<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Ilori Joshua</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Ilori Joshua (@jia69).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jia69</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jia69"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Carbon successor for c++</title>
      <dc:creator>Ilori Joshua</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jia69/carbon-successor-for-c-48b6</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jia69/carbon-successor-for-c-48b6</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Carbon by Google is said to be the successor  to c++&lt;br&gt;
C++ upgrading have been in play since but too much dept to pay , there was so much work that as been done but after much try making a new programming language seems to be a more realistic and attainable goal &lt;br&gt;
So has of this week Google engineer Chandler Carruth introduced &lt;strong&gt;Carbon&lt;/strong&gt;   to be the successor to c++ &lt;br&gt;
So like every programmer I wanted to see the documentation of carbon to see if it will be a more efficient way to get project done &lt;br&gt;
A big question popped up in my head after seeing it &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is it just another system language&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br&gt;
It solves the problem  that the aging c++ has &lt;br&gt;
But there are programming language  that do the same thing it is talking about &lt;br&gt;
I personally use rust on alot of project so am not seeing the major difference  from carbon and rust from the syntax to the logic , there are so much similarities &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I want to get comments on this &lt;br&gt;
Reference article  link&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;url=https://thenewstack.io/google-launches-carbon-an-experimental-replacement-for-c/&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwiYnpmV3435AhWRXsAKHYVcATwQ0PADKAB6BAgEEAE&amp;amp;usg=AOvVaw1HjhOEbZeuUj32vMcIiNac"&gt;https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;url=https://thenewstack.io/google-launches-carbon-an-experimental-replacement-for-c/&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwiYnpmV3435AhWRXsAKHYVcATwQ0PADKAB6BAgEEAE&amp;amp;usg=AOvVaw1HjhOEbZeuUj32vMcIiNac&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>carbon</category>
      <category>cpp</category>
      <category>rust</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
