<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Meela Dheeraj </title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Meela Dheeraj  (@dheeraj16).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/dheeraj16</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/dheeraj16"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Building software with an amnesiac agent: notes on a resumable overnight build loop</title>
      <dc:creator>Meela Dheeraj </dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 06:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/dheeraj16/building-software-with-an-amnesiac-agent-notes-on-a-resumable-overnight-build-loop-32kg</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/dheeraj16/building-software-with-an-amnesiac-agent-notes-on-a-resumable-overnight-build-loop-32kg</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to see how far an autonomous coding agent could get unattended. The constraint that makes this hard isn't code generation — it's that each session starts with zero memory of the last. So the design problem is state, not prompting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setup&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A cron-scheduled task fires hourly, 11pm–7am (~8 runs).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Each run is a fresh agent session. No shared context, no carryover.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;State lives entirely on disk: the working tree, the git history, and two files — BUILD_SPEC.md (the immutable goal/architecture) and PROGRESS.md (an append-only decision + status log).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The run loop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Every session does the same thing:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Read BUILD_SPEC.md, then PROGRESS.md, then git log --oneline.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Reconstruct "where are we" from the files themselves (the code is the source of truth, not the narrative).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Do one unit of work.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Commit. Append to PROGRESS.md: what changed, why (chosen X over Y because Z), and the exact next step.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Commit granularity = checkpoint granularity. Worst case on an interrupted session is losing one unit, and the next run re-derives it. The "why" lines matter as much as the diffs — without them a later session re-litigates settled decisions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Guardrails&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The agent was allowed to build, test, and commit locally. It was explicitly not allowed to deploy, push to a remote, or touch secrets — those get written into PROGRESS.md as "needs human" items instead. This boundary is what makes unattended runs safe to leave alone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What came out&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
A working full-stack monorepo: a pure TS scheduling engine (with property tests), multi-tenant auth, a Drizzle/Postgres schema, server-side re-validation, and publish/share/export flows. Across the runs it cleared its own stale git lock, and one session caught and fixed an off-by-one in a labeling layer that spanned five files.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The takeaway&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The leverage wasn't the model writing code. It was designing a process where progress is durable across total context loss — externalize state, checkpoint constantly, log decisions not just actions, and fence off irreversible operations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Repo/stack details in comments. Curious how others are handling agent state across sessions — file-based like this, or something more structured?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>buildinpublic</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exploring Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP) as an iOS Developer 🚀</title>
      <dc:creator>Meela Dheeraj </dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/dheeraj16/exploring-kotlin-multiplatform-kmp-as-an-ios-developer-58ih</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/dheeraj16/exploring-kotlin-multiplatform-kmp-as-an-ios-developer-58ih</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;While exploring different approaches to cross-platform development, I recently came across &lt;strong&gt;Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At first, I assumed it was another "write once, run everywhere" framework.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The more I learned, the more I realized that's not what KMP is trying to be.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of sharing everything, KMP focuses on sharing the parts that are often duplicated across platforms:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Business Logic&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Networking&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Data Layer&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Domain Models&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;while still allowing teams to build native user interfaces using:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;🍎 SwiftUI on iOS&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;🤖 Jetpack Compose (or Views) on Android&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A simplified architecture looks like this:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;┌─────────────────────┐
│   Shared Module     │
├─────────────────────┤
│ Business Logic      │
│ Networking (Ktor)   │
│ Data Layer          │
│ Domain Models       │
└──────────┬──────────┘
           │
     ┌─────┴─────┐
     │           │
┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐
│   iOS   │ │ Android │
│ SwiftUI │ │ Compose │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;What I find interesting is that KMP doesn't force you to abandon native development.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead, it tries to solve a very specific problem:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why maintain the same business rules, networking code, and data models in two different codebases?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some areas I'm currently exploring:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Project structure and source sets&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Shared vs platform-specific code&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Ktor for networking&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Dependency Injection&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Compose Multiplatform&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Interoperability between Swift and Kotlin&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;• Real-world production use cases&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For developers already using KMP in production:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What has been the biggest advantage?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What challenges did you face during adoption?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Any lessons you'd share with someone getting started?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to learning from the community and sharing my findings as I continue exploring KMP.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  KotlinMultiplatform #KMP #Kotlin #iOS #SwiftUI #Android #JetpackCompose #MobileDevelopment #SoftwareArchitecture #CrossPlatform
&lt;/h1&gt;

</description>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>ios</category>
      <category>kotlin</category>
      <category>mobile</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
