<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jayesh Pamnani</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jayesh Pamnani (@jayesh_pamnani_4ecb1c7338).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jayesh_pamnani_4ecb1c7338</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jayesh_pamnani_4ecb1c7338"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why integrations fail in production (not theory, what actually breaks)</title>
      <dc:creator>Jayesh Pamnani</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jayesh_pamnani_4ecb1c7338/why-integrations-fail-in-production-not-theory-what-actually-breaks-2b29</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jayesh_pamnani_4ecb1c7338/why-integrations-fail-in-production-not-theory-what-actually-breaks-2b29</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On paper, integrations look simple.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ERP connects to CRM. CRM connects to external tools. APIs handle the rest.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everything looks clean.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then you go live - and things slowly start breaking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not immediately. But enough to cause real problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here’s what actually goes wrong.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1. Systems don’t agree on what data means
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A “customer” is not the same everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In CRM - it’s a lead with activity
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In ERP - it’s a billing entity
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In other tools - it might just be an email
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You map fields and think you're done.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then you get:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;duplicates
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;missing data
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;updates overriding each other
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The issue is not mapping. It’s the data model.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  2. No clear source of truth
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Multiple systems updating the same fields is where things fall apart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;CRM updates phone number
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;ERP updates it later
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Another tool syncs an older value back
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now you have conflicting data and no clarity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If ownership is not defined, consistency is impossible.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  3. APIs work, workflows don’t
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;APIs returning 200 does not mean your system works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Example:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;CRM creates a deal
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;ERP needs validated customer data
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;External tool triggers actions
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If timing and sequence are not defined:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;things happen too early
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;required data is missing
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;processes silently fail
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;APIs move data. Workflows define behavior.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  4. No handling for failure
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Production always fails at some point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;API timeouts
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;network issues
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;third-party downtime
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your system assumes everything works:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;data gets lost
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;retries create duplicates
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;processes break halfway
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You need:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;retries
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;idempotency
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;proper logging
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, failures stay hidden until users notice.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  5. Real-time everywhere (when it shouldn’t be)
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Real-time sounds good. It’s often a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It creates:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;race conditions
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;higher load
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;harder debugging
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not everything needs to be instant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some flows should be queued or batched.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  6. No visibility across systems
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When something breaks, no one knows where.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each system has its own logs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is no single place to see:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;what triggered
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;what failed
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;what is pending
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Without visibility, debugging becomes guesswork.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What changed for us
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We stopped treating integration as just connecting APIs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;defined ownership of data
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;controlled workflows centrally
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;handled failure as a default case
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;made everything traceable
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Final thought
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most integrations don’t fail because of bad code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They fail because no one designed how systems should behave together.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>brainpack</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>api</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
