DEV Community: fast2future

The Last Human Job: getting good at the one thing AI can't take

fast2future — Mon, 22 Jun 2026 21:07:53 +0000

There's a sentence that would've gotten you laughed out of the room ten years ago and barely earns a shrug today: the machines are on track to get better than you at nearly everything you can name. Anything that can be checked against an answer, measured against a standard, generated from a pattern — that whole territory is being quietly handed over. If you've touched these tools at all, you've felt it.

Most takes on this sell you panic or sell you hope. Same scam, different hats. We wanted to skip both and ask the question hiding underneath: when the machine can do everything that can be checked, what's left that's actually yours? There's a real answer, and it's smaller and far more hopeful than it sounds. An agent can tell you what is. It can't tell you what's worth wanting. That gap doesn't close in next year's model — it's structural. And what's left standing in it is your job now: frame (which question are we even asking?), taste (which good answer is right, here, for me?), values (who do we become by choosing it?), and desire (what's actually worth wanting at all?).

The hopeful turn is that the same machine that takes the checkable can become a gym for exactly this skill — if you use it to sharpen your thinking instead of skip it. It cuts both ways, and the easy way is the rotting way; the book is honest about that. It's not a jungle gym. It's a judgment gym.

We wrote it by a human and an AI, together, in real time, in the open — which is itself part of the argument. Where we weren't sure, we said so plainly. Part I is free to read right now, no email and no catch.

Read it → https://the-last-human-job-firstfruits.pages.dev/

Investing in the Modern Era

fast2future — Sat, 20 Jun 2026 19:44:50 +0000

There's a particular kind of vertigo you feel in 2026 when you look at the markets. On one screen, an AI model writes code that would have taken a team a quarter. On another, a handful of companies have grown so large they practically are the market. And somewhere in your group chat, someone is either very rich or very ruined from a coin you'd never heard of last Tuesday. It can feel like the old rules have been repealed — like prudence is a relic and the only sin left is not betting big enough.

I want to make the opposite case. The modern era didn't kill the timeless principles of investing. It amplified the need for them.

Educational, not financial advice. This essay is one person thinking out loud about ideas and history. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold anything. Your situation, time horizon, and risk tolerance are yours alone. Talk to a fiduciary who knows your numbers before you act.

Bogle was right, and 2026 proved it again

Start with the boring fact that keeps winning. In 2025, roughly 79% of active large-cap funds lost to the S&P 500 (per SPIVA). Stretch the window to twenty years and that figure climbs to about 92%. These aren't amateurs — they're professionals with Bloomberg terminals, research teams, and every incentive to win. And the index quietly beat almost all of them. Passive funds now hold the majority of fund assets, which means the world has finally, slowly, voted with its money for what Jack Bogle argued his entire life: cost and discipline beat cleverness over time.

But here's the part that should rearrange how you think. The biggest enemy of your returns isn't the market, and it isn't the fund managers. It's you. DALBAR's research pegged the investor "behavior gap" — the difference between what the funds returned and what the average investor actually earned — at roughly 848 basis points in 2024. Eight and a half percentage points, evaporated, not by bad assets but by bad timing: buying high on excitement, selling low on fear, chasing the thing that already ran. Behavior matters more than intelligence. The smartest person in the room who panics in March underperforms the disciplined person who simply didn't touch it.

This is the first principle and it is unglamorous: low cost, broad diversification, a long horizon, and the self-control not to flinch.

The exponential shift is real — and you might already own it

Now the other side, because this is where it gets genuinely interesting. We are living through what Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis spent decades calling the exponential curve — the point where technology stops moving in straight lines and starts bending upward. In 2026 you can see it in the capex: hyperscaler AI spending exceeded $600 billion this year, with credible forecasts of crossing $1 trillion by 2027. That is not a marketing budget. That is a civilization re-tooling itself.

You can also see it in concentration. The "Magnificent 7" hit a record ~35% of the S&P 500 by early 2026 and drove roughly 42% of the index's entire 2025 return. Seven companies, nearly half the gain.

