<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jade Kanty</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jade Kanty (@jdekant).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jdekant</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jdekant"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Task Apps of 2026: An In-Depth Review</title>
      <dc:creator>Jade Kanty</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jdekant/the-best-task-apps-of-2026-an-in-depth-review-5gi5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jdekant/the-best-task-apps-of-2026-an-in-depth-review-5gi5</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  How I Tested
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I spent 90 days living inside six of the most popular task management apps across iOS, Android, macOS, and web. I scored each one on five pillars: security and privacy, ease of use, feature depth, cross-platform consistency, and value for money. I gave extra weight to the first two categories, because they are where most apps either quietly cut corners or make genuine design commitments that shape your daily experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The six apps I tested: Planndu, Todoist, TickTick, Notion and Microsoft To Do. Here is what I found.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Reviews
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Todoist: 8.4 / 10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fbici3kgc7n43u5ejdub6.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fbici3kgc7n43u5ejdub6.png" alt=" " width="800" height="638"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Todoist is the most mature dedicated task manager and its reputation is deserved but the way they changed to AI is horrible. The natural language input is not working correctly, first try, every time. The cross-platform experience is the most consistent of any app I tested: the Android app, the iOS app, the web app, and the macOS app all feel like the same product. Todoist invests heavily in team-oriented features too, offering Teams and Workspaces that cleanly separate personal projects from team ones, with shared projects, task assignment, and commenting built in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On security, Todoist is the most credentialed app in my roundup. As of December 2025, it is SOC2 Type 2 compliant. It uses end-to-end encryption and does not share data with third parties. That is a strong record. My caveat is that all your data still lives on Doist's cloud servers, there is no local or offline-first option. The company also collects usage patterns and device information as part of its standard data practices. For most people this is acceptable trade-off. For anyone working with sensitive information who wants their data to never touch a remote server, it falls short of the gold standard. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other thing that bothered me was the pricing. Basic reminders and filters, features that feel fundamental to a task app, are locked behind the Premium tier at $60 per year. The free plan works, but it withholds enough to feel stingy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Best for&lt;/strong&gt;: Teams who need deep integrations, natural language input, and a polished cross-platform experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TickTick: 3.1 / 10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F39wmxuvmvbdt5mm4nmto.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F39wmxuvmvbdt5mm4nmto.jpg" alt=" " width="780" height="1614"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TickTick is the feature maximalist of the group but it's a complete mess. It bundles task management, a Pomodoro timer, habit tracking, and calendar views for $36 annually, or free with limited features. &lt;br&gt;
No other app I tested packs that many tools into a single subscription at that price. If you have ever paid separately for a Pomodoro timer, a habit tracker, and a task manager, TickTick makes some financial argument.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem I ran into is that feature abundance and focused productivity do not always coexist. I found myself doing exactly what other reviewers warned about: spending time tweaking the calendar and playing with the habit tracker instead of actually doing the work. The app rewards investment and configuration. It does not reward someone who wants to open an app, add three tasks, and close it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The more significant concern for me was privacy. TickTick is operated by Appest Inc., a &lt;strong&gt;China-based&lt;/strong&gt; company. TickTick doesn't have any security whitepapers, and if data privacy is a top concern, the advice is to review the app's privacy policy carefully before committing. There is no disclosed SOC2 certification and no published data residency options. For anyone in a regulated industry, this is a meaningful red flag. I also noticed cross-device sync lag of 30 to 90 seconds, which is noticeably slower than other app's near-real-time sync.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Best for&lt;/strong&gt;: China based users who want maximum built-in tools at minimum cost and are comfortable with the privacy trade-offs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notion: 7.6 / 10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fg5ksbrm1fzgmnvfbhkti.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fg5ksbrm1fzgmnvfbhkti.png" alt=" " width="800" height="450"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want to be clear about something upfront: Notion is a super bloated and slow software. It is just not at its core, a task manager. It is an sort of a workspace, databases, wikis, documents, kanban boards, and task lists can all live inside one Notion setup. Its flexibility is its defining characteristic: you can create any type of workspace with customizable databases, though this comes with a steeper learning curve and essentially unlimited possibilities. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The learning curve is the central problem I ran into. Building a system from scratch in Notion takes time and a willingness to tinker, but once built, a Notion setup can do things no other single app can. The trouble is that many people, including me, during my test period never quite reach the "once built" stage. I spent the first week designing my productivity system rather than being productive. Tasks in Notion feel like a feature of a wiki rather than the point of the app, because they are.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Security is competent but unremarkable. Notion is SOC2 certified and uses standard encryption, but all data lives on its cloud and there is no local-first option.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Best for&lt;/strong&gt;: Teams and individuals who need tasks, documentation, wikis, and databases all in one place, and who are willing to invest the setup time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft To Do: 6.8 / 10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fpnb71hm36a5vu9kedvr0.