DEV Community: Milan

I Sent 50 LinkedIn Messages. Zero Replies. Then I Changed the First Sentence.

Milan — Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:33:17 +0000

Last year I decided to start networking seriously on LinkedIn. I had a list of people — potential clients, interesting folks from my industry, a few hiring managers.

I messaged them. All fifty of them.

Replies? Zero.

I thought LinkedIn was dead. That people just post there and never respond. That nobody reads messages.

I was wrong. The problem wasn't them. It was me — specifically, my first sentence.

What I Was Writing Before

My messages looked something like this:

"Hi Mark, I came across your profile and was really impressed by your work in product management. I'd love to connect and perhaps discuss potential opportunities to collaborate."

Looks decent, right? Polite, professional.

But Mark reads it as: "Another stranger who wants something from me."

And he's right. Because that entire message is about me. What I want. What interests me. What I'd love.

Mark doesn't appear in that message at all — except as a name in the greeting.

One Experiment

A friend told me: "Just change the first sentence. Nothing else."

Instead of "I came across your profile and was impressed by your work" I tried:

"I saw your post about why most product roadmaps fail at the execution stage — that point about stakeholders was exactly what we were dealing with last month."

Same person. Same connection request. Just a different first sentence.

He replied within two hours.

Why It Works

The human brain reads the first sentence and decides in half a second: "Is this relevant to me?"

When you start with "I came across your profile" — it's not. Everyone reads that every day.

When you start with something specific that shows you actually read what they write — it's different. They feel seen, not targeted.

It's not about being nice. It's about being specific.

Three Things I Changed

1. First sentence = about them, not about me

Instead of: "I'm interested in your work in the field of X"
Better: "Your post about Y made me think about Z"

The difference is huge. The first version talks about you. The second proves you actually listened.

2. One specific reason why I'm writing

Instead of: "I'd love to discuss potential collaboration"
Better: "I'm currently working on X, you did this at company Y — I'd be curious how you approached it"

People love to help when they know exactly what you want. "Potential collaboration" is too vague for anyone to know how to respond.

3. Keep it short. The shorter, the better.

Nobody wants to read three paragraphs from a stranger. Five sentences is the maximum. Two is ideal.

Results After a Month

From 50 messages → 0 replies.
After changing my approach → 3 to 4 replies out of every 10 messages.

That's not a lot. But it's the difference between a LinkedIn that doesn't work and one that does.

How This Connects to Wording

You don't always know how to start. You have a sense of what you want to say — but the first sentence won't come. It ends up sounding robotic, generic, like a template.

This is exactly where AI helps. You write a rough draft — and let it rewrite it into a version that sounds natural and specific.

In Stylo it's simple: paste your message and ask for a rewrite in a direct, personal tone. The result is a message that sounds like you — just better.

Try it: Open Stylo and paste your last LinkedIn message. You'll see the difference.

The Bottom Line

LinkedIn isn't dead. Most messages on it are.

One change — a specific first sentence about them, not about you — can change everything.

Note: Results vary by individual. Not every message will get a reply, regardless of wording. But the right first sentence dramatically increases the chance that it gets read at all.

I Almost Lost Money on a Return. One Message Changed Everything.

Milan — Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:38:41 +0000

A seller delivered a defective product to me. Instead of a fix, I got silence. Then "we overlooked it." Then "contact another department." After three weeks, I got a message saying they'd exchange the item – for a fee of 25 EUR.

For their mistake.

I saw red. But instead of chasing them on social media, I wrote one message. Within 48 hours, I had the money in my account – without that fee.

How It Started

I ordered something, it arrived damaged. I'm a pretty calm person, so I wrote them nicely:

"Hi, the item arrived damaged, photo attached. What now?"

Response? Nothing. After three days, I wrote again. Response: "Good day, your request is being forwarded."

A week of nothing. I wrote a third time. "You need to contact customer service." I contacted them. "That's handled by the store."

