<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Ian</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Ian (@edgecaser).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/edgecaser</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/edgecaser"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I built a PM operating system on Claude Code. Here's what it produced on two real projects.</title>
      <dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 02:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/edgecaser/i-built-a-pm-operating-system-on-claude-code-heres-what-it-produced-on-two-real-projects-hne</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/edgecaser/i-built-a-pm-operating-system-on-claude-code-heres-what-it-produced-on-two-real-projects-hne</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I've been building Shipwright, a PM toolkit that runs inside Claude Code. It's not a chatbot. Not a "give me a PRD" prompt. It's a structured system: 44 atomic skills, 7 specialist agents, 16 multi-step workflows, binary pass/fail quality gates, and deterministic recovery playbooks.                                            &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want to show what it actually produces, because the artifacts are the proof.                            &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project 1: LatAm Credential Verification&lt;/strong&gt;                                                                  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was researching a potential product in the cross-border credential verification space. I ran Shipwright's discovery and research workflows against this problem. Here's what came out:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A full TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with three-source triangulation, regulatory forcing functions (EU eIDAS 2.0 mandating digital wallet infrastructure by December 2026), and a credible SAM estimate of $150–300M. Separate country-level briefs for Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela; including the Spain homologation backlog signal (60,000 applications/year, 84% from LatAm, 3-7 year wait times) and remote tech hiring trends (50% YoY growth in LatAm-to-US placements through EOR platforms that don't systematically verify credentials).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then came an Opportunity-Solution Tree: five ranked opportunities, twelve testable assumptions, twelve experiments scoped with timelines ($0–$1,500 cost, 3-4 weeks each), and explicit decision gates that define what constitutes a pass before any solution work begins.                                           &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, a technical feasibility audit of seven credential registries — ToS reviewed, API availability tested, and commercial resale terms documented. Verdict: FAIL. Only 0–1 of seven have viable programmatic access at under $2/query with commercial-use rights. The audit invalidated a core assumption before I built anything and identified a pivot to a concierge model with different unit economics.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Realistic PM time for this research stack: &lt;strong&gt;4–8 days.&lt;/strong&gt;            &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project 2: Pre-Sales Discovery Research&lt;/strong&gt;                                                                   &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This was pre-sales work for a healthcare client — competitive analysis, company profiling, and a discovery tool for the first meeting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shipwright produced: a company profile with confidence-tagged unknowns explicitly listed for the first discovery call; a competitive analysis covering four major competitors; not just positioning claims, but a sourced capability gap matrix across nine automation dimensions, with revenue impact quantified from published industry benchmarks.                            &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It provided a 29-question discovery questionnaire (behavioral framing, not hypothetical questions) with a scoring rubric (&lt;code&gt;Friction Severity × Lens Relevance = Opportunity Score&lt;/code&gt;), industry benchmarks that auto-flag underperformance, and a decision tree that r findings to the next appropriate skill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                                                            Realistic PM time: &lt;strong&gt;4–6 days&lt;/strong&gt;.                                                                              &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What makes the artifacts strong&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
                                                            Every output includes a Decision Frame: a recommendation, the trade-off of acting now versus waiting, an explicit confidence level, an owner, a decision date, and a revisit trigger. Evidence is tagged with confidence levels. Assumptions are separated from findings. Unknowns are listed explicitly rather than papered over.                                             &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The system enforces this through binary pass/fail gates before any output is used. An artifact either satisfies the structural and evidence requirements, or it goes back through a deterministic recovery playbook.                                                                                                 &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The T3 API audit failing is the system working — a testable assumption got tested, came back false, and the strategy updated accordingly.&lt;br&gt;
                                                                                                            &lt;strong&gt;What it doesn't replace&lt;/strong&gt;                                                                                   &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The discovery conversation. Assumption validation experiments. Real customers. The artifacts create the foundation and the questions; they don't answer them.     &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shipwright is open source. It runs on Claude Code. However, the skills are plain markdown, so they also work in Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would really appreciate feedback on how to improve it, and I am happy to answer any questions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Find it on GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/EdgeCaser/shipwright" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/EdgeCaser/shipwright&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>agentskills</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
