<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Hritvik Thakur</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Hritvik Thakur (@hritvik_thakur_c2af0d672e).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/hritvik_thakur_c2af0d672e</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/hritvik_thakur_c2af0d672e"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Built an offline static scanner for AI agent skills (SKILL.md) to detect prompt injections and secret stealers before install</title>
      <dc:creator>Hritvik Thakur</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 05:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/hritvik_thakur_c2af0d672e/built-an-offline-static-scanner-for-ai-agent-skills-skillmd-to-detect-prompt-injections-and-4igl</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/hritvik_thakur_c2af0d672e/built-an-offline-static-scanner-for-ai-agent-skills-skillmd-to-detect-prompt-injections-and-4igl</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lately, I’ve been looking into how engineering teams interact with agentic frameworks like CrewAI, AutoGen, and custom internal platforms. As teams scale, they rely heavily on "Skill Bundles"—packages containing a SKILL.md instruction file along with supporting Python, Shell, or JavaScript scripts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While talking to platform leads and security engineers, a common problem kept coming up: teams are installing third-party AI skills with full execution trust, but zero automated security checks before install.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Traditional SAST tools scan code syntax, but they are completely blind to instruction manipulation, memory poisoning, and prompt injection inside markdown files.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To fix this gap, I built an open-source static scanner called nyuwayskillscanner.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Key features &amp;amp; approach:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dual Scanning: Scans natural language instructions in SKILL.md alongside Python, JS, Shell, and PowerShell scripts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Threat Coverage: Catches instruction overrides, memory poisoning, exfiltration endpoints, obfuscation (Base64, homoglyphs, zero-width spaces), hardcoded secrets, and destructive actions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Deterministic &amp;amp; 100% Offline: Runs locally with --static-only --offline so your code and prompts are never sent to external APIs during inspection.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Policy Packs &amp;amp; CI Gating: Built-in profiles for default, enterprise, marketplace, audit, or strict contexts that output clear verdicts (ALLOW, REVIEW, or BLOCK) for CI pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s available on PyPI (pip install nyuwayskillscanner) and open-sourced on GitHub:&lt;a href="https://github.com/Nyuway-Cybersecurity/nyuwayskillscanner" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/Nyuway-Cybersecurity/nyuwayskillscanner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would love to get feedback on how your teams are handling AI skill security and threat modeling in production!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>cybersecurity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
