<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jake Counsell</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jake Counsell (@jake_counsell_b7f070731a7).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jake_counsell_b7f070731a7</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jake_counsell_b7f070731a7"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Your Code Isn’t Broken. Your Prompts Are.</title>
      <dc:creator>Jake Counsell</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jake_counsell_b7f070731a7/your-code-isnt-broken-your-prompts-are-57c1</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jake_counsell_b7f070731a7/your-code-isnt-broken-your-prompts-are-57c1</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Most people don’t realize what’s actually breaking when they “vibe code.”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s not the model. It’s not even the code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s the lack of structure between what you asked for and what actually got built.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That gap is where time gets burned, tokens get wasted, and projects quietly fall apart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That’s the problem we built LaunchChair to solve.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.launchchair.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.launchchair.io/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;⸻&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The core idea: dynamic prompting that actually stays grounded&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In LaunchChair, you’re not writing prompts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every step in the build phase is driven by dynamic prompts generated from your evolving product spec. Those prompts are not just instructions, they’re structured with:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;strict agent contracts&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;scoped context pulled from your spec&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;feature-level constraints&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;taste and implementation guidance&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So instead of dumping your entire app into a single massive prompt and hoping for the best, every build card is focused, intentional, and tied directly to what you’re trying to ship.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That alone cuts a huge amount of drift.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But we ran into something interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even with strong prompts, sometimes the output is almost right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Backend is done. API is wired. But the frontend isn’t fully connected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That’s where most people go back to guessing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We didn’t want that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;⸻&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The new piece: automatic remediation prompts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We just shipped a remediation system that closes that loop.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every time a build card runs, LaunchChair checks the returned JSON against the acceptance criteria for that step.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not loosely. Directly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If something is incomplete, like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;frontend not wired to API&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;missing state handling&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;partial feature implementation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LaunchChair doesn’t just tell you “something is wrong.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It generates a remediation prompt automatically.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A focused, context-aware follow up that:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;knows what was already built&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;knows what’s missing&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;only asks for the delta&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So instead of rewriting prompts or re-explaining your app, you just run the remediation and move forward.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No guessing. No prompt thrashing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;⸻&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why this build system is different&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most “vibe coding” workflows look like this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You start with a rough idea&lt;br&gt;
You write a big prompt&lt;br&gt;
You iterate&lt;br&gt;
The context gets messy&lt;br&gt;
You lose track of what’s done&lt;br&gt;
You burn tokens trying to fix it&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LaunchChair flips that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You move through a structured build system where:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;each step has clear acceptance criteria&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;prompts are generated for you&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;outputs are validated against the spec&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;gaps are automatically remediated&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s not just helping you build faster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s helping you stay aligned with what you’re building.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;⸻&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why vibe coders actually benefit the most&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you’re someone who doesn’t want to think about prompt engineering all day, this is where things click.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You don’t need to:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;figure out how to structure prompts&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;manage context windows&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;re-explain your app every time something breaks&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You just move through the system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LaunchChair handles the prompting layer, the validation, and now the recovery when things are incomplete.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It feels a lot closer to actually building a product instead of wrestling with a model.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;⸻&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The time and token difference&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is where it gets real.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In traditional vibe coding, you’re constantly:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;over-sending context&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;rewriting prompts&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;re-running large generations&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;fixing things that were almost correct&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That adds up fast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With scoped prompts + contracts + remediation:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;you’re only sending what’s needed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;you’re not re-generating entire features&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;you’re fixing precise gaps instead of starting over&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In practice, this trims a huge chunk of token usage and iteration time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not in a theoretical way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In a “you actually finish the build without burning your entire week or budget” kind of way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;⸻&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What this unlocks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The goal isn’t just cleaner prompts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s momentum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When the system can:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;guide the build&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;check the output&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;fix what’s missing&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;you stop getting stuck in that loop where things feel almost done but never quite ship.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You just keep moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That’s the difference.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And it’s the reason LaunchChair isn’t just another tool in the stack.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s the layer that keeps the whole build from drifting in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>showdev</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
