<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: fluidwire</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by fluidwire (@fluidwire).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/fluidwire</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/fluidwire"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Three IoT origin stories — and what they still teach about building connected devices</title>
      <dc:creator>fluidwire</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/fluidwire/three-iot-origin-stories-and-what-they-still-teach-about-building-connected-devices-2jbh</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/fluidwire/three-iot-origin-stories-and-what-they-still-teach-about-building-connected-devices-2jbh</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Internet of Things feels like a recent invention, but the ideas behind it are older than the web. Three origin stories come up again and again — and each one still carries a practical lesson for anyone building a connected device today, whether it's a commercial sensor fleet or a thesis prototype.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1982: The first IoT device was a Coke machine
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Computer science students at Carnegie Mellon were tired of walking to the third-floor Coca-Cola vending machine only to find it empty — or worse, full of warm bottles that had just been restocked. So they wired the machine's status lights to a computer, connected it to the ARPANET, and wrote a program anyone on the network could query: how many bottles in each slot, and how long they'd been cooling.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A connected device, remote telemetry, queryable state — all the ingredients of IoT, a decade before the web existed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The lesson:&lt;/strong&gt; the best IoT projects start with a real, annoying problem. The CMU students didn't set out to invent a category; they wanted cold soda without a wasted walk. If you're scoping a device idea — or a thesis project — start from the walk you're tired of taking, not from the technology.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1999: "Internet of Things" was coined to sell RFID
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The phrase itself came from Kevin Ashton, a brand manager at Procter &amp;amp; Gamble, who needed a title for a presentation about putting RFID tags on products in the supply chain. His pitch: computers should gather data about the physical world &lt;em&gt;themselves&lt;/em&gt;, through sensors, instead of waiting for humans to type it in. He called that idea the "Internet of Things" because it would get executives' attention. It did.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The lesson:&lt;/strong&gt; Ashton's core argument is still the test for whether a project is really IoT. If a human has to read a dial and enter a number, you have a spreadsheet with extra steps. The value appears when the device reports its own state — which is why sensor selection and reliable connectivity matter more than the dashboard, even though the dashboard gets all the attention.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1999: MQTT was built to watch oil pipelines
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The same year, Andy Stanford-Clark of IBM and Arlen Nipper were solving a much harsher problem: monitoring oil pipelines across remote stretches of country, over satellite links that were slow, unreliable, and billed by the byte. The protocol they designed — MQTT — had to sip bandwidth, survive dropped connections, and run on tiny embedded hardware.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's why MQTT looks the way it does: a minimal 2-byte header, publish/subscribe instead of polling, three quality-of-service levels, and a "last will" message so the broker can announce when a device drops offline. None of that was academic — every feature paid for itself on a satellite bill.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The lesson:&lt;/strong&gt; constraints make good protocols, and MQTT's constraints still match most IoT projects today. An ESP32 on a spotty connection — a farm sensor on patchy 4G in Laguna, a tracker on a jeepney moving through Metro Manila — faces the same fundamentals as a 1999 pipeline: limited bandwidth, intermittent links, battery budgets. It's why MQTT is still our default for device-to-cloud messaging, twenty-five years later.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What the stories have in common
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each one starts with a concrete pain — a wasted walk, manual data entry, a satellite bill — and ends with a design shaped entirely by that pain. The technology came second.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's the order we recommend for any connected-device project: define the telemetry that solves the problem, pick the lightest transport that delivers it reliably, and only then build up the stack — firmware, broker, dashboard. If you're planning one — a product, a pilot, or a student build — our &lt;a href="https://fluidwire.com/services" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;services&lt;/a&gt; cover that full path from PCB to cloud dashboard, and we're always happy to &lt;a href="https://fluidwire.com/contact" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;talk through an idea&lt;/a&gt; before you commit to hardware.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>iot</category>
      <category>mqtt</category>
      <category>hardware</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
