<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jerry Simth</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jerry Simth (@jerrysimth).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jerrysimth</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jerrysimth"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Same prompt, six AI image models: a no-cherry-picking shootout</title>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Simth</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 08:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jerrysimth/same-prompt-six-ai-image-models-a-no-cherry-picking-shootout-2g18</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jerrysimth/same-prompt-six-ai-image-models-a-no-cherry-picking-shootout-2g18</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I run a small studio site that hosts 13 AI image models side by side, and the question I get most is "which one should I use?" Tier lists are cheap. So I ran an experiment instead: &lt;strong&gt;the same two prompts, six models, one generation each — the first result is the one you see. No re-rolls.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The six: GPT Image 2.6 (Medium, 9 credits), Nano Banana Pro (2K, 24 credits), Nano Banana 2.1 (2K, 10 credits), FLUX 2 Pro (5 credits), Seedream 5 Pro (2K, 15 credits) and Z-Image Turbo (1 credit). Prices are what each image costs in the studio; aspect ratio 3:2 throughout.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Prompt 1 — photorealism
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A lighthouse on a rocky coast at golden hour, waves crashing against the rocks, dramatic orange clouds, photorealistic, shot on 35mm film&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ficz3bmcxb5ezzjh7fldk.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ficz3bmcxb5ezzjh7fldk.webp" alt="Nano Banana Pro's lighthouse" width="800" height="537"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fwdahtayafs2d06nhhsmx.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fwdahtayafs2d06nhhsmx.webp" alt="FLUX 2 Pro's lighthouse" width="800" height="533"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly? All six produced something publishable. The differences are taste and drama, not competence: Nano Banana Pro went full cinema — deep-red storm sky, the biggest wave, lamp already lit. FLUX 2 Pro (5 credits) had the most natural light and is the value standout. GPT Image 2.6 nailed the "35mm film" brief. Nano Banana 2.1 was the brightest and cleanest; Seedream 5 Pro the calmest; Z-Image Turbo softer and simpler — completely usable for 1 credit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Prompt 2 — the spelling test
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A vintage coffee shop poster, wide landscape layout, with the headline text 'MORNING BREW' in bold retro letters, a steaming cup of coffee illustration, warm cream and brown colors, flat design&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fxodqjzkv08zlmh876eia.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fxodqjzkv08zlmh876eia.webp" alt="GPT Image 2.6's poster" width="800" height="533"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F8xy9njhzo12sisgl6srp.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F8xy9njhzo12sisgl6srp.webp" alt="Nano Banana 2.1's poster" width="800" height="537"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fqequgl0s69347m3zcq7k.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fqequgl0s69347m3zcq7k.webp" alt="Z-Image Turbo's poster" width="800" height="533"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Five of the six spelled MORNING BREW perfectly. GPT Image 2.6 even wrote its own tagline — "Good Coffee. Brighter Day." — correctly, unprompted. Nano Banana 2.1 produced the richest vintage design at 10 credits. Seedream 5 Pro got even the small badge text right; FLUX 2 Pro spelled it right but left the layout sparse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the one real miss is the instructive one: Z-Image Turbo replaced the "RE" in BREW with the coffee cup, so the headline reads "MORNING B–W". At 1 credit it's a brilliant drafting tool — just proofread its lettering before anything ships.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I actually learned
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;On photos, price buys drama and polish, not basic competence — a 5-credit model held its own against a 24-credit one.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In-image text has quietly become table stakes: five of six models now nail a two-word headline plus small print.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Every model has a failure mode; the cheap one's just happens to be visible in the headline.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The full 13-model comparison — including editing, GIF generation and bilingual typography, with per-image prices — lives in the model guide on Pizyn (&lt;a href="https://pizyn.com/blog/which-ai-image-model/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://pizyn.com/blog/which-ai-image-model/&lt;/a&gt;), and the studio itself is at &lt;a href="https://pizyn.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://pizyn.com&lt;/a&gt; if you want to run your own prompts (20 free credits at signup, drafts from 1 credit).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;All images in this post are first, unedited outputs of the prompts above, generated November 9, 2026.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