Runaround. That's when I started getting nervous.

Being Nice Didn't Help

After three weeks, I decided to be polite but firm.

Instead of "please" and "thanks," I used a different approach – precise, pragmatic, based on knowing my rights.

I wrote them this:

"Dear Seller,

Under consumer protection law, I am notifying you of my intention to withdraw from the purchase contract due to defective goods. The item was delivered on XX.XX.XXXX and the defect was reported within the statutory period. If the remedy is not carried out within 7 days, I reserve the right to file a complaint with the relevant consumer protection agency and take further legal action."

Within two days, I got: "Good day, we apologize, refund initiated. Please send us your account number."

But It Wasn't Over Yet

When I sent them my account number, this came: "Refund will be processed within 3 business days. Administrative fee for processing the withdrawal: 25 EUR."

For their mistake. For their defect. They wanted me to pay to get my own money back.

I wrote:

"Dear Seller,

Under consumer protection law, you cannot charge the consumer any costs for returning goods if it concerns a defect that existed at the time of receipt. Such a fee is contrary to the law. I demand a full refund without any deductions within 3 days."

Two days later: "Fee cancelled. Full refund will be issued."

Everything Changed – Just Because of the Right Words

Notice what happened:

Before:

"hey, could you please look at this" → silence, ignoring, runaround
3 weeks of nothing

After:

"Under the law... I reserve the right..." → response within 48 hours
Specific reference → fee removed

It's not about being rude. It's about being specific.

Three Things That Made the Difference

When you write to them "this isn't OK," they'll convince you that it is. When you write to them exactly what, when, and why – they convince themselves.

1. Reference to the Law

Instead of "I have a right to this" → "under consumer protection law"

You show that this isn't just talk – you know there are rules the seller must follow.

2. Specific Deadline

Instead of "as soon as possible" → "within 7 days"

They keep you in limbo until you give them a deadline.

3. Consequences

Instead of "I'll complain" → "I reserve the right to file a complaint with the consumer protection agency"

It's not a threat – it's about knowing your options.

How AI Helps With This

You don't need to be a lawyer. You don't need to memorize statutes. You just need to know what you want to say – and AI will rewrite it in the right form.

For example, in Stylo you write:

"I want to write to a seller that I'll sue them for not sending the product and ignoring me for two weeks. Then they wanted money for the return. Help me with the wording."

And you get exactly the message that works.

Try it here: Open Stylo and have a message "rephrased" into a formal tone. You'll see the difference.

Important: This Isn't About Being Aggressive

Writing such messages is a last resort. Most sellers are normal people who want to resolve issues.

But when you encounter someone who wants to take advantage of you – don't back down. One well-written message can save hundreds of euros.

Note: This story is inspired by real events. Company names have been changed. Consumer rights vary by country – always check what laws apply where you live. This article serves as inspiration, not legal advice.

Bots racked up a thousands-dollar bill overnight — how to avoid it

Milan — Tue, 10 Mar 2026 05:34:26 +0000

I came across a post on Reddit from a developer. He launched a SaaS app that called AI models — similar to GoStylo. One morning he opened his email and there it was. A bill for several thousand dollars. For one night.

Bots. Hundreds of different IP addresses, each within the free tier limit, but together they ate through his entire monthly budget in a few hours.

I looked at my own code and realized I was in the exact same situation.

What was wrong

My rate limiting was based on fingerprints — IP address plus a few browser headers. Each fingerprint was allowed 6 requests per hour. But a bot with a thousand different IPs means a thousand fingerprints. A thousand times six is six thousand requests per hour. Each one calling an AI model. Each one costing real money.

Worse, 10 out of 12 API endpoints had no rate limiting at all. A bot could spam the database, exhaust authentication — and I wouldn't find out until the bill arrived.

What I did about it

I went with a layered approach. Not one big wall, but several smaller ones, each catching a different type of attack.

