<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Goqa Ai</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Goqa Ai (@goqa_ai_c97f712237a7383a5).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/goqa_ai_c97f712237a7383a5</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/goqa_ai_c97f712237a7383a5"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Starting my journey in public: fixing test reliability</title>
      <dc:creator>Goqa Ai</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/goqa_ai_c97f712237a7383a5/starting-my-journey-in-public-fixing-test-reliability-183c</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/goqa_ai_c97f712237a7383a5/starting-my-journey-in-public-fixing-test-reliability-183c</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello everyone, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’ve spent years watching teams struggle with something that should be simple: trusting their tests.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On paper, everything looks fine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The test suite is large. Coverage is high. CI is green.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But in reality?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pipelines fail for no clear reason.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tests break with small UI changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And teams hesitate when it’s time to deploy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not because they didn’t write enough tests but because maintaining them became the real problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is something my brother and I have spent a lot of time thinking through and working on together.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That gap stuck with us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we decided to build something about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m a co-founder of GoQA AI, an AI-powered quality engineering platform focused on one thing: making tests reliable again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We’re building a system that:&lt;br&gt;
• Generates tests from user stories&lt;br&gt;
• Runs them across web and APIs&lt;br&gt;
• Adapts when the product changes (without constant rewrites)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No hype. No “AI replaces engineers” narrative.&lt;br&gt;
Just solving a problem most teams quietly deal with: test maintenance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We’ve started with web and API testing.&lt;br&gt;
"Mobile is next"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over the next few weeks, I’ll be sharing what we’re learning as we build:&lt;br&gt;
→ How self-healing actually works&lt;br&gt;
→ Practical ways to reduce flaky tests&lt;br&gt;
→ Where AI helps and where it doesn’t&lt;br&gt;
→ What building this in public really looks like&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your team has ever questioned whether failing tests actually mean something…&lt;br&gt;
You’re not alone. &lt;br&gt;
And it’s a problem worth fixing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curious to hear from others here, how do you deal with flaky tests today?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>buildinpublic</category>
      <category>startup</category>
      <category>testing</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
