<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: aayush</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by aayush (@devash).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/devash</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/devash"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why we don't have actor model instead of promises in JavaScript (or Nodejs).</title>
      <dc:creator>aayush</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/devash/why-we-dont-have-actor-model-instead-of-promises-in-javascript-or-nodejs-2aj7</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/devash/why-we-dont-have-actor-model-instead-of-promises-in-javascript-or-nodejs-2aj7</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Would love to have a productive discussion on this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please leave your thought in the comment sections.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Most Ignored(USELESS?) feature of JavaScript: GENERATORS?</title>
      <dc:creator>aayush</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 11:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/devash/most-ignoreduseless-feature-of-javascript-generators-5eb5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/devash/most-ignoreduseless-feature-of-javascript-generators-5eb5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you use JavaScript generators? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can you show me with an example of code that makes use of generators in a practical setting?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is it even used in during web development?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why JS Ecosystem is a MESS?</title>
      <dc:creator>aayush</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 10:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/devash/why-js-ecosystem-is-a-mess-44f2</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/devash/why-js-ecosystem-is-a-mess-44f2</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every month, GitHub dependabot notifications force you to upgrade some dependency or another, so what could possibly go wrong? At least, that's what I thought.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After the upgrade, the project refused to build with the error &lt;br&gt;
&lt;code&gt;Syntax Error: TypeError: eslint.CLIEngine is not a constructor.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Really? A syntax error in a tiny project that was building just fine before the upgrade, and that too, not in the little code I wrote, but in the tooling?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't recall any language's environment being "modernized" in this way, becoming so absurdly intricate that one would mistake it for a joke. Naturally, the symptoms were visible with the &lt;a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3047177/how-one-yanked-javascript-package-wreaked-havoc.html"&gt;leftpad&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With each upgrade, I'm sick of seeing breaking changes in WIP projects.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is this something I'm experiencing alone?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What are your thoughts on the matter? &lt;br&gt;
I'd be delighted to hear it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please share your views on this.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