Middleware — before a request even reaches any code. A limit of 200 requests per minute per IP (no human hits that, bots do), blocking known bot tools by their User-Agent header, and a whitelist for search engines so I don't wreck my SEO. Plus caching on static pages — when a bot hammers the blog a thousand times, it gets the same cached page every time. Zero server load, zero cost.

Rate limits on every endpoint — I went through all of them and set limits based on sensitivity. Public endpoints 60 per hour per IP, authenticated reads 120, writes 60, account deletion 5. Before that, there was literally nothing.

Bot scoring on the transform endpoint — that's the one calling AI models, the one that costs money. Each request gets a score based on how much it looks like a bot. A filled honeypot (a hidden form field that humans never see but bots fill automatically), a missing cryptographic signature from the frontend (meaning someone's calling the API directly), 5 requests in 5 seconds from the same source — each signal adds points. Low score slows the request down, medium triggers a CAPTCHA (solve it once, you're good for 24 hours), high score blocks it.

Cost tracking — not just the number of requests, but how much they actually cost in dollars. A bot doesn't need to send many requests, it just needs to send long texts. When a fingerprint burns through its hourly budget, it's done.

Monitoring — an automatic check every 15 minutes on overall traffic. When anonymous requests hit 80% of the limit, I get a notification. I don't want to find out about an attack over morning coffee.

Nothing changed for regular users

No CAPTCHA during normal use, no slowdowns. If you use GoStylo normally, you'll never run into any of this.

That Reddit post made me look at security before it was too late. Better to spend a few days on prevention than to wake up to a bill worth thousands.

Humanizer: How to Turn AI Text Into Natural Human Speech

Milan — Sun, 08 Mar 2026 08:46:26 +0000

Humanizer: How to Turn AI Text Into Natural Human Speech

You know that feeling when you're reading something and you instantly know AI wrote it?

That "Dear user, I'm happy to assist you with..." or "In today's digital world, it is important to..." Dead giveaways. AI texts are useful — they save time and help you brainstorm. But they have one problem: they sound like... well, AI.

In this article, we'll look at why AI texts sound so impersonal, what a humanizer is, and how to use one to make your writing feel warmer and more natural.

Why Do AI Texts Sound Like... AI?

AI models are trained on massive amounts of internet text. They learn patterns, structures, and phrases that work. The problem? They reuse those patterns way too often.

Here are the typical signs of AI text:

Formal language everywhere — Even when you're writing about pizza, AI will say "gastronomic experience" instead of "great pizza"
Templated openers — "In today's world...", "It's important to note...", "Without a doubt..."
Perfect grammar, zero flow — Sentences are grammatically correct, but the text reads like a microwave manual
No emotions — AI doesn't know when to be excited, ironic, or funny
Repeating structures — Three bullet points, then a summary. Repeat. Forever.

Imagine someone introducing you at a party as "an individual with multiple areas of interest." Technically accurate, but... who talks like that?

What Is a Humanizer and How Does It Work?

A humanizer is a tool that transforms AI text into natural human speech.

It analyzes your text and adjusts it to sound less formal and more like something a real person would actually write. Not a robot with a thesaurus.

What it does exactly:

Simplifies language — Changes "utilize" to "use", "facilitate" to "help"
Adds variation — Shorter and longer sentences. The occasional fragment. Like this one.
Reduces formality — "It is necessary" → "You need to", "At present" → "Right now"
Adds personality — Questions, exclamations, the odd metaphor
Removes clichés — Gets rid of typical AI phrases

A humanizer is not a magic wand. It won't write text for you. But when you already have an AI draft, it turns it into something that reads normally.

When Do You Need to Humanize Text?

Not every text needs humanizing. If you're writing technical documentation or a legal contract, formal language is fine. But most content looks better with a human touch.

Blog Posts and Articles

People don't read blogs to feel like they're in a lecture. They want to be entertained, learn something, and feel understood.