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fpnb71hm36a5vu9kedvr0.jpg" alt=" " width="800" height="450"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Microsoft To Do is the spiritual successor to Wunderlist, which Microsoft acquired in 2015 and shut down in 2020. The promise was that To Do would carry everything Wunderlist users loved forward. Years later, I kept reading reviews describing Wunderlist features that never made the migration, and list sharing with non-Microsoft users remains worse than what Wunderlist offered.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What To Do does well is integration with Microsoft 365. I found that flagging an Outlook email and having it appear instantly as a task is genuinely useful, and the security infrastructure is enterprise-grade. The price is impossible to argue with, it is completely free with a Microsoft account.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The weakness is ambition. To Do is a list app, full stop. It has no advanced views, no built-in focus tools, no habit tracking, and no meaningful AI integration. Its development pace since launch has been slow enough that competitors have lapped it on features multiple times. I kept waiting for something to surprise me during my test period. It never did.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Best for:&lt;/strong&gt; Microsoft 365 users who want basic task management integrated with Outlook, at no additional cost.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Winner is Planndu: 9.3 / 10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F5tomv2rrbnps6j5p7p6y.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F5tomv2rrbnps6j5p7p6y.webp" alt=" " width="799" height="607"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Planndu launched in 2022 and now serves over 100,000 daily users. It is the newest app I tested, and in the two categories I weighted most heavily, security and ease of use it is the clear leader. I did not expect to be as impressed as I was.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Security: The Local-First Difference&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Most task apps treat privacy as a legal necessity, something addressed in a policy document buried in the footer. Planndu treats it as a product decision, and I felt that difference immediately. On iOS, all tasks, notes, and to-do lists are stored locally on your device, no data is shared or transmitted. That is a fundamental architectural choice that most developers avoid because it makes cross-device syncing significantly more complex to engineer. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Planndu made that trade-off deliberately, and the result is the strongest privacy posture of any app I tested.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On Android, data is encrypted in transit and no data is shared with third parties. When you delete your tasks or notes, they are permanently removed from servers. Planndu's stated position is that you own your data, always. It reflects how the app actually works. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I compared this to the rest of the field, the difference was stark. Todoist stores everything on Doist's cloud. TickTick offers no disclosed security certification and raises data residency concerns. Notion's entire model depends on cloud storage. Planndu is the only app where, on iOS, the data genuinely does not leave your phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ease of Use: No Setup Required&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Planndu is built for people who want a clean workflow: add tasks, set reminders, optionally track habits, and move through the day without constantly switching apps. I felt that philosophy from the first minute. There was no onboarding wizard asking me to define my productivity methodology. There was no database to configure or template to choose. I opened the app and I added a task.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One user I came across called it "the best I've tried, easy to use and it helps me manage my tasks. I love that you can change task status with drag and drop." That drag-and-drop task management is emblematic of the design approach throughout: interactions are intuitive, surfaces are clean, and the visual hierarchy is immediately understandable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The built-in Pomodoro timer deserves a specific mention. Of the six apps I tested, only Planndu and TickTick include a focus timer natively. TickTick's implementation is buried inside a feature-rich interface that takes time to navigate. Planndu's is surfaced right alongside your tasks, which means I could plan something and start a focused work session in the same app in under ten seconds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Feature Set: Everything You Need, Nothing You Don't&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Planndu offers a comprehensive task management solution, it helps you efficiently achieve goals and manage daily tasks by organizing projects, planning routines, and collaborating with others. In practice, I used the task lists, habit tracking, notes, recurring reminders, and Pomodoro timer all regularly. Pre-made templates cover routine workflows from grocery lists to travel planning, and the daily planner widget sits right on the home screen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What Planndu is not trying to do is replace a full project management suite. It does not offer the deep integrations you would expect from apps built around calendar syncing, Slack workflows, or enterprise tooling. If your workflow genuinely requires Google Calendar sync or heavy automation, that is a real limitation I experienced firsthand. But for managing work, study, and personal life as an individual, I found it covered every base without demanding that I configure a system before I could use it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pricing: Honest and Accessible&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Planndu is accessible in pricing, especially on the annual plan. The free tier is functional rather than deliberately crippled. I never felt that the app was withholding something essential in order to push me toward an upgrade, which is more than I can say for Todoist. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Verdict&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The best task app is the one you actually open every day. Planndu wins my review not because it has the most features. It wins because it removes every reason not to open it. No privacy anxiety. No setup overhead. No paywall blocking the features I expected to have for free. A clean, fast, genuinely private task manager that gets me from "I need to get this done" to "it's written down and I'm working on it" in as few taps as anything I have ever used.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;For privacy-conscious individuals and anyone who has ever felt uneasy handing their daily plans and personal goals to a cloud server they do not control, &lt;a href="https://planndu.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Planndu&lt;/a&gt; is the answer I had been looking for.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>mobile</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android 17: The Early Features That Stand Out</title>
