<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Herve Kom</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Herve Kom (@herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Top 10 Mintlify Alternatives for API Documentation in 2026</title>
      <dc:creator>Herve Kom</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc/top-10-mintlify-alternatives-for-api-documentation-in-2026-1k85</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc/top-10-mintlify-alternatives-for-api-documentation-in-2026-1k85</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Choosing an API documentation platform isn't only about how the final documentation looks. For development teams, the workflow behind it matters just as much.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was looking for tools that could work with OpenAPI, stay close to the development workflow, and ideally connect documentation with API testing and CI/CD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are 10 options worth considering.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Apidog&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apidog is interesting for teams that want more than a documentation website.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It combines API design, OpenAPI, documentation, testing, mocking, and collaboration in one workflow. The CLI also makes it possible to bring API testing and validation into CI/CD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Redocly&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A strong option for teams focused on OpenAPI documentation, governance, and API reference quality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Scalar&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A modern OpenAPI documentation tool with a clean interactive experience. It's particularly interesting for developers who prefer an open-source approach.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Swagger UI&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the most established options for turning OpenAPI specifications into interactive API documentation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Stoplight&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Useful for teams that want API design, documentation, governance, and collaboration around OpenAPI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;GitBook&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A good choice when API reference needs to live alongside broader developer documentation and guides.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;ReadMe&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Designed for teams building complete developer portals around their APIs, including guides, references, and interactive experiences.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Docusaurus&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A good option for teams that prefer keeping documentation in Git and managing it alongside their codebase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Nextra&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A Next.js-based documentation framework that gives developers more control over the documentation site and deployment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;OpenAPI + Markdown&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sometimes the simplest solution is still the most flexible: keep the OpenAPI specification and Markdown documentation directly in the repository and generate what you need through your own CI pipeline.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which One Should You Choose?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It depends on what you're actually trying to solve.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you mainly need an OpenAPI viewer, Swagger UI or Scalar may be enough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you need API governance, Redocly or Stoplight are worth looking at.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For a complete developer portal, GitBook or ReadMe can make sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For teams that want API design, documentation, testing, mocking, and automation connected together, Apidog is the option I've found most interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest difference isn't necessarily the documentation UI. It's whether your documentation remains synchronized with the API development process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What Mintlify alternative are you using, and what made you choose it?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terminal-Based API Testing Tools: 5 Options I’ve Tried</title>
      <dc:creator>Herve Kom</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc/terminal-based-api-testing-tools-5-options-ive-tried-44j</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc/terminal-based-api-testing-tools-5-options-ive-tried-44j</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As more of my development workflow moved into CI/CD, I started spending less time testing APIs through GUI clients and more time working from the terminal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That made me look for a good terminal-based API testing tool that could work both locally and in automated pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are five tools I've tried.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Apidog CLI&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is the one I've been using most recently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I like about Apidog CLI is that I can run API test scenarios from the terminal and reuse the same workflow in CI/CD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;apidog login&lt;br&gt;
apidog run&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It fits particularly well when API testing needs to become part of the development and deployment process rather than remaining a manual task.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;curl&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's difficult to beat curl for simple API requests.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's available almost everywhere and is excellent for quick debugging, but more complex testing workflows usually require additional scripting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;HTTPie&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HTTPie provides a cleaner syntax than curl and is great for manually exploring APIs from the terminal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Hurl&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hurl takes a different approach by defining HTTP requests and expected responses in plain-text files.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That makes it interesting for repeatable API tests in CI environments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Newman&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your team already has Postman collections, Newman is a convenient way to execute them from the command line.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which One Should You Use?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It really depends on your workflow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For quick requests, curl is hard to beat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For readable command-line requests, HTTPie is worth considering.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For file-based HTTP tests, Hurl is interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're already invested in Postman collections, Newman makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For a more structured API testing workflow that can be reused across local development and CI/CD, Apidog CLI has been the most convenient option for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The important part isn't necessarily which tool you choose. It's being able to run the same API validation consistently during development and deployment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What's your preferred terminal-based API testing tool?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top 10 CLI Tools Every Developer Should Try in 2026</title>
      <dc:creator>Herve Kom</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 09:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc/top-10-cli-tools-every-developer-should-try-in-2026-5bc5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/herve_kom_ae5e908620d11bc/top-10-cli-tools-every-developer-should-try-in-2026-5bc5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Graphical tools are great, but most of my daily development now happens in the terminal. A good CLI tool saves time, integrates with automation, and keeps my workflow consistent across local development and CI/CD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are the 10 CLI tools I use the most.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Apidog CLI&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're working with APIs, this is the tool I've found myself using the most. I use it to run API test scenarios, manage environments, and reuse the same tests in GitHub Actions instead of maintaining separate GUI workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Git&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still the foundation of every development workflow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Docker CLI&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The fastest way to spin up local services and reproduce production environments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;GitHub CLI&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Creating pull requests, reviewing issues, and managing repositories without leaving the terminal is a huge productivity boost.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;HTTPie&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perfect for quick API requests when debugging or exploring endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;jq&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you work with JSON every day, jq is almost indispensable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;ripgrep (rg)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lightning-fast code searching. Once you start using it, it's hard to go back.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;fd&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A simpler and faster replacement for the traditional find command.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;kubectl&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Essential for anyone deploying applications to Kubernetes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;just&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A lightweight task runner that helps automate repetitive development commands.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Final Thoughts&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest improvement to my workflow has been moving repetitive tasks into the terminal. API testing, deployments, version control, and automation all become easier when everything is scriptable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Among these tools, Apidog CLI has had the biggest impact because it lets me keep API testing in the same terminal-first workflow that I already use for development and CI/CD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What CLI tool couldn't you live without?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