Before: "In the current digital era, content optimization is a key factor for a successful online presence."

After: "If you want people to find you online, write good articles. Simple."

Marketing Copy and Social Media

On Instagram or LinkedIn, you're not writing an essay. You write the way you talk.

Before: "Our company provides innovative solutions for workflow process optimization."

After: "We help you work faster with less stress. That's it."

School Papers and Essays

Fair warning — a humanizer is not for cheating. But if you use AI for brainstorming or drafting, a humanizer helps the text sound like you, not like ChatGPT.

Before: "This paper will address the analysis of climate change in the context of global warming."

After: "In this paper, we'll look at how climate change connects to global warming."

Email Communication

You don't want to sound like a spam bot, right?

Before: "I would like to bring to your attention the fact that the deadline has currently been exceeded."

After: "Hey, the deadline passed. When can you send it over?"

Business Documents

Even in professional settings, you can be human. Formal ≠ incomprehensible.

Before: "Within the meeting agenda, it will be necessary to discuss strategic priorities."

After: "At the meeting, we'll go through priorities for this quarter."

How to Use a Humanizer in Practice

Using a humanizer is simple. You don't need to be a tech expert.

Step 1: Let AI write the draft

Use ChatGPT, Gemini, or any AI tool to write the base text. For example:

"Write me a short article about the benefits of morning exercise."

Step 2: Copy the AI text into the humanizer

Paste the full text into the humanizer tool. In Stylo, all it takes is:

Paste the text
Select "Humanizer" from the transformations
Click "Transform"

Step 3: Read the result and adjust

The humanizer does most of the work, but it's not perfect. Read the result out loud. Do the sentences sound natural? Does anything feel off? Fix it.

Step 4: Add your own personality

Final step: add something personal. An example from your own experience, a joke, a metaphor. That's what the humanizer can't do for you.

Practical Example (Before/After)

Before (AI text):
"Morning exercise represents an effective method of improving overall fitness and mental health. Studies have shown that regular physical activity during morning hours contributes to increased productivity throughout the day. It is important to incorporate exercise into your morning routine."

After (humanized):
"Working out in the morning is great. You feel better all day and have more energy. Several studies show that people who exercise in the morning are more productive. Give it a try — even 15 minutes is enough."

See the difference? Both texts say the same thing, but the second one is a much easier read.

Tips for the Best Results

Start with quality AI text — Better input means better output
Don't try to be too formal — Even in professional texts, simple language works
Read it out loud — If it sounds weird when spoken, fix it
Use active sentences — "I did it" instead of "It was done"
Don't shorten every sentence — Variation is good. Shorter sentences punch harder. Longer ones give more context and explain complex ideas.

Common Mistakes When Humanizing Text

Too Much Humanizing

Yes, you can overdo it. If you turn every sentence into slang, you lose the professional tone.

Bad example:
"Yo, this is super important info, so remember it, ok?"

Good example:
"This is important, so write it down."

Losing Key Information

Humanizing should simplify, not remove facts. Check that you haven't deleted important details.

Ignoring Context

Text for LinkedIn has a different tone than text for TikTok. Adjust the level of humanization to your audience.

Can an AI Detector Spot Humanized Text?

That's the million-dollar question.

Short answer: Sometimes yes, sometimes no.

AI detectors (like GPTZero or Originality.ai) look for patterns typical of AI text. A humanizer reduces those patterns, but it's not invisible.

What this means for you:

If you're using a humanizer for a blog or marketing, you're fine
If you're using it for school papers, teachers have eyes too — they can tell if the text doesn't sound like you
Best approach: use AI for brainstorming, a humanizer to improve it, then rewrite in your own words

Is Humanizing Text Legal?

Yes. Humanizing text is legal.

It's just an editing tool, like Grammarly or a spell checker. The problem isn't the humanizer — the problem is passing off AI text as your own in situations where that's not allowed (like academic settings with strict policies).