Here's the synthesis most people miss, and it's the heart of this whole essay: if you own a broad index fund, you already own the exponential AI bet. You hold the Mag 7. You're participating in the upside of the most important technological shift of our lifetimes — and you're diversified across five hundred other companies that will catch the second-order benefits when AI makes them more productive too. You don't have to choose between "bet the farm on the future" and "hide in old-school caution." That's a false binary the loudest voices online want to sell you.

The grown-up answer is core and satellite. Let a low-cost, diversified index be your core — the disciplined, Bogle-shaped majority of your portfolio that captures the exponential bet with a seatbelt. Then, if your situation allows, let a small, deliberate satellite express conviction in specific opportunities. The core is built to be held for decades. The satellite is money you've decided, in advance and in cold blood, that you could afford to be wrong about. The structure itself protects you from your own enthusiasm.

The dark side is also real

Optimism that won't look at the downside isn't optimism — it's denial wearing a smile. So let's look.

Crypto in 2026 is a genuinely mixed picture, and honesty requires holding both halves. The real structural change is the spot Bitcoin ETFs, now holding roughly $76–80 billion in assets (down from their earlier-2026 peak). That's not hype; that's institutional plumbing being laid, and it matters. But Bitcoin itself was down roughly 30% year-to-date as of mid-June 2026, volatile and deeply sensitive to macro winds. It is an interesting, maturing asset — and it is not a settled one. Anyone telling you it only goes up is selling something.

And then there's the rot. In 2025, crypto scams took an estimated $11.37 billion — up 22% from the year before. AI-driven deepfake fraud added roughly $4.6 billion more, and it preyed hardest on the elderly, on the trusting, on people who heard a familiar voice on the phone that wasn't real. Meanwhile a live debate rages over whether AI itself is a bubble — serious investors are shorting it, and some AI CEOs have openly conceded the market is "too excited." None of that means the technology is fake. It means greed and fear are ancient, and every new gold rush imports the old con men along with the gold.

The lesson isn't stay out. The lesson is stay sober. If something promises returns without risk, the risk is that you're the product. Slow down. Verify. The deal that won't survive a night's sleep was never a deal.

Money in service of purpose

Underneath the tactics there's a frame I can't separate from how I think about any of this, and it isn't a financial metric. Investing is stewardship. The money is not the point. The money is potential energy — the stored capacity to do something that matters, to provide for people you love, to be generous when generosity is hard, to build something that outlasts you.

That frame changes the questions. Greed asks how much can I get, how fast? Stewardship asks what is this for, and over what horizon? FOMO is the spiritual opposite of patience — it insists the train is leaving right now and you are a fool to be left behind. But abundance thinking, the real kind, says the future is not a fixed pie to be grabbed at; it's something compounding and being built, and the disciplined participant gets to share in it without selling their peace to chase it. There will always be another train. There is only one you, and your composure is worth more than any single trade.

The exponential optimists are right that the long arc bends toward more — more capability, more abundance, more solved problems. The Bogle realists are right that the way you actually capture that arc is unglamorous: own broadly, keep costs low, hold through the noise, and don't let either greed or fear make your decisions for you. These two truths are not in tension. They're the same truth seen from two distances.

So here is the whole thing in a breath. Own the future through a diversified, low-cost core, so the exponential lifts you whether or not you guessed the winners. Express conviction only with a small, pre-decided satellite you could afford to lose. Refuse the scams and the FOMO with equal firmness. Treat your money as something you steward, not something you serve. And keep the horizon long — long enough that this year's headlines, in either direction, stop being able to scare you.

The modern era is loud. The principles are quiet. Quiet wins.

Educational, not financial advice. Do your own diligence and consult a fiduciary before making investment decisions.

Originally published at fast2future.com.

