<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: gmazzeigraf</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by gmazzeigraf (@gmazzeigraf).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/gmazzeigraf</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/gmazzeigraf"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>MockMe vs Beeceptor: which mock API should you use?</title>
      <dc:creator>gmazzeigraf</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/gmazzeigraf/mockme-vs-beeceptor-which-mock-api-should-you-use-30bl</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/gmazzeigraf/mockme-vs-beeceptor-which-mock-api-should-you-use-30bl</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you need a quick HTTP mock to unblock a frontend, webhook, or API client, Beeceptor and &lt;a href="https://mockme.fyi" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;MockMe&lt;/a&gt; are two common options. Here's a straight comparison.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Price
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Beeceptor's paid plans are often in the &lt;strong&gt;$10 / $25 / $99 per endpoint / month&lt;/strong&gt; range, depending on the tier. MockMe is aimed at indie and small-team use: &lt;strong&gt;free with 3 persistent endpoints&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Pro $5/month&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Enterprise $20/month&lt;/strong&gt; (subscribe on the site).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you only need a few stable endpoints, MockMe is usually cheaper. If your team already lives in Beeceptor and needs their higher per-endpoint tiers, stick with what you know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Signup friction and expiry
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MockMe's playground needs &lt;strong&gt;no account&lt;/strong&gt;. Temporary mocks &lt;strong&gt;expire after 30 minutes&lt;/strong&gt;. After you sign up, you can &lt;strong&gt;keep a playground mock&lt;/strong&gt; as a persistent endpoint (up to 3 on Free). Shareable URLs use &lt;code&gt;/m/{slug}&lt;/code&gt;. The UI is available in &lt;strong&gt;English and Portuguese&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One-click starters: &lt;code&gt;GET /users&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;/posts&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;/orders&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Beeceptor is mature and widely known. The tradeoff is usually pricing model and how much ceremony you want before the first request. MockMe optimizes for "open and try."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  When to pick which
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;MockMe&lt;/strong&gt; — prototype now, low friction, 3 free persistent endpoints, low price, EN/PT UI&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Beeceptor&lt;/strong&gt; — already standard on your team, or you need their specific plan/features&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Built for people shipping integrations — not interview prep.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Try it without signing up
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Open the playground, pick a template, copy the URL:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://mockme.fyi" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://mockme.fyi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your team already uses Beeceptor, what's the one thing that would make you switch (or stay)? Drop it in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>api</category>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