Where it's fine:

Blog posts
Marketing copy
Social media
Email communication
Business documents

Where it might be a problem:

School papers (depends on school policy)
Academic publications (most require original content)
Writing competitions (read the rules)

When in doubt — ask. Better to ask upfront than apologize later.

How Much Does It Cost?

Depends on the tool. Some humanizers are free (with limits), others are paid.

In our case (Stylo):

Free: 6 transformations per hour (great for trying it out)
Free account: 20 transformations per hour
Paid account: 100 transformations per hour

The paid version is worth it if you use the humanizer regularly — for a blog, marketing, or work.

Does a Humanizer Work for All Languages?

Most humanizer tools work best in English. Other languages have smaller support, but it still works.

Our tool supports 5 languages: Slovak, Czech, English, Spanish, and German. Quality also depends on the AI model you use (GPT-4, Gemini, Claude).

Tip: If you're writing in your language and the result isn't perfect, try a different model. Each one has a slightly different style.

Conclusion: A Humanizer Is a Tool, Not a Magician

A humanizer is a great tool for making your AI texts sound more natural. But it's not a replacement for your own writing.

Key takeaways:

AI texts sound robotic because of formal language and repeating patterns
A humanizer simplifies language and adds variation
Works best for blogs, marketing, emails, and social media
Not invisible to AI detectors, but completely legal
Best approach: AI + humanizer + your own edits

So if you want your texts to sound like you (and not like an 80s robot), try a humanizer. Just don't forget — the best content always has a piece of you in it.

Ready to try it? Open Stylo and transform your first text for free. No registration, no credit card. Just copy, click, and done.

This article was written with AI assistance, humanized, and edited by a human hand. Exactly as it should be.

Writing in a Foreign Language Without Stress: How to Use Stylo for Emails in German or English

Milan — Fri, 06 Mar 2026 06:19:49 +0000

Need to write an email in German, but German isn't your strong suit? You're not alone. Thousands of people deal with the same problem every day — whether they're writing to an Austrian office, a German employer, or an English-speaking client.

The Classic Approach: Google Translate and Hope

Most people solve this with Google Translate. They write the text in their native language, translate it, and hit send. The problem? The result often sounds mechanical and unnatural. The translation is understandable, but nobody actually writes like that.

Let's say you want to email your German landlord. In your own language you'd write something like:

"Hi, I wanted to ask when the washing machine in my apartment will be fixed. I've been waiting for two weeks and still nothing."

Google Translate result:

„Guten Tag, ich wollte fragen, wann die Waschmaschine in der Wohnung repariert wird. Ich warte schon zwei Wochen und immer noch nichts."

Grammatically OK, but it sounds like a machine translation. No greeting, no politeness, no closing.

Stylo result:

„Sehr geehrter Herr Müller, ich möchte mich erkundigen, wann die Reparatur der Waschmaschine in meiner Wohnung vorgesehen ist. Ich warte nun bereits seit zwei Wochen auf eine Lösung. Ich würde mich über eine kurze Rückmeldung sehr freuen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen"

The difference is clear — Stylo adds a proper greeting, polite phrases, and a closing, which are simply expected in a German email.

How It Works in Stylo

Write an email in your own words in any language. Pick a target language — German, English, French — and click. Stylo doesn't just translate, it also adapts the text to the natural style of the target language.

When It Comes in Handy

Writing to a German or Austrian office — applications, complaints, inquiries
Communicating with a foreign employer — formal emails in English or German
Replying to clients — a quick professional response in their language
Airbnb, booking, complaints — short messages in a foreign language

Stylo vs. Google Translate: What's the Difference

	Google Translate	Stylo
Translation	Literal	Natural
Email style	None	Formal / informal by choice
Polite phrases	Missing	Automatically added
Grammar	Occasional errors	Corrected
Speed	Fast	Equally fast

Try It Out

If you often write in a foreign language and don't want to worry about translation quality, try Stylo for free. Write an email in your language and let Stylo do the rest.