Don't Fear the Road

fast2future — Mon, 15 Jun 2026 04:17:08 +0000

An essay

faith4future

There's a fear going around among faithful people, and I don't think it's silly. It goes something like this: this AI thing is different. It's not just another gadget. It's powerful in a way that feels spiritual, almost rival. Maybe the holy thing to do is to keep our distance.

I want to take that fear seriously before I take it apart, because the people who feel it are usually not fools. They're sensing something real — that a technology this capable can become an idol, can hollow out human dignity, can be the tower of Babel poured into silicon. That instinct is not ignorance. It's discernment. So I'm not going to tell you to stop being careful.

I'm going to tell you a story about roads.

The road was built for taxes.

Two thousand years ago, the most powerful nation on earth built the most advanced infrastructure the world had ever seen: a network of stone roads stretching across three continents. Rome did not build them for God. Rome built them for legions and tax collectors — for moving armies fast and moving money faster. The roads were imperial muscle. War and commerce, paved.

And then a handful of unarmed men walked out onto those roads and used them to carry a message the empire never authorized.

Paul of Tarsus covered something like ten thousand miles on Roman roads. His letters — half the New Testament — moved through the imperial postal arteries, on the same stone laid for soldiers and silver. The gospel spread across the known world at the speed of Rome's own engineering, riding infrastructure built for the exact opposite purpose. The empire built the road for taxes. The good news walked it anyway.

That is not a one-time accident. That is a pattern. And once you see it, you see it everywhere.

The pattern.

The common language of that same empire was Koine Greek — a flattened, practical trade-tongue imposed for administration, so a merchant in Antioch could do business with a clerk in Corinth. It was the bureaucratic Esperanto of its day. And it became the language the New Testament was written in — because a message meant to cross every border needed a tongue that already had. The empire standardized the language to run its accounts. The gospel used it to run past every wall.

Fast forward fourteen centuries. A goldsmith in Mainz builds a machine with movable metal type, and the educated world panics. The printing press will destabilize everything. It will rot the memory — why remember anything if it's all written down? It will spread error and heresy faster than any authority can correct it. It will put dangerous ideas in the hands of people who can't be trusted with them. The fear was loud, and some of it was even right.

And the first great work to roll off Gutenberg's press was the Bible. The very technology the cautious feared became the technology that put Scripture into ordinary hands for the first time in history — and lit a reformation that remade the faith. The disruption was the distribution. The thing they were afraid of was the thing God used.

It kept happening. Radio was going to coarsen the culture; it became a pulpit that reached more souls than every traveling preacher in history combined. Television, the internet — each one arrived under a cloud of religious suspicion, and each one became a carrier of the message to more people than the generation before could have dreamed. Every single time, the same two things were true at once: the fear was understandable, and the repurposing was coming.

Why the fear keeps misfiring.

Here is the uncomfortable thing I have to say to my own people, gently. The fear of powerful new tools is not a Christian instinct. It's a human one, and the faith has spent its whole history overcoming it, not obeying it.

The same dread aimed at AI today was aimed, almost word for word, at every tool before it. The printing press would rot our memory. The novel would corrupt the young. Electricity was the devil's current. The fear feels new each time because the tool is new each time — but the shape of the fear is ancient and unchanging, and history's verdict on it is brutally consistent: the ones who feared the press too much missed the chance to print the Bible first. Their caution, which felt like holiness, was just a slower way of handing the future to whoever feared least.

Because that's the part the fear never accounts for. Refusing to build doesn't keep the world safe. The road gets built whether or not you walk it. The press gets invented whether or not you print on it. AI is being built right now, at enormous scale, by people — many of them brilliant, some of them reverent, plenty of them indifferent to anything past the curve. The question was never whether this technology would shape the spiritual life of humanity. It will. The only question is whether anyone who loves God and loves people will be among the ones shaping it.

A faith that trembles at a tool has, for a moment, made the tool bigger than God. And the God of the Roman roads is not nervous about server racks. The same Lord who was unthreatened by Caesar's empire, by Gutenberg's machine, by the radio tower and the fiber-optic cable, is not pacing the floor of heaven over a language model. "God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, and love, and a sound mind." The caution is wisdom — keep it. But the dread is not from Him.

