layer and the container stalls loading conflicting bundles; (3) ColdFusion's startup time exceeds the orchestrator's health-probe timeout, so Kubernetes/Docker kills the "unhealthy" container mid-startup in a restart loop that looks like a hang; and (4) JVM heap settings exceed the container's memory limit, causing the JVM to stall or get OOM-killed before logging even initializes (which is why the logs look empty). The correct fix for containers is fundamentally different from patching a server in place: you don't update a running container — you build a new, immutable image on a specific patched version tag, test it, and redeploy. This guide covers every failure mode and the complete fix.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@Coding-Algorithms/coldfusion-docker-containers-hanging-during-security-updates-01321eac8c4c?sharedUserId=Coding-Algorithms" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>docker</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>devops</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
