<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jimbo</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jimbo (@jimbotheus).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jimbotheus</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jimbotheus"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I built an 8-agent AI pipeline that keeps full context across every step — here's the architecture</title>
      <dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jimbotheus/i-built-an-8-agent-ai-pipeline-that-keeps-full-context-across-every-step-heres-the-architecture-2aef</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jimbotheus/i-built-an-8-agent-ai-pipeline-that-keeps-full-context-across-every-step-heres-the-architecture-2aef</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with most AI coding tools: every prompt starts from zero. By step 5, the AI has forgotten what you decided in step 1.&lt;br&gt;
So I built a pipeline where that can't happen.&lt;br&gt;
How it works&lt;br&gt;
Eight specialized agents run sequentially. Each reads a shared context object containing every decision made by every prior agent.&lt;br&gt;
Analyst → Architect → Orchestrator → Engineer → Reviewer → QA → Release Manager → Release&lt;br&gt;
No phase begins until the previous one passes a gate check. If QA finds a bug, it routes back to the Engineer with the full original spec intact.&lt;br&gt;
The shared context object&lt;br&gt;
yamlcontext:&lt;br&gt;
  problem:&lt;br&gt;
    statement: ""&lt;br&gt;
    success_criteria: []&lt;br&gt;
    constraints: []&lt;br&gt;
  solution:&lt;br&gt;
    approach: ""&lt;br&gt;
    tech_stack: {}&lt;br&gt;
  code:&lt;br&gt;
    files: []&lt;br&gt;
  review:&lt;br&gt;
    approved: false&lt;br&gt;
  tests:&lt;br&gt;
    passed: false&lt;br&gt;
Every agent reads and writes here. The Reviewer checks code against original requirements. QA validates against Phase 1 success criteria — not just whether the code runs.&lt;br&gt;
What I learned&lt;br&gt;
The hard part isn't the agents. It's the gates. Bad output that passes unchecked compounds fast across 8 phases. Every transition needs an explicit pass/fail.&lt;br&gt;
Try it&lt;br&gt;
Live demo, free, no signup: friendly-maamoul-bf2dd5.netlify.app&lt;br&gt;
What would you architect differently?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