AI is the newest road.

So here is where it lands. AI is this generation's Roman road. Its Gutenberg press. It is the most powerful infrastructure for reaching, reasoning, and carrying a message that human beings have ever built — and it was built, like all the others, mostly for empire and commerce. For compute and profit.

Which means we are standing exactly where Paul stood, looking at a road the empire paved for its own reasons, deciding whether to walk it.

If the pattern of all of history holds — and I'd bet my life it does — this road will carry the message too. The good news will move on it, faster and farther than any road before. But that part isn't automatic, and here's the catch that should get a faithful person off the sidelines and onto their feet: the gospel only walked the Roman road because someone actually walked it. The infrastructure doesn't carry the message by itself. It carried it because Paul put his sandals on the stone. The press didn't print the Bible on its own; someone set the type. Every time the empire's tool became God's carrier, it was because a person of conviction picked it up and pointed it.

So the road is here. It's the most powerful one ever laid. And the faithful are standing at the on-ramp, and some of them are afraid, and I understand why.

But I keep thinking about the believers who looked at Gutenberg's terrifying machine and stepped back to keep their hands clean — and how the first thing it printed was the Word of God anyway, in someone else's hands. I don't want to be the one who feared the road. I want to be the one who walked it.

Don't fear the road.

Walk it.

— faith4future

This essay is part of a forthcoming book on building, and keeping faith, in the age of AI.

Originally published at dont-fear-the-road.pages.dev.

Point Anyway

fast2future — Mon, 15 Jun 2026 03:30:37 +0000

An essay

faith4future

I want to tell you the truth before I tell you anything else, because the whole thing falls apart if I don't.

I'm a screwup.

Not in the cute, self-deprecating way people say it on a stage to seem humble before they list their accomplishments. I mean the real way. I fall short of the things I believe. I say things I can't fully live. I start strong and drift. If you measured my life by the gap between what I point at and what I actually reach, you'd find a wide one, and you'd be right to.

So here is the question that almost stopped me from writing any of this:

Who am I to point anyone toward anything?

If I can't get there myself — if I'm still a mess, still wandering, still failing at the very thing I want to call others toward — then isn't it hypocrisy to open my mouth at all? Isn't the honest move to stay quiet until I've earned the right? To arrive first, and then point?

I sat in that for a long time. It's a heavy place to sit. And I think a lot of people are sitting in it right now — people with something true to say who've been convinced they have to become flawless before they're allowed to say it. So they say nothing. The light stays unmentioned. The drowning go unpointed-to. All because the only people who could point are honest enough to know they haven't arrived.

Here's what finally got me up off the floor.

A signpost doesn't have to reach the city.

Think about what a signpost actually is. It stands at the crossroads, and it says: the city is that way. It points true. And it does this without ever taking a single step toward the city itself. It will never arrive. It's not supposed to. Its whole job is to point, not to travel.

Nobody looks at a signpost and calls it a hypocrite for not being in the city it points to. That would be absurd. The signpost isn't claiming to be the destination. It's claiming to know the direction. And those are completely different claims.

I had confused them. I thought that to point toward the source — toward God, toward meaning, toward the thing worth wanting — I had to first be a person who had arrived there. But that was never the assignment. I was never asked to be the source. I was only asked to point toward it. And you don't have to be the light to point at the light. You just have to be honest about which way it is.

In fact — and this is the part that turned the whole thing over for me — the honest pointer is the one still walking.

Picture two guides. The first stands at the front of the room, polished and arrived, and says: follow me, I have made it, be like me. The second stands in the middle of the same dark road as everyone else, mud on his knees, and says: I haven't made it either, but I can see the light from here, and it's that way — come on, let's go together.

Which one do you trust? Which one reaches you when you're actually lost?

