<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: interview pitch</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by interview pitch (@interview_pitch).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/interview_pitch</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/interview_pitch"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The 30-Day Coding Interview Prep Plan (For People Who Don't Have 6 Months)</title>
      <dc:creator>interview pitch</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/interview_pitch/the-30-day-coding-interview-prep-plan-for-people-who-dont-have-6-months-4620</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/interview_pitch/the-30-day-coding-interview-prep-plan-for-people-who-dont-have-6-months-4620</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most interview prep advice assumes you have 3-6 months and unlimited free evenings. Most people don't. Maybe you got a call for an interview loop in three weeks. Maybe you're job hunting on top of a full-time job. Maybe you just don't want to spend half a year grinding LeetCode before you feel "ready."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's a realistic 30-day plan that assumes 1-2 hours a day, and focuses on the things that actually move the needle in an &lt;strong&gt;interview — not just problem count&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The plan only works if you stop doing this first&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Before the schedule&lt;/strong&gt;: the single biggest time-waster in interview prep is solving random problems in random order with no plan for why you got one wrong. If a problem stumps you and you just look at the solution, read it, and move on — you'll forget it in a week. You have to know which pattern you missed, not just which problem you missed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;That's the whole plan, really: organize your practice by pattern, not by problem number.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Week 1&lt;/strong&gt; — Foundations + the 4 highest-frequency patterns&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Spend &lt;strong&gt;day 1&lt;/strong&gt; reviewing time/space complexity and the patterns you'll drill: two pointers, sliding window, hashmaps, and binary search. These four alone cover a disproportionate share of "easy" and "medium" interview questions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Days 2-4&lt;/strong&gt;: two pointers + sliding window (aim for 3-4 problems per pattern, timed)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Days 5-6&lt;/strong&gt;: hashmaps for frequency/lookup problems&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Day 7&lt;/strong&gt;: binary search, including the "search on the answer" variant that trips people up&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By end of week 1, you should be able to name the pattern in a new problem within 2-3 minutes, even if you can't solve it yet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Week 2&lt;/strong&gt; — Trees, graphs, and recursion&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is where most people's pace collapses, because trees and graphs have more variations than arrays. Don't try to memorize every traversal — understand the three or four templates (DFS, BFS, backtracking, and topological sort) deeply enough to adapt them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Days 8-10&lt;/strong&gt;: tree traversals + BST properties&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Days 11-13&lt;/strong&gt;: graph BFS/DFS, including grid-based problems (very common)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Day 14&lt;/strong&gt;: recursion + backtracking basics (permutations, subsets)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Week 3&lt;/strong&gt; — Dynamic programming + a system design primer&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;DP is the pattern people fear most, and it's also the one where "practice by pattern" pays off the most, because most DP problems reduce to a handful of shapes (0/1 knapsack, unbounded knapsack, longest common subsequence, and interval DP).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Days 15-18&lt;/strong&gt;: DP — 1D problems first (climbing stairs, house robber), then 2D&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Days 19-20&lt;/strong&gt;: if your target role includes system design, start now — don't leave it for the last week. Learn the vocabulary (load balancers, caching, sharding, CAP theorem) even before you can design a full system end to end&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Day 21&lt;/strong&gt;: rest or catch-up day — use it, don't skip it&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Week 4&lt;/strong&gt; — Mock interviews and weak-spot triage&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is the week most self-taught plans skip entirely, and it's the highest-leverage week you have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Days 22-25&lt;/strong&gt;: timed mock &lt;a href="https://interviewpitch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;interviews&lt;/a&gt; (with a friend, mentor, or a structured tool) — explaining your thinking out loud is a completely different skill from solving quietly, and you only build it by doing it&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Days 26-28&lt;/strong&gt;: revisit your weak pattern, not a random new one. If sliding window kept tripping you up in week 1, redo it now with fresh eyes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Days 29-30&lt;/strong&gt;: light review only. Sleep matters more than one more problem at this stage.&lt;br&gt;
What actually separates a "pass" from a "borderline pass"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having reviewed a lot of prep timelines, the difference usually isn't raw problem count. It's:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Talking through your approach before coding — interviewers are grading reasoning, not typing speed&lt;br&gt;
Knowing your weak pattern and deliberately drilling it, instead of doing more of what you're already good at&lt;br&gt;