Why I Created Stylo: The Text Editing Tool I Couldn't Find

Milan — Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:41:41 +0000

Anyone who has ever needed to quickly edit a text, write an email in a foreign language, or rephrase a message in a more formal tone knows the feeling of frustration. Stylo was born from exactly that frustration.

Why I Started Building Stylo

The reason was simple — I needed a fast tool to edit text the way I wanted. I searched online, but nothing I found satisfied me. Existing tools were either too complex, packed with unnecessary features, or simply didn't do what I needed.

So I sat down and started thinking about what I actually wanted from such a tool. And that's how Stylo was born — a simple yet powerful text editing and transformation tool.

What Stylo Can Do

Stylo saves you time and energy in your everyday work with text:

Grammar correction — fixes spelling and grammar errors with one click
Style transformation — converts everyday text into formal, legal, casual, or fun styles
Translation and foreign language writing — write a draft email in your native language and Stylo translates and refines it into French, German, or any other language
Legal documents — need to write a complaint or formal letter? Stylo handles it
Message replies — generates contextual responses to emails or messages

Real-World Use Cases

A French Email in Under a Minute

Imagine you need to write an email in French, but your French isn't perfect. With other tools, you'd have to craft a prompt for ChatGPT or Gemini, copy the result, and possibly translate it again. With Stylo, you write a draft in your language and get a polished French email with one click.

A Formal Complaint Without the Stress

Need to write a legal complaint or formal letter? You don't have to be a lawyer. Write what you want to say in plain language, and Stylo transforms it into a formal legal style.

What Makes Stylo Different

Unlike ChatGPT or other AI chatbots, Stylo is a specialized tool. No need to invent prompts, no need to copy text between windows, no waiting for chatbot responses. Everything works simply — write your text, choose a transformation, and get the result.

Free and For Everyone

I originally built Stylo for myself, but gradually realized that thousands of people face the same problems every day. That's why I'm committed to keeping Stylo free for everyone. I'm constantly working on it and developing it to serve not just me, but others as well.

In the future, if there's strong demand for Stylo, I may introduce a small fee to keep the project sustainable and growing. But I believe Stylo will find its audience.

Try Stylo

If you've ever spent too much time editing text, translating emails, or crafting prompts for AI, try Stylo for free. It might be exactly the tool you've been missing — just like it was for me.

Stylo for Android: From Idea to Release

Milan — Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:41:22 +0000

When I sat down to write the first line of code for the Android version of Stylo a few months ago, I had no idea how many late-night debugging sessions awaited me. Today, the app is finally ready for testing and I can breathe.

How it started

It all started with a simple question from a friend: "Why doesn't Stylo have an Android app?" And I answered like a typical programmer: "It'll be done in a week."

Well, it wasn't.

The web version worked great, but a mobile app is a completely different world. We wanted people to have Stylo on their phones — on the bus, at a coffee shop, wherever they need to quickly fix some text. So I said, alright, let's try it.

Kotlin, Compose, and all those fancy things

I decided to do it properly. Not some quick & dirty prototype, but a real production app. So Kotlin (of course), Jetpack Compose instead of those crazy XML layouts, MVVM architecture so I'd still understand it in six months, Hilt for dependency injection, and Room database for offline mode.

It all sounded great in my head. In practice... well, let me tell you about it.

That Galaxy A5 that taught me patience

The worst part was when a friend sent me a screenshot: "The app crashed." He had an old Samsung Galaxy A5 from 2017. 2GB RAM. Android 9.

And there I was with my new phone where everything ran beautifully smooth, and I realized I had completely neglected optimization for old devices.

I spent about 3 weeks just hunting memory leaks, debugging why Compose recomposes 50 times instead of 2, and profiling every single LazyColumn. You know what's the worst? When you see in the profiler that your animation is eating 80% of CPU. That's when I realized some animations just have to go.

