<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: DeevTheDev</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by DeevTheDev (@deevthedev).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/deevthedev</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/deevthedev"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How to Test AI Agents Before Production</title>
      <dc:creator>DeevTheDev</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 10:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/deevthedev/how-to-test-ai-agents-before-production-3omo</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/deevthedev/how-to-test-ai-agents-before-production-3omo</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most AI agents are not failing because the model is useless.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They fail because nobody defined what “working” means.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A chatbot can answer a question and still fail the actual workflow. An agent can call a tool and still use the wrong parameter. A model upgrade can look better in a demo but silently break your most important use case.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is why vibe-testing is dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are building agentic AI workflows, you need a small evaluation process before you ship.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Create a baseline test set
Start with 10 to 30 real tasks your users would ask.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do not use only happy path examples. Include messy inputs, missing details, tool failures, and tasks where the agent should refuse or ask a follow-up question.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Score outputs consistently
Use a simple 1 to 5 score:&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;5: Excellent&lt;br&gt;
4: Good&lt;br&gt;
3: Usable with review&lt;br&gt;
2: Poor&lt;br&gt;
1: Failed&lt;br&gt;
The exact scale matters less than using the same scale every time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Test tool calling separately
An agent can produce a nice final answer while making a bad tool call underneath.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Did it choose the correct tool?&lt;br&gt;
Did it include the required parameters?&lt;br&gt;
Did it handle tool errors?&lt;br&gt;
Did it ask for approval before risky actions?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Run prompt regression tests
Every prompt change is a code change.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Before changing your system prompt, model, tool descriptions, or memory strategy, save baseline outputs. Then re-run the same tests with the new version.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the new version is worse on core tasks, do not ship it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A simple regression test sheet should track:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Test case&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Baseline output&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;New output&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Old score&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;New score&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Regression status&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Notes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you do not want to build this from scratch, I included a ready-to-use Prompt Regression Testing Workbook inside the AI Agent Evaluation Starter Kit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Track cost per run
Agents can become expensive quickly because they perform multiple steps.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Track input tokens, output tokens, number of model calls, and cost per completed workflow. A reliable agent that costs too much to run is still a product problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Add a release gate
Before production, define what blocks a release.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any critical tool-calling failure blocks release.&lt;br&gt;
Any unsafe action without approval blocks release.&lt;br&gt;
Average score below 4/5 blocks release.&lt;br&gt;
Cost above budget blocks release.&lt;br&gt;
Final thought&lt;br&gt;
The goal is not to make agents perfect. The goal is to make failures visible before your users find them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I created a small AI Agent Evaluation Starter Kit with checklists, test templates, a regression workbook, and a release gate if you want a faster starting point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Get it here: deevthedev.gumroad.com/l/ai_evaluation_starter_kit&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>agentic</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