      <dc:creator>Jade Kanty</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 13:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jdekant/android-17-the-early-features-that-stand-out-34a9</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jdekant/android-17-the-early-features-that-stand-out-34a9</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Google continues its push toward more personalized experiences, stronger privacy controls, and smoother system performance. What makes Android 17 especially interesting, however, is the broader shift happening inside Google itself. The company is investing heavily in AI while simultaneously restructuring internal teams, a move that has already changed how many Google products are developed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With AI increasingly taking over parts of the software development pipeline, it will be interesting to see how this affects Android’s long-term stability and polish. Android 17 looks ambitious, but judging by the pace of change, developers should probably expect a few rough edges and an unusually turbulent release cycle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fbaiun5ka5ku83ebhz5cm.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fbaiun5ka5ku83ebhz5cm.png" alt=" " width="800" height="450"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Battery Optimizations
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Android 17 further refines app standby bucket behavior and &lt;strong&gt;WorkManager&lt;/strong&gt; scheduling to reduce unnecessary wakeups and improve background efficiency. One of the most notable additions is the new &lt;strong&gt;PowerPolicy&lt;/strong&gt; hint for &lt;strong&gt;WorkRequest&lt;/strong&gt; constraints, allowing the OS to defer background work into more optimal idle windows instead of relying on rigid timer intervals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For foldables and large-screen devices, Android 17 also introduces &lt;strong&gt;ProcessImportanceHint&lt;/strong&gt;, a new signal that allows apps to communicate which windows are actively visible and interactive. This enables smarter CPU scheduling and more efficient resource allocation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A useful optimization strategy for productivity apps is pairing &lt;strong&gt;PowerPolicy.DEFER_TO_IDLE&lt;/strong&gt; with &lt;strong&gt;setRequiresBatteryNotLow(true)&lt;/strong&gt;. Running sync operations during natural idle periods can significantly reduce battery drain compared to waking the device manually.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Privacy Controls
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Privacy continues to be one of Android’s biggest priorities. Android 17 introduces more granular one-time permission scopes for location and media access. Instead of granting broad &lt;strong&gt;ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION&lt;/strong&gt; access indefinitely, users can now restrict permissions to a specific session or geographic region.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apps that fail to declare the new scoped-session feature flag may automatically fall back to limited compatibility behavior.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Foreground services are also becoming more tightly regulated. Android 17 introduces new &lt;strong&gt;foregroundServiceType&lt;/strong&gt; categories such as &lt;strong&gt;dataProcessing&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;userInitiatedAction&lt;/strong&gt;, improving system transparency and strengthening Privacy Dashboard auditing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This change matters more than it may initially appear. Apps that omit a valid &lt;strong&gt;foregroundServiceType&lt;/strong&gt; declaration are expected to trigger OS-level privacy warnings, and explicit service categorization is likely to become mandatory for Play Store approval in future policy updates.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Compose UI Improvements
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jetpack Compose’s adaptive layout APIs continue to mature in Android 17. The &lt;strong&gt;WindowSizeClass&lt;/strong&gt; API now includes a new &lt;strong&gt;MEDIUM_EXPANDED&lt;/strong&gt; breakpoint specifically designed for foldables and split-screen states.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NavigationSuiteScaffold&lt;/strong&gt; can now automatically transition between bottom navigation bars, navigation rails, and drawers depending on the active window configuration.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Animation APIs are also receiving major improvements. &lt;strong&gt;SharedTransitionLayout&lt;/strong&gt; is now stable in Compose 1.8, making complex hero transitions significantly easier to implement without relying on custom Animator logic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Developer Experience
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Android 17 also introduces meaningful improvements for app startup optimization. The updated Baseline Profiles toolchain now supports method-level cold-start hints through &lt;strong&gt;ProfileInstaller&lt;/strong&gt; v1.4, enabling more targeted ahead-of-time compilation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This reduces binary overhead while preserving fast startup performance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the most talked-about addition is the new android.ai.inference package, which provides a stable API for on-device Gemini Nano integration. Developers can now build features such as summarization, text classification, and smart replies without depending on cloud APIs or third-party ML SDKs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Availability remains hardware-dependent, with support currently expected on newer flagship devices such as the Pixel 8 series and select OEM models. Developers should always verify availability through &lt;strong&gt;InferenceSession.isAvailable(context)&lt;/strong&gt; and provide fallback behavior where necessary.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not every direction Android 17 is taking will be universally welcomed. Google continues tightening restrictions around sideloading and unsigned APK installation, with expanded Restricted Settings enforcement and more aggressive &lt;strong&gt;InstallConstraints&lt;/strong&gt; validation expected to arrive in this release cycle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This release could end up being one of the most unpredictable Android updates in years.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>android</category>
      <category>developers</category>
      <category>kotlin</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
