<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Farzam Habibi</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Farzam Habibi (@farzam_habibi).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/farzam_habibi</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/farzam_habibi"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The most useful word my checklist prints is UNKNOWN</title>
      <dc:creator>Farzam Habibi</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 13:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/farzam_habibi/the-most-useful-word-my-checklist-prints-is-unknown-1d3</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/farzam_habibi/the-most-useful-word-my-checklist-prints-is-unknown-1d3</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I shipped a release last week and checked it twice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The registry had the new version. The pinned CDN link had the new file. Then I checked the link people actually install from, the one with &lt;code&gt;@latest&lt;/code&gt; in it, and it was still serving the previous release. Same path, different content, no error anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every check I ran was green. That is the failure I care about most: the one where nothing throws, nothing pages you, and every signal says fine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  There is no pass state, on purpose
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I maintain prodcheck, a free and open source list of 4,372 things to check before you ship. Security, performance, scale, integrations, and the post-launch parts that rarely make it onto a checklist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When something runs it, each item can come back exactly three ways:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;code&gt;FINDING&lt;/code&gt;, with the file and line that is wrong&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;UNKNOWN&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;code&gt;N/A&lt;/code&gt;, with a reason&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is no &lt;code&gt;pass&lt;/code&gt;, and that is deliberate. A tool reading your repo cannot know that your backups restore, that your on-call rotation answers, or that the check you mocked in a test is wired up in production. The honest answer is usually that nobody has checked this yet, and a checklist that turns that into a green tick is worse than no checklist, because now you have a document telling you that you are safe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;UNKNOWN is a first class answer for the same reason. It stays visible, it keeps its name, and a person has to close it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Five that catch people most often
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Restore from backup end to end, into a usable environment, at least once. Plenty of teams never have, and restore time at ten times the data is a different number.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Validation errors that leak stack traces, SQL, filesystem paths or internal service names to whoever is poking at your form.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Producers and consumers that can be deployed in either order, because during a rollout both orders happen.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A rollback that does not need the person who deployed it to be awake.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Token checks that verify issuer, audience, expiry, signature algorithm and key, not just that a signature exists.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The 12 percent nobody mentions
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3,830 of the 4,372 items are stack agnostic, which is 88 percent. The rest are not, and pretending otherwise is how a generic checklist wastes your afternoon. 26 stacks have their own supplement, so the Next.js items stay out of your way while you are shipping Django.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Three ways to run it
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;As an MCP server in Claude Code: &lt;code&gt;claude mcp add prodcheck -- npx -y --package=prodcheck prodcheck-mcp&lt;/code&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Inside a repo: &lt;code&gt;npx prodcheck init&lt;/code&gt;, which drops a review skill next to your code&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;As a prompt pasted into any chat window&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Free, open source, no account. Content is CC BY 4.0, code is MIT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Where it came from, honestly
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It started as our own pre-launch audit at Arioo, and a lot of it was expanded with heavy AI help. That is exactly why the file and line rule exists. A model will happily tell you something is fine. The rule is the only thing that makes it show you where it looked.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/FarzamHabibi/pre-production-checklist" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/FarzamHabibi/pre-production-checklist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If a check bit you once and it is not in the list, that is the thing I actually want to hear.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
