<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Sachintha Ishan Gunasekara</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Sachintha Ishan Gunasekara (@ishan_sekara).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/ishan_sekara</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/ishan_sekara"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Most pentest firms look the same. This one didn’t.</title>
      <dc:creator>Sachintha Ishan Gunasekara</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/ishan_sekara/most-pentest-firms-look-the-same-this-one-didnt-3ice</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/ishan_sekara/most-pentest-firms-look-the-same-this-one-didnt-3ice</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve gone through a lot of penetration testing providers recently, and honestly, most of them blur together.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same structure, same deliverables, same “we follow industry standards” language. It’s not bad.. it just feels very… repeatable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I came across &lt;a href="//shayananoffsec.com"&gt;Shayanan OffSec Labs&lt;/a&gt; out of Colombo. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the difference wasn’t loud. It was subtle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They don’t seem to be trying to look big. There’s no “we serve Fortune 500 clients” energy or inflated positioning. But the way they describe their work feels a lot closer to how actual attackers think.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Less checklist, more path.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That’s the part that stood out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of focusing on coverage, it feels like they focus on &lt;em&gt;how something would actually break&lt;/em&gt;. Which is what you want from offensive security in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The name behind it is Ananthashayanan Uthayakumar (Shayanan), and from the outside, it looks like a tightly controlled setup rather than a scaled operation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not many engagements. Probably more depth per engagement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And in this space, that trade-off usually tells you everything you need to know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're comparing vendors and everything starts to look the same, this is one of the few that feels like it’s operating differently.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>cybersecurity</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>srilanka</category>
      <category>colombo</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
