<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Fernando Roa</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Fernando Roa (@fernandoroa).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/fernandoroa</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/fernandoroa"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Trying AI chats - citations</title>
      <dc:creator>Fernando Roa</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 21:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/fernandoroa/trying-ai-chats-citations-974</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/fernandoroa/trying-ai-chats-citations-974</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have used chatgpt (OpenAI), and bard.google.com, recently to get some code insights, or help with programming definitions. I guess it is a plus (from bard only), that it includes sometimes, i.e. sources links, they can be really helpful. Chatgpt said about it, hat it takes info from books, etc, without citing them. So I think I will stick to bard for respect to original authors. What do you think about the importance to give credit for GPTs?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>gpt3</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
