<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jimmy AI</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jimmy AI (@jimmy_ai).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jimmy_ai</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jimmy_ai"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I logged 39 public Codex reset signals so I could tell fresh from re-shared</title>
      <dc:creator>Jimmy AI</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 05:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jimmy_ai/i-logged-39-public-codex-reset-signals-so-i-could-tell-fresh-from-re-shared-49f</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jimmy_ai/i-logged-39-public-codex-reset-signals-so-i-could-tell-fresh-from-re-shared-49f</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Codex reset posts are easy to find and hard to use. A signal gets logged,&lt;br&gt;
then re-shared two days later by someone who read it as live, and by then&lt;br&gt;
"the weekly window reset" and "a one-off reset card" are sitting in the&lt;br&gt;
same feed using the same word.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wanted a single place to answer one narrow question: &lt;strong&gt;is this reset&lt;br&gt;
claim new, or am I reading a two-day-old repost?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That turned into a small read-only tracker for public Codex usage-limit&lt;br&gt;
reset signals — &lt;a href="https://codexreset.today/?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=devto_showdev&amp;amp;utm_campaign=1003" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Codex Reset Radar&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Each event carries a date, a source, a confidence label, and a summary;&lt;br&gt;
older events stay visible so the history doesn't reset itself every time&lt;br&gt;
something lands.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The problem: "reset" is three different clocks
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reading these threads, the same word covers at least three events:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the 5-hour usage window coming back,&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the weekly plan window replenishing,&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a one-off reset card that only some plans see.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same word, three different clocks. A repost from three days ago reads&lt;br&gt;
exactly like breaking news, and a signal that was true for one plan gets&lt;br&gt;
read as "my quota should be back too."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What the log actually records
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every entry is a &lt;em&gt;publicly reported&lt;/em&gt; signal, not a verified reset. As of&lt;br&gt;
writing (October 2, 2026, UTC):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;39 public signals&lt;/strong&gt; logged since April 28, 2026&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;across &lt;strong&gt;33 distinct reset days&lt;/strong&gt; (events ≠ days; several signals landed the same day)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;4.8-day average gap&lt;/strong&gt; between consecutive signal days&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;longest wait so far: 37 days&lt;/strong&gt; (April 28 → June 4)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;confidence split: &lt;strong&gt;32 high / 7 medium&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;latest public signal: &lt;strong&gt;2026-09-30 01:48 UTC&lt;/strong&gt; (GPT reset card for paid users)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"High confidence" means a strong public source said something — &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
that your quota went back. For the "strong signal, nothing changed on my&lt;br&gt;
account" case, the site keeps a reset-failed checklist: rollout lag,&lt;br&gt;
plan scope, 5-hour vs weekly windows, and banked-reset confusion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What it is not
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI — unofficial by design.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;No OpenAI login, no API keys, no cookies, no session tokens. It never
touches your account and can't see your plan or workspace.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It does not predict your quota. Nothing public can. Your own Codex
usage UI is the only account-level source of truth — the site says so
in almost every state it's in.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  If you'd rather pull the data than read it
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Three read-only endpoints, no key required — a status file with derived&lt;br&gt;
stats, a full event list, and an RSS feed:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://codexreset.today/api/?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=devto_showdev&amp;amp;utm_campaign=1003" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;the API page&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Fine for dashboards, status bots, and home-lab monitors. They carry the&lt;br&gt;
same unofficial disclaimer as the site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The full history lives at&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://codexreset.today/history/?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=devto_showdev&amp;amp;utm_campaign=1003" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;the reset history page&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If something in the log is wrong, or the source ranking looks off, tell&lt;br&gt;
me in the comments — that correction is worth more to me than the post&lt;br&gt;
itself. Happy to walk through how the confidence labels are assigned,&lt;br&gt;
too; that part took the most time to get right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(Unofficial, not affiliated with OpenAI. Your Codex usage UI is still&lt;br&gt;
the source of truth.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>showdev</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>openai</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