But when I finally saw the app running smoothly on that old Samsung, I felt like I'd won a marathon.

Architecture? When it pays off

At first, I wondered if it was worth doing the whole Clean Architecture with MVVM. It sounds complicated — you have a UI layer, domain layer, data layer, each communicating only through interfaces...

I decided to give it a try. And then came the moment when we needed to add offline mode. You know what? I changed the repository implementation to get data from Room database instead of API. I didn't have to change the UI at all. Not a single line.

That's when I understood why all those Android tutorials on YouTube shout so much about separation of layers.

That token bug that cost me an evening

I'll never forget how I forgot to implement EncryptedSharedPreferences and was storing tokens in plain text. I found it by accident when I was reading documentation about something completely different.

Imagine if someone decompiled the APK and found Supabase tokens just sitting there in SharedPreferences. Nightmare. I quickly rewrote it with AES-256 encryption and since then I check security before I commit anything.

Lesson? Never postpone security for later. When you have a deadline and you're tired, you'll forget about it.

What does the app actually do?

Okay, so after all those optimizations and refactors, we have an app that can transform text in 10 different ways — grammar, formal style, summarization, everything. It works in 5 languages and has auto-detect mode, so you don't have to select the language manually.

Everything is stored locally in Room database, so even without internet, you see your history. I implemented rate limiting so we don't spam the API — 6 requests per hour for visitors, 20 for logged-in users.

I used Supabase for authentication, Material Design 3 for UI (with dark mode, of course), and we also made support for tablets, which was actually easier than I expected.

What's next?

Now I need real people to try it. Not friends who'll say "great app bro", but people who'll tell me "this crashed", "this is slow", "this doesn't make sense".

Beta testing starts soon. If you have Android and want to help, I'd be glad.

And one more thing — thank you. Stack Overflow saved my life about 20 times, Google documentation is actually good (which can't be said about many docs), and the Kotlin community is super helpful.

But mainly, thank you to those who use Stylo and give feedback. That's what drives me forward.

See you in the app. 🚀

Found a bug or have a question? Write to me, I'll be happy to answer.

Stylo vs ChatGPT: Simplicity is Beauty

Milan — Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:35:23 +0000

People often ask me: "What makes Stylo better than ChatGPT or Gemini?" I thought about this for a long time. Until I realized one simple thing — Stylo is significantly simpler.

The Problem with Classic AI Chatbots

Imagine you need to write a professional email. With ChatGPT or Gemini, it works like this:

You come up with a prompt ("Write a professional email about...")
You wait for a response
You copy the result
You use it

And what if you want to do this again in a week? Either you have to generate the prompt again, or search through your history. That's a pointless waste of time.

How Stylo Solves This

Stylo is designed completely differently. We don't deal with chatbots or complex prompts. We solve repetitive tasks.

Want to write an email? Write it in your own words. Click the "Email" tag and you have a professional email.

Need legally formatted text? Click twice and you have it.

No creating prompts. No copying between windows. No searching through history.

Simplicity is Beauty

When we created Stylo, we had one main idea: be as simple and intuitive as possible.

We don't want you to have to think about how to give AI a command. We want you to simply write and let Stylo do the rest.

That's what I believe makes Stylo unique. It's not the most powerful AI. It's not the most complex tool. But it's the simplest way to transform text exactly as you need it.

Try It Yourself

You don't have to take my word for it. Try Stylo for free and see for yourself. You might discover that simplicity is exactly what you've been missing when working with text.

I'm a developer. Writing code is easy. Writing a formal document? Not so much. Open ChatGPT, write a prompt, tweak it, copy it, paste it. 20 minutes gone. Every. Single. Time. So I just... built the thing I wanted. gostylo.app

Milan — Sun, 22 Feb 2026 11:43:32 +0000