The first one is the hypocrite. The hypocrite isn't the mess who says "the light's that way, I'm still walking toward it too, come on." The hypocrite is the one who pretends he's already arrived. My honesty about still walking isn't the thing that disqualifies me. It's the thing that makes me believable.

The screwups were always the ones who got sent.

I used to read the old stories and assume the people God used were the qualified ones. The clean ones. The ones who had it together.

Then I actually read them.

A murderer with a stutter, hiding in the desert. A coward threshing wheat in a winepress because he was too afraid to be seen. A man who said, the moment he glimpsed the holy, "I am a man of unclean lips." A liar. A doubter. A denier who wept. A persecutor. Over and over, the pattern is the same, and it is not subtle: God reaches for the ones who know they don't measure up.

I used to think that was strange. Now I think it's the whole point. The person who knows he's a screwup is the only person who can point at grace honestly — because he's not secretly pointing at himself. The polished man is always, quietly, a little bit the message. Look how I did it. The broken man can't pull that off. He has nothing to point at but the light, because he knows better than anyone that he isn't it.

So my failure — the very thing I thought disqualified me — might be the qualification. It's the thing that guarantees I'll never put myself on the altar where only God belongs. I'm too aware of my own cracks to mistake myself for the source. That's not my weakness as a witness. It's my credential.

Toward, not to.

There's a small word I kept tripping over, and it turned out to hold the whole thing.

I kept asking whether my life was supposed to be pointed to the source, or toward it. It felt like grammar. It wasn't.

To is arrival. To is a finish line you cross, a destination you possess, a box you check. If the assignment is to get to the source — to fully arrive, to embody it, to be done — then I have already failed, and so has every person who ever lived, and the whole project is hopeless.

But it was never to. It was always toward.

Toward is a direction. Toward is a heading you keep correcting back to every time you drift. It doesn't require arrival. It requires facing. You can be miles off the path and still be oriented toward home — still turning back, still leaning that way, still correcting. A compass needle doesn't have to reach north to point north. It just has to keep swinging back.

Which means the question at the end of a life was never did you arrive. You won't. None of us do. The question was always: which way were you facing?

And that changes everything about what it means to have lived well. You can fall a thousand times. You can drift, fail, screw up by nature, feel like a fraud at 1 a.m. with the work undone — and still, still, have lived a life pointed toward the source. The drift doesn't break it. The only thing that breaks it is ceasing to turn back. And the name for the force that lets a wandering man, who keeps turning back, count in the end as pointed toward — that name is grace.

So: point anyway.

Here's where I landed, after all of it.

The fear said: you're a screwup, so don't point at all. Stay quiet. You'd be a hypocrite. And for a while the fear sounded like humility. It sounded like the honest, modest thing to do.

But it had it exactly backwards. Refusing to point because you're unworthy isn't humility — it's the last hiding place of pride, still secretly believing the message depends on the messenger being clean. The message was never about me. It was always about grace. And the most powerful sermon a screwup can preach is the one his polished competitors can't: I'm a mess. The light is still that way. Grace is real. Come on.

That reaches the drowning person. The arrived saint, pointing down from the shore, can't touch the one in the water the way the fellow-swimmer can — the one who's choking on the same waves and still has a hand free to point and say that way, kick that way, I've got you, let's go.

So I'm done waiting to be worthy. I'll be a mess who points true. I'll be a signpost that knows it's also a traveler. I'll point from inside the struggle, toward and not to, a screwup aiming at grace instead of at himself, turning back every time I drift — and trusting that the turning-back is enough, because Someone made it enough.

If you've been waiting to arrive before you point — waiting to be clean, to be finished, to be qualified, to have earned the right — hear this from one screwup to another:

You don't have to arrive to point. You just have to be honest about which way it is.

Point anyway.

Grace.

— faith4future

This essay was written during a real night of the author's own wrestling. It is not a report from someone who figured it out. It's a note from inside the struggle, which is the only place any of it was ever worth saying from.

Originally published at point-anyway.pages.dev.