Getting real timed practice under mild pressure before the actual interview, so the format isn't a surprise&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want a structured way to follow this — organized by pattern instead of random problem lists, plus mock interview practice and language-specific Q&amp;amp;A — I built &lt;strong&gt;[InterviewPitch ]&lt;/strong&gt;(&lt;a href="https://interviewpitch.com/)around" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://interviewpitch.com/)around&lt;/a&gt; exactly this approach. It's free.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What's your weak pattern? Curious what trips people up most under time pressure — drop it in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>career</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7 DSA Patterns That Show Up in Almost Every Coding Interview</title>
      <dc:creator>interview pitch</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/interview_pitch/7-dsa-patterns-that-show-up-in-almost-every-coding-interview-54p8</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/interview_pitch/7-dsa-patterns-that-show-up-in-almost-every-coding-interview-54p8</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you've been grinding LeetCode without a plan, you already know the problem: there are thousands of questions, but only a handful of underlying patterns. Once you recognize the pattern, most "new" problems stop feeling new.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are the 7 patterns that keep showing up across interviews at companies of every size — and how to recognize them fast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Two Pointers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: Sorted array, or you're comparing pairs/windows from both ends.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Pair sum in sorted array, container with most water, remove duplicates in place.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: You collapse an O(n²) brute-force scan into O(n) by moving two indices toward each other based on a comparison.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Sliding Window&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: "Longest/shortest substring/subarray that satisfies X."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Longest substring without repeating characters, max sum subarray of size k, minimum window substring.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: Instead of recomputing a window from scratch every time, you slide it — adding one element, removing one — keeping the computation incremental.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Fast &amp;amp; Slow Pointers (Tortoise and Hare)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: Anything involving cycles or finding a "middle" without extra space.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Detect a cycle in a linked list, find the middle node, find duplicate number in an array.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: Two pointers moving at different speeds will eventually meet if there's a cycle — no hash set required.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Merge Intervals&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: You're given a list of ranges and need to combine, insert, or check for overlaps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Merge overlapping intervals, insert interval, meeting rooms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: Sort by start time first — almost every interval problem becomes trivial once sorted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Top-K Elements (Heap)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: "Find the k largest/smallest/most frequent..."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Kth largest element, top k frequent words, k closest points to origin.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: A heap keeps the k best candidates without sorting the entire dataset — O(n log k) instead of O(n log n).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Backtracking&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: "Generate all possible..." or "find all valid combinations."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Permutations, subsets, N-Queens, Sudoku solver.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: You explore a decision tree, and prune branches early the moment they can't lead to a valid answer — that pruning is what keeps it from being pure brute force.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Dynamic Programming (the one everyone fears)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signal: "Maximum/minimum/number of ways to..." with overlapping subproblems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic problems: Climbing stairs, coin change, longest common subsequence, knapsack.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why it works: You cache the answer to subproblems so you never recompute the same thing twice. The trick isn't the code — it's correctly defining the state and the transition.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How to actually practice this (not just read about it)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Recognizing a pattern in an article is easy. Recognizing it cold, in a 35-minute interview, under pressure, is a different skill entirely. A few things that actually move the needle:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Drill by pattern, not by difficulty. Doing 10 sliding-window problems back to back builds pattern recognition far faster than doing 10 random "medium" problems.&lt;br&gt;
Time yourself. If you can't identify the pattern in the first 3 minutes, you need more reps on that pattern specifically, not a harder problem.&lt;br&gt;
Explain out loud as you solve. Interviewers are grading your reasoning, not just your final code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want a structured, topic-wise way to drill these (plus language-specific interview Q&amp;amp;A, system design, and mock interviews), I put together &lt;a href="https://www.interviewpitch.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;InterviewPitch&lt;/a&gt; — it's free and organized so you can practice pattern by pattern instead of jumping between random blog posts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What pattern do you find hardest to spot under pressure? Curious what trips people up most — drop it in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>interview</category>
      <category>career</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>dsa</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
