<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Intrascope APP</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Intrascope APP (@intrascope_app).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/intrascope_app</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/intrascope_app"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why we’re building Intrascope.app</title>
      <dc:creator>Intrascope APP</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/intrascope_app/why-were-building-intrascopeapp-1n3f</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/intrascope_app/why-were-building-intrascopeapp-1n3f</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI tools are now everywhere inside companies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Developers use ChatGPT. Marketing teams use Claude. Founders test Gemini. Someone connects an API key. Someone else pays for a separate account. Prompts, context, files, usage and costs are spread across personal tools, private chats and disconnected workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At first, this works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then the team grows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Suddenly, the company has no clear answer to very simple questions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Who is using which AI model?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How much are we spending?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which projects have access to which context?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can we control what models people use?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can we separate internal knowledge by team, client or workspace?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can we give people AI access without sharing API keys?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is the problem we are working on with Intrascope.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://intrascope.app" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Intrascope&lt;/a&gt; is an AI workspace for teams that want more control over how AI is used across the company.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of everyone using separate personal AI accounts, teams can work in one shared environment with users, projects, model access, shared context, permissions, usage visibility and spending controls.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We support both BYOK and managed usage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With BYOK, teams can connect their own OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, xAI, Mistral or Qwen API keys and keep full control over provider billing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With managed usage, teams can top up balance and use supported AI models directly inside Intrascope, without managing multiple provider accounts or sharing API keys across the team.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our goal is simple.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI inside companies should not feel like a collection of scattered personal accounts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It should feel like infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Structured. Visible. Governed. Flexible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are still early, and we are learning from every team that tries the product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your company is already using AI across different people, tools and projects, I would love to hear how you currently manage access, context and costs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is the space we are building for.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>saas</category>
      <category>startup</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
