<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Abdul Haleem</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Abdul Haleem (@haleemkhan2109).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/haleemkhan2109</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/haleemkhan2109"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How I Monitored My Anti-Gravity Web App Using SigNoz and OpenTelemetry</title>
      <dc:creator>Abdul Haleem</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/haleemkhan2109/how-i-monitored-my-anti-gravity-web-app-using-signoz-and-opentelemetry-1dph</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/haleemkhan2109/how-i-monitored-my-anti-gravity-web-app-using-signoz-and-opentelemetry-1dph</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Building a high-performance web application is only half the battle; knowing how it behaves under real-world traffic is where the real challenge begins. Recently, I built a web application using the Anti-Gravity framework. While the frontend and API layers worked perfectly in local environments, I wanted complete visibility into request cycles, database latencies, and unexpected runtime errors.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of relying on traditional console logs, I integrated SigNoz with OpenTelemetry as my central observability stack. In this post, I will walk you through exactly how I did it, the challenges I overcame, and the insights gained from my custom dashboards.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why SigNoz?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The core objective was to trace every single user interaction from the application interface down to the backend service layers. Rather than tracking metrics in silos, I targeted three core parameters:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Application Tracing: Tracking the complete lifecycle of incoming API calls.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;System Metrics: Monitoring CPU utilization, memory consumption, and network input/output rates.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Structured Logging: Consolidating standard application logs with absolute trace contexts to minimize debugging intervals.&lt;br&gt;
**&lt;br&gt;
Setting Up SigNoz (Self-Hosted)**&lt;br&gt;
To establish the backend observability warehouse, I deployed SigNoz locally via Docker Compose. The configuration script clones the official deployment repository and sets up the architecture seamlessly:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
git clone -b main &lt;a href="https://github.com/SigNoz/signoz.git" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/SigNoz/signoz.git&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
cd signoz/deploy/&lt;br&gt;
./install.sh&lt;br&gt;
Once the installation script executed, the central dashboard interface became accessible at &lt;a href="http://localhost:3301" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://localhost:3301&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
**&lt;br&gt;
Instrumenting the Codebase**&lt;br&gt;
To pipe application telemetry down to our running SigNoz cluster, I utilized OpenTelemetry SDK specifications. The initial step required bootstrapping the runtime environment with key monitoring hooks:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
pip install opentelemetry-api opentelemetry-sdk opentelemetry-instrumentation&lt;br&gt;
opentelemetry-bootstrap --action=install&lt;br&gt;
Next, I embedded the tracking agent initialization logic directly within the entry point of the backend application code structure:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Python&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
from opentelemetry import trace&lt;br&gt;
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider&lt;br&gt;
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import BatchSpanProcessor&lt;br&gt;
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.grpc.trace_exporter import OTLPSpanExporter&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  Initialize Tracer Provider configuration
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;provider = TracerProvider()&lt;br&gt;
processor = BatchSpanProcessor(OTLPSpanExporter(endpoint="&lt;a href="http://localhost:4317" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://localhost:4317&lt;/a&gt;", insecure=True))&lt;br&gt;
provider.add_span_processor(processor)&lt;br&gt;
trace.set_tracer_provider(provider)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;tracer = trace.get_tracer(&lt;strong&gt;name&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
Analyzing Real-World Operations via Dashboards&lt;br&gt;
With instrumentation active, the web application started reporting metrics live. The SigNoz management pane provided profound insights right out of the box. Below are the key indicators captured during active validation sessions:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fh6vuwpgjvvrh4rijvl9s.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fh6vuwpgjvvrh4rijvl9s.png" alt=" " width="799" height="388"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Caption&lt;/strong&gt;: The main application telemetry console displaying execution frequency, systemic error ratios, and precise percentile latencies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking closely at the charts, I could instantly isolate performance thresholds. Instead of parsing massive plain-text log files, the continuous graphical line layouts quickly highlighted outlier web requests that exceeded safe operational time limits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fg3e75g8kr2lrb8q58u24.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fg3e75g8kr2lrb8q58u24.png" alt=" " width="800" height="393"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Caption: Detailed end-to-end trace mapping illustrating the exact distribution of internal execution cycles and structural code block intervals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This second visualization proved invaluable for fixing layout performance bugs. I discovered that external processing tasks were causing intermittent thread blocking, allowing me to optimize database interactions and secure faster load speeds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion and Next Milestones&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Integrating SigNoz into the Anti-Gravity project completely changed how I look at application performance. Moving away from standard console output to a fully visual system makes debugging straightforward and data-driven. For our next development cycle, I plan to configure automated alerts on these metrics to flag performance drops before they impact users.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>signoz</category>
      <category>opentelemetry</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
